assign blame for 中文

“assigning blame” 是什麼意思 查看翻譯

To name a person to be responsible for what happened after a mistake was made.

• do u know what's better than 69? it's 88 because u get 8 twice. please explain the joke.是什麼意思
• delulu是什麼意思
• Men with no hoes? What does it mean?是什麼意思
• dump truck是什麼意思
• SOMETIMES U GOTTA THUG SHIT OUT是什麼意思
• 一個人好像也蠻好的是什麼意思
• 我真心希望有一天不再是這樣，我不用再掙扎而真的能是走在陽光下的是什麼意思
• 拼命地工作。 的 地 意思是什麼？是什麼意思
• 感覺那段可以報什麼是什麼意思
• I have to go to university now. please add voice recording too😉.用 中文 (簡體) 要怎麼說？
• Could you fix my grammar? "She was trouble with trusting people, and she shut her eyes to the tru...

這個標誌代表你有興趣的語言的程度到哪裡，幫助回答者提供和程度相對應的回答。

難以理解使用非母語語言的回答

能夠提出簡單的問題，也可以理解簡單的回答。

能夠提出一般程度的問題，也能夠理解大部分的答案。

能夠完整理解問題與回答。

比起按讚跟貼圖更能表達你的感謝之情

贈送禮物將會讓你更容易收到答案！

您在送某人禮物後所發布的問題， 該問題將在顯示對方時間軸上顯眼的位子。

用App來輕鬆解決你的問題！

• 在4500萬個回答中找到你想要的答案！
• 當你搜索答案時，自動翻譯功能也可以同時享受！

• “assigning blame”是什麼意思

• to be assigned to sth [+ place, group ] 被指派到某处(處)  bèi zhǐpài dào mǒu chù
• to be assigned sb/sth 被分配了某人/某物  bèi fēnpèile mǒurén/mǒuwù

标题中含有单词 'assign' 的论坛讨论：

• Go to Preferences page and choose from different actions for taps or mouse clicks.

其他语言： 西班牙语 | 法语 | 意大利语 | 葡萄牙语 | 罗马尼亚语 | 德语 | 荷兰语 | 瑞典语 | 俄语 | 波兰语 | 捷克语 | 希腊语 | 土耳其语 | 日语 | 韩语 | 阿拉伯语

blame 在英语-中文（简体）词典中的翻译

Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio

• It's tempting to blame television for the increase in crime .
• They blamed their defeat on the media's one-sided reporting of the election campaign .
• She blamed me for practically every mistake in the report .
• Human error has been blamed for the air crash .
• Anything that goes wrong in the office is blamed on Pete.
• It is not the job of the investigating committee to allocate blame for the disaster .
• The report assigned the blame for the accident to inadequate safety regulations .
• She can't accept she made a mistake and now she's trying to lay the blame on her assistant .
• I accept my portion of the blame.
• Teachers cannot be expected to shoulder all the blame for poor exam results .

获得快速、免费的翻译！

to change what someone is saying into another language

Flat out or at a snail’s pace? Talking about speed

• 最近的词和建议 {{#preferredDictionaries}} {{name}} {{/preferredDictionaries}}
• 定义 清晰解释自然的书面和口头英语 英语 学习词典 基础英式英语 基础美式英语
• 语法与同义词词典 对自然书面和口头英语用法的解释 英语语法 同义词词典
• Pronunciation British and American pronunciations with audio English Pronunciation
• 英语-中文（简体） Chinese (Simplified)–English
• 英语-中文（繁体） Chinese (Traditional)–English
• 英语-荷兰语 荷兰语-英语
• 英语-法语 法语-英语
• 英语-德语 德语-英语
• 英语-印尼语 印尼语-英语
• 英语-意大利语 意大利语-英语
• 英语-日语 日语-英语
• 英语-挪威语 挪威语-英语
• 英语-波兰语 波兰语-英语
• 英语-葡萄牙语 葡萄牙语-英语
• 英语-西班牙语 西班牙语-英语
• 词典+Plus 词汇表
• I don't blame sb
• be to blame
• take the blame
• Translations

把 blame 添加到下面的一个词汇表中，或者创建一个新词汇表。

{{message}}

Example sentences assign blame

The first years of opposition could be wasted in a war to assign blame .

