Forgot password?
New to Digital Leadership? Create your account
Your e-mail address: * Your first name: *
Help us better understand the UNITE community
Our 35-page comprehensive innovation guide covers the key areas why innovation fails. While it cannot cover all the solutions (that would take books to fill), it provides you with a convenient starting point for your analysis and provides further resources and links to the corresponding UNITE models, ultimately allowing you to work towards a doubling and tripling your chances of success.
Discover the largest library of innovation & transformation tools on the internet!
Choose Your Password *
Confirm Your Password *
Already have an account? Log in
Country * Please Select Afghanistan Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin (Dahomey) Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Brunei Brunswick and Lüneburg Bhutan Bulgaria Burkina Faso (Upper Volta) Burundi Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cayman Islands Central African Republic Central American Federation Chad Chile China Colombia Comoros Congo Free State Costa Rica Cote d’Ivoire (Ivory Coast) Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czechia Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Eswatini Ethiopia Fiji Finland France Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Grand Duchy of Tuscany Greece Grenada Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Holy See Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Mauritania Mauritius Mexico Micronesia Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nassau Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North Macedonia Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Panama Papal States Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Piedmont-Sardinia Poland Portugal Qatar Republic of Congo Republic of Korea (South Korea) Republic of the Congo Romania Russia Rwanda Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Schaumburg-Lippe Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Sweden Switzerland State of Palestine Syria Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United States United Arab Emirates United Kingdom Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Württemberg Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Industry * Please Select Automotive, mobilty & transport Financial Services Chemical & agriculture Construction & Real Estate Consulting Education Energy Banking, insurance & FS FMCG Food Gov / Public Industry Health & lifestyle Logistics, Aero & Shipping Media & Entertainment Natural resources & mining Pharma & Biotech Retail & trade Tech & E-Commerce Telco Tourism design Information technology & services Management consulting Retail Pharmaceuticals International trade & development Professional training & coaching luxury goods & jewelry Automotive Insurance Mechanical or industrial engineering Company Size * XS - 1-10 S - 10-100 M - 100-1000 L - 1000-5000 XL - > 5000
Most of our models and canvases are designed to be applied!
To help you personalize them to your exact business requirements, you can download fully editable versions of the UNITE models available (PowerPoint format)!
They are straightforward to work with, and you can directly incorporate them into your presentations as you need…thus saving countless hours of replication!
PS: did you know that you are also getting hi-res print-ready versions for your workshops?
Each month we host our exclusive, invitation-only webinar series where one of our industry-leading experts updates our members on the latest news, progress and concepts around business strategy, innovation and digital transformation, as well as other related topics.
You will receive the book in PDF and EPUB formats, ideal for your computer, Kindle, Tablet or other eReading device.
These sessions are your opportunity to bring any questions or challenges you’re facing and receive expert guidance on the spot.
Come and be a part of engaging discussions where your unique concerns are heard and addressed.
If you are occasionally looking for a sparring partner or you need limited support, then this option will be ideal for you. Coaching sessions are 1-2 hours where we can discuss any challenge or opportunity you are currently facing.
If you need a few more hours outside of this provision, then these could be billed transparently.
We believe support shouldn’t be limited. Because we typically find that the occasional hour just doesn’t cut it – particularly if you and your team are in the midst of a large and complex project.
Your time with Stefan is therefore unlimited (fair usage applies) – in his function as coach and sparring partner. That does mean that you will still have to do the work – we cannot take that off you, unless you hire us as consultants. But you will get valuable strategic insight and direction to make sure you are always focusing your efforts where they will lead to the best results.
We believe support shouldn’t be limited. If you generally know what you are doing but want a sparring partner to frequently raise questions to, this is the perfect choice!
In addition to your monthly 1-1 live coaching sessions with Stefan, you will also get unlimited support from him via email and WhatsApp messaging (fair usage applies). This not only allows you to get valuable strategic direction in your calls, but also gives you instant access to expert help as you work through your plans each month.
The fact that support is text-based means that we can speed up our responses to you while keeping the overall cost of support down.
As a welcome gift, you will receive the both the digital and physical version of our book “How to Create Innovation”, which covers numerous relevant resources and provides additional deep dives into our UNITE models and concepts.
The print version will be shipped out to you on sign-up. The digital version will be emailed to you, and comes in PDF and EPUB formats, ideal for your computer, Kindle, Tablet or other eReading device.
1x major or 2x smaller workshops based on the UNITE models.
All of our Professional plans offer full access to the following:
We are currently in the process of launching our brand new community., we are designing our community to specifically help you:.
Cancelling your plan will deactivate your plan after the current billing period ends. You will not be charged further, but also won’t be able to access [exclusive features/services].
Simply fill out the below form and book in a time for our initial session that works for you. This initial session is free, no strings attached, and is where we can discuss your Blueprint needs more in-depth before moving forward.
Founder of digital leadership.
Partner for it strategy & business alignment.
Speak to our team today to find the best solution for your business to grow and scale.
We are here to support you across the entire lifecycle in all topics related to #digital, #innovation, #transformation and #marketing!
Stefan F. Dieffenbacher Founder of Digital Leadership
Contact form, contact details, book a call.
