Start-up Funding | |
Start-up Expenses to Fund | $0 |
Start-up Assets to Fund | $20,100,000 |
Total Funding Required | $20,100,000 |
Assets | |
Non-cash Assets from Start-up | $0 |
Cash Requirements from Start-up | $20,100,000 |
Additional Cash Raised | $0 |
Cash Balance on Starting Date | $20,100,000 |
Total Assets | $20,100,000 |
Liabilities and Capital | |
Liabilities | |
Current Borrowing | $0 |
Long-term Liabilities | $0 |
Accounts Payable (Outstanding Bills) | $0 |
Other Current Liabilities (interest-free) | $0 |
Total Liabilities | $0 |
Capital | |
Planned Investment | |
Investor 1 | $20,000,000 |
Investor 2 | $100,000 |
Other | $0 |
Additional Investment Requirement | $0 |
Total Planned Investment | $20,100,000 |
Loss at Start-up (Start-up Expenses) | $0 |
Total Capital | $20,100,000 |
Total Capital and Liabilities | $20,100,000 |
Total Funding | $20,100,000 |
Strategy and implementation summary, sales forecast forecast sales .">.
Sales Forecast | |||||
Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | |
Sales | |||||
Management Fees | $400,000 | $400,000 | $400,000 | $400,000 | $400,000 |
Equity appreciation | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $45,000,000 |
Total Sales | $400,000 | $400,000 | $400,000 | $400,000 | $45,400,000 |
Direct Cost of Sales | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 |
Management Fees | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Equity appreciation | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Subtotal Direct Cost of Sales | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
7.1 personnel plan.
This hypothetical company pays salaries to its partners and other employees, and office expenses, from the management fee of two percent (2%).
Personnel Plan | |||||
Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | |
Partners | $240,000 | $252,000 | $265,000 | $278,000 | $292,000 |
Other | $60,000 | $63,000 | $66,000 | $69,000 | $72,000 |
Total People | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Total Payroll | $300,000 | $315,000 | $331,000 | $347,000 | $364,000 |
8.1 projected profit and loss.
Please note that in the third year one investment is written off as a failure, producing a $5 million cost which ends up showing a loss for the year of nearly $5 million. The sale of equity at the end of the period enters the sales forecast and the profit and loss statement as a $45 million gain.
Pro Forma Profit and Loss | |||||
Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | |
Sales | $400,000 | $400,000 | $400,000 | $400,000 | $45,400,000 |
Direct Cost of Sales | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Investment write-off | $0 | $0 | $5,000,000 | $0 | $0 |
Total Cost of Sales | $0 | $0 | $5,000,000 | $0 | $0 |
Gross Margin | $400,000 | $400,000 | ($4,600,000) | $400,000 | $45,400,000 |
Gross Margin % | 100.00% | 100.00% | -1150.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
Expenses | |||||
Payroll | $300,000 | $315,000 | $331,000 | $347,000 | $364,000 |
Sales and Marketing and Other Expenses | $13,200 | $13,900 | $14,600 | $15,300 | $16,000 |
Depreciation | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Leased Equipment | $2,400 | $2,500 | $2,600 | $2,700 | $2,800 |
Utilities | $1,200 | $1,300 | $1,400 | $1,500 | $1,600 |
Insurance | $2,400 | $2,500 | $2,600 | $2,700 | $2,800 |
Rent | $36,000 | $37,800 | $39,700 | $41,700 | $43,800 |
Payroll Taxes | $45,000 | $47,250 | $49,650 | $52,050 | $54,600 |
Other | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Operating Expenses | $400,200 | $420,250 | $441,550 | $462,950 | $485,600 |
Profit Before Interest and Taxes | ($200) | ($20,250) | ($5,041,550) | ($62,950) | $44,914,400 |
EBITDA | ($200) | ($20,250) | ($5,041,550) | ($62,950) | $44,914,400 |
Interest Expense | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Taxes Incurred | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $8,982,880 |
Net Profit | ($200) | ($20,250) | ($5,041,550) | ($62,950) | $35,931,520 |
Net Profit/Sales | -0.05% | -5.06% | -1260.39% | -15.74% | 79.14% |
The Cash Flow shows four $5 million investments made in the first few months of the plan.
In the third year, one of the target companies fails, so $5 million is written off as failure. You’ll see that shows as a $5 million sale of long-term assets in the cash flow, and a balancing entry of $5 million in costs of sales in the profit and loss, making for a loss and write-off that year. The result is a tax loss, and the balance of investments goes to $15 Million.
In the fifth year, another investment is transacted at $50 million. This shows up as a $5 million equity appreciation in the Sales Forecast, plus a $5 million sale of long-term assets in the Cash Flow. At that point there’s been a $45 million profit and the balance of long-term assets goes down to $10 million.
The partners invest an additional $100,000 in the fourth year as additional working capital to balance the cash flow of the company.
Pro Forma Cash Flow | |||||
Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | |
Cash Received | |||||
Cash from Operations | |||||
Cash Sales | $400,000 | $400,000 | $400,000 | $400,000 | $45,400,000 |
Subtotal Cash from Operations | $400,000 | $400,000 | $400,000 | $400,000 | $45,400,000 |
Additional Cash Received | |||||
Sales Tax, VAT, HST/GST Received | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
New Current Borrowing | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
New Other Liabilities (interest-free) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
New Long-term Liabilities | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Sales of Other Current Assets | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Sales of Long-term Assets | $0 | $0 | $5,000,000 | $0 | $5,000,000 |
New Investment Received | $0 | $0 | $0 | $100,000 | $0 |
Subtotal Cash Received | $400,000 | $400,000 | $5,400,000 | $500,000 | $50,400,000 |
Expenditures | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 |
Expenditures from Operations | |||||
Cash Spending | $300,000 | $315,000 | $331,000 | $347,000 | $364,000 |
Bill Payments | $92,128 | $104,671 | $4,699,155 | $526,465 | $8,365,697 |
Subtotal Spent on Operations | $392,128 | $419,671 | $5,030,155 | $873,465 | $8,729,697 |
Additional Cash Spent | |||||
Sales Tax, VAT, HST/GST Paid Out | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Principal Repayment of Current Borrowing | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Other Liabilities Principal Repayment | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Long-term Liabilities Principal Repayment | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Purchase Other Current Assets | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Purchase Long-term Assets | $20,000,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Dividends | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Subtotal Cash Spent | $20,392,128 | $419,671 | $5,030,155 | $873,465 | $8,729,697 |
Net Cash Flow | ($19,992,128) | ($19,671) | $369,845 | ($373,465) | $41,670,303 |
Cash Balance | $107,872 | $88,201 | $458,045 | $84,580 | $41,754,883 |
You can see in the balance sheet how the ending balances for long-term assets were not re-valued. They remain at the original purchase price until they are sold, or written off as a complete loss. There is a $5 million write-off in the third year, and a sale of $5 million worth of assets in the last year. That sale of $5 million in assets produces the $5 million sale at book value plus the $45 million gain in the sales forecast and profit and loss table.
Pro Forma Balance Sheet | |||||
Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | |
Assets | |||||
Current Assets | |||||
Cash | $107,872 | $88,201 | $458,045 | $84,580 | $41,754,883 |
Other Current Assets | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Current Assets | $107,872 | $88,201 | $458,045 | $84,580 | $41,754,883 |
Long-term Assets | |||||
Long-term Assets | $20,000,000 | $20,000,000 | $15,000,000 | $15,000,000 | $10,000,000 |
Accumulated Depreciation | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Long-term Assets | $20,000,000 | $20,000,000 | $15,000,000 | $15,000,000 | $10,000,000 |
Total Assets | $20,107,872 | $20,088,201 | $15,458,045 | $15,084,580 | $51,754,883 |
Liabilities and Capital | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 |
Current Liabilities | |||||
Accounts Payable | $8,072 | $8,651 | $420,045 | $9,530 | $748,313 |
Current Borrowing | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Other Current Liabilities | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Subtotal Current Liabilities | $8,072 | $8,651 | $420,045 | $9,530 | $748,313 |
Long-term Liabilities | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Liabilities | $8,072 | $8,651 | $420,045 | $9,530 | $748,313 |
Paid-in Capital | $20,100,000 | $20,100,000 | $20,100,000 | $20,200,000 | $20,200,000 |
Retained Earnings | $0 | ($200) | ($20,450) | ($5,062,000) | ($5,124,950) |
Earnings | ($200) | ($20,250) | ($5,041,550) | ($62,950) | $35,931,520 |
Total Capital | $20,099,800 | $20,079,550 | $15,038,000 | $15,075,050 | $51,006,570 |
Total Liabilities and Capital | $20,107,872 | $20,088,201 | $15,458,045 | $15,084,580 | $51,754,883 |
Net Worth | $20,099,800 | $20,079,550 | $15,038,000 | $15,075,050 | $51,006,570 |
The Standard Industry Code (SIC) for this type of business is 7389, Business Services. The Industry Data is provided in the final column of the Ratios table.
Ratio Analysis | ||||||
Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | Industry Profile | |
Sales Growth | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11250.00% | 8.20% |
Percent of Total Assets | ||||||
Other Current Assets | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 44.20% |
Total Current Assets | 0.54% | 0.44% | 2.96% | 0.56% | 80.68% | 74.30% |
Long-term Assets | 99.46% | 99.56% | 97.04% | 99.44% | 19.32% | 25.70% |
Total Assets | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
Current Liabilities | 0.04% | 0.04% | 2.72% | 0.06% | 1.45% | 49.00% |
Long-term Liabilities | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 13.80% |
Total Liabilities | 0.04% | 0.04% | 2.72% | 0.06% | 1.45% | 62.80% |
Net Worth | 99.96% | 99.96% | 97.28% | 99.94% | 98.55% | 37.20% |
Percent of Sales | ||||||
Sales | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
Gross Margin | 100.00% | 100.00% | -1150.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 0.00% |
Selling, General & Administrative Expenses | 100.05% | 105.06% | 110.39% | 115.74% | 20.86% | 81.40% |
Advertising Expenses | 0.30% | 0.33% | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 1.70% |
Profit Before Interest and Taxes | -0.05% | -5.06% | -1260.39% | -15.74% | 98.93% | 2.10% |
Main Ratios | ||||||
Current | 13.36 | 10.20 | 1.09 | 8.88 | 55.80 | 1.49 |
Quick | 13.36 | 10.20 | 1.09 | 8.88 | 55.80 | 1.17 |
Total Debt to Total Assets | 0.04% | 0.04% | 2.72% | 0.06% | 1.45% | 62.80% |
Pre-tax Return on Net Worth | 0.00% | -0.10% | -33.53% | -0.42% | 88.06% | 4.20% |
Pre-tax Return on Assets | 0.00% | -0.10% | -32.61% | -0.42% | 86.78% | 11.30% |
Additional Ratios | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | |
Net Profit Margin | -0.05% | -5.06% | -1260.39% | -15.74% | 79.14% | n.a |
Return on Equity | 0.00% | -0.10% | -33.53% | -0.42% | 70.44% | n.a |
Activity Ratios | ||||||
Accounts Payable Turnover | 12.41 | 12.17 | 12.17 | 12.17 | 12.17 | n.a |
Payment Days | 27 | 29 | 15 | 676 | 15 | n.a |
Total Asset Turnover | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.88 | n.a |
Debt Ratios | ||||||
Debt to Net Worth | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.01 | n.a |
Current Liab. to Liab. | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | n.a |
Liquidity Ratios | ||||||
Net Working Capital | $99,800 | $79,550 | $38,000 | $75,050 | $41,006,570 | n.a |
Interest Coverage | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | n.a |
Additional Ratios | ||||||
Assets to Sales | 50.27 | 50.22 | 38.65 | 37.71 | 1.14 | n.a |
Current Debt/Total Assets | 0% | 0% | 3% | 0% | 1% | n.a |
Acid Test | 13.36 | 10.20 | 1.09 | 8.88 | 55.80 | n.a |
Sales/Net Worth | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.89 | n.a |
Dividend Payout | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | n.a |
Sales Forecast | |||||||||||||
Month 1 | Month 2 | Month 3 | Month 4 | Month 5 | Month 6 | Month 7 | Month 8 | Month 9 | Month 10 | Month 11 | Month 12 | ||
Sales | |||||||||||||
Management Fees | 2% | $0 | $0 | $100,000 | $0 | $0 | $100,000 | $0 | $0 | $100,000 | $0 | $0 | $100,000 |
Equity appreciation | 0% | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Sales | $0 | $0 | $100,000 | $0 | $0 | $100,000 | $0 | $0 | $100,000 | $0 | $0 | $100,000 | |
Direct Cost of Sales | Month 1 | Month 2 | Month 3 | Month 4 | Month 5 | Month 6 | Month 7 | Month 8 | Month 9 | Month 10 | Month 11 | Month 12 | |
Management Fees | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Equity appreciation | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Subtotal Direct Cost of Sales | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Personnel Plan | |||||||||||||
Month 1 | Month 2 | Month 3 | Month 4 | Month 5 | Month 6 | Month 7 | Month 8 | Month 9 | Month 10 | Month 11 | Month 12 | ||
Partners | 0% | $20,000 | $20,000 | $20,000 | $20,000 | $20,000 | $20,000 | $20,000 | $20,000 | $20,000 | $20,000 | $20,000 | $20,000 |
Other | 0% | $5,000 | $5,000 | $5,000 | $5,000 | $5,000 | $5,000 | $5,000 | $5,000 | $5,000 | $5,000 | $5,000 | $5,000 |
Total People | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
Total Payroll | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 |
General Assumptions | |||||||||||||
Month 1 | Month 2 | Month 3 | Month 4 | Month 5 | Month 6 | Month 7 | Month 8 | Month 9 | Month 10 | Month 11 | Month 12 | ||
Plan Month | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
Current Interest Rate | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% | |
Long-term Interest Rate | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% | |
Tax Rate | 20.00% | 20.00% | 20.00% | 20.00% | 20.00% | 20.00% | 20.00% | 20.00% | 20.00% | 20.00% | 20.00% | 20.00% | |
Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Pro Forma Profit and Loss | |||||||||||||
Month 1 | Month 2 | Month 3 | Month 4 | Month 5 | Month 6 | Month 7 | Month 8 | Month 9 | Month 10 | Month 11 | Month 12 | ||
Sales | $0 | $0 | $100,000 | $0 | $0 | $100,000 | $0 | $0 | $100,000 | $0 | $0 | $100,000 | |
Direct Cost of Sales | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Investment write-off | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Total Cost of Sales | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Gross Margin | $0 | $0 | $100,000 | $0 | $0 | $100,000 | $0 | $0 | $100,000 | $0 | $0 | $100,000 | |
Gross Margin % | 0.00% | 0.00% | 100.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 100.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 100.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 100.00% | |
Expenses | |||||||||||||
Payroll | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | |
Sales and Marketing and Other Expenses | $1,100 | $1,100 | $1,100 | $1,100 | $1,100 | $1,100 | $1,100 | $1,100 | $1,100 | $1,100 | $1,100 | $1,100 | |
Depreciation | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Leased Equipment | $200 | $200 | $200 | $200 | $200 | $200 | $200 | $200 | $200 | $200 | $200 | $200 | |
Utilities | $100 | $100 | $100 | $100 | $100 | $100 | $100 | $100 | $100 | $100 | $100 | $100 | |
Insurance | $200 | $200 | $200 | $200 | $200 | $200 | $200 | $200 | $200 | $200 | $200 | $200 | |
Rent | $3,000 | $3,000 | $3,000 | $3,000 | $3,000 | $3,000 | $3,000 | $3,000 | $3,000 | $3,000 | $3,000 | $3,000 | |
Payroll Taxes | 15% | $3,750 | $3,750 | $3,750 | $3,750 | $3,750 | $3,750 | $3,750 | $3,750 | $3,750 | $3,750 | $3,750 | $3,750 |
Other | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Total Operating Expenses | $33,350 | $33,350 | $33,350 | $33,350 | $33,350 | $33,350 | $33,350 | $33,350 | $33,350 | $33,350 | $33,350 | $33,350 | |
Profit Before Interest and Taxes | ($33,350) | ($33,350) | $66,650 | ($33,350) | ($33,350) | $66,650 | ($33,350) | ($33,350) | $66,650 | ($33,350) | ($33,350) | $66,650 | |
EBITDA | ($33,350) | ($33,350) | $66,650 | ($33,350) | ($33,350) | $66,650 | ($33,350) | ($33,350) | $66,650 | ($33,350) | ($33,350) | $66,650 | |
Interest Expense | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Taxes Incurred | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Net Profit | ($33,350) | ($33,350) | $66,650 | ($33,350) | ($33,350) | $66,650 | ($33,350) | ($33,350) | $66,650 | ($33,350) | ($33,350) | $66,650 | |
Net Profit/Sales | 0.00% | 0.00% | 66.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 66.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 66.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 66.65% |
Pro Forma Cash Flow | |||||||||||||
Month 1 | Month 2 | Month 3 | Month 4 | Month 5 | Month 6 | Month 7 | Month 8 | Month 9 | Month 10 | Month 11 | Month 12 | ||
Cash Received | |||||||||||||
Cash from Operations | |||||||||||||
Cash Sales | $0 | $0 | $100,000 | $0 | $0 | $100,000 | $0 | $0 | $100,000 | $0 | $0 | $100,000 | |
Subtotal Cash from Operations | $0 | $0 | $100,000 | $0 | $0 | $100,000 | $0 | $0 | $100,000 | $0 | $0 | $100,000 | |
Additional Cash Received | |||||||||||||
Sales Tax, VAT, HST/GST Received | 0.00% | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
New Current Borrowing | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
New Other Liabilities (interest-free) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
New Long-term Liabilities | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Sales of Other Current Assets | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Sales of Long-term Assets | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
New Investment Received | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Subtotal Cash Received | $0 | $0 | $100,000 | $0 | $0 | $100,000 | $0 | $0 | $100,000 | $0 | $0 | $100,000 | |
Expenditures | Month 1 | Month 2 | Month 3 | Month 4 | Month 5 | Month 6 | Month 7 | Month 8 | Month 9 | Month 10 | Month 11 | Month 12 | |
Expenditures from Operations | |||||||||||||
Cash Spending | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | |
Bill Payments | $278 | $8,350 | $8,350 | $8,350 | $8,350 | $8,350 | $8,350 | $8,350 | $8,350 | $8,350 | $8,350 | $8,350 | |
Subtotal Spent on Operations | $25,278 | $33,350 | $33,350 | $33,350 | $33,350 | $33,350 | $33,350 | $33,350 | $33,350 | $33,350 | $33,350 | $33,350 | |
Additional Cash Spent | |||||||||||||
Sales Tax, VAT, HST/GST Paid Out | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Principal Repayment of Current Borrowing | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Other Liabilities Principal Repayment | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Long-term Liabilities Principal Repayment | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Purchase Other Current Assets | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Purchase Long-term Assets | $5,000,000 | $5,000,000 | $5,000,000 | $5,000,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Dividends | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Subtotal Cash Spent | $5,025,278 | $5,033,350 | $5,033,350 | $5,033,350 | $33,350 | $33,350 | $33,350 | $33,350 | $33,350 | $33,350 | $33,350 | $33,350 | |
Net Cash Flow | ($5,025,278) | ($5,033,350) | ($4,933,350) | ($5,033,350) | ($33,350) | $66,650 | ($33,350) | ($33,350) | $66,650 | ($33,350) | ($33,350) | $66,650 | |
Cash Balance | $15,074,722 | $10,041,372 | $5,108,022 | $74,672 | $41,322 | $107,972 | $74,622 | $41,272 | $107,922 | $74,572 | $41,222 | $107,872 |
Pro Forma Balance Sheet | |||||||||||||
Month 1 | Month 2 | Month 3 | Month 4 | Month 5 | Month 6 | Month 7 | Month 8 | Month 9 | Month 10 | Month 11 | Month 12 | ||
Assets | Starting Balances | ||||||||||||
Current Assets | |||||||||||||
Cash | $20,100,000 | $15,074,722 | $10,041,372 | $5,108,022 | $74,672 | $41,322 | $107,972 | $74,622 | $41,272 | $107,922 | $74,572 | $41,222 | $107,872 |
Other Current Assets | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Current Assets | $20,100,000 | $15,074,722 | $10,041,372 | $5,108,022 | $74,672 | $41,322 | $107,972 | $74,622 | $41,272 | $107,922 | $74,572 | $41,222 | $107,872 |
Long-term Assets | |||||||||||||
Long-term Assets | $0 | $5,000,000 | $10,000,000 | $15,000,000 | $20,000,000 | $20,000,000 | $20,000,000 | $20,000,000 | $20,000,000 | $20,000,000 | $20,000,000 | $20,000,000 | $20,000,000 |
Accumulated Depreciation | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Long-term Assets | $0 | $5,000,000 | $10,000,000 | $15,000,000 | $20,000,000 | $20,000,000 | $20,000,000 | $20,000,000 | $20,000,000 | $20,000,000 | $20,000,000 | $20,000,000 | $20,000,000 |
Total Assets | $20,100,000 | $20,074,722 | $20,041,372 | $20,108,022 | $20,074,672 | $20,041,322 | $20,107,972 | $20,074,622 | $20,041,272 | $20,107,922 | $20,074,572 | $20,041,222 | $20,107,872 |
Liabilities and Capital | Month 1 | Month 2 | Month 3 | Month 4 | Month 5 | Month 6 | Month 7 | Month 8 | Month 9 | Month 10 | Month 11 | Month 12 | |
Current Liabilities | |||||||||||||
Accounts Payable | $0 | $8,072 | $8,072 | $8,072 | $8,072 | $8,072 | $8,072 | $8,072 | $8,072 | $8,072 | $8,072 | $8,072 | $8,072 |
Current Borrowing | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Other Current Liabilities | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Subtotal Current Liabilities | $0 | $8,072 | $8,072 | $8,072 | $8,072 | $8,072 | $8,072 | $8,072 | $8,072 | $8,072 | $8,072 | $8,072 | $8,072 |
Long-term Liabilities | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Liabilities | $0 | $8,072 | $8,072 | $8,072 | $8,072 | $8,072 | $8,072 | $8,072 | $8,072 | $8,072 | $8,072 | $8,072 | $8,072 |
Paid-in Capital | $20,100,000 | $20,100,000 | $20,100,000 | $20,100,000 | $20,100,000 | $20,100,000 | $20,100,000 | $20,100,000 | $20,100,000 | $20,100,000 | $20,100,000 | $20,100,000 | $20,100,000 |
Retained Earnings | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Earnings | $0 | ($33,350) | ($66,700) | ($50) | ($33,400) | ($66,750) | ($100) | ($33,450) | ($66,800) | ($150) | ($33,500) | ($66,850) | ($200) |
Total Capital | $20,100,000 | $20,066,650 | $20,033,300 | $20,099,950 | $20,066,600 | $20,033,250 | $20,099,900 | $20,066,550 | $20,033,200 | $20,099,850 | $20,066,500 | $20,033,150 | $20,099,800 |
Total Liabilities and Capital | $20,100,000 | $20,074,722 | $20,041,372 | $20,108,022 | $20,074,672 | $20,041,322 | $20,107,972 | $20,074,622 | $20,041,272 | $20,107,922 | $20,074,572 | $20,041,222 | $20,107,872 |
Net Worth | $20,100,000 | $20,066,650 | $20,033,300 | $20,099,950 | $20,066,600 | $20,033,250 | $20,099,900 | $20,066,550 | $20,033,200 | $20,099,850 | $20,066,500 | $20,033,150 | $20,099,800 |
Fill-in-the-blanks and automatic financials make it easy.
No thanks, I prefer writing 40-page documents.
Discover the world’s #1 plan building software
Step-by-Step Guide to Understanding the Business Model of an Investment Bank
Learn Online Now
An investment bank is a financial intermediary that performs a variety of services, primarily:
Table of Contents
Mergers and acquisitions advisory services (m&a), sample merger process: transaction timeline, sales and trading division (s&t), retail brokerage and commercial banking, history of investment banking, financial crisis (post-2008).
Investment banks earn profit by charging fees and commissions for providing these services and other kinds of financial and business advice.
Learn More → Investment Banking Primer
Investment banks are middlemen between a company that wants to issue new securities and the buying public. So when a company wants to issue, say, new bonds to get funds to retire an older bond or to pay for an acquisition or new project, the company hires an investment bank. The investment bank then determines the value and riskiness of the business in order to price, underwrite, and then sell the new bonds. Banks also underwrite other securities (like stocks) through an initial public offering (IPO) or any subsequent secondary (vs. initial) public offering. When an investment bank underwrites stock or bond issues, it also ensures that the buying public – primarily institutional investors, such as mutual funds or pension funds, commit to purchasing the issue of stocks or bonds before it actually hits the market. In this sense, investment banks are intermediaries between the issuers of securities and the investing public. In practice, several investment banks will buy the new issue of securities from the issuing company for a negotiated price and promote the securities to investors in a process called a roadshow . The company walks away with this new supply of capital, while the investment banks form a syndicate (group of banks) and resell the issue to their customer base (mainly institutional investors) and the investing public. Investment banks can facilitate this trading of securities by buying and selling the securities out of their own account and profiting from the spread between the bid and the ask price. This is called “making a market” in a security, and this role falls under “Sales & Trading.”
Gillette wants to raise some money for a new project. One option is to issue more stock (through what’s called a secondary stock offering). They’ll go to an investment bank like JPMorgan, which will price the new shares (remember, investment banks are experts at calculating what a business is worth). JPMorgan will then underwrite the offering, meaning it guarantees that Gillette receives proceeds at ($share price * newly issued shares) less JPMorgan’s fees.