It's always difficult to assign blame when a marriage breaks down.

Then, if feeling defensive, she'll look to assign blame and you'll be the closest target.

While leaving open the possibility that there was 'unlawful interference' in the cockpit, the investigation did not assign blame .

In his correspondence and public statements, he was careful not to assign blame or cause embarrassment to colleagues in government.

Definition of 'assign' assign

Definition of 'blame' blame

COBUILD Collocations assign blame

Browse alphabetically assign blame.

• assign a unit
• assign a value
• assign an officer
• assign blame
• assign meaning
• assign personnel
• assign responsibility
• All ENGLISH words that begin with 'A'

Quick word challenge

Quiz Review

Score: 0 / 5

Wordle Helper

Scrabble Tools

assigning是什么意思_assigning用英语怎么说_assigning的翻译_assigning翻译成_assigning的中文意思_assigning怎么读,assigning的读音,assigning的用法,assigning的例句

• v. 分配( assign的现在分词 ) ; 指派 ; 指定 ; （作为说明或原因）提出

点击 金山快译 ，了解更多 人工释义

这次派他去侦察,很可能又是将军调他到侦察排的用意的进一步发挥.

我们可以稍后再讨论为这个过失负责的问题.

无法获得用于分配工作项目的应用程序锁.

但随意分配补助则能够避免这种风险.

优先就是确定呼叫的优先权等级.

涉及将结构指派给变量并访问结构元素.

至于担任会计这样的事情就比较危险了.

将绝对地址分配给某个程序的操作过程.

不过你可以通过重新分配来更改他们的工作.

而且还提出了基于两阶段URL散 列的内容分配算法.

试问为交换机配置IP地址的目的是什么?

对于这样的成员, 在构造函数函数体中对它们赋值不起作用.

李涛站在指定位置, 准备开舱.

通过将项目分配给组可在区域中排列此项目.

局况——设定奖分和宕墩罚分多少的条件 ( 参见第77条 ).

Assigning students' lodging randomly is not a good policy.

出自-2011年6月阅读原文

Academic departments vary in their procedures for assigning academic advisers to graduate students.

2016年6月四级真题（第二套）听力 Section C

Meanwhile, this policy does nothing to ensure that the homework students receive is meaningful or appropriate to their age and the subject, or that teachers are not assigning more than they are willing to review and correct.

2012年考研真题（英语二）阅读理解 Section Ⅱ

1. the act of distributing something to designated places or persons;

"the first task is the assignment of an address to each datum"

Forgiveness

Assigning blame, when is it reasonable and appropriate to point fingers.

Posted April 4, 2019

One of the unfortunate ways many people have of addressing a negative situation is to identify the person allegedly responsible for the situation so that blame can be assigned. I find this to be a most unfortunate impulse, since so many life situations that occur do not require, nor do they benefit from, the identification of a culprit by a blame-focused individual.

Many people report having grown up in a "blaming environment" or a "blame-oriented emotional atmosphere." This suggests a parental or family focus on discovering the culprit involved in wrongdoing so that he or she can be punished for the transgression committed. There are times, no doubt, when this is necessary and appropriate; occasions where a wrongdoer must be identified and attended to. Examples might include such occasions where carelessness leads to a dangerous situation.

There are times, however, when a situation does not require the identification of the offender, particularly when the offense is inconsequential and could be handled by the person discovering the offending act. One patient reported his childhood home atmosphere as one in which any minor infraction—leaving a room without turning off the light, leaving the cap off the toothpaste tube, or forgetting to put a dish in the dishwasher—would lead to a "parental witch hunt" for the responsible culprit. Often, an environment like this one breeds a blame mentality wherein many behaviors are viewed as justifying criticism and punishment .

Blaming is an unfortunate occurrence often observed when working with couples. At times, one member of the relationship is perceived—rightly or wrongly—as "guilty" of some wrongdoing and, therefore, deserving of blame for the alleged offense. One problem with blaming is that it tends to undermine what otherwise might be constructive communication that could lead to better understanding and meaningful change. Another common problem is that the blamer often avoids a necessary self-examination to determine his or her own responsibility for a problem or wrongdoing.