Then, JPMorgan will use its institutional salesforce to go out and get Fidelity and many other institutional investors to buy chunks of shares from the offering. JPMorgan’s traders will facilitate the buying and selling of these new shares by buying and selling Gillette shares out of their own account, thereby making a market for the Gillette offering.
You’ve probably heard of the term “Mergers and acquisitions” or M&A. It’s an important source of fee income for investment banks as the fee margin structure is substantially higher than most underwriting fees). This is why M&A bankers are some of the highest paid and highest profile bankers in the industry. As a result of much corporate consolidation throughout the 1990’s M&A advisory became an increasingly profitable line of business for investment banks. M&A is a cyclical business that was hurt badly during the financial crisis of 2008-2009, but rebounded in 2010, only to dip again in 2011. In any event, M&A will likely continue to be an important focus for investment banks.
JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Credit Suisse, BofA/Merrill Lynch, and Citigroup, are generally recognized leaders in M&A advisory and are usually ranked high in M&A deal volume . The scope of the M&A advisory services offered by investment banks usually relates to various aspects of the acquisition and sale of companies and assets such as business valuation, negotiation, pricing and structuring of transactions, as well as procedure and implementation. Investment banks also provide “fairness opinions” – documents attesting to the fairness of a transaction. Sometimes firms interested in M&A advice will approach an investment bank directly with a transaction in mind, while many times investment banks will “pitch” ideas to potential clients.
When an investment bank takes on the role of an advisor to a potential seller (target), this is called a sell-side engagement . Conversely, when an investment bank acts as an advisor to the buyer (acquirer), this is called a buy-side assignment . Other services include advising clients on joint ventures, hostile takeovers, buyouts, and takeover defense.
When investment banks advise a buyer (acquirer) on a potential acquisition, they also often help to perform what’s called due diligence to minimize risk and exposure to an acquiring company, and focus on a target’s true financial picture. Due diligence basically involves gathering, analyzing and interpreting the target’s financial information, analyzing historical and projected financial results, evaluating potential synergies and assessing operations to identify opportunities and areas of concern. Thorough due diligence enhances the probability of success by providing risk-based investigative analysis and other intelligence that helps a buyer identify risks – and benefits – throughout the transaction.
By submitting this form, you consent to receive email from Wall Street Prep and agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
The Investment Bank will identify potential merger partners and confidentially contact them to discuss the transaction. As potential partners respond, the Investment Bank will meet with potential partners to determine if a transaction makes sense. Follow-up management meetings with serious potential partners to establish terms
The Client’s and Merger Partner’s Board of Directors Meet to approve the transaction, while the Investment Bank (and the investment bank advising the Merger Partner) both deliver a Fairness Opinion attesting to the “fairness” of the transaction (i.e., nobody overpaid or underpaid, the deal is fair). All definitive agreements are signed.
Both companies prepare and file appropriate documents (Registration Statement: S-4), Schedule Shareholder Meeting. Prepare filings in accordance with antitrust laws (HSR) and begin preparing integration plans.
Both companies hold Shareholder Meeting to approve transaction
The merger, acquisition, or reorganization formally closes, with the agreed upon shares (and/or cash consideration) issued.
Institutional investors such as pension funds, mutual funds , university endowments, as well as hedge funds use investment banks in order to trade securities. Investment banks match up buyers and sellers as well as buy and sell securities out of their own account to facilitate the trading of securities, thus making a market in the particular security which provides liquidity and prices for investors. In return for these services, investment banks charge commission fees. In addition, the sales & trading arm at an investment bank facilitates the trading of securities underwritten by the bank into the secondary market .
Revisiting our Gillette example, once the new securities are priced and underwritten, JP Morgan has to find buyers for the newly issued shares. Remember, JP Morgan has guaranteed to Gillette the price and quantity of the new shares issued, so JP Morgan better be confident that they can sell these shares. The sales and trading function at an investment bank exists in part for that very purpose. This is an integral component of the underwriting process – in order to be an effective underwriter, an investment bank must be able to efficiently distribute the securities. To this end, the investment bank’s institutional sales force is in place to build relationships with buyers in order to convince them to buy these securities (Sales) and to efficiently execute the trades (Trading).
A firm’s sales force is responsible for conveying information about particular securities to institutional investors. So, for example, when a stock is moving unexpectedly, or when a company makes an earnings announcement, the investment bank’s sales force communicates these developments to the portfolio managers (“PM”) covering that particular stock on the “buy-side” (the institutional investor). The sales force is also in constant communication with the firm’s traders and research analysts to provide timely, relevant market information and liquidity to the firm’s clients.
Traders are the final link in the chain, buying and selling securities on behalf of these institutional clients and for their own firm in anticipation of changing market conditions and upon any customer request. They oversee positions in various sectors (traders specialize, becoming experts in particular types of stocks, fixed income securities, derivatives, currencies, commodities , etc…), and buy and sell securities to improve those positions. Traders trade with other traders at commercial banks, investment banks and large institutional investors.. Trading responsibilities include: position trading, risk management, sector analysis & capital management.
Traditionally, investment banks have attracted equity trading business from institutional investors by providing them with access to equity research analysts and the potential of being first in line for “hot” IPO shares that the investment bank underwrote. As such, research has traditionally been an essential supporting function to equity sales and trading (and represents a significant cost of the sales & trading business)
From 1932 until 1999 there was a law called The Glass-Steagall Act, which said that commercial banks can lend money, extend lines of credit, and open checking and savings accounts, while investment banks can underwrite securities, advise on M&A , and provide institutional brokerage services. Under the Glass Stegall Act, commercial banks and investment banks had to limit their respective activities to those which traditionally fell under those respective labels.
Late 1999 saw the repeal of the Depression-era Glass-Steagall Act, marking the deregulation of the financial services industry. This now allows commercial banks, investment banks, insurers, and securities brokerages to offer one another’s services. As such, many investment banks now offer retail brokerage (retail meaning the customers are individual investors rather than institutional investors) as well as commercial lending. For example, today you can open a checking account with JP Morgan via its Chase brand, while JP Morgan offers investment banking services and asset management.
Until 1999, one financial institution providing all of these services under one roof was technically not allowed (although many post-enactment loopholes basically neutered the law long before 1999). It is not an understatement to say that deregulation has transformed the financial services industry, with the repeal paving the way for mega-mergers and consolidation in the financial services industry. In fact, many blame the repeal of the Glass-Steagall as a contributing factor to the financial crisis in 2008-9.
Undoubtedly, investment banking as an industry in the United States has come a long way since its beginnings. Below is a brief review of the history:
The greatest global financial crisis since the Great Depression was triggered in 2008 by multiple factors including the collapse of the subprime mortgage market, poor underwriting practices, overly complex financial instruments, as well as deregulation, poor regulation, and in some cases a complete lack of regulation. Perhaps the most substantial piece of legislation that emerged from the crisis is the Dodd-Frank Act, a bill that sought to improve the regulatory blind spots that contributed to the crisis, by increasing capital requirements as well as bringing hedge funds, private equity firms, and other investment firms considered to be part of a minimally regulated “shadow banking system.” Such entities raise capital and invest much like banks but escaped regulation which enabled them to over-leverage and exacerbated system-wide contagion. The jury is still out on Dodd-Frank’s efficacy, and the Act has been heavily criticized by both those who argue for more regulation and those who believe it will stifle growth .
“Pure” investment banks like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley traditionally benefited from less government regulation and no capital requirement than their full service peers like UBS, Credit Suisse, and Citi. During the financial crisis, however, the pure investment banks had to transform themselves to bank holding companies (BHC) to get government bailout money. The flip-side is that the BHC status now subjects them to the additional oversight.
Investment banking advisory fees in 2010 were $84 billion globally, the highest level since 2007. Although the official scorecard isn’t in, based on press releases from the largest financial institutions, 2011 will see a significant decline in fees. The future of the industry is a highly debated topic. There is no question that the financial services industry is going through something pretty significant post-crisis. Many banks had near-death experiences in 2008 and 2009, and remain hobbled. 2011 saw much lower profitability for many of the largest financial institutions. This directly impacts bonuses for even the entry level investment banker, with some pointing to smaller fractions of ivy league graduating classes going into finance as a harbinger of a fundamental shift . That being said, those trying to break into the industry will find that compensation is still high compared to other career opportunities. Also, the job function of an M&A professional has not dramatically changed, so the professional development opportunities haven’t changed.
Enroll in The Premium Package : Learn Financial Statement Modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO and Comps. The same training program used at top investment banks.
Very Informative
Glad to hear it, James!
We're sending the requested files to your email now. If you don't receive the email, be sure to check your spam folder before requesting the files again.
Everything you need to master financial and valuation modeling: 3-Statement Modeling, DCF, Comps, M&A and LBO.
The Wall Street Prep Quicklesson Series
Get instant access to video lessons taught by experienced investment bankers. Learn financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel shortcuts.
A business model helps shape a company's marketing and sales plans, its growth potential, and its ability to attract investors. Investors use business models to assess a company’s profit potential while entrepreneurs use them to shape their ideas into a sound business structure.
A business model provides a framework for a company's monetization strategies. It focuses on defining the audience (customer segment), unique selling proposition, brand positioning, method of delivery, and distribution channels to create a profit-making formula.
Business models shape all aspects of a company's development and growth. Therefore, they may change over time to adapt to new marketplace opportunities, technologies, or distribution channels.
With many types of business models, companies may implement several models simultaneously to maximize profits.
Typical business models include:
User-generated content
Bricks and mortar retailer
Direct sales or multi-level marketing (MLM)
Advertising based
Diversified model
e-Commerce retail
Subscription model
Freemiums (giving away a free product to sell more later)
Two-sides marketplace
Manufacturing
Distributor
Entrepreneurs launching a new company often compare various business models and select one that is likely to generate the best revenues.
Some models offer more significant risks, such as user-generated content. While it has a lower startup cost than building a traditional publisher's website, the risk of lawsuits from copyright infringement, low-quality content that degrades SEO potential, and fickle search engine algorithm changes can make user-generated content a risky venture with uncertain profit potential.
SaaS (“software as a service”) companies have high startup costs but more stable long-term profit potential. SaaS companies rely on cloud-based software delivered by subscription to multiple customers. Innovation, customer service, and a stable subscription base are success drivers for higher long-term rewards.
Successful entrepreneurs utilize the business model canvas to compare different business models and select the one that leverages their strengths for the highest profits.
A franchise exists when a parent corporation creates a unique product, strong brand, and replicable business model, then sells it to others to own and operate independently. The parent company licenses the franchise (or a replicable business model) to independent business owners.
In return, franchisees must adhere to the rules set forth by the parent franchise company. They must use the required products and methods of production, adhere to strict advertising and marketing policies, and run their business per the franchise's requirements.
Typical franchises include popular eateries such as McDonald's, Dunkin' Donuts, and Baskin Robbins, as well as service-based franchises such as Edward Jones Investments, Great Clips, and Visiting Angels home-care nursing assistance.
A brick and mortar business model depends upon a physical store location that sells products and services solely through the storefront. These types of businesses were the norm until mail order, with the internet creating new distribution channels.
Direct sales or multi-level marketing (MLM) companies follow a business model that relies heavily on networks of distributors who recruit more people to become distributors. Each distributor receives a commission on products sold and distributors may also receive a commission from the network of distributors they have personally recruited into the company.
Typical direct sales businesses include Tupperware, Avon, Mary Kay, LulaRoe, doTerra Essential Oils, Beach Body, and many more.
An advertising-based business model generates revenue solely from the advertisers who either pay for advertising space (print or digital) or time (television or radio ads). The product itself is given away for free to reach the largest number of people.
Telephone books were some of the earliest advertising-based business models. These (and similar directories) offered convenient sources of information before the internet and earned profits from advertisers who paid to have their businesses showcased through display ads. Broadcast television and traditional broadcast radio are great examples of advertising-based companies.
New advertising-based models include blogs and websites which earn profits from digital advertising. Like broadcast radio and television, the content itself is available to view at no charge. Advertising revenues generate these businesses' gross profits.
As companies find new markets, discover new distribution channels, or develop new products, companies can change their original business model or add additional ones.
For example, McDonald's began as a barbecue founded by brothers Mac and Maurice McDonald. In 1954, Ray Kroc, a salesman, found that the McDonald brothers had created a simple yet effective formula for producing low-cost, tasty hamburgers and shakes. With Kroc's help, the company shifted from a brick-and-mortar model to a franchise.
Today, McDonald's owns over 36,889 outlets in 120 countries worldwide. The corporation reports that 90% of these are franchises.
In the early 2000s, Alexander Osterwalder invented the business model canvas to help businesses develop and analyze potential business frameworks.
The business model canvas features nine sections or 'building blocks' that define customer segments, value propositions, revenue streams, distribution channels, customer relationships, key activities, resources, partners, and cost structures. The model also guides users through the major areas of consideration for a business's structure and strategy.
Entrepreneurs often look to existing business models for ideas and inspiration. Below, several common business model examples offer ideas as to how each framework generates profits for owners and/or investors.
The SaaS business model features centrally-hosted software that can be licensed by multiple customers. Customers pay a subscription fee to utilize the software. Cloud computing – linking numerous networked servers through internet hosts – enables SaaS companies to scale quickly and offer software to multiple customers at once.
Because SaaS is subscription-based, revenue tends to be steady and recurring. SaaS companies can instead focus on building product loyalty and enhancing subscription models.
Amazon is run according to a diversified business model . This model includes online stores (which account for 52% of Amazon revenues), as well as physical store locations, AWS services like site hosting, third-party sellers, subscription services, and advertising revenue.
Begun solely as a bookseller, Amazon quickly realized that their actual 'product' was an user-friendly e-commerce store. This unique selling point – combined with an extensive warehouse network that enabled them to ship products quickly from multiple locations – created the perfect environment for adding countless product categories.
Once Amazon became the “everything store”, a natural business model extension was included in the advertising model. This encouraged book publishers and product sellers to advertise their goods for a premium position on the Amazon product search results. Third-party sellers have continued to capitalize on the enormous volume of web traffic the site attracts, enabling smaller business owners to reach more customers.
Uber runs according to a 'two-sided' marketplace business model. The company acts as the middleman/broker between two sides: drivers and those who need a ride. Uber created a sophisticated and streamlined platform that easily and quickly connects someone with a need (riders) to someone who can fill that need (drivers). The company derives profits from each transaction, taking a percentage from gross booking.
Consumers' increasing reliance on smartphones and the on-demand economy converged to make Uber’s two-sided marketplace business model incredibly lucrative. Their unique selling point is convenience: Consumers can request a driver anywhere, anytime, using an app quickly downloaded to their smartphones. Unlike hailing a cab, they don't have to stand out in the cold, rain, or snow waiting until an available taxi happens to pass by.
Combining multiple business models (or using a variety of business models) in a single company is called a diversified business model. As companies mature, they often shift from their original business model to a diversified model to embrace technological advances, open new markets, or add product categories.
Walmart began as a “dime store” offering high-value, low priced products in a single brick and mortar location. Gradually, Sam Walton expanded the number and location of brick and mortar stores. The company eventually shifted to a diversified model incorporating e-commerce, brick and mortar, and third-party sellers through their online shopping portal.
AAA offers subscription-based automotive roadside service but also produces travel guides. These guides are partially funded through advertising, as well as a review and endorsement service for hospitality businesses (e.g. restaurants, hotels).
Publishers sell magazines and newspapers via subscription. In addition, they may use three or more additional models to generate profits: retail (individual copies available for purchase at newsstands or supermarkets), advertising revenue, and freemiums (giving away free copies to doctors and dentists for their waiting rooms).
Business models offer insights into a company's long-term profit potential. Investors tend to focus on several areas before choosing companies to add to their portfolios: This is especially true of market size, product demand, scalability, and the ability to add new channels.
These components have the most significant potential to impact net income , which is the accurate way investors measure a company's wealth-generating potential. If net income increases, the company is doing well and can be a good investment.
Business models include insights into the marketplace, like customer demand, potential for reaching new customers, and expansion opportunities. These insights help investors and analysts understand whether a company has long-term profit potential.
Breyer Model Horse sells realistic and beautifully detailed horse figurines. For decades, collectors have displayed, shown, and competed with their figures for prizes. The company's current business model has expanded to multiple toys for children (e.g. plush toys and mobiles, play barns, posable rider dolls).
By expanding their product line beyond collectibles, the company has increased its customer base to both the collector market and parents of small children. They improved their opportunity to increase gross profit while sustaining their USP as a brand for people who love horses.
Scalability refers to a company's ability to expand or grow with the same amount of resources. If a company is limited by geography, customer demand, service delivery, or product availability, its potential for growth and profitability is also limited unless the business model shifts.
Taxi companies provide drivers, cars, and dispatch services. They’re limited, however, by the number of cab drivers employed, medallions issued by the city, cars available, and people seeking rides in New York City.
Conversely, Uber can scale exponentially because its product is its app (rather than providing drivers and vehicles). As long as people need rides and drivers require a flexible income source, Uber can continually scale to meet demand.
5 Money Moves That Made Warren Buffett Rich Warren Buffett is perhaps the most famous investor in the world, amassing a fortune of over $80 billion during his lifetime. His ...
Sean Quinn was once the richest man in Ireland. In 2008, Forbes estimated Quinn's riches reached $6 billion. Today, however, he owes Anglo Irish Bank $2.7 billion and in ...
A nearly 2% pullback for the S&P 500 shouldn’t be of much concern. The fact that index had risen for five straight months prior to the pullback suggests a bit of ...
Learn how to invest in startups, from finding strategic opportunities to evaluating the risks and rewards.
Identify high-growth startups and industry trends so you know where to invest.
Investing in a startup demands more than just financial acumen — it requires a deep exploration of the market and entrepreneurial landscape. While it’s a risky endeavor for some, it can also be thrilling and purposeful, offering high personal and financial rewards and putting you at the forefront of innovation.
Whether you’re a seasoned investor looking to diversify or a newcomer exploring the potential of startup investments, these insights and actionable steps will help you navigate the complexities of this high-potential, high-risk endeavor.
Let’s start by reviewing the various ways you can invest in startups. These include traditional avenues like angel investing and IPOs to contemporary options such as crowdfunding and private equity trusts. Each approach offers distinct considerations, letting you choose the strategy that best serves your needs and goals.
Angel investing is a form of early-stage investment where affluent individuals provide capital to startups in exchange for equity. Angel investors typically invest their own funds, and they play a crucial role in the startup ecosystem by supporting entrepreneurs during their initial stages of development. In addition to offering financial backing, they also provide valuable mentorship, industry connections, and strategic guidance to founders.
Angel investments are made in the seed or early stages of a company, when there’s both high risk and potential for significant returns. Successful angel investors possess a keen eye for promising ventures, a strong network within the entrepreneurial community, and the ability to navigate the uncertainties inherent in the startup landscape. Both AngelList and Angel Investment Network are popular platforms for connecting entrepreneurs with investors for startups .
Crowdfunding platforms allow a large number of investors to contribute small amounts of money to a project or small business. Platforms like Kickstarter and Indiegogo enable entrepreneurs to showcase their ideas and products to a global audience, attracting funding from backers who may receive rewards, early access or discounted products in return.
Equity crowdfunding platforms, such as SeedInvest and Crowdcube , take this concept a step further, allowing backers to invest in startups and receive equity shares. This democratization of investment provides an alternative to traditional funding models, empowering both startups and a diverse range of investors to participate in the early stages of innovative ventures.
Venture capital involves professional firms pooling funds from various investors to invest in startups with high growth potential. Venture capitalists play a pivotal role in the startup ecosystem by injecting substantial amounts of capital into companies poised for rapid expansion.
VCs typically engage in multiple rounds of funding and, in return, receive equity in the startups they invest in. Beyond the financial investment, venture capitalists often bring strategic insights, industry expertise, and a vast network that can significantly contribute to the growth of the startups in their portfolio.
While venture capital offers startups the resources needed to scale, it also comes with the expectation of substantial returns. This symbiotic relationship between investors and startups is a cornerstone of innovation and growth within the tech industry.
Startup accelerators and incubators are programs designed to support the growth and development of early-stage companies. In exchange for equity, these programs offer startups access to mentorship, resources, office space and sometimes initial funding.
Accelerators typically have a fixed-duration program that culminates in a demo day, where startups pitch their businesses to a room full of potential investors. Y Combinator and Techstars are well-known examples of such programs.
Incubators, on the other hand, provide more extended support and a collaborative environment for startups to mature. These initiatives not only offer financial assistance but also foster a culture of innovation and collaboration that is invaluable for startups navigating the challenges of building a sustainable business in competitive industries.
Initial Public Offerings represent a critical milestone in the lifecycle of a startup, signaling its transition from a private to a public company. When a startup decides to go public, it offers shares to the general public through a regulated stock exchange for the first time.
Investors, including institutional funds, retail investors and even individual enthusiasts, can participate in the IPO process. This presents a unique opportunity to invest in a company during its early stages of being publicly traded, allowing investors to be part of the company’s growth story.
Pro Tip: Get the most up-to-date information on IPOs with a quick search on Crunchbase. You can also customize your search using filters for IPO date, valuation and more. Take a look at this list of recent IPOs .
Private equity trusts pool capital from multiple investors and deploy it across a range of private companies, often spanning various industries and stages of development. These trusts are managed by professional fund managers with expertise in selecting and managing investments in the private markets. Investing in private equity trusts is a way for individuals to gain exposure to a diversified portfolio of private companies, including startups.
Direct investments involve high-net-worth individuals, family offices or institutions making direct equity investments in startups without going through a formal venture capital fund. This approach enables investors to have a more hands-on role in their investment decisions and often involves a direct relationship with the startup founders. Direct investments can take place at various stages of a startup’s development, from the seed stage to later rounds of financing.
Investors and shareholders interested in selling or buying shares in private companies can use dedicated platforms such as SharesPost , EquityZen and other private marketplaces. This offers liquidity to early investors, employees or other stakeholders who hold shares in startups, allowing them to sell their positions before a company goes public or is acquired. Additionally, this enables new investors to enter into established startups, offering an alternative investment avenue outside traditional fundraising rounds.
Now that you understand the different ways you can invest in startups, let’s go over the steps for investing, from start to finish. From understanding the fundamentals of the startup ecosystem to making informed investment decisions and actively managing your portfolio, these steps will equip you with the knowledge you need to get started as a startup investor.
If the world of startup investing is new to you, start by learning the basics. This includes familiarizing yourself with both the startup ecosystem and industry trends.
First, you’ll need to know about the various stakeholders and their roles. This includes the founders, angel investors, venture capitalists, accelerators and incubators we discussed in the section above.
Next, learn about the startup lifecycle, from ideation and seed funding to Series A, B, and beyond. Each stage comes with its own set of challenges, opportunities and investment dynamics that you should be familiar with.
In addition, don’t forget to keep tabs on industry trends – a must for any serious investor. This will help you understand which industries are up-and-coming, which are undergoing significant shifts, and which are and aren’t worth your money.
Pro Tip: Check out the Crunchbase Unicorn Board , which tracks the most valuable companies in the word, and the Crunchbase Emerging Unicorn Board , which tracks companies that are on the path to unicorn status. Both lists are updated real-time and provide invaluable data on market trends and hot companies.
We mentioned above that investing in startups is inherently risky, and it’s important to understand what those risks are before getting started. It’s also important to understand the potential rewards and how they stack up against those risks so that you can make the right investment decisions.
The risks of investing in startups include:
All that said, many people dedicate their careers to startup investing because they find it to be incredibly rewarding. These rewards include:
As an investor, understanding the potential pitfalls and benefits ensures a more nuanced approach to building and managing a startup-focused portfolio.
Once you familiarize yourself with how startup investing and funding work, you’ll need to take an inward look at your own readiness as an investor. This self-assessment involves evaluating various aspects of your financial standing, risk tolerance and time commitment. Ask yourself the following questions to decide whether startup investing is right for you.
Financial readiness
Risk tolerance
Time commitment
Alignment with overall goals
Once you’ve thought through these questions and assessed your readiness, it’s time to move on to the next step: outlining your goals as an investor.
This stage is all about clarifying what, exactly, you hope to gain from investing in startups. Your investment objectives will dictate which startups you choose to invest in, how you want to invest, and how much risk you’re willing to take.
Are you primarily seeking to grow your wealth through potential high returns? This is one common reason to invest in startups. If this is your goal, set expectations around your desired level of risk and the timeline over which you expect to see returns.
Beyond financial gains, some startup investors are driven by the desire to support innovative ideas and contribute to the growth of groundbreaking ventures. This may be an attractive goal if you find fulfillment in driving cutting-edge development in tech, or if you want to contribute to social and environmental causes through impact investing.
Of course, you can also seek a combination of financial returns and supporting ideas that align with your values. You might look for ventures that not only have the potential for profitability but also contribute positively to our world. Whatever your goals, defining them clearly will help you make investment choices based on your broader vision for impact and financial growth.
While no one can say for sure whether a startup will succeed or fail, you can gather information to ensure that your investment decision ultimately aligns with your objectives. Go into your research with the following factors in mind:
Now that you know what to look for, it’s time to identify the companies you might want to invest in.
Start by going to Crunchbase , a comprehensive database that provides detailed information on startups, their funding rounds, their leadership team, other investors and industry trends. You can use the search filters to narrow down your focus based on location, industry, company size, funding stage, funding date and more. This will surface companies that match the criteria you’re looking for.