When Paul blamed his wife, Martha, for his sexual affair with a colleague, he felt justified and managed to absolve himself of any responsibility for his transgression. "It's what guys often do when they're not being satisfied at home," he asserted with self-righteous indignation. The first time he was helped to look at his own responsibility for his behavior was when he was asked to ponder the question of why not everyone chooses to handle that problem by having an affair. The purpose here was not simply to shift blame on the person whose behavior impaired the marriage . It was to have Paul take responsibility for his own actions and not blame Martha, thereby justifying his own unacceptable behavior and absolving himself of any wrongdoing.

With help, Paul was able to examine his motivation for his extramarital affair. He discovered that he had actually used his dissatisfaction in his marriage to justify doing something that he wanted to do anyway and might well have done regardless of whether or not he was or was not a satisfied husband.

Another consequence of what I call a blaming mentality is self-blame, especially when there appears to be little or no justification for it. Many people rush to judgment against themselves without a full examination of the justification for such self-indictment. This propels them into significant emotional distress and often requires professional help.

There are certain circumstances and occasions when leveling blame at someone else or oneself is fitting and reasonable. One needs to be very careful to differentiate between justifiable and unjustifiable blaming, as well as to have a reasonably forgiving attitude when this may be the appropriate response.

Richard B. Joelson, DSW, LCSW, is a psychotherapist in private practice in New York City who has been an administrator, educator, and author in the field of mental health for many years.

• Find a Therapist
• Find a Treatment Center
• Find a Psychiatrist
• Find a Support Group
• Find Teletherapy
• United States
• Brooklyn, NY
• Chicago, IL
• Houston, TX
• Los Angeles, CA
• New York, NY
• Portland, OR
• San Diego, CA
• San Francisco, CA
• Seattle, WA
• Washington, DC
• Asperger's
• Bipolar Disorder
• Chronic Pain
• Eating Disorders
• Passive Aggression
• Personality
• Goal Setting
• Positive Psychology
• Stopping Smoking
• Low Sexual Desire
• Relationships
• Child Development
• Therapy Center NEW
• Diagnosis Dictionary
• Types of Therapy

As the lines between real and fake blur, Americans increasingly chase the idea of authenticity. The first step may be to consider self-knowledge, truthfulness, and other building blocks on the road to personal growth.

• Coronavirus Disease 2019
• Affective Forecasting
• Neuroscience

Lawyers for 'orgasmic meditation' company founder refute prosecutors' ethics concerns

Nicole Daedone, founder and former CEO of OneTaste Inc., arrives for a hearing at the Brooklyn Federal Courthouse in Brooklyn, New York, U.S., June 21, 2023. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid Acquire Licensing Rights

• Onetaste GmbH Follow

Sept 21 (Reuters) - Attorneys at law firm Steptoe & Johnson on Wednesday defended their work for the indicted founder of the sexuality-focused wellness company OneTaste, as they asked a judge to reject U.S. prosecutors' concerns about a potential conflict of interest.

In a filing , defense lawyers for OneTaste founder Nicole Daedone responded to a request from the U.S. Attorney's Office in Brooklyn for a hearing to explore what the government called the possibility for divided loyalties among defense lawyers.

Daedone and former OneTaste head of sales Rachel Cherwitz were charged in an unsealed indictment in June with orchestrating a forced labor conspiracy, which included instructing their members to perform sexual acts for "freedom and enlightenment."

They have pleaded not guilty. The company itself, which is not a defendant, has said it cooperated with the investigation. OneTaste in a statement on its website called the charges against Daedone and Cherwitz "utterly unjustified."

Steptoe represents both Daedone and Institute of OM, which the government said is a OneTaste-affiliated entity. Institute of OM is not a defendant. Cherwitz is represented by law firm Alston & Bird.

Prosecutors said they were concerned about two things: Daedone's legal strategy — for instance, if she were to plead guilty — could "tarnish the OneTaste brand" and be "adverse" to Institute of OM, prosecutors said.