Importantly, this data also reveals key growth signals that indicate the health of a particular startup. Here are some tips for how to use these insights to inform your investment decision:
You should monitor this data on an ongoing basis, while continually checking for new startups that match your preferred criteria. You can do this by setting automatic alerts on Crunchbase so that you get immediate updates when a company raises new funding, undergoes changes in leadership and more. These sample lists will help you get started:
Pro Tip: Build custom searches to find the types of companies you’re looking for, including recently funded companies and growing startups. For more details on how to use Crunchbase’s best-in-class company data to inform your investment strategy, learn how to find investments on Crunchbase .
In addition to conducting data-driven research, directly engaging with the people behind the company allows you to gain a more complete understanding of their mission and vision, culture and potential challenges. One effective way to initiate these connections is by attending industry events, conferences and networking meetups. These forums provide valuable opportunities to interact with founders, key team members and fellow investors.
Social media platforms, particularly LinkedIn and X (formerly Twitter) , have also emerged as powerful tools for connecting with startups and their founders. Follow the profiles of startups you find intriguing, actively participate in relevant discussions and reach out via direct message. Many founders are receptive to engaging with potential investors who express genuine interest in their endeavors. Establishing these connections, either in person or online, will enrich your understanding of the startup landscape, position you as an engaged and proactive investor, and create a foundation for ongoing dialogue with key stakeholders.
As you conduct research and build connections, you’ll identify startups you’re seriously considering investing in. You’ll need to estimate the valuation of these startups in order to ultimately make a smart investment decision.
While calculating an exact valuation can be challenging, especially for early-stage startups, investors often employ methods that provide a reasonable estimate. One commonly used approach is the comparable company analysis, where the startup’s key metrics, such as revenue, growth rate and market potential, are compared to those of similar companies that have undergone funding rounds. This method helps in establishing a valuation benchmark, offering insights into where the startup stands relative to its peers.
Another approach is the discounted cash flow analysis, which involves estimating the startup’s future cash flows and discounting them back to present value. While more complex, DCF allows for a more detailed exploration of the startup’s financial projections and potential return on investment.
You’ll also need to conduct a thorough and meticulous due diligence process to mitigate risks and make well-informed decisions. This phase involves a comprehensive examination of various aspects of the startup, ranging from its financial health and market positioning to the competency of its leadership team.
Financial due diligence is critical – it involves an in-depth analysis of the startup’s financial statements, revenue model, and historical and projected financial performance. Scrutinize the funding history, including the terms and conditions of previous rounds, to get insights into the startup’s capital structure and investor relations.
Equally important is operational due diligence, where investors delve into the day-to-day operations of the startup. Understanding the scalability of the business model, potential operational challenges and the efficiency of internal processes is crucial for predicting future success.
Finally, legal due diligence ensures compliance with regulations, assessment of intellectual property rights and identification of any potential legal liabilities. It’s a good idea to consult experts in these fields to guide you through the due diligence process.
We mentioned the different ways to invest in startups at the beginning of this article, and now it’s time to select your preferred investment method. This is a pivotal decision, as it involves a careful consideration of your risk tolerance, financial goals and level of involvement.
One common avenue is direct investments, where investors directly contribute capital to a startup in exchange for equity. This method provides a hands-on approach, allowing investors to actively participate in the growth and strategic decisions of the startup.
Angel investors, in particular, play a crucial role in this category, often providing not just capital but valuable mentorship and guidance to early-stage startups. Multiple angel investors may come together through angel investor networks, where they can leverage their combined expertise and resources for a more impactful support system.
For those seeking a more diversified and passive approach, investing through venture capital funds can be an attractive option. These platforms pool capital from multiple investors to fund a portfolio of startups, offering a broader exposure to different ventures.
Another method gaining popularity is crowdfunding, which democratizes the investment landscape by allowing individuals to contribute smaller amounts of capital to startups. Equity crowdfunding platforms provide access to a wide range of investment opportunities, making startup investing more accessible to a broader audience.
Additionally, for those looking to invest in startups that have already matured, IPOs offer the chance to buy shares of a startup as it goes public.
Each method comes with its own set of advantages and considerations, and the choice ultimately depends on factors such as risk appetite, investment horizon and the desire for direct involvement in the startup ecosystem. Take another look at the first section of this guide to review other ways to invest, and chat with a mentor to help you make the right investment decision for your goals.
Let’s say you’ve chosen a startup to invest in and are ready to move forward. The negotiation stage is a critical juncture in the startup investment process, where terms are hammered out, and the foundation for the investor-founder relationship is established. Successful negotiation requires a delicate balance between securing favorable terms and fostering a collaborative partnership.
Start by understanding the key elements of the deal, including the valuation, equity stake and any additional preferences attached to the investment. This proposal often comes in the form of a term sheet, which covers essential aspects such as the valuation, investment amount, ownership stake and any protective provisions or rights the investor may seek. Review the term sheet prior to negotiations so that you have a clear framework for your discussion.
As negotiations unfold, clear communication is paramount. As an investor, you should express their expectations, whether it’s a seat on the board, information rights or involvement in strategic decisions. Founders, in turn, may present their vision for the company and their reasoning behind the proposed terms.
Negotiations may involve give-and-take, with both parties working towards a consensus that aligns with their respective goals. Consider consulting a skilled attorney specializing in startup investments to review term sheets, agreements and regulatory compliance and ensure that your interests are protected.
Once the deal is sealed, your journey as a startup investor will enter a new phase — one that involves active management and strategic involvement. You’ll need to regularly engage with the startup’s leadership team and stay informed about its progress. Attend board meetings or investor updates to gain insights into the company’s strategic decisions, financial performance and any challenges it may be facing. Being an engaged investor allows you to offer support and guidance when needed while ensuring alignment with the startup’s trajectory.
Beyond active involvement, managing your investment also entails staying attuned to market dynamics and industry trends. The startup ecosystem is ever-changing, and factors such as evolving technology, regulatory changes or shifts in consumer behavior can impact a startup’s prospects. Regularly reassess your investment strategy and consider whether adjustments are needed based on the startup’s performance and changes in the external environment.
Finally, make sure to seek professional advice throughout the research, decision-making and management process. Engage with financial advisors, particularly those with expertise in venture capital and startup investments, as you explore potential opportunities, assess risks versus returns and manage your portfolio. Additionally, consider consulting with mentors or seasoned investors at various stages of your investment journey, as their firsthand experience can help you navigate challenges and make strategic decisions.
Are you still wondering how much, exactly, you should be investing? It’s important to keep in mind that there’s not only the question of how much you should invest, but how much you can .
For accredited investors, who meet specific income and net worth requirements, the limits are often dictated by personal financial capacity and risk tolerance. Angel investors contribute an average of $25,000 to $100,000 per deal, with a 20-30% average return . That said, this number can vary greatly, and returns, of course, aren’t guaranteed.
If you’re a non-accredited investor going the crowdfunding route, regulations will dictate how much you can invest. Crowdfunding platforms impose certain restrictions on investment amounts within a specific timeframe. As of 2023, non-accredited investors with an annual income or net worth less than $124,000 can invest a maximum of 5% of those amounts (whichever is greater), while those with an annual income and net worth greater than $124,000 can invest up to 10%. Refer to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for the most up-to-date information.
Not only should you strike a balance between ambitious investment goals and prudent risk management, but you should also familiarize yourself with the rules and regulations surrounding different investment strategies.
At this point, you’ve learned everything you need to know about how to invest in startups. Now comes the next question: how do you actually make money from your investments?
There are several ways to generate returns. One primary avenue is equity appreciation — as the startup progresses and achieves key milestones, the value of your equity stake can increase substantially. This appreciation is often realized during exit events, such as acquisitions by larger companies or when the startup goes public through an IPO. Successful exits can lead to significant financial gains for investors.
In addition to equity appreciation, some startups may distribute profits through dividends. However, it’s essential to note that this is less common, particularly in the early stages of a startup’s development when the focus is often on reinvesting profits for further growth. Investors should carefully assess a startup’s financial structure and policies regarding profit distribution.
Active involvement in the growth and strategic decisions of the startup is an indirect, but equally important, way to make more money off your investment. Providing strategic guidance, leveraging industry expertise and fostering valuable connections can contribute to the overall success of the startup and, consequently, generate greater returns.
If you’re ready to start finding startups to invest in , take a look at these well-regarded platforms and websites. These sites can help you discover new companies, engage with key stakeholders and ultimately invest in startups of interest.
Crunchbase is a comprehensive platform for investors seeking robust, best-in-class data on startups. It offers detailed profiles of companies, including funding history, information about the leadership team and industry trends, and is a critical tool for discovering and researching startups. As an investor, you can use Crunchbase to track funding rounds, identify key players in specific industries and gain insights into the competitive landscape. Crunchbase also delivers personalized recommendations and lets you set custom alerts to monitor companies of interest. Learn more about finding investments with Crunchbase.
AngelList is a prominent platform connecting startups with investors, particularly angel investors. It offers a curated list of startups seeking funding and facilitates the investment process. Investors on AngelList can discover early-stage startups, review their pitches and connect directly with founders. The platform streamlines the investment process, making it accessible to a broader network of angel investors.
StartEngine is an equity crowdfunding platform that empowers both accredited and non-accredited investors to discover and invest in a diverse range of startups and emerging companies. Through StartEngine, individuals can access investment opportunities with relatively lower minimum investment requirements, fostering a more inclusive approach to startup investing.
Crowdcube enables individuals to invest in small companies in return for equity or an annual return. It provides investors with access to a variety of startups, spanning different industries and geographical locations, and facilitates international investment opportunities for those looking to diversify their portfolios.
The ACA is an organization that connects accredited angel investors. While not a platform in the traditional sense, it serves as a network that enables investors to discover opportunities and collaborate on investment deals. The ACA fosters a community of angel investors, providing opportunities for collaboration, knowledge-sharing and co-investment. It is a valuable resource for investors seeking to engage with like-minded individuals.
These platforms and sites serve as valuable tools for investors seeking to explore and engage with startup investment opportunities. Use these tools, along with your own network of entrepreneurs and investors, to stay well-informed about a startup’s progress, industry trends and market dynamics.
Grow your revenue with Crunchbase, the all-in-one prospecting solution. Start your free trial.
No products in the cart.
Return to shop
The Goldman Sachs business model is centered around providing four primary financial services — Investment Banking, Global Markets, Asset Management, and Consumer & Wealth Management — to individuals, corporations, governments, and institutional clients across the globe. Goldman Sachs is not your ordinary investment bank. It’s a powerhouse of strategic thinking, financial expertise, and unwavering commitment to excellence.
Goldman Sachs has built an empire on its ability to identify and capitalize on market trends. It uses innovative financial instruments and unparalleled industry knowledge to generate profits for itself and its clients. At the heart of Goldman Sachs’ business model lies a relentless pursuit of success. Whether navigating global finance’s complexities, pioneering new investment strategies, or leveraging cutting-edge technology, the firm is always at the forefront of change.
But what truly sets Goldman Sachs apart is its people. With a talent pool that’s second to none, the firm attracts the brightest and most driven minds from around the world. A common goal unites these individuals: to push the boundaries of what’s possible and deliver superior results for their clients. In short, Goldman Sachs is a company that’s constantly pushing forward, innovating, and looking for ways to create value for its stakeholders. It’s a model of success that’s been honed over decades and will continue to shape the future of finance for years to come.
Goldman Sachs is one of the world’s leading investment banks, providing a wide range of financial services to clients around the globe. Founded in 1869 by Marcus Goldman, a German-born immigrant who established the firm as a small commercial paper trading business in New York City, Goldman Sachs has since evolved into a global financial powerhouse with a reputation for innovation, risk management, and client service. Headquartered in New York City, Goldman Sachs has a global presence with offices in major financial centers worldwide, including London, Tokyo, Hong Kong, and Singapore. The firm operates in more than 40 countries and has over 30,000 employees.
Goldman Sachs’ business model is based on four primary pillars: Investment Banking, Global Markets, Asset Management, and Consumer & Wealth Management. In Investment Banking, Goldman Sachs provides advisory services for mergers and acquisitions, underwriting services for equity and debt securities, and structured finance solutions for clients in various industries. The firm offers trading and market-making services across various asset classes, including equities, fixed income, currencies, and commodities in Global Markets.
In Asset Management, Goldman Sachs manages and invests assets for institutional and individual clients, offering solutions such as mutual funds, private equity, hedge funds, and other alternative investments. Lastly, in Consumer & Wealth Management, the firm provides banking and investment services to high-net-worth individuals and institutional clients, focusing on personalized advice and tailored solutions.
One of the hallmarks of Goldman Sachs is its ability to adapt to changing market conditions and rapidly evolve its business strategies to stay ahead of the curve. This agility is reflected in the firm’s diverse revenue streams, which range from investment banking and trading to asset management and consumer banking. This diversity has helped Goldman Sachs weather the storms of economic uncertainty and remains a top player in the finance industry for over 150 years.
However, Goldman Sachs has faced its fair share of successes and failures. In the early years, the firm played a significant role in helping finance the US economy’s growth, including providing capital for the expansion of the railroad industry. The firm also participated in some of the most significant financial events of the 20th century, including the founding of the World Bank and the initial public offering (IPO) of Ford Motor Company. The company has continued to innovate and expand its business, but it has also faced criticism for contributing to the financial crisis of 2008. The firm has been accused of contributing to the crisis by involving complex and risky financial instruments like mortgage-backed securities.
Despite these challenges, Goldman Sachs has maintained its reputation as one of the world’s most prestigious financial institutions. Goldman Sachs’ strong emphasis on innovation and its ability to adapt to changing market conditions sets it apart from other investment banks. The firm has pioneered technology and digital finance and is willing to experiment with new business models and strategies.
Additionally, Goldman Sachs greatly values building deep and lasting relationships with its clients. This focus on client service has helped the firm to establish a loyal client base and maintain its position as a top player in the finance industry. By taking the time to truly understand the unique needs and objectives of each individual or institution it serves, Goldman Sachs can provide bespoke solutions that deliver real value and drive long-term success.
In conclusion, the Goldman Sachs business model is a testament to the power of innovation, adaptability, and client-centricity. The firm’s ability to navigate changing market conditions and provide customized solutions has allowed it to remain a top player in the finance industry for over a century and a half. Despite facing significant challenges, Goldman Sachs has continued to evolve and grow, cementing its place in the banking industry.
Goldman Sachs is a publicly-traded company, which means it is owned by shareholders who buy and sell its stock on various stock exchanges worldwide. As of May 2023, the largest shareholders of Goldman Sachs are institutional investors, such as mutual funds, pension funds, and hedge funds. The current CEO of Goldman Sachs is David Solomon, who took over the role in October 2018, succeeding Lloyd Blankfein.
Goldman Sachs’ mission statement is “to advance sustainable economic growth and financial opportunity globally.”
Goldman Sachs is a multinational investment bank providing financial services to corporations, governments, and individuals. It is widely recognized as a leader in the financial services industry and has built a reputation for delivering innovative and effective solutions to its clients. Here’s how Goldman Sachs works and what differentiates it from other financial institutions.
The first key area of focus for Goldman Sachs is investment banking. The company offers its clients a wide range of investment banking services, including underwriting and distributing securities, advising on mergers and acquisitions, and helping companies raise capital. It is also involved in various trading activities, including buying and selling stocks, bonds, and other financial instruments. Additionally, Goldman Sachs manages assets for various clients, including individuals, institutions, and governments. The company’s asset management division includes mutual funds, hedge funds, and private equity.
Asides from asset management, Goldman Sachs, provides insights and recommendations to clients about various financial markets and securities. The company’s research team comprises highly experienced analysts who combine data and analysis to provide clients, traders, and portfolio managers with valuable insights about potential investment opportunities. Furthermore, the company also manages various types of risk, including market, credit, and operational risks.
As a financial institution, Goldman Sachs makes money through investment banking, trading, asset management, securities service, and consumer banking. Below are more details on each income stream;
Goldman Sachs works with clients to help them raise capital through various financial products such as initial public offerings (IPOs), bonds, and other types of securities. The bank also advises clients on risk management, strategic planning, and mergers and acquisitions.
Goldman Sachs is one of the largest trading firms in the world, with a strong presence in equities and fixed-income markets. The company uses sophisticated algorithms and trading strategies to profit from market fluctuations. Additionally, Goldman Sachs engages in market-making activities, acting as a middleman between buyers and sellers of securities.
Goldman Sachs manages assets for many clients, including pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, and high-net-worth individuals. The company offers a variety of investment strategies, including passive index-tracking funds, active equity funds, and alternative investments such as hedge funds and private equity.
In addition to providing clearing, settlement, and custody services, Goldman Sachs offers financing and securities lending to other financial institutions. These services help clients manage their positions and provide liquidity to the markets.
In recent years, Goldman Sachs’ consumer banking arm, Marcus, has rapidly grown. In addition to personal loans and savings accounts, Marcus offers credit cards and other financial products. The bank uses sophisticated underwriting models and digital platforms to offer competitive rates and a seamless customer experience. Additionally, Marcus partners with other fintech companies to offer their products through its platform.
The Goldman Sachs Business Model can be explained in the following business model canvas :
To download Goldman Sachs Business Model Canvas today just enter your email address!
Goldman Sachs’ customer segments are:
Goldman Sachs’ value propositions are:
Value Propositions for Individuals:
Value Propositions for Corporations:
Value Propositions for Governments:
Value Propositions for Financial Institutions:
Goldman Sachs’ channels are:
Goldman Sachs’ customer relationships comprise:
Goldman Sachs’ revenue streams are:
Goldman Sachs’ key resources include:
Goldman Sachs’ key activities include:
Goldman Sachs’ key partners include:
Goldman Sachs’ cost structure includes:
Below are some of Goldman Sachs’ competitors:
Despite its successes, Goldman Sachs is not without its weaknesses. Also, there are some opportunities the company can leverage to strengthen its position in the market while eliminating the threats that stand in its way. Below, there is a detailed swot analysis of Goldman Sachs.
Below, there are Goldman Sachs’ strengths:
Here are Goldman Sachs’ weaknesses:
Below, there are Goldman Sachs’ opportunities:
Lastly, here are Goldman Sachs’ threats;
Goldman Sachs is a leading global financial institution with a reputation for expertise, innovation, and a talented workforce. However, the firm faces challenges such as competition, regulatory oversight, economic uncertainty, and reputation risk. To remain competitive and capitalize on opportunities, Goldman Sachs can focus on sustainable investing, digital transformation, expansion into emerging markets, and providing M&A advisory services. Overall, the firm’s success will depend on its ability to navigate these challenges and adapt to changes in the global financial landscape.
Related posts.
The HBO Business Model is mostly a subscription-based model that charges users to watch its [...]
When we think of video game companies making money, like the Riot Games business model [...]
The SpaceX business model is based on making and launching rockets into Earth orbit. The [...]
The Revolut business model revolves around disrupting the traditional banking industry by providing users with [...]
Carvana is one of the most popular online used car retailers in the United States [...]
The Chevron business model has become a cornerstone example in the oil and gas industry, [...]
The Duolingo Business Model revolves around creating an interactive language-learning platform accessible to people worldwide. [...]
Chick-fil-A is a typical example of a company that believes in “what is worth doing [...]
Username or email address *
Password *
Remember me Log in
Lost your password?
According to Weill and his co-authors , the four business activity typologies and the four asset typologies can be integrated into a chart that categorizes fourteen different possible business models.
Note: Both Creator/Human Assets and Distributor/Human Assets categories are omitted from this model. This is because both categories are illegal and immoral. A Creator/Human Assets business model is where a person or business enslaves another human being and sells that person to a buyer. A Distributor/Human Assets business model is where a person or business buys and sells slaves. Both business models were practiced in the past, but are now considered highly illegal and morally repugnant in virtually all nations and cultures around of the world. In contrast, the two other “Human asset” categories are legal and widespread. People can rent out their time, effort and labor to others in a voluntary exchange (Contractor) or be a Broker between Contractors and prospective employers (temp agencies or headhunters).
The fourteen possible business model archetypes are examined below in detail.
Creator makes physical assets and sells directly to the consumer
Description: The business goal of this type of Manufacturer is to create physical products and sell them directly to customers. These manufacturers can sell their products directly to consumers through either a live salesperson, via ecommerce , or through a Broker. The keys to this business model are that 1) Manufacturers own the asset (product) until the end user purchases it from them and 2) the Manufacturers either own or control their participation in the sales channels they use to reach buyers.
Examples: Oakley, Nike, Dell, Apple , Nintendo
Advantages: Increased margins, brand building, and building personal relationships with customers. Apple is an example of a large, global company that sells its products directly to consumers through its Apple Stores.
Key Challenges: Creating products that fill a customer need and effectively distributing those products to consumers. This means the business must focus on two big and often divergent missions (production and consumer marketing).
Creator makes physical assets and sells to Distributors or Retailers
Description: The business goal of this type of Manufacturer is to create physical products and sell them to wholesale or retail intermediaries who then sell those products to consumers.
Examples: Intel, Kimberly Clark, Sony, Chiquita, Johnson & Johnson
Advantages: These Manufacturers have the ability to focus on creating and producing products efficiently. The Manufacturer can gain wide commercial exposure through multiple sales channels. The Manufacturer can also transfer the asset’s property rights to others quickly and move large volumes of product per sale. This strategy is often good for mass produced hit products or commodities.
Key Challenges: Manufacturer must accept lower margins. Manufacturer has less control over its brand and customer relationships.
Creator sells directly to a customer
Description: The business goal of this type of Creator is to create an intangible good and sell it to others. The sale of the Intangible Asset can be conducted directly by the Inventor or through Distributors or Brokers. The key aspect of this business model is the Inventor sells the absolute rights of ownership to the Intangible Asset to another (this is not a limited license or rental). This type of transaction sometimes happens when a company in financial distress (or bankruptcy) sells the intellectual property it created to stay or become solvent.
Examples: This business model is virtually non-existent for a public company.
Advantages: Potential for high margins.
Key Challenges: Considerable business risk in terms of time, effort and money; often very difficult to find buyers; difficult to scale.
Description: An Entrepreneur is either a company or individual that creates and sells companies. The individuals who create and sell companies are either “serial entrepreneurs” or active early-stage investors. Entities that create and sell companies are incubators, venture capital firms and innovative companies. The measure of success in this category is maximizing ROIC – Return on Invested Capital. Founders of businesses who do not sell their companies are not counted in this business model.
Examples: This business model ( creating a company then selling it ) is very rarely pursued by public companies as a business model.
Advantages: Potentially, a successful entrepreneur can get fantastic returns on their investment of time and capital.
Key Challenges: Risking significant equity assets in starting and growing a venture, overcoming barriers of entry; companies can be illiquid, possibility of bankruptcy.
Description: A Wholesaler/Retailer is a Distributor who buys and sells physical assets without changing the fundamental nature of those assets. The value Wholesaler/Retailers bring to the marketplace is they specialize in connecting Manufacturers and consumers. Wholesaler/Retailers aggregate products from various Manufacturers, and use distribution and logistics economies of scale to offer those products and services to customers. The primary business goals of Wholesaler/Retailers are to create and execute superior logistics in order to maximize margins. The primary tension in this business is keeping product and service margins as high as possible while successfully competing against both established competitors and new market entrants.
Examples: Wal-Mart, Nordstrom, Macy’s, Amazon
Advantages: The barriers of entry for niche Wholesaler/Retailers are quite low; these business models can be systematized.
Key Challenges: Barriers of entry to become a low-cost leader or differentiated Wholesaler/Retailer are often high due to the large infrastructure and logistics networks needed to leverage economies of scale and/or economies of scope.
Description: An Intellectual Property (IP) Trader buys and sells intangible assets. This may include firms that buy and sell copyrights, patents, trademarks, mobile device applications (mobile apps), digital currencies, domain names, etc. If a company uses this business model, it is more likely than not that company also uses the Intellectual Property Landlord business model.
Examples: This business model is very rarely pursued by public companies as a business model.
Advantages: Intellectual Property Traders can have low fixed costs.
Key Challenges: Finding willing buyers and sellers of the intangible assets can be difficult and the transaction costs can be steep. The task of properly valuing intangible assets is quite difficult.
Description: A Financial Trader buys and sells financial assets without significantly altering them. Financial Traders mainly buy and sell stocks and securities. Financial Traders invest in a wide range of private or public companies and securities .
Examples: Vanguard, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Stanley.
Advantages: Financial Traders can achieve high profitability by recognizing undervalued or overvalued assets and employing an appropriate trading strategy to exploit these opportunities.
Key Challenges: Financial Traders can suffer huge losses due to a systemic financial crisis. The majority of Financial Traders cannot achieve better sustained returns than the overall market.
Description: Where a person or entity either creates or purchases a physical asset and sells (rent, lease or admission) a limited right to a customer to use that property. This is a widely used business model and prominent in the following industries: real estate rental and leasing, accommodation, transportation and entertainment or recreation.
Examples: Hilton Hotels, Zipcar, Netflix, Hertz Rental Car.
Advantages: Often the income from renting or leasing activities can be passive. Acquiring physical assets can be a significant barrier of entry for market entrants. Real estate asset prices can rise over time and can be used as a source of financing for business operations.
Key Challenges: The capital costs of acquiring assets to rent or lease to others is usually significant and is a substantial barrier of entry for a new market entrant. Furthermore, the assets to be rented or leased must have and maintain steady market demand.
An Intellectual Property Landlord is a person or entity that either creates or buys intellectual property assets (trademarks, patents, trade secrets, copyrights…) and then sells a limited right to use that intellectual property to customers. There are three major subtypes of this business model:
a. Publisher
Description: Publishers provide limited use of information assets (software, video, audio, databases…) in return for a purchase price, subscription or license fee. The Publisher grants the customer certain limited rights to use a copy of an information asset (the limitation could be time, scope or amount). The Publisher retains the right to make and sell additional copies of the information asset to other customers.
Examples: Disney, HBO, Random House, Microsoft, Apple (iTunes).
Advantages: The costs to create additional copies of an information asset are usually small to negligible. Copyrights and trademarks provide some legal protection for the information assets.
Key Challenges: Generating information products is usually labor intensive. Attracting and retaining customers is critical for success as a Publisher.
b. Brand Manager – Franchisor
Description: A Brand Manager (Franchisor) leases the limited use of a trademark or other elements of a brand (trade secrets, process knowledge) to a customer (Franchisee).
Examples: McDonald’s, Wendy’s, Curves.
Advantages: The Brand Manager business model can allow a successful company clone their business model, allowing their brand to expand rapidly and extract continuing rents from franchisees.
Disadvantages: Franchisors lack direct ownership of their Franchisees’ assets. Franchisors lack direct control over their Franchisees and must rely on contracts to constrain their business decisions.
c. Attractor
Description: An Attractor publishes information IP products to gain the attention of potential customers. Once the Attractor has the attention of potential customers, it taps one or more revenue models to monetize that customer attention (advertising, freemium…).
Examples: New York Times, NBC.
Advantages: This is a potentially lucrative business model for Attractors who develop and offer valuable or popular content.
Disadvantages: An Attractor relies on network effects and multi-sided platforms where one customer segment subsidizes the other. It is often difficult for a company to correctly gauge how one customer segment should subsidize the activities of the other.
A Financial Landlord lends liquid financial assets (cash) to a customer under certain conditions that the customer promises to fulfill. There are two major subtypes of this business model.
Description: A lender provides cash to a customer on the condition that, within a predetermined timeframe, the customer agrees to pay back the amount borrowed plus a fee (interest). In a sense, a Lender rents money to a borrower. Often the Lender
Examples: Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Lending Tree.
Advantages: A Lender can hedge its risk in lending to a borrower by requiring the borrower to pledge collateral (or other terms) to protect against a potential loan default by the borrower. If a borrower meets all of its loan obligations, the Lender will earn a predictable stream of cash flows.
Key Challenges: Lenders must be experts in determining the credit worthiness of a borrower. There is generally a high level of competition among companies who use this business model. Interest rate risk can erode profits. This is a highly regulated industry and its regulatory framework could be a significant barrier of entry for a new market entrant.
b. Insurance
Description: Insurers provide their customers conditional financial reserves in exchange for a fee (premium). A customer cannot have access to these monies unless the customer sustains a predetermined category of loss.
Examples: AIG, Farmers.
Advantages: Steady and predictable cash flows.
Key Challenges: Risk management – catastrophic events and natural disasters can overwhelm an insurer. Also this industry is heavily regulated and could present a significant barrier of entry for a new market entrant.
Description: A Contractor sells a service provided primarily by people to a customer. Common contractor services are, but not limited to: consulting, construction, education, tax and legal services, personal care, package delivery, live entertainment and healthcare . Customers pay Contractors usually on a fee-for-service basis where the fee is usually (but not always) based on the amount of time the services require. In a sense, all employees are contractors.
Examples: Accenture, Federal Express.
Advantages: Often low barriers of entry; potentially low capital intensity.
Key Challenges: Companies that employ this business model are usually difficult to scale. Credentials and certifications can be a significant barrier of entry. Businesses that employ this business model are employee-centric (their labor generates the revenue) and sometimes difficult to organize and manage.
Note: A Contractor and Physical Landlord can be confused – Physical Landlords can provide human services that are necessary for their assets’ value propositions. The differentiator between the two business models is what kind of asset is essential to the nature of the service being provided. For example, a bus company such as Greyhound would be classified as a physical landlord because the essence of the service is to transport people from one place to another. Conversely, a maritime shipping company would be classified as a contractor because the essence of the service provided is the transportation of goods from one place to another.
Description: Financial Brokers match buyers and sellers of financial assets. This business model includes insurance brokers, large stock brokerage firms, and large investment banks that underwrite IPOs.
Examples: Etrade, Charles Schwab, Ameritrade, Goldman Sachs.
Advantages: Market participants can be highly profitable; there are huge opportunities for economies of scale using this business model.
Disadvantages: The success of this business model requires network effects – the more people who use the platform increases the overall value of the platform. This can be exceedingly difficult to establish for a new market entrant.
Description: A Physical Broker matches buyers and sellers of physical assets. A physical broker may connect buyers and sellers of physical assets (eBay) or owners and renters of physical assets (Airbnb).
Examples: eBay, Priceline, Century 21, Airbnb.
Advantages: There is a significant opportunity to create market opportunities using this business model for Physical Brokers who facilitate exchanges between owners of physical assets and people who want to rent those assets. Network effects can establish powerful barriers of entry for an established Physical Broker firm.
Disadvantages: New firms who attempt to use this business model may face significant barriers of entry due to the network effects of established brokerage firms.
An Intellectual property (IP) Broker matches buyers and sellers of intangible assets or owners and renters of intangible assets.
Examples: Valassis. There are very few large firms who employ this business model.
Advantages: There are future market opportunities for using this business model because new and different types of IP assets are being created all the time. An example of a relatively new form of IP that can be brokered is phone apps.
Disadvantages: It is difficult to determine the value of intangible assets . Buyers and sellers of intellectual property have a hard time agreeing on IP asset prices. This can inhibit deal volume for IP Brokers.
A Human Resources (HR) Broker matches buyers and sellers of human services.
Examples: LinkedIn, GlassDoor, Odesk.
Advantages: This business model benefits from the increasing trend of companies hiring contractors for project work. Network effects can create a hugely profitable business through facilitating the buying and selling of labor.
Disadvantages: New market entrants can have great difficulty overcoming established firm’s barriers of entry (network effects).
Covid-19 impact on us private capital raising activity in 2020, healthcare 2021: trends, m&a & valuations, 2021 outlook on media & telecom m&a transactions.
Reduce the risk factor, increase the reward factor, and generate meaningful returns.
If you make smart decisions and invest in the right places, you can reduce the risk factor, increase the reward factor, and generate meaningful returns. Here are a few questions to consider as you get started.
Where your work meets your life. See more from Ascend here .
Are you a saver or spender?
Our summer 2024 issue highlights ways to better support customers, partners, and employees, while our special report shows how organizations can advance their AI practice.
New research suggests that the stock market particularly values business models based on innovation and intellectual property..
Image courtesy of Flickr user alvazer.
Why are investors so bullish on companies like Apple and Disney? Is it financial metrics, great management, industry prowess, good investor relations or good timing? Probably all of these. But something else may be at work, too. In research we conducted at the MIT Sloan School of Management, we found that the stock market consistently values certain types of business models more highly than others. Specifically, we found that in recent years, investors have favored business models focusing on licensing intellectual property (such as Walt Disney’s business model) and a certain kind of highly innovative manufacturing (such as Apple’s).
We developed a framework that includes 14 types of business models. (Surprisingly, we found there is no universally accepted definition of the important concept of a business model.) Then, using data from Compustat, we classified all the more than 10,000 companies that are publicly traded on U.S. exchanges within the framework by identifying the percentage of each company’s revenue generated through each of the 14 business models; we used a combination of manual classification and a custom-developed rule-based software program. By classifying companies’ revenue into these 14 business models, a new picture emerged of not only individual companies, but businesses more generally. The individual classifications were then aggregated to construct an index for each business model. Those indices then allowed us to compare total stock market returns — as measured by changes in stock price plus dividends — for different business models in the U.S. markets over a 12-year period, from 1997 through 2009. The results provide insight into investor treatment of various business models. In particular, the findings underscore the importance of innovation and intellectual property in the U.S. economy.
T.W. Malone, P. Weill, R.K. Lai, V.T. D’Urso, G. Herman, T.G. Apel and S.L. Woerner, “ Do Some Business Models Perform Better than Others? ” working paper 4615-06, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, Massachusetts, May 18, 2006.
Our business model framework is based on defining the types of assets a company sells and the rights it grants customers to use those assets. We define four asset types and four ways companies manage asset rights to generate revenue.
Peter Weill is a senior research scientist and chairman of the Center for Information Systems Research at the MIT Sloan School of Management. Thomas W. Malone is the Patrick J. McGovern Professor of Management and the founding director of the MIT Center for Collective Intelligence at the MIT Sloan School of Management. Thomas G. Apel is a research affiliate with the Center for Information Systems Research. The research team also included George Herman, Stephanie L. Woerner, Steve Kahl, Richard K. Lai, Victoria T. D’Urso and more than 20 MIT undergraduate, graduate and postgraduate students. This research was funded by the National Science Foundation (grant number IIS-0085725), the MIT Center for Collective Intelligence and the MIT Center for Information Systems Research.
Add a comment cancel reply.
You must sign in to post a comment. First time here? Sign up for a free account : Comment on articles and get access to many more articles.
Last updated: March 2024
Business models distill the potential of a business down to its essence. Companies across every industry and at all stages of maturity need business models. Some rely on lengthy processes to build complicated models, while others move quickly to articulate the basics and take action. Either way, having the discipline to work through this planning tool forces internal alignment.
You must build something that real people with real needs will find value in and pay for — otherwise you do not have a lasting business. Brian de Haaff Aha! co-founder and CEO
For established enterprises, a business model is often a living document that is reviewed and adapted over the years. For companies launching products and services or entering new markets, a business model helps ensure that decisions are tied back to the overall business strategy . And for early-stage startups, a simple one-page business model enables founders to explore the mechanics of a business and how you anticipate it will be successful.
Defining and documenting a business model is an essential exercise. Whether you are starting a new venture, expanding into a new market, or shifting your go-to-market strategy , you can use a business model to capture fundamental assumptions about the opportunity ahead and tactics for addressing challenges.
Forward-thinking companies integrate their business model into all aspects of the organization — from recruiting talent to motivating employees. That is why many choose tools that make it possible to quickly build and share a business model. In Aha! software, for example, there are multiple ways to build a model and connect it to everyday work. One of the quickest ways is by using our whiteboard template — featured below.
Start using this template now
You can also try a similar template that is built into the product strategy section of Aha! Roadmaps . Or you can download free Excel and PowerPoint business model templates in this guide .
This article covers the basics of business models, from core concepts to best practices. Jump ahead to any section:
Definition of a business model
Business model vs. business plan.
Different types of business models
Pros and cons of different models
Analyzing competitor business models
How to build a business model
A business model defines how a company will create, deliver, and capture value.
A business model answers questions that are crucial for strategic decision-making and business operations. Creating a business model for your startup or product means identifying the problem you are going to solve, the market that you will serve, the level of investment required, what products you will offer, and how you will generate revenue. Pricing and costs are the two levers that affect profitability within a given business model.
A business model is part of your overall business strategy. Some business models extend beyond economic context and include value exchange in social or cultural terms — such as the intangible impact the company will have on a community or industry. The process of constructing and changing a business model is often referred to as “business model innovation.”
15 elements of a brilliant business strategy
This is why innovation programs fail
There are three main areas of focus in a business model: value proposition, value delivery, and value capture. The proposition outlines who your customers are and what you will offer. The delivery details how you will organize the business to deliver on the proposition. And the capture is a hypothesis for how the proposition and delivery will align to return value back to the business.
The components of a business model include everything the organization needs to document and internalize so that the team can implement all three value focuses. This includes the market in which you operate, organizational strengths and challenges , essential elements of your product or products, and how you will generate revenue.
Below are some components to include when you create a business model:
Vision and mission : Overview of what you want to achieve and how you will do it.
Objectives: High-level goals that will support your vision and mission, along with how you will measure success.
Customer targets and challenges: Description of target customers (written as archetypes or personas ) and their pain points.
Solution: How your offering will solve customer pain points.
Differentiators: Characteristics that differentiate your product or service.
Pricing: What your solution will cost and how it will be sold.
Positioning and messaging: How you will communicate the value of your offering to customers.
Go-to-market: Proposed approach for launching new offerings and services.
Investment: Resources required to introduce your offering.
Growth opportunity: Ways that you will grow the business over time.
Positioning vs. messaging
What is a business roadmap?
Business models and business plans are both elements of your overall business strategy. But there are key differences between a business model and a business plan.
| A business model captures your hypothesis for how your business will generate revenue and — charging a price for an offering you create at a sustainable cost. A business model will include a brief overview of what you offer and to whom. |
| A business plan drops down one level to show how you will implement the business model. It includes specifics such as operational practices, experience and structure of the , milestones to be reached on a set timeline, and comprehensive financial projections. |
A business model is seen as foundational and will not usually be reworked in reaction to shorter-term shifts — whereas a business plan is more likely to be updated based on changes in the economy or market.
Related: Business plan templates
Innovation is about more than the products or technologies that you build. The way that you operate your business is a critical factor in how you stand apart in a crowded marketplace. The benefit of building a business model is that you can use the exercise to expose and exploit what makes your company unique — why choosing your offering is better for customers than any alternatives and how you will grow the business over time.
Many people associate business models with lengthy documents that describe a company’s problem, opportunity, and solution in the context of a two-to-five-year forecast. But business models do not need to be a long treatise.
A one-pager is just as effective for distilling and communicating the most important elements of your business strategy. The concise format is useful for sharing with broader teams so that everyone understands the high-level approach. Done right, a business model can become a touchstone for the team by outlining core differentiators to promote and defend in the market.
Related: A more comprehensive business model builder
There are many different types of business models. Below are some of the most common business models with example companies for reference (take note of the companies that appear in several categories):
|
|
| Displays advertisements from other companies to a specific audience. |
| Pays a small commission to others to promote goods. |
| Sells multiple products to a single customer for a fixed price. |
| Sells labor (intellectual or physical) for a set price (hourly or by project). |
| Builds on existing successful business and receives a percentage of earnings from franchises who invest in, operate, and promote new locations. |
| Provides a limited free product with a more advanced option that users can pay to access. |
| Sources raw materials to produce finished goods that are sold to retailers or directly to customers. |
| Charges customers based on actual usage of a product. |
| Procures and sells products manufactured by others — the last step of a supply chain. |
| Offers a product that requires ongoing payment for a fixed time period. |
| Hosts a platform for other companies to do business in exchange for compensation |
Did you keep track of the companies that appeared in several of the business model examples? Good. You now have a grasp of how complex enterprises with vast portfolios of products and services often employ many business models within the same organization.
Consider a company like Apple, which manufactures and sells hardware products as well as offering cloud-storage, streaming subscriptions, and a marketplace for other applications. Amazon, whose offerings range from retail (with the acquisition of Whole Foods) to marketplace (Amazon.com) to subscription services (Amazon Prime and Amazon Music) to affiliate, also features in different categories. Each division or vertical will have a distinct business model that reflects the nuances of how it operates while also supporting the corporate business model.
Related: The product manager vs. the portfolio product manager
Some types of business models work better for certain industries than others. For example, software-as-a-service (SaaS) companies often rely on freemium business models. This makes it easy for potential users to experience the value of the product and incentivizes paid conversions via access to additional features.
Many social media platforms make money through advertising. By providing full access to the platform for free, these companies attract more users. In turn, this creates a more valuable audience for advertisers and increases revenue for the business.
|
|
|
| Simple and transactional | Customers expect return on investment |
| Low barrier to entry for customers | Lack of control over branding |
| Sell more products at once | Reliance on discounting |
| Simple billing | Requires pipeline of new leads |
| Low initial cost | Difficult to maintain quality |
| Rapid user growth | Path to profit is uncertain |
| Control and innovation opportunities | High capital investment |
| Low barrier of entry for customers | Challenges with customer retention |
| More profit margin | High competition |
| Continual revenue stream | High customer churn |
Business analysts and investors will often evaluate a company’s business model as part of due diligence for funding or market research . You can apply the same tactics to analyze a competitor’s business model — with a few caveats.
Public companies are subject to reporting requirements. This means that the business must regularly disclose financial and performance data to the public — these disclosures occur quarterly and annually. The data includes everything from gross revenue, operating costs and losses, cash flow and reserves, and leadership discussions of business results. Designed to protect and inform investors, these reports can provide you with the information you need to understand the basics of the company’s business model and how well it is performing against the model.
Private companies are not required to reveal business data publicly. Investors or partners may be privy to certain aspects of the company’s performance, but it can be difficult to understand exactly what is happening from the outside. Some analysts or business websites will attempt to “size” a business or market by looking at a variety of factors — including the number of employees, volume of search terms related to the core offering, estimated customer base, pricing structure, partnerships, advertising spend, and media coverage.
Once you have identified relevant alternatives to your offering and gathered all of the information that you can find, a good way to analyze a competitor’s business model is to conduct a competitive analysis.
You do not want to spend too much time thinking about other companies when you could be focused on your own. A simple SWOT analysis is a helpful way to map out strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats that were revealed during your research.
Competitor analysis templates
Below are three types of business model layouts available in Aha! software that you can use to succinctly assess what is possible and what challenges could arise for your business.
Articulate the foundation of your product or service in a whiteboard-style format. The focus is on capturing key elements like why the solution is worth buying (messaging), pain points of the buyers (customer challenges), and ways you will grow the business (growth opportunities).
This business model canvas included in Aha! Roadmaps uses drag-and-drop components within a flexible layout. You can rename or hide components as needed. And you can create as many strategic models in your workspace as you would like.
How to craft a product strategy in Aha! Roadmaps
How to use the strategic model template in Aha! Roadmaps
Free Excel and PowerPoint business model templates
Similar to the business model canvas, the lean canvas in Aha! Roadmaps takes a problem-focused approach to create an actionable business plan. It is most commonly used by startups and entrepreneurs to document business assumptions. The focus is on quickly creating a concise, single-page business model. It documents nine elements, including customer segments, channels used to reach customers, and the ways you plan to make money.
Crafting a business model is part of establishing a meaningful business strategy. But a business model is essentially a hypothesis — you need to test yours to prove that it will actually provide value. Many startup founders especially underestimate the costs and timeline for reaching profitability.
1. Identify your target market
Who will benefit from your offering? What characteristics do prospective customers share?
2. Define the problem you will solve
What is the problem that you are solving? What are the pain points of your potential customers?
3. Detail your unique selling proposition (USP)
What will you build and how will you support it?
4. Create a pricing strategy
How much will you charge for your offering? What factors will go into choosing your price point?
5. Develop a marketing approach
How will you market your product and reach target customers? What channels will you choose for go-to-market?
6. Establish operational practices
How will you streamline processes and procedures to reduce overhead and fixed costs?
7. Capture path to profitability
How will your business generate revenue? What level of investment will be required and what fixed costs exist?
8. Anticipate challenges
Who are your competitors? What opportunities and threats exist for your business?
9. Validate your business model
Was your hypothesis correct? Does your business model solve a problem the way you thought it would?
10. Update to reflect learnings
What can you do differently in the future to ensure greater success?
Your business model will ultimately guide your organization and influence your product roadmap. Give it the deep thought it deserves — questioning your core assumptions about how you will generate value and how your team will work towards achieving shared goals.
You need a winning strategy, a clear roadmap, and a strong team.
Make adjustments as plans change, show progress, and create tailored views for different audiences.
Capture and share high-level observations about competitors in your space.
The possibility for substantial financial gains is one of the main advantages of an investment company. As the company expands and gains customers, it has the potential to generate large fees and commissions based on investment portfolios.
Are you looking for the same rewards? Then go on with planning everything first.
Need help writing a business plan for your investment company? You’re at the right place. Our investment company business plan template will help you get started.
Free Business Plan Template
Download our free investment company business plan template now and pave the way to success. Let’s turn your vision into an actionable strategy!
Writing an investment company business plan is a crucial step toward the success of your business. Here are the key steps to consider when writing a business plan:
An executive summary is the first section planned to offer an overview of the entire business plan. However, it is written after the entire business plan is ready and summarizes each section of your plan.
Here are a few key components to include in your executive summary:
Ensure your executive summary is clear, concise, easy to understand, and jargon-free.
Say goodbye to boring templates
Build your business plan faster and easier with AI
Plans starting from $7/month
The business overview section of your business plan offers detailed information about your company. The details you add will depend on how important they are to your business. Yet, business name, location, business history, and future goals are some of the foundational elements you must consider adding to this section:
Describe what kind of investment company you run and the name of it. You may specialize in one of the following investment businesses:
This section should provide a thorough understanding of your business, its history, and its future plans. Keep this section engaging, precise, and to the point.
The market analysis section of your business plan should offer a thorough understanding of the industry with the target market, competitors, and growth opportunities. You should include the following components in this section.
Here are a few tips for writing the market analysis section of your investment company business plan:
The product and services section should describe the specific services and products that will be offered to customers. To write this section should include the following:
In short, this section of your investment business plan must be informative, precise, and client-focused. By providing a clear and compelling description of your offerings, you can help potential investors and readers understand the value of your business.
Writing the sales and marketing strategies section means a list of strategies you will use to attract and retain your clients. Here are some key elements to include in your sales & marketing plan:
Overall, this section of your investment company business plan should focus on customer acquisition and retention.
Have a specific, realistic, and data-driven approach while planning sales and marketing strategies for your investment business, and be prepared to adapt or make strategic changes in your strategies based on feedback and results.
The operations plan section of your business plan should outline the processes and procedures involved in your business operations, such as staffing requirements and operational processes. Here are a few components to add to your operations plan:
Adding these components to your operations plan will help you lay out your business operations, which will eventually help you manage your business effectively.
The management team section provides an overview of your investment business’s management team. This section should provide a detailed description of each manager’s experience and qualifications, as well as their responsibilities and roles.
This section should describe the key personnel for your investment company, highlighting how you have the perfect team to succeed.
Your financial plan section should provide a summary of your business’s financial projections for the first few years. Here are some key elements to include in your financial plan:
Be realistic with your financial projections, and make sure you offer relevant information and evidence to support your estimates.
The appendix section of your plan should include any additional information supporting your business plan’s main content, such as market research, legal documentation, financial statements, and other relevant information.
Use clear headings and labels for each section of the appendix so that readers can easily find the necessary information.
Remember, the appendix section of your investment firm business plan should only include relevant and important information supporting your plan’s main content.
The Quickest Way to turn a Business Idea into a Business Plan
Fill-in-the-blanks and automatic financials make it easy.
This sample investment company business plan will provide an idea for writing a successful investment company plan, including all the essential components of your business.
After this, if you still need clarification about writing an investment-ready business plan to impress your audience, download our investment company business plan pdf .
Frequently asked questions, why do you need an investment company business plan.
A business plan is an essential tool for anyone looking to start or run a successful investment business. It helps to get clarity in your business, secures funding, and identifies potential challenges while starting and growing your business.
Overall, a well-written plan can help you make informed decisions, which can contribute to the long-term success of your investment company.
There are several ways to get funding for your investment company, but self-funding is one of the most efficient and speedy funding options. Other options for funding are:
Crowdfunding, angel investors.
Apart from all these options, there are small business grants available, check for the same in your location and you can apply for it.
There are many business plan writers available, but no one knows your business and ideas better than you, so we recommend you write your investment company business plan and outline your vision as you have in your mind.
A lot of research is necessary for writing a business plan, but you can write your plan most efficiently with the help of any investment company business plan example and edit it as per your need. You can also quickly finish your plan in just a few hours or less with the help of our business plan software .
About the Author
Upmetrics Team
Upmetrics is the #1 business planning software that helps entrepreneurs and business owners create investment-ready business plans using AI. We regularly share business planning insights on our blog. Check out the Upmetrics blog for such interesting reads. Read more
No Risk – Cancel at Any Time – 15 Day Money Back Guarantee
Streamline your business planning process with Upmetrics .
Written by Dave Lavinsky
Over the past 20+ years, we have helped over 1,000 entrepreneurs and business owners create business plans to start and grow their investment companies. On this page, we will first give you some background information with regards to the importance of business planning. We will then go through an investment company business plan template step-by-step so you can create your plan today.
Download our Ultimate Business Plan Template here >
A business plan provides a snapshot of your investment company as it stands today, and lays out your growth plan for the next five years. It explains your business goals and your strategy for reaching them. It also includes market research to support your plans.
If you’re looking to start an investment company, or grow your existing investment company, you need a business plan. A business plan will help you raise funding, if needed, and plan out the growth of your investment company in order to improve your chances of success. Your business plan is a living document that should be updated annually as your company grows and changes.
With regards to funding, the main sources of funding for an investment company are bank loans and angel investors. With regards to bank loans, banks will want to review your business plan and gain confidence that you will be able to repay your loan and interest. To acquire this confidence, the loan officer will not only want to confirm that your financials are reasonable, but they will also want to see a professional plan. Such a plan will give them the confidence that you can successfully and professionally operate a business. Investors, grants, personal investments, and bank loans are the most common funding paths for investment companies.
How to write a business plan for an investment company.
If you want to start an investment company or expand your current one, you need a business plan. Below we detail what you should include in each section of your own business plan:
Your executive summary provides an introduction to your business plan, but it is normally the last section you write because it provides a summary of each key section of your plan.