In addition, they said OneTaste's payment of fees to Cherwitz's lawyers could affect what legal advice they provide to her in any scenario in which she takes a stance adverse to OneTaste.

Steptoe "owes a duty of loyalty" to the Institute of OM and could be limited in sharing information with Daedone, prosecutors told U.S. District Judge Diane Gujarati.

Attorneys for Daedone and Cherwitz did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

In their court filing, Daedone's attorneys called the government's concerns "speculative" and "implausible."

"The dual representations have not, and have no potential of, creating a conflict of interest for Steptoe," Steptoe's Reid Weingarten and Julia Gatto said.

They also called the government's case "exceedingly weak" and said the defense "will not include assigning blame to OneTaste or anyone affiliated with OneTaste."

Daedone's lawyers said she signed a waiver wishing to keep Steptoe.

Cherwitz's attorneys denied there was any conflict in her fee arrangement, saying "companies routinely agree to advance the legal fees of current and former employees." They said there was not "a single shred of evidence that Ms. Cherwitz engaged in a forced-labor conspiracy."

A spokesperson for the U.S. attorney's office in Brooklyn declined to comment.

The next status conference is scheduled for Oct. 3.

The case is United States v. Nicole Daedone and Rachel Cherwitz, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York, No. 1:23-cr-00146-DG.

For U.S.: Lauren Howard Elbert and Gillian Kassner of the U.S. Attorney's Office

For Daedone: Reid Weingarten and Julia Gatto of Steptoe & Johnson

For Cherwitz: Jenny Kramer and Rachel Finkel of Alston & Bird

US founder of 'orgasmic meditation' company charged with forced labor conspiracy

Reporting by Mike Scarcella; editing by Leigh Jones

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read Next / Editor's Picks

UAW to strike more GM, Stellantis facilities, has made progress with Ford

Auto workers rally as deadline nears to expand strikes on Detroit Three

NextEra workers roll the dice with big bet on company stock

California lets insurers factor wildfire risks in rates to widen coverage

More from Reuters

Industry insight.

Andrew Goudsward

Sara Merken

Zach Warren

• Share full article

Advertisement

Supported by

DealBook Newsletter

Is Rupert Murdoch Really Moving on?

The 92-year-old media tycoon is set to become chairman emeritus of Fox and News Corporation, but he still wields considerable power over the empire he built.

By Andrew Ross Sorkin ,  Ravi Mattu ,  Bernhard Warner ,  Sarah Kessler ,  Michael J. de la Merced ,  Ephrat Livni and Edmund Lee

The next chapter in the Murdoch family drama

Rupert Murdoch’s bombshell retirement announcement on Thursday apparently ended some speculation over a real-life succession story that gripped the business world (and even inspired a must-watch fictional one ). Murdoch, 92, will become chairman emeritus of Fox and News Corporation and named Lachlan , his elder son, as the designated heir.

But is Murdoch really hanging up his spikes? The Times’s Edmund Lee writes on why succession isn’t settled.

Murdoch isn’t about to disappear. In his farewell note to staff , he made clear he would “be watching our broadcasts with a critical eye, reading our newspapers and websites and books with much interest, and reaching out to you with thoughts, ideas, and advice.”

In his seven decades as a media baron, Murdoch’s favorite part of the job has been talking to his editors about big stories. He won’t stop doing that.

Murdoch still has a huge say in the companies’ operations. He is the majority shareholder of a family trust that owns significant stakes in each business. The trust manages about 40 percent of the voting stock in News Corp and 43 percent of voting shares in the more valuable Fox. In other words, he’s still in charge.

The real succession battle still looms. When Murdoch dies, four of his children — Lachlan, James, Elisabeth and Prudence — will have an equal say in what happens next because they will inherit his voting shares. And alongside his two other children from another marriage, they stand to inherit a fortune in some kind of deal for the companies. (The children made out nicely in the $71 billion sale of the majority of Fox’s assets to Disney in 2018, as each got about $2 billion.)