The goal of your Executive Summary is to quickly engage the reader. Explain to them the type of investment company you are operating and the status. For example, are you a startup, do you have an investment company that you would like to grow, or are you operating investment companies in multiple markets?
Next, provide an overview of each of the subsequent sections of your business plan. For example, give a brief overview of the investment company industry. Discuss the type of investment company you are operating. Detail your direct competitors. Give an overview of your target customers. Provide a snapshot of your marketing plan. Identify the key members of your team. And offer an overview of your financial plan.
In your company analysis, you will detail the type of investment company you are operating.
For example, you might operate one of the following types of investment companies:
In addition to explaining the type of investment company you will operate, the Company Analysis section of your business plan needs to provide background on the business.
Include answers to question such as:
In your industry analysis, you need to provide an overview of the investment industry.
While this may seem unnecessary, it serves multiple purposes.
First, researching the investment industry educates you. It helps you understand the market in which you are operating.
Secondly, market research can improve your strategy, particularly if your research identifies market trends.
The third reason for market research is to prove to readers that you are an expert in your industry. By conducting the research and presenting it in your plan, you achieve just that.
The following questions should be answered in the industry analysis section of your business plan:
The customer analysis section of your business plan must detail the customers you serve and/or expect to serve.
The following are examples of customer segments: companies or employees in specific industries, couples with double income, families with kids, small business owners, etc.
As you can imagine, the customer segment(s) you choose will have a great impact on the type of investment company you operate. Clearly, couples with families and double income would respond to different marketing promotions than corporations, for example.
Try to break out your target customers in terms of their demographic and psychographic profiles. With regards to demographics, include a discussion of the ages, genders, locations and income levels of the customers you seek to serve.
Psychographic profiles explain the wants and needs of your target customers. The more you can understand and define these needs, the better you will do in attracting and retaining your customers.
Don’t you wish there was a faster, easier way to finish your business plan?
With Growthink’s Ultimate Business Plan Template you can finish your plan in just 8 hours or less!
Your competitive analysis should identify the indirect and direct competitors your business faces and then focus on the latter.
Direct competitors are other investment companies.
Indirect competitors are other options that customers have to purchase from that aren’t direct competitors. This includes robo investors and advisors, company 401Ks, etc. You need to mention such competition as well.
With regards to direct competition, you want to describe the other investment companies with which you compete. Most likely, your direct competitors will be investment companies located very close to your location.
For each such competitor, provide an overview of their businesses and document their strengths and weaknesses. Unless you once worked at your competitors’ businesses, it will be impossible to know everything about them. But you should be able to find out key things about them such as:
With regards to the last two questions, think about your answers from the customers’ perspective. And don’t be afraid to ask your competitors’ customers what they like most and least about them.
The final part of your competitive analysis section is to document your areas of competitive advantage. For example:
Think about ways you will outperform your competition and document them in this section of your plan.
Traditionally, a marketing plan includes the four P’s: Product, Price, Place, and Promotion. For an investment company, your marketing plan should include the following:
Product : In the product section, you should reiterate the type of company that you documented in your Company Analysis. Then, detail the specific products you will be offering. For example, in addition to an investment company, will you provide insurance products, website and app accessibility, quarterly or annual investment reviews, and any other services?
Price : Document the prices you will offer and how they compare to your competitors. Essentially in the product and price sub-sections of your marketing plan, you are presenting the services you offer and their prices.
Place : Place refers to the location of your company. Document your location and mention how the location will impact your success. For example, is your investment company located in a busy retail district, a business district, a standalone office, etc. Discuss how your location might be the ideal location for your customers.
Promotions : The final part of your investment company marketing plan is the promotions section. Here you will document how you will drive customers to your location(s). The following are some promotional methods you might consider:
While the earlier sections of your business plan explained your goals, your operations plan describes how you will meet them. Your operations plan should have two distinct sections as follows.
Everyday short-term processes include all of the tasks involved in running your investment company, including researching the stock market, keeping abreast of all investment industry knowledge, updating clients on any new activity, answering client phone calls and emails, networking to attract potential new clients.
Long-term goals are the milestones you hope to achieve. These could include the dates when you expect to land your Xth client, or when you hope to reach $X in revenue. It could also be when you expect to expand your investment business to a new city.
To demonstrate your investment company’s ability to succeed, a strong management team is essential. Highlight your key players’ backgrounds, emphasizing those skills and experiences that prove their ability to grow a company.
Ideally you and/or your team members have direct experience in managing investment companies. If so, highlight this experience and expertise. But also highlight any experience that you think will help your business succeed.
If your team is lacking, consider assembling an advisory board. An advisory board would include 2 to 8 individuals who would act like mentors to your business. They would help answer questions and provide strategic guidance. If needed, look for advisory board members with experience in managing an investment company or successfully advised clients who have achieved a successful net worth.
Your financial plan should include your 5-year financial statement broken out both monthly or quarterly for the first year and then annually. Your financial statements include your income statement, balance sheet and cash flow statements.
Income Statement : an income statement is more commonly called a Profit and Loss statement or P&L. It shows your revenues and then subtracts your costs to show whether you turned a profit or not.
In developing your income statement, you need to devise assumptions. For example, will you take on one new client at a time or multiple new clients? And will sales grow by 2% or 10% per year? As you can imagine, your choice of assumptions will greatly impact the financial forecasts for your business. As much as possible, conduct research to try to root your assumptions in reality.
Balance Sheets : Balance sheets show your assets and liabilities. While balance sheets can include much information, try to simplify them to the key items you need to know about. For instance, if you spend $50,000 on building out your investment company, this will not give you immediate profits. Rather it is an asset that will hopefully help you generate profits for years to come. Likewise, if a bank writes you a check for $50,000, you don’t need to pay it back immediately. Rather, that is a liability you will pay back over time.
In developing your Income Statement and Balance Sheets be sure to include several of the key costs needed in starting or growing an investment company:
Attach your full financial projections in the appendix of your plan along with any supporting documents that make your plan more compelling. For example, you might include your office location lease or list of clients that you have acquired.
Putting together a business plan for your investment company is a worthwhile endeavor. If you follow the template above, by the time you are done, you will truly be an expert. You will really understand the investment industry, your competition, and your customers. You will have developed a marketing plan and will really understand what it takes to launch and grow a successful investment company.
What is the easiest way to complete my investment company business plan.
Growthink's Ultimate Business Plan Template allows you to quickly and easily complete your Investment Company Business Plan.
The goal of your Executive Summary is to quickly engage the reader. Explain to them the type of investment company you are operating and the status; for example, are you a startup, do you have an investment company that you would like to grow, or are you operating a chain of investment companies?
Don’t you wish there was a faster, easier way to finish your Investment Company business plan?
Since 1999, Growthink has developed business plans for thousands of companies who have gone on to achieve tremendous success. Click here to hire someone to write a business plan for you from Growthink’s team.
Written by Dave Lavinsky
You’ve come to the right place to create your Investment Company business plan.
We have helped over 1,000 entrepreneurs and business owners create business plans and many have used them to start or grow their Investment Companies.
Below is a template to help you create each section of your Investment Company business plan.
Business overview.
NovaGrowth Investments is a startup investment company located in Aurora, Colorado. The company is founded by Thom Anderson, an investment broker from Colorado Springs, Colorado, who has amassed millions of dollars for his clients over ten years while working at Clear River Investments. Because Thom has gained an extensive following of clients who have already indicated they will follow him to his new investment company, he has made the initial steps into forming NovaGrowth Investments. Thom plans on recruiting a team of highly-qualified professionals to help manage the day-to-day operations of a premier investment company in every aspect of marketing and advising in the land acquisition investment company.
NovaGrowth Investments will provide a wide array of services for investors, in particular those related to the optimal attention and time needed to secure valuable investments on their behalf. Investors can feel confident and secure, knowing that Thom and his team are looking out for their interests in every aspect of the land acquisition process. What’s more, NovaGrowth offers customized guarantees of investment performance that are singular within the investment company industry.
The following are the services that NovaGrowth Investments will provide:
NovaGrowth Investments will target individual investors. They will also target corporate investors who are seeking land acquisitions. They will target fast-growing companies known to be seeking additional tracts of land. NovaGrowth Investments will target industry partners (cattle ranchers, horse breeders, etc) that could benefit from land acquisition as an investment.
NovaGrowth Investments will be owned and operated by Thom Anderson. He recruited Jackson Byers and Kylie Carlson to manage the day-to-day operations of the investment company and oversee human resources.
Thom Anderson is a graduate of Cambridge University in the U.K., where he graduated with an International Business bachelor’s degree. He spent five years in the U.K. sourcing land for a large investment firm as an entry-level investment advisor.
Upon his return to the U.S.,Thom obtained his investment broker’s license and was employed by Clear River Investments in Colorado Springs, Colorado. Within one year, Thom secured over 5M in investments for his clients and, within five years, he amassed over 25M in land acquisition investments on behalf of his clients.
Jackson Byers is a graduate of the University of Illinois, where he graduated with a master’s degree in Accounting. His former role at Clear River Investments was as the Associate Accountant, where he managed the normal business accounting processes for the firm. He will serve as the Staff Accountant in the startup company and will assist in overseeing the day-to-day operations of the firm.
Kylie Carlson was hired by Thom Anderson as his Assistant and worked for him at Clear River Investments for over ten years. Her new role will be the Human Resources Manager, overseeing personnel and the processes that are regulated and required by Colorado.
NovaGrowth Investments will be able to achieve success by offering the following competitive advantages:
NovaGrowth Investments is seeking $200,000 in debt financing to launch its NovaGrowth Investments. The funding will be dedicated toward securing the office space and purchasing office equipment and supplies. Funding will also be dedicated toward three months of overhead costs to include payroll of the staff, rent, and marketing costs for the marketing costs. The breakout of the funding is below:
The following graph outlines the financial projections for NovaGrowth Investments.
Who is novagrowth investments.
NovaGrowth Investments is a newly established, full-service investment company in Aurora, Colorado. NovaGrowth Investments will be the most reliable, effective and value-driven choice for private and commercial investors in Aurora and the surrounding communities. NovaGrowth Investments will provide a comprehensive menu of portfolio and land acquisition services for any potential investor to utilize. Their full-service approach includes a comprehensive seminar and helpful introductory information for first-time investors.
NovaGrowth Investments will be able to manage the investments and acquire new investments for their clients. The team of professionals are highly qualified and experienced in investment brokerage and land acquisitions. NovaGrowth Investments removes all headaches and issues of trying to locate safe and secure investments and ensures all issues are taken care of expeditiously while delivering the best customer service.
Thom Anderson is a graduate of Cambridge University in the U.K., where he graduated with an International Business bachelor’s degree. He spent five years in the U.K. sourcing land for a large investment firm as an entry-level investment advisor. Upon his return to the U.S.,Thom obtained his investment broker’s license and was employed by Clear River Investments in Colorado Springs, Colorado. Within one year, Thom secured over 5M in investments for his clients and, within five years, he amassed over 25M in land acquisition investments on behalf of his clients.
Since incorporation, NovaGrowth Investments has achieved the following milestones:
The following will be the services NovaGrowth Investments will provide:
The investment company industry is expected to grow over the next five years to over $1.3 trillion. The growth will be driven by ongoing vast opportunities for individuals and organizations seeking to grow their wealth The growth will be driven by new technology that navigating the complexities of the financial markets The growth will be driven by an increase in the interest of individuals in “making their own way” in the world The growth will be driven by the stability of land ownership as an on-going and important element in investment portfolios.
Costs will likely be reduced as technology continues to advance, allowing better-informed acquisition interest and supplemental risk mitigation Costs will likely be reduced as younger investors, such as Gen Z and millennials, continue to express an interest and desire for land acquisition investments, which indicates an increased number of sellers will enter the market due to favorable conditions.
Demographic profile of target market.
NovaGrowth Investments will target those potential individual investors in Aurora, Colorado. They will target businesses with a track record of land investments or a need for land due to company growth. NovaGrowth Investments will target industry partners (cattle ranchers, horse breeders, etc) that could benefit from land acquisition as an investment.
Total | Percent | |
---|---|---|
Total population | 1,680,988 | 100% |
Male | 838,675 | 49.9% |
Female | 842,313 | 50.1% |
20 to 24 years | 114,872 | 6.8% |
25 to 34 years | 273,588 | 16.3% |
35 to 44 years | 235,946 | 14.0% |
45 to 54 years | 210,256 | 12.5% |
55 to 59 years | 105,057 | 6.2% |
60 to 64 years | 87,484 | 5.2% |
65 to 74 years | 116,878 | 7.0% |
75 to 84 years | 52,524 | 3.1% |
NovaGrowth Investments will primarily target the following customer profiles:
Direct and indirect competitors.
NovaGrowth Investments will face competition from other companies with similar business profiles. A description of each competitor company is below.
CapitalMax Advisors is a startup investment company in Colorado Springs, Colorado. The owner, Barry Jackson, is a graduate of Purdue University and has been an investment advisor for over ten years. He recently launched Capital Max Advisors to meet what he coined, “The Great Asset Allocation” investment opportunities within the city of Colorado Springs. Barry has hired ten associates from his former employer’s company to seek investors who are primarily interested in asset allocation investments and the company is promising reduced portfolio management rates for the first six months of business.
CapitalMax Advisors is a full-service investment company with a strong following of investors who were delighted by Barry’s performance on their behalf at his former employer. The expectation is that CapitalMax Advisors will live up to their primary purpose, which is to oversee and direct asset allocation to maximize returns in substantial numbers.
Owned by Tamara and Loren Downs, WealthWise Investments is known for it’s assertive actions on behalf of clients. The company was founded in 2010 and currently offers a diverse range of investment products and services. They specialize in ETFs, mutual funds, and alternative investments. WealthWise Investments is known for its expertise in risk management, technology-driven investment strategies, and statewide reach beyond it’s home city of Colorado Springs.
WealthWise Investments offers excellent services to clients; however, clients have noted publicly that the fees and service charges are high in tandem with the asset allocation gains. There have been two complaints noted with the state regulatory agencies. Meanwhile, Tamara and Loren Downs continue to employ efforts to bring technology-driven tools into the investment company that will trim staff and distribute higher rates on behalf of investors.
FinTech Capital Management is a five-year-old company located in Denver, Colorado. The focus of the company is on financial technology investments on behalf of their client investors. Currently, the company has recorded stable and growing levels of profitability and has been tagged as an investment management firm known for its expertise in mutual funds and retirement planning They offer a sizable range of investment strategies, including equity, fixed income, and asset allocation funds. They are tech-driven and focus on research-driven investment decisions to fulfill the goals of their clients in long-term wealth creation.
In addition to tech acquisitions, FinTech Capital Management is also directed toward senior investors, with brokerage, retirement planning, wealth management, and mutual funds in their services offered. They provide a range of investment options, from individual stocks and bonds to managed portfolios and retirement accounts, many of which are perfect for those investors who have amassed a sizable portfolio, but are becoming risk-averse as they age. FinTech Capital Management is owned by The Thurgood Family Trust with the Thurgood brothers, Jonathan and Regis, responsible for day-to-day management. It has been recently suggested that the firm may be sold if the right buyers were to approach.
NovaGrowth Investments will be able to offer the following advantages over their competition:
Brand & value proposition.
NovaGrowth Investments will offer the unique value proposition to its clientele:
The promotions strategy for NovaGrowth Investments is as follows:
Word of Mouth/Referrals
Thom Anderson has built up an extensive list of contacts over the years by providing exceptional service and expertise to former clients and potential investors. The contacts and clients will follow him to his new company and help spread the word of NovaGrowth Investments.
Professional Associations and Networking
The executives within NovaGrowth Investments will begin networking in professional associations and at events within the city-wide industry groups. This will bring the new startup into focus for other companies, providing a path to increased clients and strategic partnerships within the city.
Social Media Marketing
NovaGrowth Investments will target their primary and secondary audiences with a series of text announcements via social media. The announcements will be invitations to the opening of the company, with a champagne reception and information regarding the services available at NovaGrowth Investments. The social media announcements will continue for the three weeks prior to the launch of the company.
Website/SEO Marketing
NovaGrowth Investments will fully utilize their website. The website will be well organized, informative, and list the services that NovaGrowth Investments provides. The website will also list their contact information and biographies of the executive group. The website will engage in SEO marketing tactics so that anytime someone types in the Google or Bing search engine “Investment company” or “Investment opportunities near me,” NovaGrowth Investments will be listed at the top of the search results.
The pricing of NovaGrowth Investments will be moderate and on par with competitors so customers feel they receive excellent value when purchasing their services.
The following will be the operations plan for NovaGrowth Investments. Operation Functions:
NovaGrowth Investments will have the following milestones completed in the next six months.
Key revenue & costs.
The revenue drivers for NovaGrowth Investments are the fees they will charge to clients for their investment acquisition and portfolio management services.
The cost drivers will be the overhead costs required in order to staff NovaGrowth Investments. The expenses will be the payroll cost, rent, utilities, office supplies, and marketing materials.
NovaGrowth Investments is seeking $200,000 in debt financing to launch its investment company. The funding will be dedicated toward securing the office space and purchasing office equipment and supplies. Funding will also be dedicated toward three months of overhead costs to include payroll of the staff, rent, and marketing costs for the print ads and association memberships. The breakout of the funding is below:
The following outlines the key assumptions required in order to achieve the revenue and cost numbers in the financials and in order to pay off the startup business loan.
Income statement.
FY 1 | FY 2 | FY 3 | FY 4 | FY 5 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenues | ||||||
Total Revenues | $360,000 | $793,728 | $875,006 | $964,606 | $1,063,382 | |
Expenses & Costs | ||||||
Cost of goods sold | $64,800 | $142,871 | $157,501 | $173,629 | $191,409 | |
Lease | $50,000 | $51,250 | $52,531 | $53,845 | $55,191 | |
Marketing | $10,000 | $8,000 | $8,000 | $8,000 | $8,000 | |
Salaries | $157,015 | $214,030 | $235,968 | $247,766 | $260,155 | |
Initial expenditure | $10,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Total Expenses & Costs | $291,815 | $416,151 | $454,000 | $483,240 | $514,754 | |
EBITDA | $68,185 | $377,577 | $421,005 | $481,366 | $548,628 | |
Depreciation | $27,160 | $27,160 | $27,160 | $27,160 | $27,160 | |
EBIT | $41,025 | $350,417 | $393,845 | $454,206 | $521,468 | |
Interest | $23,462 | $20,529 | $17,596 | $14,664 | $11,731 | |
PRETAX INCOME | $17,563 | $329,888 | $376,249 | $439,543 | $509,737 | |
Net Operating Loss | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Use of Net Operating Loss | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Taxable Income | $17,563 | $329,888 | $376,249 | $439,543 | $509,737 | |
Income Tax Expense | $6,147 | $115,461 | $131,687 | $153,840 | $178,408 | |
NET INCOME | $11,416 | $214,427 | $244,562 | $285,703 | $331,329 |
FY 1 | FY 2 | FY 3 | FY 4 | FY 5 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASSETS | ||||||
Cash | $154,257 | $348,760 | $573,195 | $838,550 | $1,149,286 | |
Accounts receivable | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Inventory | $30,000 | $33,072 | $36,459 | $40,192 | $44,308 | |
Total Current Assets | $184,257 | $381,832 | $609,654 | $878,742 | $1,193,594 | |
Fixed assets | $180,950 | $180,950 | $180,950 | $180,950 | $180,950 | |
Depreciation | $27,160 | $54,320 | $81,480 | $108,640 | $135,800 | |
Net fixed assets | $153,790 | $126,630 | $99,470 | $72,310 | $45,150 | |
TOTAL ASSETS | $338,047 | $508,462 | $709,124 | $951,052 | $1,238,744 | |
LIABILITIES & EQUITY | ||||||
Debt | $315,831 | $270,713 | $225,594 | $180,475 | $135,356 | |
Accounts payable | $10,800 | $11,906 | $13,125 | $14,469 | $15,951 | |
Total Liability | $326,631 | $282,618 | $238,719 | $194,944 | $151,307 | |
Share Capital | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Retained earnings | $11,416 | $225,843 | $470,405 | $756,108 | $1,087,437 | |
Total Equity | $11,416 | $225,843 | $470,405 | $756,108 | $1,087,437 | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES & EQUITY | $338,047 | $508,462 | $709,124 | $951,052 | $1,238,744 |
FY 1 | FY 2 | FY 3 | FY 4 | FY 5 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATIONS | ||||||
Net Income (Loss) | $11,416 | $214,427 | $244,562 | $285,703 | $331,329 | |
Change in working capital | ($19,200) | ($1,966) | ($2,167) | ($2,389) | ($2,634) | |
Depreciation | $27,160 | $27,160 | $27,160 | $27,160 | $27,160 | |
Net Cash Flow from Operations | $19,376 | $239,621 | $269,554 | $310,473 | $355,855 | |
CASH FLOW FROM INVESTMENTS | ||||||
Investment | ($180,950) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Net Cash Flow from Investments | ($180,950) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING | ||||||
Cash from equity | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Cash from debt | $315,831 | ($45,119) | ($45,119) | ($45,119) | ($45,119) | |
Net Cash Flow from Financing | $315,831 | ($45,119) | ($45,119) | ($45,119) | ($45,119) | |
Net Cash Flow | $154,257 | $194,502 | $224,436 | $265,355 | $310,736 | |
Cash at Beginning of Period | $0 | $154,257 | $348,760 | $573,195 | $838,550 | |
Cash at End of Period | $154,257 | $348,760 | $573,195 | $838,550 | $1,149,286 |
What is an investment company business plan.
An investment company business plan is a plan to start and/or grow your investment company business. Among other things, it outlines your business concept, identifies your target customers, presents your marketing plan and details your financial projections.
You can easily complete your Investment Company business plan using our Investment Company Business Plan Template here .
There are a number of different kinds of investment company businesses , some examples include: Closed-End Funds Investment Company, Mutual Funds (Open-End Funds) Investment Company, and Unit Investment Trusts (UITs) Investment Company.
Investment Company businesses are often funded through small business loans. Personal savings, credit card financing and angel investors are also popular forms of funding.
Starting an investment company business can be an exciting endeavor. Having a clear roadmap of the steps to start a business will help you stay focused on your goals and get started faster.
1. Develop An Investment Company Business Plan - The first step in starting a business is to create a detailed investment company business plan that outlines all aspects of the venture. This should include potential market size and target customers, the services or products you will offer, pricing strategies and a detailed financial forecast.
2. Choose Your Legal Structure - It's important to select an appropriate legal entity for your investment company business. This could be a limited liability company (LLC), corporation, partnership, or sole proprietorship. Each type has its own benefits and drawbacks so it’s important to do research and choose wisely so that your investment company business is in compliance with local laws.
3. Register Your Investment Company Business - Once you have chosen a legal structure, the next step is to register your investment company business with the government or state where you’re operating from. This includes obtaining licenses and permits as required by federal, state, and local laws.
4. Identify Financing Options - It’s likely that you’ll need some capital to start your investment company business, so take some time to identify what financing options are available such as bank loans, investor funding, grants, or crowdfunding platforms.
5. Choose a Location - Whether you plan on operating out of a physical location or not, you should always have an idea of where you’ll be based should it become necessary in the future as well as what kind of space would be suitable for your operations.
6. Hire Employees - There are several ways to find qualified employees including job boards like LinkedIn or Indeed as well as hiring agencies if needed – depending on what type of employees you need it might also be more effective to reach out directly through networking events.
7. Acquire Necessary Investment Company Equipment & Supplies - In order to start your investment company business, you'll need to purchase all of the necessary equipment and supplies to run a successful operation.
8. Market & Promote Your Business - Once you have all the necessary pieces in place, it’s time to start promoting and marketing your investment company business. This includes creating a website, utilizing social media platforms like Facebook or Twitter, and having an effective Search Engine Optimization (SEO) strategy. You should also consider traditional marketing techniques such as radio or print advertising.
Learn more about how to start a successful investment company business:
Evaluate the return and payback on a company's capital investment
Most companies make long-term investments that require a large amount of capital invested in the initial years, mostly in fixed assets such as property, machinery, or equipment . Due to the significant amount of cash outflows required, companies perform a capital investment analysis to evaluate the profitability of an investment and determine whether it is worthy. This is especially important when a business is presented with multiple potential opportunities and needs to make an investment decision based on the long-run returns they can get.
To assess the profitability of a capital investment, companies can build a capital investment model in Excel to calculate key valuation metrics including the cash flows , net present value (NPV) , internal rate of return (IRR) , and payback period .
In this guide, we will outline the major line items that should be included in a capital investment model and how to use the calculated metrics to evaluate the investment.
The first step to building a capital investment model is to determine the cash flows for the investment period. In this simplified model, we are presenting the income statement using the minimal number of line items – revenue, expenses, and profit. By subtracting the expenses from the annual revenue we can determine the profit for each year within the investment period, which will be used as cash inflows for the capital investment.
Next, we need to determine the amount of capital invested in the project, which equals the cash outflows during the investment period. With that information, we can then calculate the annual cash flows using the following formula:
Cash Flow (Annual) = Profit – Capital Investment
The cash flow line will be the major input in the calculations of net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR) for this capital investment.
We also need to determine the cumulative cash flow, which is essentially the sum of all cash flows expected from the investment. The cumulative cash flow figures will be used to compute the payback period of the investment.
The net present value (NPV) is the value of all future cash flows over the entire life of the capital investment discounted to the present. In this example, we will determine the NPV using three different discount rates – 10%, 15%, and 20%. This rate is often a company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) , or the required rate of return investors expect to earn relative to the risk of the investment.