The revival of a failed deal could be in the offing. Murdoch tried to combine the two businesses last year, but called that off in January when shareholders balked. The hugely profitable Fox is driven largely by Fox News, and News Corp is now a hodgepodge that includes newspapers, digital real estate businesses and book publishing.

Both companies have shrunk severely over the years as the media landscape has been taken over by big tech and streaming. There hasn’t been a growth story to tell investors.

What to watch for: A potential sale of the media empire, either as a whole or in parts. Fox’s stock jumped 3 percent and News Corp’s shares were up 1.3 percent after Murdoch’s announcement, widely outperforming the S&P 500, which fell 1.6 percent.

HERE’S WHAT’S HAPPENING

Hard-right Republicans block a defense bill, dealing a blow to Speaker Kevin McCarthy. Hours after the top House Republican signaled that he had won over some holdouts, a handful of his party’s lawmakers opposed the measure , renewing doubts that a government shutdown can be avoided this month.

The White House tells federal agencies to consider climate change in procurement decisions. New Biden administration guidelines could affect where the federal government spends roughly $600 billion annually on goods and services. The directive was issued as a judge in Texas denied an attempt by red states to block a federal rule allowing employee retirement plans to consider E.S.G. issues when making investment decisions.

Biden says Abrams tanks will start arriving in Ukraine next week. The decision came as Volodymyr Zelensky, Ukraine’s president, visited Washington to shore up support for his country despite Republican opposition to the cost of aid growing louder. Meanwhile, the European Commission is reportedly a step closer to starting discussions that would allow Ukraine to join the European Union .

A big tech deal suggests antitrust fears are receding

Cisco’s $28 billion deal to buy Splunk , announced on Thursday, was notable for a number of reasons, including for being the network hardware giant’s biggest-ever takeover — and for what it may portend for the future of megadeals.

The move reflects Cisco’s belief that the transaction will withstand the increased scrutiny of mergers by the Biden administration and other antitrust watchdogs. It suggests that corporate leaders are increasingly confident that heightened opposition to M.&A. may not be such an impediment.

The deal doesn’t pose a problem for competition — at least not based on traditional antitrust views, Chuck Robbins, Cisco’s C.E.O., told DealBook. Splunk, which mines customers’ data for insights on security vulnerabilities and other matters, complements rather than competes with his company’s own offerings. “This is not a roll-up,” he said. “We don’t have a lot of overlap in our portfolios.”

Investors may need convincing: Though shares in Splunk jumped nearly 21 percent on Thursday, they’re still trading below Cisco’s offer price of $157 a share.

But C.E.O.s are taking comfort from recent setbacks for regulators, including the F.T.C.’s defeat in its effort to block Microsoft’s nearly $70 billion takeover bid for Activision Blizzard. That deal is poised to close, after Britain’s antitrust regulator said on Friday that the companies had taken action that “substantially addresses” its concerns ; Microsoft and Activision are aiming to close the transaction by Oct. 18.

Executives and deal advisers say privately that Biden’s antitrust enforcers may be feeling more gun-shy after the Microsoft defeat. (A commonly cited piece of evidence is the F.T.C. withdrawing its challenge to Amgen’s $27.8 billion takeover of Horizon Therapeutics.)

That said, the F.T.C. and the Justice Department have at least publicly committed to aggressive enforcement. And the F.T.C. sued a big anesthesiology company on Thursday, challenging a common private equity strategy of rolling up small businesses to create a more powerful player.

That renewed confidence could help bolster the flagging deal-making business, which is down 28 percent year on year, according to LSEG.

Goldman’s top I.P.O. banker on the state of play

On Thursday, shares in the ad-tech company Klaviyo finished their second day of trading 12 percent above the price set in its initial public offering. That’s below the heights the stock touched on its first day, but better than what’s happened to shares in the grocery delivery app Instacart and the chip designer Arm, which are now just above their debut prices.

That’s disappointing for investors who bought into the companies on their first days of trading. But David Ludwig, the global head of equity capital markets at Goldman Sachs, who helped lead all three I.P.O.s, argues that the shares are actually performing as well as can be expected in turbulent markets — and that there’s hope for the future.

Some analysts said that the companies may have overshot on valuations. Arm priced its offering at $51 a share, the high end of its forecast range, while Instacart priced its stock at the top of an already raised range, and Klaviyo was priced above expectations. Shares in each popped on their first day of trading before drifting down.

Matt Kennedy, a senior strategist at Renaissance Capital, an I.P.O.-focused data firm, suggested that the companies may have miscalculated investor demand. “The next deals will have to price more conservatively,” he told DealBook.

But Ludwig noted that the markets have been choppy, with the Nasdaq down nearly 6 percent since the beginning of September and the S&P 500 down 4 percent. “The market backdrop has clearly gotten tougher,” he told DealBook. “In a market that’s not fully healed yet, I think it’s good that companies can get access to the markets in a fairly efficient manner.”

Market expectations for a sudden I.P.O. resurgence may have been overblown. Given uncertainty over inflation and the Fed’s plans for interest rates, deal makers have actually been pushing back their expectations for a revival into next year. The I.P.O. calendar for the rest of 2023 looks fairly quiet, save for a few notable exceptions like the sandal maker Birkenstock.

The companies that can go public now share a number of qualities, including profitability and — for the more mature companies — strong balance sheets not weighed down by excessive debt, according to Ludwig. But he hopes that will change: “We expect a moderate reopening in 2023, and as the markets stabilize, the I.P.O. window will likely open to a broader array of companies,” he said.

“There is a group of Tesla workers who are actively talking about forming a union.”

— Mike Miller , a regional director for the U.A.W. He told the The Times that Tesla employees were reviving efforts to unionize. In other labor news: Marathon talks between Hollywood executives and striking Writers Guild of America members ended last night with no deal .

Truth, consequences and FTX

As Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder of the failed crypto exchange FTX, prepares for his upcoming criminal trial, his parents are facing accusations too.

FTX debtors this week sued Joseph Bankman and Barbara Fried , longtime Stanford Law School professors, claiming they unjustly collected millions in cash, property and donations from the “family business.”

The claims are particularly notable in light of Bankman’s and Fried’s academic writings, which explore the nature of wrongdoing, honesty and consequences.

Bankman and Fried have written extensively about moral questions. Bankman, a tax expert, co-wrote a paper that proposes a fix for tax evasion : “changing the wording on existing returns to increase the psychological cost of evasion and increase the perceived expectation of detection.”

Fried is known for her work in legal ethics. Much of it focuses on consequentialism, a centuries-old idea that deems an action right or wrong depending on its outcomes. In a 2013 essay, she lamented a cultural enthusiasm for assigning blame , pointing to the 2008 housing crisis.

She noted soberly that “parental income and education are the most powerful predictors of whether a three-year-old will end up in the boardroom or in prison.”

FTX debtors accuse Bankman-Fried’s parents of ignoring “bright red signs,” and say they should have been able to see evidence of fraud at FTX companies. In a statement, lawyers for Bankman and Fried called FTX’s claims “completely false” and “a dangerous attempt to intimidate Joe and Barbara and undermine the jury process just days before their child’s trial begins.”

Bankman joined the FTX payroll last year and complained to his son that his $200,000 salary was inadequate; he wanted $1 million . The filing details other perks, including a $16.4 million property in the Bahamas and a $10 million payout.

The FTX debtors want to claw it all back.

THE SPEED READ

Shares in Coty, the fragrance and beauty giant that trades in New York, jumped on Thursday on a report that it may also list its stock in Paris . (Bloomberg)

The Silicon Valley venture firm GGV Capital has followed Sequoia in splitting its Asia-focused operations from its U.S. arm. (FT)

David McCormick, the Republican former C.E.O. of Bridgewater who unsuccessfully ran for Pennsylvania’s governorship, is now hoping to unseat Senator Bob Casey , a Democrat.