In Excel, you can use the NPV function to find the present value of a series of future cash flows with equal time periods. The formula for the NPV function is = NPV(rate, cash flows).
In this example, the NPV of this capital investment would be $120,021 when the discount rate is 10%, $77,715 when the discount rate is 15%, and $48,354 when the discount rate is 20%. It tells us that when there is a higher risk associated with a capital investment, investors expect to pay less today and a higher return in the future.
The internal rate of return (IRR) is the expected compound annual rate of return earned on a capital investment. IRR is usually compared to a company’s WACC to determine whether an investment is worthy or not. If the IRR is greater than or equal to the WACC, then the company would accept the project as a good investment. Vice versa, the company would reject the investment if the IRR is less than the WACC.
You can use the IRR function in Excel to compute the rate of return based on a series of future cash flows. The formula for the IRR function is =IRR(rate, cash flows).
The last metric to calculate for a capital investment is the payback period , which is the total time it takes for a business to recoup its investment. The payback period is similar to a breakeven analysis but instead of the number of units to cover fixed costs, it looks at the amount of time required to return the investment.
A simple way to calculate the payback period is to count the number of periods until the company earns a positive cumulative cash flow on the investment. In the example provided, the company starts to have positive cumulative cash flow in year 5 and, thus, the payback period for this investment is 5 years.
Besides calculating the payback period, a cash flow chart is also a good way to visualize the cash flow trend over the investment period and the time when the investment breaks even. In the example above, the column chart in blue represents the annual cash flow of the investment, while the line chart in orange shows the cumulative cash flow over the period.
The point where the orange line intersects with the horizontal axis is the breakeven point, where the company earns zero cumulative cash flow and begins to recognize positive cash flow after paying back all of the initial investment.
Enter your name and email in the form below and download the free template now!
Download the free Excel template now to advance your finance knowledge!
We hope this has been a helpful guide on what is a capital investment model and how to use it to evaluate the return on an investment. CFI offers the Financial Modeling & Valuation Analyst (FMVA)™ certification program for those looking to take their careers to the next level.
If you want to learn more, CFI has all the resources you need to advance your career:
Below is a break down of subject weightings in the FMVA® financial analyst program. As you can see there is a heavy focus on financial modeling, finance, Excel, business valuation, budgeting/forecasting, PowerPoint presentations, accounting and business strategy.
A well rounded financial analyst possesses all of the above skills!
CFI is the global institution behind the financial modeling and valuation analyst FMVA® Designation . CFI is on a mission to enable anyone to be a great financial analyst and have a great career path. In order to help you advance your career, CFI has compiled many resources to assist you along the path.
In order to become a great financial analyst, here are some more questions and answers for you to discover:
Access and download collection of free Templates to help power your productivity and performance.
Already have an account? Log in
Take your learning and productivity to the next level with our Premium Templates.
Upgrading to a paid membership gives you access to our extensive collection of plug-and-play Templates designed to power your performance—as well as CFI's full course catalog and accredited Certification Programs.
Already have a Self-Study or Full-Immersion membership? Log in
Gain unlimited access to more than 250 productivity Templates, CFI's full course catalog and accredited Certification Programs, hundreds of resources, expert reviews and support, the chance to work with real-world finance and research tools, and more.
Already have a Full-Immersion membership? Log in
Advertisement
You have full access to this open access article
8685 Accesses
12 Citations
Explore all metrics
Firms frequently change their business models in order to respond to internal and external challenges. This study aims to explore how investments banks adjust their business models in response to internal and external challenges. Based on a qualitative data from ten major investment banks operating in the largest financial market in the Middle East, we show that investment banks can achieve resilience by adjusting their business models through continuous activity changes in response to internal and external challenges. Specifically, investment banks adjust their business models through deploying alternative combinations of activities from a broad repertoire of activities. Within the same bank, divisions that respond to external challenges tend to sustain their performance, whereas resilient divisions that respond to both internal and external challenges tend to bounce back or achieve substantial increase in performance levels. This study contributes to the literature by proposing resilience as an alternative approach to business model innovation and by providing insight into how firms adjust their business models by altering specific activities in response to both internal and external challenges.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Firms frequently change their business models (BMs) in order to respond to internal and external challenges. While some firms need to respond to internal challenges such as organisational capabilities (Teece, 2018 ), and learning processes (Futterer, Schmidt, & Heidenreich, 2018 ), other firms need to address external challenges such as changing demands of stakeholders (Amit & Zott, 2015 ), new technology (Cozzolino, Verona, & Rothaermel, 2018 ), and deregulation (Casadesus-Masanell & Ricart, 2010 ). Business Model Innovation (BMI) has been suggested as a way to respond to these challenges by adjusting BMs, and as a new source of innovation that goes beyond product and process innovation (Osiyevskyy & Dewald, 2015 ). Although there is no commonly recognised definition of a BM, scholars tend to agree that a BM is about the value proposition the enterprise delivers to its customers, how it creates that value, and how it captures a portion of it (Wirtz, Pistoia, Ullrich, & Göttel, 2016 ; Massa, Tucci, & Afuah, 2017 ; Foss & Saebi, 2017 ). Moreover, researchers are increasingly becoming interested in how BM evolves over time (Saebi, Lien, & Foss, 2017 ).
There is an ongoing debate regarding what constitutes a BMI. Some scholars claim that BMI constitutes varying degrees of innovation. As Khanagha et al. ( 2014 : p. 324) put it “ activities can range from incremental changes in individual components of business models, extension of the existing business model, introduction of parallel business models, right through to disruption of the business model, which may potentially entail replacing the existing model with a fundamentally different one ”. Researchers advocating this inclusive definition highlight that BMI could be new to the firm as well as new to the industry. Studies show that BMI may affect only a single component (e.g. Schneider & Spieth, 2013 ), “one or more” components (e.g. Sorescu, Frambach, Singh, Rangaswamy, & Bridges, 2011 ), “two or more” components (e.g. Lindgardt, Reeves, Stalk, & Deimler, 2009 ), or the entire BM components and the links between the components (e.g. Velamuri, Bansemir, Neyer, & Möslein, 2013 ). However, other scholars stress that BMI has to be new to the industry (e.g. Aspara, Hietanen, & Tikkanen, 2010 ). Innovation here is typically disruptive where a completely new BM is introduced. In differentiating the types of BMI, Foss and Saebi ( 2017 ) use two dimensions of BMI, namely the degree of novelty (new to a firm vs. new to an industry), and scope of innovation (modular vs. architectural change). As a result, they suggest four types of BMI: evolutionary (fine-tuning process), adaptive (changes in the overall BM that are new to a firm), focussed (changes within one area of the BM), and complex (change the entire BM).
The BMI literature suggests that firms can adjust their BMs through adaptation, which is “ the process by which management actively aligns the firm’s business model to a changing environment ” (Saebi et al., 2017 , p. 569). Some studies focus on how firms adapt their BMs suggesting several approaches namely trial-and-error (Morris, Schindehutte, & Allen, 2005 ), learning (Teece, 2010 ), fine-tuning process (Demil & Lecocq, 2010 ), and continuous adjustments (Landau, Karna, & Sailer, 2016 ). Other studies focus on the conditions facilitating BMI. Firms are more likely to adapt their BMs under conditions of perceived threat than under conditions of perceived opportunities (Saebi et al., 2017 ). Despite the numerous studies on the drivers (e.g. Saebi et al., 2017 ), processes (e.g. Landau et al., 2016 ), and consequences (e.g. McNamara, Peck, & Sasson, 2013 ) of BM adaptation, there is still limited knowledge of how firms adjust their BMs.
Another less explored avenue for adjusting BMs is resilience, which is the ability “ to respond more quickly, recover faster or develop more unusual ways of doing business under duress than others ” (Linnenluecke, 2017 : p. 4). Dewald and Bowen ( 2010 ) suggest that “ resilience depends on a simultaneous internal and external evaluation of the situation ” (p. 212). This line of research stops short of disclosing how firms adjust their BMs in response to internal and external challenges. To fill this gap, our study aims to explore how investments banks can achieve resilience by adjusting their BMs in response to both internal and external challenges.
We choose to study investment banks for at least two reasons. First, Crotty ( 2009 ) argues that investment banking is a complex and risky business, and investment banks face continuous shift in market and regulatory environments. For instance, five of the largest independent investment banks in the US lost their independence in 2008: Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers failed, Merrill Lynch was taken over by Bank of America, and Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley became bank holding companies to qualify for bailout money (Crotty, 2009 ). One of the main reasons for their failure has been attributed to the ambiguity and complexity of their BMs. This could be due to running multiple divisions (i.e. Asset Management, Brokerage, Investment Banking, and Custody Services) independently with ‘Chinese Wall arrangements’ (Lipton & Mazur, 1975 ) to avoid conflicts of interest. Second, investment banks throughout the world have made significant changes to their BMs after the 2008 financial crisis as they were forced by regulators to entirely abandon their old BMs by maintaining lower levels of leverage and accepting lower risk and lower returns (Teece, 2010 ).
Political and economic instabilities are real challenges for businesses in general and investment banks in particular throughout the Middle East. Saudi Arabia, as well as the Gulf region, has been hit by at least three major crises in the past three decades. The first crisis was the invasion of Kuwait by Iraq in August 1990, and the ensuing Gulf war that threatened not only the economies of the Gulf states but also their very existence (Finlan, 2003 ). The second major crisis was the 2006 IPO crisis in Saudi Arabia. This crisis was caused by an oversubscription to company shares on the Saudi stock market (Jeambey, 2007 ). From a peak on 25 February 2006, the Saudi stock market index fell by about 65% (Lerner, Leamon, & Dew, 2017 ). The crisis was felt across the entire Gulf economies. The third crisis was the 2008 global financial crisis, which caused the Saudi stock market to fall even further than it had in 2006 (Lerner et al., 2017 ). In addition, the Middle East region is well-known for its political instability; ranging from the Iraq-Iran war, the Arab Spring, to the current wars in Yemen, Syria and Libya.
Since the 1980s, the financial sector in Saudi Arabia has been given a priority as part of the Saudi government diversification policy away from the dependence on oil revenues (Samargandi, Fidrmuc, & Ghosh, 2014 ). As a result, the government has built financial markets, an efficient banking system, and a competitive insurance sector. Recently, the government launched the National Transformation Program (Saudi Vision 2030). Evidence suggests that although Saudi Arabia still depends on the oil sector, investment in Saudi stock market boosts Saudi economic growth (Jawadi & Ftiti, 2019 ). The shift in the Saudi policy makers towards a more sustainable economy and away from oil dependence makes investment banks an ideal context to study how firms adjust their BMs in response to internal and external challenges.
Business model resilience.
An emerging body of research in BMI advocates that firms respond to internal and external challenges through resilience. According to Lengnick-Hall and Beck ( 2005 ), resilience is an organisational capacity to adjust routines in order to overcome challenges. BM resilience has emerged as one of the key themes in a recent review of resilience in business and management research (Linnenluecke, 2017 ). Research in this area posits that firms are able to respond to challenges through continuously adjusting, adapting and reinventing their BMs. However, “ the boundaries of organizational resilience have been ill defined and wide ranging ” (Dewald & Bowen, 2010 : p. 199). This field has included studies that range from continuous adjustment (Hamel & Valikangas, 2003 ), surviving an industry attack (Gittell, Cameron, Lim, & Rivas, 2006 ), and adoption or resistance of new disruptive BMs (Dewald & Bowen, 2010 ).
Resilient firms maintain a broad repertoire of options to effectively respond to challenges (Boisot & Child, 1999 ; Lengnick-Hall & Beck, 2005 ). Having a flexible inventory of alternatives enables firms to take a different path from that which is the usual (Sutcliffe & Vogus, 2003 ), adopt unexpected and timely responses to market shifts (Ferrier, Smith, & Grimm, 1999 ), and increase the odds of success (Eisenhardt & Tabrizi, 1995 ). Using the resilience perspective, this study will show the repertoire of options available to investment banks. To do that, it is necessary to outline the BMI challenges and dimensions.
Firms adjust their BMs in response to challenges (Egfjord and Sund, 2020 ), antecedents (Amit & Zott, 2015 ), and/or barriers (Bocken & Geradts, 2019 ). These challenges have been argued to impact organisational outcomes including influencing business performance (Aversa, Furnari, & Haefliger, 2015 ), financial sustainability (Santos, Pache, & Birkholz, 2015 ), future growth (Gilbert, Eyring, & Foster, 2012 ), firm’s value (Eyring, Johnson, & Nair, 2011 ), competitive advantages (Tallman, Luo, & Buckley, 2018 ), and strategic flexibility (George & Bock, 2011 ). A full review of the BMI literature undertaken by the authors reveals two internal (challenges top management, and organisational culture) and seven external challenges, namely crises, regulations, client demands, new technologies, competitive pressure, industry, and service providers. Table 1 gives detailed explanation on each of the nine identified challenges. Relevant references are also provided for each challenge.
In BMI research both element-based and activity-based approaches have been used (Clauss, Kesting, & Naskrent, 2019 ; Spieth, Schneider, Clauß, & Eichenberg, 2019 ). The former is a high abstraction approach that views BMI as a change of BM elements. Although restrictive, this approach has been used to help communicate changes in BMs (e.g. Aversa et al., 2015 ). However, the latter approach views BMI as a change in BM activities (e.g. Tykkyläinen & Ritala, 2020 ). This view goes beyond identifying specific innovation components to by detailing the change in activities performed when adjusting BMs. Based on this view, we use Ramdani, Binsaif, and Boukrami ( 2019 ) activity-based framework (Fig. 1 ). This framework consists of four dimensions and 16 sub-dimensions. Unlike previous conceptualisations that identify the elements associated with BMI, this framework could be used to detail the activity changes within each sub-dimension.
BMI Framework (Ramdani et al., 2019 ). Ramdani et al., 2019 . Business model innovation: a review and research agenda. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 22 (2): 89–108
The four top level dimensions of BM identify different facets of the firm’s business. The following is a brief review of these four dimensions:
Value proposition : firms adjust their BM activities by rethinking what a firm sells, exploring new customer needs, acquiring target customers, and ensuring the benefits offered will be perceived by their customers. Prior studies in BMI research show that firms adjust their BMs by exploring various alternatives of core offering (Clauss, 2017 ), meeting unsatisfied needs in other markets (Eyring et al., 2011 ), altering activities in the value chain to acquire target customers (Kiron et al., 2013 ), and articulating a value proposition that is attractive for price-sensitive customers (Wu, Ma, & Shi, 2010 ).
Operational Value : firms adjust their BM activities through configuring key assets and sequencing activities to deliver the value proposition, establishing links with key partners and suppliers, and exposing the various means by which a company reaches out to customers. Studies in BMI research highlight that firms can adjust their BMs through integrating various assets (Al-Debei & Avison, 2010 ), developing new processes (Mason & Spring, 2011 ), forming new partnerships (Clauss, 2017 ), and adopting new distribution channels (Cao, 2014 ).
Human Capital : firms adjust their BM activities by experimenting with new ways of doing business, tapping into the skills and competencies (Hock-Doepgen, Clauss, Kraus, & Cheng, 2020 ) needed for the new BMs through motivating and involving individuals in the innovation process. Prior studies in BMI research show that firms can adjust their BMs through learning from previous experiences (Yunus, Moingeon, & Lehmann-Ortega, 2010 ), changing the level of participation in performing the activities (Sorescu et al., 2011 ), adopting different compensation and incentive policies (Brea-Solís, Casadesus-Masanell, & Grifell-Tatjé, 2015 ), and assembling cross-functional teams (Michel, 2014 ).
Financial Value : firms adjust their BM activities by capturing value through alternative revenue streams, changing the price-setting mechanisms, and assessing the financial viability and profitability. Studies in BMI research highlight that firms can adjust their BMs through introducing new cost structures and revenue models (Clauss, 2017 ), exploring ways to manage cash-flows, and generating more profit (Sorescu et al., 2011 ).
In order to explore how investment banks adjust their BMs, this study employs a qualitative approach (Yin, 2014 ). Multiple in-depth case studies are adopted because research in this field is still in its infancy and researchers are seeking new perspectives (Eisenhardt, 1989 ). Purposive sampling was used to select investment banks that operate all four divisions (i.e. Asset Management, Brokerage, Investment Banking, and Custody Services). As a result, our final sample is 10 fully-licenced investment banks operating in Saudi Arabia.
To ensure the trustworthiness, the authors addressed credibility, transferability, dependability and confirmability based on the criteria developed by Guba ( 1981 ). Credibility refers to the internal validity of the data. This was established through the use of triangulation. Primary data collected through semi-structured interviews was verified with the available secondary data (annual reports, financial statements, websites, and brochures). Transferability refers to external validity, which was achieved through the audio recording and transcription of interviews as well as through the purposeful sampling to collect the data from various top management positions where participants included chairman, executives, heads of division and heads of department. Dependability refers to reliability, which was established through ensuring that participants reflect on their experiences covering events that occurred up to 3 years prior to the interviews as well as recent events. Finally, confirmability refers to the objectivity of the data, which was achieved through independently auditing the findings, comparing and refining the interpretations among the authors.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants that had key positions in all four divisions (see the Appendix – Table 6 ). The participants were asked questions on their banks’ goals and strategy, followed by a set of questions focusing on BM activities relating to value proposition, operational value, human capital and financial value, and questions on the their responses to current internal and external challenges. Interviews were recorded and transcribed to develop the full cases. The data was triangulated (Jick, 1979 ; Gibbert, Ruigrok, & Wicki, 2008 ) by cross checking the data with internal documents and publicly available information including the Capital Market Authority (CMA), the Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority (SAMA), the Saudi Stock Exchange (Tadawul) and the Ministry of Finance. In total, we conducted 29 interviews, each of which lasted between 46 and 140 min.
Using the validated transcripts, case studies were compiled for each investment bank. Then, the data was coded by two researchers independently (Mayring, 2014 ). After that, each case was analysed using thematic content analysis to explore how firms adjust their BMs. By analysing the content relating to challenges and the associated changes in activities, the authors were able to link what makes firms change their BMs and how they adjust them. Cross-case analysis (Eisenhardt, 1989 ) was conducted with two researchers present looking at comparing BMs as well as the challenges and activity changes for each division. The researchers went through several iterations between literature, data and findings until a consistent map was drawn for all BMs. Using the resilience perspective, a repertoire of activities was developed to show all possible activity changes.
One of the main findings of this paper is a map that describes the various options available to investment banks to respond to internal and external challenges. Table 2 presents this repertoire of specific activities for all four divisions. The first column shows the BM four dimensions starting with value proposition. The second column shows the four sub-dimensions for each of the four dimensions. For instance, the first sub-dimension for Operational Value is “Key Assets”. The remaining four columns show the actual activities available as a means to respond by adjusting their BM to potential challenges. For example, a Brokerage division under the “Distribution Channels” sub-dimension has four activities (online, mobile, direct calls and branches). This means that if an investment bank identifies that a threat can best be dealt with from the ‘Operational Value-Distribution Channels’ side, it can use the online activity alone or in combination with the other three tools (mobile, direct calls and branches). Of course, the managers can see a solution as a combination of many dimensions, sub-dimensions and activities.
Table 2 reveals three important aspects of resilience. First, we note the richness and diversity of activities that can help BMs to navigate through difficult terrain. Although some cells (as represented by an individual cell in the table) have one or two activities only, the vast majority of cells contain five activities. The second aspect is the specificity of various activities to the division and BM sub-dimension. Except from a single case (Direct communication under “Perceived Customer Value”), activities do not repeat across divisions or across sub-dimensions. The third aspect is that some divisions have a richer set of activities than others. The highest is Asset Management with 59 activities, followed by Investment Banking and Brokerage with 49 and 46 activities respectively. Custody Services has the least activities, with 31 activities only.
Table 3 summarises the main findings of this paper. The rows of the table show the BM dimensions and sub-dimensions that have been impacted. The columns show the challenges influencing each of the four divisions. Finally, the cells show whether, for a particular cross between BM sub-dimension and challenge, the firm uses activities intensively, moderately or not at all. In the following, we focus only on the most utilised activities.
We begin by highlighting the type of challenges to which divisions are subjected to. First, different divisions have different types and numbers of challenges. For example, the Asset Management and Investment Banking divisions have the highest number of challenges (five each). Custody Services has the least challenges with two only. The type of challenges varies across the four divisions, with two divisions sharing no more than two types of challenges. For example, Asset Management and Brokerage share “Client Demands” which no other division has. There is one exception. The “Crises” challenge is shared by three divisions, which makes it the most important challenge to investment banks. Second, out of the 16 challenges reported by interviewees, only three are internal (shaded columns), and these are found in Asset Management and Investment Banking divisions.
The pattern of results shown in Table 3 can be summarised as follows. First, different divisions deploy different sets of activities even for the same challenge. For example, if we take the “Client Demands” challenge, Asset Management uses “Revenue Stream” activity, while Brokerage uses “Key Assets” activities (but they use the same three other activities). Second, different divisions have different intensities of activity. By far the most activities deployed are for Asset Management, which totals 44 different activities. This division outshines the other three divisions, with the closest being Brokerage with 14 activities only.
Third, there is a significant difference as to what dimensions of the BM are given priority in overcoming the various challenges. Here we notice one dominant BM dimension and two dominant sub-dimensions. The most important dimension is Value Proposition with 31 sub-dimensions involved throughout the firm. Operational and Financial Value dimensions are also important with 19 and 16 sub-dimensions respectively. The human capital dimension is virtually inexistent, having only 3 out of the possible 64 sub-dimensions involved.
The most important sub-dimension is “Core Offering” which is involved in 15 out of the possible 16 challenges throughout the firm. The second and fourth highest sub-dimensions are “Customer Needs” and “Target Customers” with 9 and 7 challenges respectively. All three sub-dimensions form the core “Value Proposition” dimension. The third most important sub-dimension is “Revenue Stream”, with involvement in 8 challenges. The table also reveals that there are five unimportant sub-dimensions (zero challenges), and three weak sub-dimensions (3 or 2 challenges in total).
Overall, depending on the challenge faced, investment banks respond by adjusting their BM through deploying alternative combinations of activities from the repertoire. In Asset Management division, Table 3 shows that investment banks respond to the six challenges by altering eight sub-dimensions with a total of 44 activities.
To obtain further insights as to what kind of specific activities are used by investment banks, we produce detailed activity responses to the challenges faced by each division. We will focus here on presenting the activity responses to challenges in the Asset Management division (highlighted in Table 4 ). Activity responses to challenges faced by other divisions are included in the Appendix. Within the Asset Management division, two main sub-dimensions are dominant, namely the “Core Offering” and “Revenue Stream”. Within “Core Offering”, innovative investment is used as an activity against all five threats, whereas under “Revenue Stream” the fees-based model is dominant.
In the Asset Management division, investment banks respond to five challenges with a repertoire of activities. Top management push asset managers to create new investment products and alter both current revenue streams and overall margins. Asset managers respond to clients’ demands by creating new investment products to meet needs for new categories of customers, and adopting a new revenue model that is based on sharing the returns. In response to financial crisis, asset managers created a new offering with low margins and low returns to meet the demands of the new customer base that have fixed income and low-risk profile. To adhere to regulations and maintain the division’s performance, asset managers created new funds to target international investors and modified the fee structure of some funds to absorb the regulator’s imposed costs. Finally, asset managers responded to competitive pressure by hiring new asset managers, expanding the portfolio of investment products, charging lower fees for niche investment products.
For the remaining divisions, the repertoire of utilised activities is detailed in the Appendix (Tables 8 , 9 , 10 ). The Brokerage division responds to four challenges, namely competitive pressure, new technologies, client demands, and crises. As the competition intensifies this division invests in its brokerage system to approve margin lending (loans for trading) online, and deploy multi-brokerage models where clients are charged either through trading commissions or lending revenues. The technology challenges were dealt with by improving the brokerage system to allow clients to trade via online platforms or through smartphones. Investment banks also deployed multi-channel communication tools as a means to change some of the key processes such as opening online accounts. This led to reducing the staff and branch costs, but increased the IT costs. Clients’ demands were responded to by improving their brokerage systems to facilitate access and transactions for active traders. After the 2008 financial crisis, investment banks introduced margin lending to encourage trading. However, after the market stabilised, investment banks changed the parameters for margin lending to increase returns by charging trading commissions.
Investment Banking divisions face both internal and external challenges, including top management, service providers, organisational culture, new technologies, and crises. The response to top management challenges led to diversifying portfolio of investment services to attract new customers internationally such as corporates and government institutions interested in buying family-owned businesses. This meant that revenue streams (such as fixed, transaction-based, and success fees) were negotiated depending on the deal. One of the teams responsible for IPOs suggested changing a labour intensive process. A software was developed to automate the process, which led to reducing staff costs, quickening the process of delivering services, and finishing the deal faster for corporates in order to go public. Because banking advisory services depends on the participation of other parties such as accountants, legal firms, commercial banks, and underwriters, services may not be delivered in a timely fashion. Thus, in response to service providers’ challenges, Investment Banking divisions change their partnerships with legal firms and hire experienced investment banks that are able to deliver reliable services. The response to new technologies focused on new online and mobile distribution channels to make it easier for clients to access services, monitor their progress, and provide them with reports. Finally, during times of fluctuations in the market, this division focuses more on advisory services where non-listed firms prepare their IPOs or preferred private equities and only go public if the market conditions are favourable.