TikTok is fighting more potential bans, this time in Africa . (WSJ)

Best of the rest

“​​China’s quest for human genetic data spurs fears of a DNA arms race ” (WaPo)

Meet the 34-year-old business school graduate who is now the face of Wagner Group , the Russian mercenary force whose former leader, Yevgeny Prigozhin, was likely assassinated last month. (WSJ)

Victor Fuchs , whose work on understanding American health care costs made him a towering figure in his corner of economics, died on Saturday. He was 99. (NYT)

Jimmy Carter entered hospice care seven months ago — and his health is defying everyone’s expectations. (NYT)

We’d like your feedback! Please email thoughts and suggestions to [email protected] .

Andrew Ross Sorkin is a columnist and the founder and editor at large of DealBook. He is a co-anchor of CNBC’s "Squawk Box" and the author of “Too Big to Fail.” He is also a co-creator of the Showtime drama series "Billions." More about Andrew Ross Sorkin

Ravi Mattu is the managing editor of DealBook, based in London. He joined The New York Times in 2022 from the Financial Times, where he held a number of senior roles in Hong Kong and London. More about Ravi Mattu

Bernhard Warner joined the The Times in 2022 as a senior editor for DealBook. Previously he was a senior writer and editor at Fortune focusing on business, the economy and the markets. More about Bernhard Warner

Sarah Kessler is an editor for the DealBook newsletter and writes features on business and how workplaces are changing. More about Sarah Kessler

Michael de la Merced joined The Times as a reporter in 2006, covering Wall Street and finance. Among his main coverage areas are mergers and acquisitions, bankruptcies and the private equity industry. More about Michael J. de la Merced

Ephrat Livni reports from Washington on the intersection of business and policy for DealBook. Previously, she was a senior reporter at Quartz, covering law and politics, and has practiced law in the public and private sectors.   More about Ephrat Livni

Edmund Lee covers the media industry as it grapples with changes from Silicon Valley. Before joining The Times he was the managing editor at Vox Media’s Recode. More about Edmund Lee

96-year-old judge who refuses to retire suspended for ‘misconduct’

The order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit begins with praise. Judge Pauline Newman is called “a heroine,” “highly valued and respected,” and “the most beloved colleague,” one who has served for 39 years.

But it’s not an award or a retirement announcement; it’s a notice that Newman has been suspended from the court for a year for “serious misconduct.” Her transgression: refusing to cooperate with an investigation into whether, at the age of 96, she can no longer do the job. The suspension could be renewed after a year, the court says.

“We are acutely aware that this is not a fitting capstone to Judge Newman’s exemplary and storied career,” the other active judges of the court wrote in a 70-page explanation of the decision . “We all would prefer a different outcome for our friend and colleague. However, we have a solemn obligation … to take action — and not to simply look the other way — when it appears that a judge of this Court is no longer capable of performing the duties of her judicial office.”

Newman has sued her colleagues , providing an unusually public view into what is usually a secretive process. The suspension comes as lawmakers such as Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) face calls to step down over age-related health issues. Newman refused to cooperate unless the investigation was transferred to a different court, arguing that there would be inevitable conflicts of interest if her colleagues were evaluating her fitness and questioning their own staff.

“This could have been done in a much more respectful, nonhostile and appropriate manner simply by transferring to another tribunal,” her attorney Greg Dolin said. “This was entirely avoidable.” The lawsuit is ongoing; Dolin says Newman also plans to appeal Wednesday’s order to the federal courts’ Committee on Judicial Conduct and Disability, made up of seven judges from around the country.

The court says in its order that it is Newman’s recalcitrance that led to these “very sad proceedings.”

Newman was one of the first judges appointed to the Federal Circuit, which hears cases involving patents and trademarks along with some other claims involving government contracts and benefits. A trained chemist who helped invent a new type of synthetic fabric, she is known as a vociferous defender of the patent system amid a backlash spurred by “ patent trolls ” who claim broad inventions.

She is also known for her dissents and for taking a long time to write them. But Chief Judge Kimberly A. Moore argued that Newman’s output in the past two years was so meager, despite a reduced caseload, that it was necessary to ask her to retire or take less onerous “senior status.”

Newman declined. Moore then convened a panel of three judges to investigate Newman’s competence, which recommended the suspension to the rest of the court in July. Newman has not been assigned new cases since the investigation began, which she says in her lawsuit is a denial of due process.