In Custody Services division, investment banks respond to two external challenges, namely industry demands and regulations. Custody Services division responded to industry demands by offering their services to non-listed firms, investment banks, and mutual investment funds. Technical investment banks partners were established to perform custody services at a lower cost and deliver these services to other banks bringing in new revenues. Finally, to adhere to new local regulations, investment banks were forced to assign an independent custodian to carry out safekeeping and administration, which meant that some banks were consuming these services locally through other investment banks or outsourcing these activities to an international partner. By improving their custody systems, investment banks incurred new IT costs.
To assess the performance of each division for 2016 and 2017, revenue growth data is highlighted in Table 5 . Looking at the cumulative growth for each division, the data suggest that divisions responding to only external challenges tend to sustain their performance levels as highlighted in Brokerage and Custody Services divisions. However, divisions responding to both internal and external challenges (i.e. Asset Management and Investment Banking) tend to bounce back in the Asset Management division and increase growth substantially in the Investment Banking division.
Firms respond to internal and external challenges through adaptation and/or resilience. The adaptation perspective focuses on responding to external challenges (Saebi et al., 2017 ), whereas the resilience perspective focuses on responding to both internal and external challenges. All divisions responded to external challenges. This may explain the focus of previous studies on responding to external challenges through adaptation. However, this study shows that resilience can be achieved by responding to both internal and external challenges. As a result, revenue growth bounced back in the Asset Management divisions, and increased substantially for Investment Banking divisions.
In their response to internal challenges, both divisions responded to top management. Asset managers withheld periodical meetings to discuss performance and review new trends in the industry in order to develop new investment products. In the Investment Banking division, financial advisory and arrangements were delivered with guarantees from the top in terms of execution and professionalism. Different management challenges are posed when carrying out BMI (Foss & Saebi, 2017 ). Moreover, Investment Banking responded to the challenge of organisational culture. By embracing an innovative culture, Investment Banking division was able to capitalise on new ideas emerging from internal teams. In short, creative culture has positive effects on firms undertaking BMI (Bock et al., 2012 ).
In their response to internal and external challenges, investment banks maintain a broad repertoire of activities that are used to adjust their BMs. Firms keep a broad repertoire of options to overcome challenges (Boisot & Child, 1999 ; Lengnick-Hall & Beck, 2005 ). Although previous studies claim that firms are able to respond to challenges through continuously adjusting their BMs (Landau et al., 2016 ), it is not clear how such a continuous adjustment of BMs takes place. We demonstrate how investment banks continuously adjust their BM through deploying alternative combinations of activities from the repertoire in response to specific internal and/or external challenge.
To adjust their BMs, investment banks modify a combination of activities. Previous studies in BMI have shown that firms adjust their BMs by changing a single component to replacing the entire BM (Saebi et al., 2017 ). This study shows that investment banks deploy a variety of activities. While the most important set of activities are found within the value proposition, followed by the operational value and the financial value dimensions, the lowest activity changes occur in the human capital dimension. This could be due to the challenges faced, the nature of the industry, and the context. This study shows that investment banks tend to mainly respond to external challenges including clients’ demands, crises and competitive pressure. In their response, investment banks focus more on rethinking their value proposition through expanding their core offering and meeting customer needs. Previous studies have focused on modifying the value proposition due to external challenges (e.g. Demil & Lecocq, 2010 ). Moreover, the nature of the financial services industry could have influenced which activity changes investment banks must focus on. The operational value and financial value activities remain less changeable than value proposition due to the maturity of the industry as well as the stringency of the regulatory environment. Also, it is a well-known practice that investment banks attract the highest talents because they can afford them. This may explain why human capital activity changes are the lowest changed compared to other activities. According to Chivers ( 2011 ), training in investment banks tend to be more “informal and on-the-job in nature”. He argues that this informal learning was “ad hoc, poorly recorded, and limited in scope”. Also, he claims that investment bankers prefer learning by doing. This may explain why human capital activity changes are the lowest changed compared to other activities. Previous studies show the particularity of certain industries (e.g. Aversa et al., 2015 ). Finally, the context of this study might have influenced activity changes. This study is conducted in an emerging economy, where the BMs are usually replications of existing BMs in developed economies rather completely new BMs. This could explain why activity changes focus more on the value proposition to adapt their replicated BMs (Landau et al., 2016 ).
By revealing how investment banks adjust their BMs in response to internal and external challenges, this study makes at least four contributions to BMI literature. First, it confirms that firms adjust their BMs not only in response to external challenges (Amit & Zott, 2015 ), but also in response to internal challenges (Teece, 2018 ). In this paper, we summarise and list the internal and external challenges that influence firms to change their existing BMs. Also, we show that resilience can be achieved by responding to both internal and external challenges. Second, this study provides important insights into how firms change their existing BM using a repertoire of activities. Using the resilience perspective, this study provides insight into how firms adjust their BMs by altering specific activities, an area that has not been sufficiently covered. This study captures activity changes by empirically examining the BMI framework. Third, this study brings together internal and external perspectives of the BMI literature, and provides evidence on the challenges and the associated activity changes for each of the four investment banking divisions. Fourth, this study adds evidence to industry-focused BMI by examining BMI in an understudied industry context (i.e. investment banks).
This study has several implications for senior executives, analysts and regulators. It provides senior executives with a repertoire of activities that can be used to adjust their BMs. The repertoire can be used in conjunction with internal and external challenges to navigate BMI. This repertoire can be used not only by executives working in investment banks, but also by executives in other sectors to develop their own repertoire of potential BMs. Moreover, this study provides analysts and investors with a tool to help them understand investment banks BMs. The repertoire could be used by investors and financial analysts to complement their financial, industry and company analyses. By using this repertoire, analyst could demystify the complexity of activities, identify risks for each activity, and rationalise the different financial and operational performances. Furthermore, this repertoire could be used by regulators to legislate based on informed understanding of activity changes. This repertoire could help regulators navigate activity changes, communicate these changes with investment banks, and legislate accordingly.
Apart from the typical limitations that apply to qualitative studies, we highlight three areas for future research. First, this study fills a significant gap in our understanding of the internal challenges (Foss & Saebi, 2017 ) by demonstrating that firms need to respond to top management and organizational culture. Future research should further unravel other internal challenges such as organisational capabilities. Second, this study demonstrates that investment banks achieve resilience through continuously adjusting their BMs by maintaining a repertoire of activity changes. Future studies should explore flexible repertoires of options in other industries and how they compare to the findings of this study. Also, it will be interesting to track the sequence of activity changes, which was not captured in our study. Another avenue for future research is to investigate the levels of resilience among a group of firms facing similar internal and external challenges. Third, although this study showed how firms adjust their BMs in response to internal and external challenges and the associated performance levels for divisions, more research is needed to show activity changes and link them to performance levels. It would be interesting to further examine the association between BM changes and firm performance.
The aim of this study was to explore how investments banks adjust their BMs in response to internal and external challenges. Using the resilience perspective, case evidence from ten investment banks operating in the largest financial market in the Middle East was qualitatively analysed. The findings of this study suggest that investment banks adjust their BM through continuous activity changes in response to internal and external challenges. To overcome challenges, investment banks maintain a broad repertoire of activities that are used to adjust their BMs. Investment banks respond by adjusting their BMs through deploying alternative combinations of activities from the repertoire in response to specific internal and/or external challenges. In their response to internal and external challenges, investment banks deploy a variety of activities. While the most important set of activities are related to the value proposition, followed by the operational value and the financial value dimensions, the lowest activity changes occur in the human capital dimension.
Achtenhagen, L., Melin, L. & Naldi, L., 2013. Dynamics of business models–strategizing, critical capabilities and activities for sustained value creation. Long Range Planning, 46(6): 427-442.
Google Scholar
Al-Debei, M.M. & Avison, D., 2010. Developing a unified framework of the business model concept. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(3): 359-376.
Amit, R., & Zott, C. 2015. Crafting business architecture: The antecedents of business model design. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 9(4): 331-350.
Aspara, J., Hietanen, J. & Tikkanen, H., 2010. Business model innovation vs replication: financial performance implications of strategic emphases. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 18(1): 39-56.
Aversa, P., Furnari, S. & Haefliger, S., 2015. Business model configurations and performance: A qualitative comparative analysis in Formula One racing, 2005–2013. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(3): 655-676.
Bock, A.J., Opsahl, T., George, G. & Gann, D.M., 2012. The effects of culture and structure on strategic flexibility during business model innovation. Journal of Management Studies, 49(2): 279-305.
Bocken, N.M., & Geradts, T.H., 2019. Barriers and drivers to sustainable business model innovation: Organization design and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 101950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101950 .
Boisot, M. & Child, J., 1999. Organizations as adaptive systems in complex environments: The case of China. Organization Science, 10(3): 237-252.
Brea-Solís, H., Casadesus-Masanell, R. & Grifell-Tatjé, E., 2015. Business Model Evaluation: Quantifying W almart's Sources of Advantage. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 9(1): 12-33.
Cao, L., 2014. Business model transformation in moving to a cross-channel retail strategy: A case study. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 18(4): 69-96.
Casadesus-Masanell, R. & Ricart, J.E., 2010. From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3): 195-215.
Chakravorti, B. 2010. Finding Competitive Advantage in Adversity. Harvard Business Review, 88(11): 102-108.
Chivers, G. 2011. Supporting informal learning by traders in investment banks. Journal of European Industrial Training, 35(2): 154-175.
Clauss, T. 2017. Measuring business model innovation: Conceptualization, scale development, and proof of performance. R&D Management, 47(3): 385-403.
Clauss, T., Kesting, T., & Naskrent, J. 2019. A rolling stone gathers no moss: the effect of customers' perceived business model innovativeness on customer value co-creation behavior and customer satisfaction in the service sector. R&D Management, 49(2): 180-203.
Cozzolino, A., Verona, G., & Rothaermel, F. T. 2018. Unpacking the disruption process: New technology, business models, and incumbent adaptation. Journal of Management Studies, 55(7): 1166-1202.
Crotty, J., 2009. Structural causes of the global financial crisis: a critical assessment of the ‘new financial architecture’. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(4): 563-580.
Demil, B. & Lecocq, X., 2010. Business model evolution: in search of dynamic consistency. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3): 227-246.
Dewald, J. & Bowen, F., 2010. Storm clouds and silver linings: Responding to disruptive innovations through cognitive resilience. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(1): 197-218.
Egfjord, K.F.H. & Sund, K.J., 2020. Do you see what I see? How differing perceptions of the environment can hinder radical business model innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150: 119787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119787 .
Eisenhardt, K.M., 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532-550.
Eisenhardt, K.M. & Tabrizi, B.N., 1995. Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1): 84-110.
Eyring, M.J., Johnson, M.W. & Nair, H., 2011. New business models in emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 89(1-2): 88-95.
Ferrier, W.J., Smith, K.G. & Grimm, C.M., 1999. The role of competitive action in market share erosion and industry dethronement: A study of industry leaders and challengers. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4): 372-388.
Finlan, A. 2003. The gulf war of 1991 . London: Osprey.
Foss, N.J. & Saebi, T., 2017. Fifteen years of research on business model innovation: How far have we come, and where should we go?. Journal of Management, 43(1): 200-227.
Frankenberger, K., Weiblen, T. & Gassmann, O., 2014. The antecedents of open business models: an exploratory study of incumbent firms. R&D Management, 44(2): 173-188.
Futterer, F., Schmidt, J., & Heidenreich, S. 2018. Effectuation or causation as the key to corporate venture success? Investigating effects of entrepreneurial behaviors on business model innovation and venture performance. Long Range Planning, 51(1): 64-81.
George, G. & Bock, A.J., 2011. The business model in practice and its implications for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1): 83-111.
Gibbert, M., Ruigrok, W. & Wicki, B., 2008. What passes as a rigorous case study?. Strategic Management Journal, 29(13): 1465-1474.
Gilbert, C., Eyring, M. & Foster, R.N., 2012. Two routes to resilience. Harvard Business Review, 90(12): 65-73.
Gittell, J.H., Cameron, K., Lim, S. & Rivas, V., 2006. Relationships, layoffs, and organizational resilience: Airline industry responses to September 11. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42(3): 300-329.
Guba, E.G., 1981. Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Technology Research and Development, 29(2): 75 -91.
Hamel, G. & Valikangas, L., 2003. Why resilience matters. Harvard Business Review, 81(9): 56-57.
Hock-Doepgen, M., Clauss, T., Kraus, S., & Cheng, C. F. 2020. Knowledge management capabilities and organizational risk-taking for business model innovation in SMEs. Journal of Business Research
Jawadi, F., & Ftiti, Z. 2019. Oil price collapse and challenges to economic transformation of Saudi Arabia: A time-series analysis. Energy Economics, 80, 12-19.
Jeambey, A.A. 2007. Saudi stock market valuation the case of STC and SABIC. Theses, American University of Beirut, Department of Economics. https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/Saudi_Stock_Market_Valuation.html?id=8No9MwEACAAJ&redir_esc=y .
Jick, T.D., 1979. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4): 602-611.
Khanagha, S., Volberda, H. & Oshri, I., 2014. Business model renewal and ambidexterity: structural alteration and strategy formation process during transition to a C loud business model. R&D Management, 44(3): 322-340.
Kiron, D., Kruschwitz, N., Reeves, M. & Goh, E., 2013. The benefits of sustainability-driven innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 54(2): 69-73.
Landau, C., Karna, A. & Sailer, M., 2016. Business model adaptation for emerging markets: a case study of a German automobile manufacturer in India. R&D Management, 46(3): 480-503.
Lengnick-Hall, C.A. & Beck, T.E., 2005. Adaptive fit versus robust transformation: How organizations respond to environmental change. Journal of Management, 31(5): 738-757.
Lerner, J. O. S. H., Leamon, A. & Dew, S. 2017. The CMA and the Saudi stock market crash of 2006. BELLA Research Group and Saudi Capital Market Authority (CMA) . https://cma.org.sa/en/Market/Documents/CMA_Crash2006_en.pdf .
Lindgardt, Z., Reeves, M., Stalk, G. & Deimler, M.S., 2009. Business model innovation. When the Game Gets Tough, Change the Game, The Boston Consulting Group, Boston, MA.
Linnenluecke, M.K., 2017. Resilience in business and management research: A review of influential publications and a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1): 4-30.
Lipton, M. & Mazur, R. B. 1975. The Chinese Wall Solution to the Conflict Problems of Securities Firms. New York University Law Review, 50(3): 459-494.
Loon, M. & Chik, R. 2019. Efficiency-centered, innovation-enabling business models of high tech SMEs: Evidence from Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 36(1): 87-111.
Mason, K. & Spring, M. 2011. The sites and practices of business models. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(6): 1032-1041.
Massa, L., Tucci, C.L. & Afuah, A., 2017. A critical assessment of business model research. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1): 73-104.
Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution : GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences.
McNamara, P., Peck, S.I. & Sasson, A., 2013. Competing business models, value creation and appropriation in English football. Long Range Planning, 46(6): 475-487.
Michel, S. 2014. Capture More Value. Harvard Business Review, 92(8): 80-85.
Morris, M., Schindehutte, M. & Allen, J., 2005. The entrepreneur's business model: toward a unified perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58(6): 726-735.
Osiyevskyy, O. & Dewald, J., 2015. Explorative versus exploitative business model change: the cognitive antecedents of firm-level responses to disruptive innovation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 9(1): 58-78.
Rajala, R., Westerlund, M. & Möller, K., 2012. Strategic flexibility in open innovation–designing business models for open source software. European Journal of Marketing, 46(10): 1368-1388.
Ramdani, B., Binsaif, A., & Boukrami, E. 2019. Business model innovation: a review and research agenda. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 22 (2): 89-108.
Saebi, T., Lien, L. & Foss, N.J., 2017. What drives business model adaptation? The impact of opportunities, threats and strategic orientation. Long Range Planning, 50(5): 567-581.
Samargandi, N., Fidrmuc, J. & Ghosh, S. 2014. Financial development and economic growth in an oil-rich economy: The case of Saudi Arabia. Economic Modelling, 43, 267-278.
Santos, F., Pache, A. C., & Birkholz, C. 2015. Making hybrids work: Aligning business models and organizational design for social enterprises. California Management Review, 57(3): 36-58.
Schneider, S., & Spieth, P. 2013. Business model innovation: Towards an integrated future research agenda. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(1): 1-34.
Sinfield, J.V., Calder, E., McConnell, B. & Colson, S., 2012. How to identify new business models. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(2): 85-90.
Sorescu, A., Frambach, R.T., Singh, J., Rangaswamy, A. & Bridges, C., 2011. Innovations in retail business models. Journal of Retailing, 87(1): 3-16.
Sosna, M., Trevinyo-Rodríguez, R.N. & Velamuri, S.R., 2010. Business model innovation through trial-and-error learning: The Naturhouse case. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3): 383-407.
Spieth, P., Schneider, S., Clauß, T. & Eichenberg, D. 2019. Value drivers of social businesses: A business model perspective. Long Range Planning, 52(3): 427-444.
Sutcliffe, K.M. & Vogus, T.J. 2003. Organizing for resilience. In Cameron, K.S., Dutton, J.E. and Quinn, R.E. (eds), Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Tallman, S., Luo, Y. & Buckley, P. J. 2018. Business models in global competition. Global Strategy Journal, 8(4): 517-535.
Teece, D. J. 2010. Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3): 172-194.
Teece, D. J. 2018. Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1): 40-49.
Tykkyläinen, S., & Ritala, P. (2020). Business model innovation in social enterprises: An activity system perspective. Journal of Business Research . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.045 .
Velamuri, V. K., Bansemir, B., Neyer, A. K. & Möslein, K. M. 2013. Product service systems as a driver for business model innovation: lessons learned from the manufacturing industry. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(1): 1-25.
Velu, C. & Stiles, P. 2013. Managing decision-making and cannibalization for parallel business models. Long Range Planning, 46(6): 443-458.
Wirtz, B.W., Pistoia, A., Ullrich, S. & Göttel, V. 2016. Business models: Origin, development and future research perspectives. Long Range Planning, 49(1): 36-54.
Wu, X., Ma, R. & Shi, Y. 2010. How do latecomer firms capture value from disruptive technologies? A secondary business-model innovation perspective. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 57(1): 51-62.
Yin, R.K. 2014. Case Study Research: Design and methods, 5th Edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Yunus, M., Moingeon, B. & Lehmann-Ortega, L. 2010. Building social business models: Lessons from the Grameen experience. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3): 308-325.
Download references
We thank the senior editor Dr. Seung-Hyun Lee and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful and constructive comments.
(The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to sharing restrictions, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request)
Open Access funding provided by the Qatar National Library.
Authors and affiliations.
Centre for Entrepreneurship, College of Business & Economics, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
Boumediene Ramdani
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Ahmed Binsaif
Regent’s University London, London, UK
Elias Boukrami
University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
Cherif Guermat
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Correspondence to Boumediene Ramdani .
Conflicts of interest/competing interests.
Not applicable.
(Custom code is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request)
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Not Applicable
Publisher’s note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .
Reprints and permissions
Ramdani, B., Binsaif, A., Boukrami, E. et al. Business models innovation in investment banks: a resilience perspective. Asia Pac J Manag 39 , 51–78 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-020-09723-z
Download citation
Published : 17 June 2020
Issue Date : March 2022
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-020-09723-z
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Understanding an investment company, closed-end funds, mutual funds, unit investment trusts (uits), the bottom line.
James Chen, CMT is an expert trader, investment adviser, and global market strategist.
Investopedia / Michela Buttignol
An investment company is a corporation or trust engaged in the business of investing the pooled capital of investors in financial securities. This is most often done either through a closed-end fund or an open-end fund (also referred to as a mutual fund). In the U.S., most investment companies are registered with and regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 .
An investment company may be known as a "fund company" or "fund sponsor." They often partner with third-party distributors to sell mutual funds.
Investment companies are business entities, both privately and publicly owned, that manage, sell, and market funds to the public. The main business of an investment company is to hold and manage securities for investment purposes, but they typically offer investors a variety of funds and investment services, which include portfolio management , recordkeeping, custodial, legal, accounting, and tax management services.
An investment company can be a corporation, partnership, business trust, or limited liability company (LLC) that pools money from investors on a collective basis. The money pooled is invested, and the investors share any profits and losses incurred by the company according to each investor’s interest in the company. For example, assume an investment company pooled and invested $10 million from a number of clients, who represent the fund company's shareholders. A client who contributed $1 million will have a vested interest of 10% in the company, which would also translate into any losses or profits earned.
Investment companies are categorized into three types: closed-end funds , mutual funds (or open-end funds ), and unit investment trusts (UITs). Each of these three investment companies must register under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940.
Investment companies may charge fees on their products, including management fees and other expenses, which can reduce returns. Investors should carefully review the fund's prospectus and performance before investing in a closed-end fund.
Closed-end funds issue a fixed number of shares that may then be traded on stock exchanges. As demand increases or wanes for fund shares, the supply of them remains the same. The price of the shares is thus determined by demand in the market and can trade at a premium or discount to the fund's net asset value (NAV) (although the units or shares of closed-end funds are typically offered at an initial discount to their NAV).
Investors who want to sell shares will sell them to other investors on the secondary market at a price determined by market forces and participants, making them not redeemable. Since investment companies with a closed-end structure issue only a fixed number of shares, back-and-forth trading of the shares in the market has no impact on the portfolio.
Mutual funds have a floating number of issued shares and investors may sell or redeem their shares back to the fund or the broker acting for the fund at their current net asset value at each trading day's closing NAV. As investors move their money in and out of the fund, the fund expands and contracts, respectively. Open-ended funds are often restricted to investing in liquid assets, given that the investment managers have to plan in a way that the fund is able to meet the demands for investors who may want their money back at any time.
Mutual fund companies may charge fees, including management fees, 12b-1 fees, and other expenses, which can reduce returns (although the trend has been that fees have gotten lower over time). Mutual funds are popular among investors because they can offer diversification and professional management. However, investors should carefully review the fund's prospectus and performance before investing in a mutual fund.
A unit investment trust (UIT) issues a set number of units that represent undivided interests in a specific, fixed portfolio of securities. They have a specified termination date, and investors receive a pro-rata share of the UIT's net assets upon termination. UITs are passive investments in that they typically invest in a fixed portfolio of securities, such as stocks or bonds, and are not actively traded or rebalanced like the portfolios of mutual funds or closed-end funds. UITs may charge fees, including a creation and development fee, a trustee fee, and other expenses, which can reduce returns.
Each of these fund types can invest in a variety of securities, such as stocks, bonds, and commodities. Some may also use leverage to enhance returns, but this also increases the risk involved.
Private investment funds that only accept money from investors with a substantial amount of assets (i.e., accredited investors ) are not considered to be investment companies under the federal securities laws. These funds are exempt from the registration requirements under the Investment Company Act of 1940, but they are still subject to other securities laws and regulations. Private investment funds include hedge funds , private equity funds , and venture capital funds .
Investment companies have been around since the 1800s. The first mutual fund, the Massachusetts Investors Trust, was established in 1924 to allow small investors to invest in the stock market. It was an open-end fund, which became the most popular type of investment company. An iteration of this fund operates under the ticker MITTX.
Socially responsible investing (SRI) became a growing trend in the investment industry, and some investment companies specialize in SRI strategies. These companies invest in companies that have a positive impact on society and the environment, while avoiding companies that engage in practices that are harmful to people or the planet.
Investment companies can play a role in philanthropy. Donor-advised funds (DAFs) allow individuals to donate money to a charitable organization, while still retaining some control over how the funds are invested and distributed. This can be a tax-efficient way to support charitable causes while also benefiting from the investment returns.
Investment companies are legally defined and regulated entities that pool money from investors to invest in a portfolio of securities, such as stocks, bonds, and commodities. They are regulated by the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, which set forth various registration, disclosure, and reporting requirements. Investment companies are categorized into three types: closed-end funds, mutual funds (open-end funds), and unit investment trusts (UITs). Each type of investment company has its own characteristics, benefits, and risks. Investors should carefully review the offering documents, past performance, and risk factors before investing in any investment company or fund.
Investor.gov. “ The Laws That Govern the Securities Industry .”
Investor.gov. “ Closed-End Funds .”
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. “ Mutual Funds and ETFs: a Guide for Investors .” Pages 4, 9, 31.
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. “ Mutual Funds and ETFs: a Guide for Investors .” Pages 5, 52.
Investor.gov. " Hedge Funds ."
Investment Company Institute. “ How US-Registered Investment Companies Operate and the Core Principles Underlying Their Regulation .” Page 1.
MFS. “ Massachusetts Investors Trust .”
Published: June 28, 2024
As a writer, I’m extremely familiar with the concept of proposals. We write these sorts of proposals to convert clients, persuade buyers, and grow our business in the short term. However, investment proposals are a bit different — these proposals are written with a unique purpose for a specific audience and with some high stakes attached.
An investment proposal is the key to long-term business growth for many businesses, so it’s important to get it right.
In this article, I’ll define investment proposals, compare them to the business proposal, and then break down the components. I’ll provide a template, look at investment proposal examples, and even hear some tips for writing from a professional.
Table of Contents
Investment proposal vs. business proposal, 10 components of an investment proposal, how to write an investment proposal [+template], investment proposal examples [+tips].
An investment proposal is a document outlining the plan for a business. You use it to attract or convert investors to fund your organization. It covers the strategy of your business, the market, and financial projections, making it an essential document for conversion — empowering them to invest.
Related articles.
2 Essential Templates For Starting Your Business
Powerful and easy-to-use sales software that drives productivity, enables customer connection, and supports growing sales orgs
We apologize, our site does not support Internet Explorer 6 or 7. Please view our site in a different, standards-adherent browser such as Firefox , Safari , or Chrome , or upgrade your Internet Explorer browser to Version 8 or Version 9 . Thank you.
No one enters the business world with a desire to fail.
Becoming an entrepreneur opens a world of possibilities, and though one of these is the potential for failure, everyone hopes for great success and financial prosperity. Operating a business isn’t easy, and many people expect challenges and difficulties on the way to the top. However, many underestimate the importance of having a strong business model in place before the first sale is made.
A business model sets the foundation for how your business will operate, how you will create value for your customers, and how you will advance past industry competition. It is also a starting point for investors like Mark Stevens to evaluate the potential of the company. Investors need to have reasonable assurance that their money will be put into a business venture that is worth the risk, and a business model is revealed through the business plan. These steps help you create a streamlined plan for your business, focusing on growth and longevity.
Identify Your Audience
Without carefully choosing a specific audience, you don’t give your business the opportunity to address the individuals and markets that either need or want your services or products. A target market shouldn’t be based on a general assumption about community needs, but it should focus on a specific profile that includes the personas of two or three types of buyers. Come up with a profile for the ideal customer, then work out to incorporate correlating demographic information. Think of the problem your product or service will have and which group of buyers this would most benefit. Consider Walmart, the major retailer. This is a company that fits almost every purchase need of the average shopper, but you won’t find contractors or homebuilders headed there for home furnishings. In spite of their huge success and national presence, the retailer still knows who their specific audience is.
Determine Your Business Processes
Before you are able to connect with customers or hire employees, you should be able to define each area of activity that will make the business model work. The core aspects of your operations are the most crucial functions to develop. Don’t just know what they are but also be comfortable with the resources and efforts it will take to make them run smoothly. Things like marketing, product delivery, and invoicing all are all key activities to understand.
Document Key Resources
The different aspects of the operation will inevitably rely on different resources to work efficiently. Compile a master list of key business resources, then go through and makes sure that your business model has the capital it needs to provide these resources. Your resources aren’t limited to vendor and supplies, but also storage facilities, a digital presence, customer lists, and financial capital.
Develop Your Product’s Value Proposition
Unless you are in a niche business with little competition, you will need to find a way to rise to the top of your field. Identifying your value proposition is usually done in the early stages of business development, as you look for creative ways to solve an industry need. As you prepare to market your services, you will need to bring that value to the front of the discussion. Your value is more than just a price point. Contrary to popular opinion, consumers aren’t just worried about the price. They want to know about quality and what makes one product or business a better choice. Sustainability, customer service, self-service options, or a revolutionary idea can support why your product has value. Develop a product delivery system that keeps your product and business valuable and relevant to consumers for a long period of time.
Secure Business Partners
In the business world, no man is an island. You may not need or want a financial partner or investor, but you won’t be able to conduct business without the help of advertising partners, suppliers or vendors, and networking connections. Look for partners that have a specialty service or supply chain in your industry, as this can help eliminate third party and transport costs. Negotiate your contracts carefully, looking at quality and consistency, in addition to the cost. Make sure those you partner with understand your goals and business model, as the relationship you form will either promote or detract from them.
Allow for Innovation
Over time and as your business becomes more successful, you need to leave room for growth through innovation. Create consumer loyalty by developing a brand that they can get behind, but deliver the products they are looking for with quality service. Your business model may need to adapt to consumer trends, so don’t feel that this plan must remain static. As your business begins to understand the needs of the consumer and what may be happening in the market, revisit your business model and adapt it to foster continued success.
Receive our daily news straight to your inbox
News provided by
26 Jun, 2024, 07:32 CST
Share this article
The search for technology to support model portfolio management and portfolio construction services is increasing as companies look to centralise and scale their model portfolio management and compete in a rapidly growing market.
BRISBANE, Australia , June 26, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- The utilisation of model portfolios among financial advisers has emerged as a transformative force, with staggering growth in model portfolios projected to continue over the next decade. And with good reason, they offer an efficient method for diversification, risk management, and portfolio construction, with personalisation features to match the unique financial goals and risk tolerances of clients.
Financial advisers are also increasingly turning to asset managers for assistance in managing the model portfolios they build and maintain for clients. Jacobi's model management technology enables asset managers to scale the portfolio construction services they offer financial professionals. The technology enables a platform that can centralise performance and risk analytics, integrate investment workflows, and produce professional reports to share with clients.
An early adopter of Jacobi's model technology, leading asset manager T. Rowe Price has seen improved process efficiencies and enhanced engagement with clients.
Chris Augelli , Head of Advisor Engagement & Portfolio Construction Solutions at T. Rowe Price , says:
"Jacobi's technology has enabled us to work faster and handle the increasing demand for our portfolio construction services. Having the team on one common platform through Jacobi has facilitated collaboration in real-time, which has supported our effectiveness in meeting clients' needs."
Tanya Bartolini , Chief Revenue Officer at Jacobi , says:
"Our technology helps us partner with asset managers such as T. Rowe Price to scale and connect workflows, driving enormous efficiencies – and ultimately increasing their market distribution."
About Jacobi
Jacobi Inc. is a global investment technology provider that streamlines multi-asset investment processes and enables portfolio design, analysis, and client engagement. Its unique "open architecture" platform allows users to tailor the platform by integrating their own code, models, data, analytics, and applications.
Founded in 2014, Jacobi provides its technology to top-tier investors across the globe, including some of the world's leading asset and wealth managers, pension funds, asset owners, and investment consultants.
About T.Rowe Price
Founded in 1937, T. Rowe Price helps people around the world achieve their long-term investment goals. As a large global asset management company known for investment excellence, retirement leadership, and independent proprietary research, the firm is built on a culture of integrity that puts client interests first. Investors rely on the award-winning firm for its retirement expertise and active management of equity, fixed income, alternatives, and multi-asset investments. T. Rowe Price manages $1.54 trillion in client assets as of May 31, 2024 , and it serves millions of clients globally.
SOURCE Jacobi Inc
Integrating traditional and blockchain financial models: a blueprint for future investments.
Dr. Clemen Chiang is the CEO of Spiking .
We are on the verge of a new era of investing that will leverage the strengths of traditional financial models and the advancements of blockchain technology. Blockchain is no longer a fringe technology in finance. Major financial institutions, including BlackRock and HSBC , are adopting blockchain-based funds and platforms, and a growing number of countries around the world are launching, developing or researching central bank digital currencies .
As a fintech entrepreneur with years of experience in both portfolio management and financial innovation, I am excited about the immense opportunities we can unlock by combining these two domains. But I have also observed an urgent need to bridge the gap between the models that have historically guided Wall Street's money managers’ investment decisions and the rapidly evolving blockchain currencies and applications that will shape future investments.
In 2022, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink predicted that "the next generation for markets, the next generation for securities, will be tokenization of securities,” meaning that stocks, bonds and other financial instruments will eventually be converted to digital assets on a blockchain. I share this vision that, in the future, every single asset class will be tokenized on an open, immutable ledger—from stocks and real estate to art and vintage whiskey.
The current landscape is fragmented and confusing. Traditional financial models rely on a vast array of metrics, such as price-to-earnings ratios and debt-to-equity ratios. Blockchain assets have their own set of metrics, such as on-chain analysis for cryptocurrencies. The sheer volume and diversity of these metrics can be overwhelming, especially for the average investor, and investors need to be able to compare apples to apples, not apples to oranges.
Apple to upgrade iphone 16 design in important way, new leak claims, fed chair powell issues ‘critical’ warning, sparking sudden $60,000 bitcoin price and crypto crash.
To navigate this new terrain effectively, we must develop integrated frameworks that enable investors to evaluate blockchain options and stocks through the same lens, with the same criteria. Comprehensive integration will help us get the best of both worlds: the wisdom of traditional financial analysis and the transparency and security of blockchain.
Fundamental financial models such as the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), efficient market hypothesis (EMH) and modern portfolio theory (MPT) continue to offer money managers valuable guidance in investment decisions in the following ways.
• Fundamental analysis: Evaluating a company's financial statements, management and competitive advantages, as well as market conditions to determine its intrinsic value.
• Technical analysis: Using historical price data and trading volumes to forecast future price movements.
• Quantitative analysis: Employing mathematical models and statistical techniques to determine risk and return.
• Sentiment analysis: Assessing market sentiment through news, social media and other sources to gauge investor behavior and potential market moves.
Traditional models also have constraints and inefficiencies when trying to address modern financial challenges. When integrated with Wall Street data, blockchain tools can improve important metrics.
• Transparency: Blockchain’s transparent ledger system enables immediate verification of transactions, significantly reducing the risk of fraud and increasing investor trust in data.
• Real-time data: Blockchain continuously updates and validates transaction records on its
decentralized ledger, allowing money managers to monitor and analyze real-time data from traditional and digital currency transactions.
• Asset tokenization: When traditional assets, including stocks, bonds and real estate, are represented as digital tokens on a blockchain, it lowers high barriers to entry in markets that were previously inaccessible to many investors. Tokenization allows fractional ownership, making it easier for people to buy and sell portions of these assets.
I believe that a framework that successfully combines data and insights from both traditional and blockchain-based assets must focus on several key areas.
In our efforts to move toward integrating and analyzing traditional and blockchain-based assets, my team and I are developing the FIAT methodology:
• Fundamental: Incorporating key financial metrics from all relevant sources.
• Insider: Tracking the transactions of major money managers across stocks and digital currencies.
• Alert: Monitoring news and social media sentiment from a wide range of sources.
• Technical: Applying advanced charting and trend analysis to all asset classes.
As we move toward a future where tokenization becomes increasingly prevalent and blockchain plays a greater role in financial portfolios, the tools and methodologies we develop today will be influential in shaping how and where we invest. We need holistic, multifaceted frameworks that can help us create more effective, transparent and accessible financial systems for all investors.
Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
Download the spreadsheet here .
Be smart with your money. Get the latest investing insights delivered right to your inbox three times a week, with the Globe Investor newsletter. Sign up today .
Report an editorial error
Report a technical issue
Editorial code of conduct
Authors and topics you follow will be added to your personal news feed in Following .
Shard’s CEO tells Gulf Business that its co-ownership model offers a pathway to affordable luxury living in Dubai’s booming property market
Shard, a property ownership company, is differentiating itself in the UAE’s high-end real estate market, through a new model.
The firm announced that its co-ownership model will open to investors starting July 1, and promises to make luxury real estate more accessible to a broader audience. This model, which has seen success globally, allows for part-ownership of premium properties, enabling more individuals to partake in Dubai’s booming real estate sector.
Shard’s co-ownership scheme offers 1/8th ownership of luxury properties, complete with the owner’s name on the title deed, highlighted the launch announcements. This model provides all the benefits of premium property ownership at a fraction of the cost, it added.
The company has selected some of Dubai’s most sought-after locations for its listings, including Downtown Dubai, Bluewaters Island, and Palm Jumeirah. These areas are known for their luxurious lifestyle offerings, from world-class dining and entertainment to stunning views and prime beachfront access.
Shard ensures a hassle-free experience through its dedicated management services. The company explained that it handles all aspects of property management, from maintenance and repairs to scheduling stays for co-owners. This service is facilitated through a custom website and mobile app, providing transparency and ease of use.
The co-ownership model simplifies the complexities of property ownership, such as large financial commitments, paperwork, and ongoing maintenance. Shard’s dedicated team supports co-owners throughout the entire purchase and ownership process, making it an appealing option for those looking to enjoy the perks of premium property ownership without the associated burdens.
In a move to strengthen its market presence, Shard has partnered with leading real estate agencies and proptech companies, including BetterHomes and Huspy. These collaborations enhance Shard’s ability to list and acquire top-tier properties, leveraging a vast network to offer exclusive opportunities.
The co-ownership model, popular in regions like the US, Europe, and Southeast Asia, is expected to rapidly gain traction in the UAE, driven by the booming real estate market. Shard’s entry into this market aligns with the increasing demand for flexible and cost-effective property ownership solutions.
To explain the new model, István Juhász, CEO and co-founder of Shard , speaks to Gulf Business .
The co-ownership model is a modern approach to owning luxury properties, designed to make high-end real estate more accessible.
Under this model, each property is divided into 1/8th shares, allowing up to eight individuals to co-own a portion of the property.
Each co-owner is listed on the title deed, ensuring legal ownership and allowing for personal use of the property. Specifically, with Shard’s model, each owner is entitled to exclusive use of the property for 44 days a year. These days can be scheduled flexibly, either for personal enjoyment or to rent out the property for income.
Unlike timeshares, Shard’s co-ownership model ensures that co-owners hold actual ownership stakes in the property.
This means any appreciation in property value benefits the owners directly.
Shard handles all aspects of property management, from maintenance to rental services, providing a hassle-free ownership experience. Owners can sell their shares at any time through Shard’s digital platform, which also allows them to manage their bookings and track rental income.
Q: What types of properties does Shard offer for co-ownership?
Shard curates a selection of the top 1 per cent of premium properties in Dubai’s most desirable locations, such as Downtown Dubai, Marina, Creek, and Palm Jumeirah.
These properties come fully furnished and equipped with high-end amenities. By partnering with leading real estate agencies like BetterHomes and Huspy, Shard ensures that their listings represent the best opportunities in the market.
The properties are tailored for a luxurious lifestyle and are managed entirely by Shard to maintain their high standards.
Q: How is co-ownership different from fractional ownership?
Co-ownership differs from fractional ownership in two key ways:
Q: What is the legal framework that supports co-ownership in Dubai?
Dubai’s legal system supports co-ownership through laws such as Law No. 27 of 2007 on Encumbrance of Real Property Units (the “Joint Property Law”) and Law No. 7 of 2006 regulating Real Property Registration in the Emirate of Dubai (the “Property Registration Law”).
These laws provide a clear structure for co-ownership agreements, outlining the rights and obligations of co-owners. They also ensure that multiple individuals can be listed on a single title deed, allowing for up to eight co-owners to share legal ownership of a property.
Q: How will investors benefit from co-ownership with Shard?
Co-ownership with Shard offers several benefits for investors such as access to premium properties as investors can own a share of luxury real estate starting from Dhs200,000 making it a more accessible way to participate in Dubai’s high-end property market.
Additionally, instead of investing in a single property, investors can spread their investment across multiple properties, enhancing their portfolio and reducing risk.
This model, futhermore, brings in high rental yields and caapital appreciation. Co-owners can generate income from renting out their property share and benefit from the property’s increasing value.
As part of our services, Shard handles all aspects of property management, including maintenance, taxes, and rental services, ensuring a seamless experience for co-owners.
Another benefit of co-owning a property is that investors can enjoy 44 days of personal use per year, allowing for a luxurious lifestyle or the opportunity to use it as per their convenience.
Q: Does co-ownership impact existing market inventories or inspire new developments?
Co-ownership models can significantly influence the real estate market.
In markets where co-ownership has been introduced, such as the US with companies like Pacaso, the availability and desirability of premium properties have increased.
Co-ownership can make high-end real estate more accessible, driving demand and potentially inspiring developers to create properties specifically designed for this model.
In Dubai, Shard’s entry into the market could lead to similar trends, encouraging the development of properties that cater to the co-ownership model’s unique requirements.
Q: What motivated Shard to introduce the co-ownership model in Dubai?
I was inspired by the challenge of finding an appealing real estate investment option.
Traditional property purchases required significant capital and concentrated risk, while real estate funds felt impersonal. The idea of co-ownership offered a balance—allowing real ownership at a lower entry cost.
Given Dubai’s booming real estate market and the high demand for flexible, luxury living options, introducing the co-ownership model here was a logical step.
Read: Pioneering proptech: Transforming real estate through blockchain
Saudi arabia’s wealth fund pif swings to $36.8bn profit in 2023, staycations rise, visitors staying longer in middle east, reveals travel report, oppo to launch ‘ultimate’ ai phones in dubai on july 2, latest issue.
Privacy policy.
© 2021 MOTIVATE MEDIA GROUP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
You're reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool's Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More
The stock initially soared on the loan news, but it now trades below where it was before the announcement.
Shares of Plug Power ( PLUG 6.83% ) surged in May after the company announced that it had received a conditional commitment for a $1.66 billion loan from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). However, the stock is now well below where it was before the announcement, and one U.S. senator has called the loan into question.
The stock, meanwhile, is now down over 70% in the past year.
Let's look at the proposed DOE loan, why it is being called into question, why it is so important for Plug Power, and whether the slide in the stock is a buying opportunity.
Plug Power has long been grappling with a flawed business model, which it has set out to fix. The company initially found a niche selling fuel cells used in forklifts and other material-handling equipment to companies with high-volume, three-shift warehouses like Amazon and Walmart .
But the flaw in its business model was that it would sell the hydrogen fuel needed to run its fuel cells at a loss. This could be seen in the company's most recent results, where negative gross margin led to a $159 million gross loss.
Just to emphasize how bad this is, the loss was measured before any corporate costs. The company loses a lot of money on the hydrogen fuel it sells, although in the first quarter, it also lost money on the equipment it sold.
Obviously, acquiring or making something for $3 and then selling it for $1 is not a durable business model, but that is pretty close to what Plug Power did last quarter with hydrogen fuel. Over the years, the company has mostly obtained hydrogen from third parties and sold it to its customers at a huge loss.
This is why it has embarked on building a network of its own hydrogen plants that can produce fuel that it can sell to its customers for a profit.
This is where the DOE loan comes in. In May, the company was given the chance to secure the loan -- if certain conditions to be negotiated by the company and the government are met -- to help it build out its hydrogen plant network. If it is approved, the loan would help fund up to six green hydrogen production facilities.
Plug Power already has two plants up and running, and another is expected to be complete by the end of the year, and that would meet about 65% of where it sees demand headed.
The loan would help create a large plant in Texas scheduled for next year that would meet its customer needs and allow it to expand beyond that.
However, in June, Sen. John Barrasso, a Republican from Wyoming who is the ranking member of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, asked the DOE's inspector general to investigate "any potential impropriety" by the the DOE’s Loan Programs Office and the loan program's director, Jigar Shah, due to possible conflicts of interest. The senator also questioned Plug Power's viability given its $1.4 billion in losses last year.
While Plug Power could pursue financing elsewhere if the loan ultimately does not get approved, the terms and interest rates would undoubtedly be much less favorable. And given the company's financial position and negative operating cash flow , there is no guarantee it would be able to find an institution to lend it the money.
Image source: Getty Images.
Plug Power shares shot up as much as 70%, to $4.90, in the day after the DOE loan offer was announced. Today it is trading more than 15% below where it was before the announcement.
If the loan is approved, there should be some immediate upside potential given the past reaction and where the stock now trades. However, that could be short-lived.
Plug Power, meanwhile, has said it is looking to get to gross margin breakeven in its fuel business in the fourth quarter, which would not be dependent on the loan. That is a potential catalyst, but a break-even gross margin is still not a complete solution because it will not make the company profitable or start generating cash.
At this point, I would view Plug Power more like a lottery ticket. If it gets the loan, builds out its plants, and turns positive in gross margin and free cash flow, there could be tremendous upside in the stock. But just like most lottery tickets, there is also the chance it becomes worthless.
John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Geoffrey Seiler has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon and Walmart. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy .
Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Business Model: A business model is a company's plan for how it will generate revenues and make a profit . It explains what products or services the business plans to manufacture and market, and ...
8. Agency/Promotion. Agents create value by marketing an asset, which they don't own, to an interested buyer. They then earn a fee or a commission for bringing the buyer and seller together. Thus, instead of using their own assets to create value, they team up with others to help promote them to the world.
Definition of Investment Model. Investment Model is a strategy or plan that outlines how investors intend to allocate their assets and invest their money. ... Texas. 11 Financial may only transact business in those states in which it is registered, or qualifies for an exemption or exclusion from registration requirements. 11 Financial's ...
Example: A business that rents machinery like backhoes, augers and dozers to individuals for their home construction projects is using a leasing business model. 8. Franchise model. A franchise is ...
This sample plan was created for a hypothetical investment company that buys other companies as investments. In this sample, the hypothetical Venture Capital firm starts with $20 million as an initial investment fund. In its early months of existence, it invests $5 million each in four companies. It receives a management fee of two percent (2% ...
A business model defines how a company creates, delivers, and captures value. It acts as a blueprint for the operations, strategies, and potential profitability of a business. This article explores the various facets of business models, their importance, and the different types that are prevalent in today's business environment.
The scope of the M&A advisory services offered by investment banks usually relates to various aspects of the acquisition and sale of companies and assets such as business valuation, negotiation, pricing and structuring of transactions, as well as procedure and implementation. Investment banks also provide "fairness opinions" - documents ...
While the definition of "business model" can vary depending on who's using the term, it generally refers to how a business brings in cash. It could refer to a number of different strategies ...
A business model provides a framework for a company's monetization strategies. It focuses on defining the audience (customer segment), unique selling proposition, brand positioning, method of delivery, and distribution channels to create a profit-making formula. Business models shape all aspects of a company's development and growth.
Explore the ins and outs of investing in startups. Learn how to invest in startups, the various ways to invest, and the risks and rewards of startup investing. Solutions. Find Prospects; ... Good business model: Examine the startup's business model and how it plans to generate revenue. Likewise, understand the cost and efficiency of customer ...
The firm operates in more than 40 countries and has over 30,000 employees. Goldman Sachs' business model is based on four primary pillars: Investment Banking, Global Markets, Asset Management, and Consumer & Wealth Management. In Investment Banking, Goldman Sachs provides advisory services for mergers and acquisitions, underwriting services ...
This business model includes insurance brokers, large stock brokerage firms, and large investment banks that underwrite IPOs. Examples: Etrade, Charles Schwab, ... Nate Nead is a licensed investment banker and Principal at Deal Capital Partners, LLC, a middle-marketing M&A and capital advisory firm. Nate works with corporate clients looking to ...
Matthew Blume is a portfolio manager of private client accounts at Pekin Hardy Strauss Wealth Management.He also manages the firm's ESG research and shareholder advocacy efforts. He earned a B.S ...
1. Industry profitability challenges grow. 2. Regulations and standards get tighter. 3. Success influenced by business model differences.
The individual classifications were then aggregated to construct an index for each business model. Those indices then allowed us to compare total stock market returns — as measured by changes in stock price plus dividends — for different business models in the U.S. markets over a 12-year period, from 1997 through 2009.
Fee-for-service business model examples: McKinsey & Company, MedExpress, Walmart. Franchise. Builds on existing successful business and receives a percentage of earnings from franchises who invest in, operate, and promote new locations. Franchise business model examples: Ace Hardware Stores, McDonald's, The UPS Store.
The global investment market grew to around $3837 billion this year from around $3532 billion in 2022 at a CAGR of 8.6%. Competitive Analysis: Identify and analyze your direct and indirect competitors. Identify their strengths and weaknesses, and describe what differentiates your investment company services from them.
Investment Company Business Plan. Over the past 20+ years, we have helped over 1,000 entrepreneurs and business owners create business plans to start and grow their investment companies. On this page, we will first give you some background information with regards to the importance of business planning. We will then go through an investment ...
Business Overview. NovaGrowth Investments is a startup investment company located in Aurora, Colorado. The company is founded by Thom Anderson, an investment broker from Colorado Springs, Colorado, who has amassed millions of dollars for his clients over ten years while working at Clear River Investments. Because Thom has gained an extensive ...
What is a Capital Investment Model? Most companies make long-term investments that require a large amount of capital invested in the initial years, mostly in fixed assets such as property, machinery, or equipment.Due to the significant amount of cash outflows required, companies perform a capital investment analysis to evaluate the profitability of an investment and determine whether it is worthy.
We choose to study investment banks for at least two reasons. First, Crotty argues that investment banking is a complex and risky business, and investment banks face continuous shift in market and regulatory environments.For instance, five of the largest independent investment banks in the US lost their independence in 2008: Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers failed, Merrill Lynch was taken over ...
Investment Company: An investment company is a corporation or trust engaged in the business of investing the pooled capital of investors in financial securities. This is most often done either ...
Business proposals are a bit more commonplace than investment proposals — and the two types are different in crucial ways. Here's a summary of the similarities and differences between these proposal formats. Similarity. The key similarity between an investment proposal and a business proposal is the drive to convert. Each proposal seeks to ...
Things like marketing, product delivery, and invoicing all are all key activities to understand. Document Key Resources. The different aspects of the operation will inevitably rely on different resources to work efficiently. Compile a master list of key business resources, then go through and makes sure that your business model has the capital ...
BRISBANE, Australia, June 26, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- The utilisation of model portfolios among financial advisers has emerged as a transformative force, with staggering growth in model portfolios ...
The Value Of Traditional Models. Fundamental financial models such as the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), efficient market hypothesis (EMH) and modern portfolio theory (MPT) continue to offer ...
Download the spreadsheet here.. Be smart with your money. Get the latest investing insights delivered right to your inbox three times a week, with the Globe Investor newsletter.
Shard, a property ownership company, is differentiating itself in the UAE's high-end real estate market, through a new model. The firm announced that its co-ownership model will open to ...
Fixing a flawed business model. Plug Power has long been grappling with a flawed business model, which it has set out to fix. The company initially found a niche selling fuel cells used in ...
Meta can tweak its advertising model to stave off a fine of as much as 10% of its global annual turnover if found guilty of DMA breaches. The Commission has until March next year to wrap up its ...