Because Newman would not submit to a neurological examination and interview set up by the committee or share her medical records, the court ultimately ruled only on her failure to engage with the investigation. But the order also details what the judges describe as “overwhelming evidence that Judge Newman may be experiencing significant mental problems.”

Newman did undergo about four hours of evaluation with a forensic psychiatrist and a neurologist, both of whom deemed her mentally fit, and argues she is actually slightly more productive in recent months than previously.

“I am not physically disabled; I am not mentally disabled. I may talk too much, but that’s always been true,” Newman said in an interview earlier this year.

The court dismissed those psychiatric reports as inadequate, noting that the doctors were chosen by Newman, relied on her for information and gave tests far shorter than the six-hour cognitive exam the judicial committee wanted.

Included in the order are emails in which Newman appears not to remember having agreed to let a law clerk change jobs and repeatedly demands return of a computer she was told did not belong to her. (Newman’s attorney said the judge had accepted that the clerk would leave but did not know he would go to another judge.) In affidavits, court employees say she had begun having trouble keeping track of her files and the status of various cases, started struggling to use technology, and would claim her phone was “bugged” and her computers “hacked.”

“I would describe Judge Newman as ranting, rambling, and paranoid,” one information technology staffer wrote in an affidavit. According to the order, the clerk of court “advised staff to avoid interacting with her in person or, when they must, to bring a co-worker with them.”

Newman’s paralegal said that after he complained about a law clerk treating him inappropriately, including by calling in the middle of the night with personal requests, the judge retaliated against the paralegal and threatened to have him arrested.

“I love, revere, and admire Judge Newman personally and professionally for all her accomplishments and who she is as a person, which makes the last few months so much more difficult,” the paralegal wrote in an affidavit.

Dolin blamed the court’s refusal to transfer the investigation for Newman’s mistrustful behavior, and suggested staffers exaggerated or distorted their concerns about the judge to curry favor with the chief judge.

“Given how Judge Newman was treated,” he said, “can you really blame Judge Newman for not taking what she’s been told at value?”

Even if Newman’s managerial style was unpleasant for some staffers, he argued in an August filing, it was nothing she could be disciplined for, as federal judges have significant power over their offices : “It is entirely Judge Newman’s prerogative to determine when to work and when to expect assistance of her chambers staff.”

The Federal Circuit judges are acting under a 1980 law that allows for judicial sanction by colleagues, as long as the punishment is not removal from office or indefinite suspension. Had the committee deemed Newman disabled, another judge could be appointed by the president, but she would still not be forced to retire. The only generally accepted way to remove a federal judge from the bench entirely is impeachment.

In the August filing , her attorneys argued that while the court committee could stop assigning Newman cases under a misconduct order, they cannot bar her from “en banc” hearings that include the full court or make the punishment renewable indefinitely.

“The Committee’s remit is limited only to sanctioning judges for past conduct, rather than attempting to directly compel some future conduct,” they wrote.

The court dismissed Newman’s criticisms of the process as baseless, saying that keeping the investigation in the Federal Circuit was more efficient.

“Judge Newman can, at any time, end this suspension, by … allowing the Committee to complete its investigation,” they wrote.

Arthur Hellman, a law professor at the University of Pittsburgh who studies the federal court system, said the order was “quite persuasive that there’s reason to be concerned about Judge Newman’s cognitive abilities.” But he said there is “no judicial precedent” making clear that a court can force a judge to undergo medical testing or impose a renewable sanction. He expects she will argue that the punishment violates the Constitution “because it is the functional equivalent of removing the judge from office.”

• A federal judge was refused a Lyft ride with his guide dog. He’s not alone. April 21, 2023 A federal judge was refused a Lyft ride with his guide dog. He’s not alone. April 21, 2023
• One murder, two convictions and a man’s battle to clear his name May 18, 2023 One murder, two convictions and a man’s battle to clear his name May 18, 2023
• Proud Boys revealed: Videos, secret chats show how Jan. 6 plot unfolded May 5, 2023 Proud Boys revealed: Videos, secret chats show how Jan. 6 plot unfolded May 5, 2023