Title, first name & last name * Email address * Phone number Please let us know how we can best support you! *
By clicking “Send”, I agree to Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
“Please be invited to reach out! We are happy to help and look forward to a first meeting!”
+41 (0) 44 562 42 24
Find a time on our calender that best suits you !
Founder and CEO of Digital Leadership
SCHEDULE YOUR INITIAL CALL
What is the main challenge you're currently facing in your business?
Let’s find the best solution for your business to grow and scale sustainably!
We will uncover your current business situation and goals and provide you with a bespoke solution that helps you drastically grow your business working with us.
Read the reviews and make sure that this is not a waste of time, but a super effective tool.
Schedule your free business assessment call with our founder.
On this call, we will uncover your current business situation and goals and talk about how to drive change and solve your need.
Choose the meeting type that applies to your needs and schedule a time to meet with someone from our team. We look forward to speaking with you soon!
Welcome to our scheduling page.
In a uniquely designed 60 or 90 minute session* , we will …
Based on the Blueprinting session, you will receive a tailored blueprint that aligns with your objectives, vision and goals, ensuring that your initiative is a success from start to finish.
In this session, you will be working together with Patrick Zimmermann, Associate Partner for Customer Experience
In this session, you will be working together with Dr. Andreas Rein, Partner at Digital Leadership for Culture & Org Change
In this session, you will be working together with Sascha Martini, Partner at Digital Leadership for Innovation and Digital Transformation
In this session, you will be working together with Stefan F. Dieffenbacher, Founder of Digital Leadership Stefan is a global thought leader in the innovation space
In this session, you will be working together with Adam D. Wisniewski, Partner for IT Strategy & Business Alignment
Write a personalized review! Log in
The Leading Source of Insights On Business Model Strategy & Tech Business Models
The cost structure is one of the building blocks of a business model . It represents how companies spend most of their resources to keep generating demand for their products and services. The cost structure together with revenue streams, help assess the operational scalability of an organization.
is a fundamental concept in business and economics that refers to the composition of costs within an organization. It involves categorizing and analyzing the various expenses incurred in the production of goods or services. Understanding cost structure is crucial for decision-making, pricing strategies, financial planning, and profitability analysis. It helps businesses determine where their resources are allocated and how efficiently they are used. | |
The cost structure typically includes the following components: – : These are expenses that remain constant regardless of the level of production or sales. Examples include rent, salaries of permanent staff, and insurance premiums. – : Variable costs vary in direct proportion to the level of production or sales. Common examples are raw materials, direct labor, and sales commissions. – : Semi-variable costs have both fixed and variable components. For instance, utility bills may have a fixed service fee and a variable usage fee. – : Operating costs encompass all expenses related to day-to-day operations, including both fixed and variable costs. They are essential for keeping the business running smoothly. – : COGS includes expenses directly tied to the production of goods or services. It often includes raw materials, labor, and manufacturing overhead. – : Total costs are the sum of fixed, variable, and semi-variable costs. They represent the overall expenditure of a business. | |
Analyzing cost structure is vital for multiple business aspects: – : Understanding cost components helps in setting competitive prices that cover expenses while generating profits. – : Identifying areas of high or unnecessary costs allows businesses to implement cost-cutting measures effectively. – : Cost structure data is essential for creating budgets, financial forecasts, and business plans. – : Businesses use cost structure to assess the profitability of products, services, or business segments. – : It aids in making informed decisions, such as expanding production, outsourcing, or investing in cost-effective technologies. | |
A clear understanding of cost structure provides several benefits: – : It helps in optimizing pricing and cost management strategies to maximize profits. – : Businesses can allocate resources efficiently to areas with the most significant impact on their bottom line. – : Knowing the cost structure helps identify potential financial risks and uncertainties. – : Effective cost control can lead to a competitive advantage by offering products or services at lower prices or with higher quality. | |
Challenges associated with cost structure analysis include: – : In some industries, cost structures can be intricate, making it challenging to allocate costs accurately. – : Fluctuations in variable costs due to market changes or supply chain disruptions can pose challenges in cost management. – : Managing fixed costs can be challenging if a business faces declining revenue or significant disruptions. | |
In manufacturing, analyzing the cost structure helps determine the cost of producing each unit and the breakeven point for a product. – Service industries use cost structure analysis to allocate labor costs, overheads, and other expenses to various service offerings. – Startups and small businesses often focus on minimizing fixed costs to maintain flexibility and adaptability in the early stages. |
Table of Contents
There are two elements to understand about any company:
While most people focus on how companies make money. A few truly grasp how those same companies spend money.
However, understanding how companies spend money can give you insights into the economics of their business model .
Thus, once you grasp those two – seemingly simple – elements you’ll understand a good part of the logic behind the company’s current strategy .
In the business model canvas by Alexander Osterwalder , a cost structure is defined as:
What are the most cost in your business? Which key resources/ activities are most expensive?
In other words, the cost structure comprises the key resources a company has to spend to keep generating revenues.
While in accounting terms, the primary costs associated with generating revenues are called COGS (or cost of goods sold).
In business modeling , we want to have a wider view.
In short, all the primary costs that make a business model viable over time are good candidates for that.
Therefore, there is not a single answer.
For instance, if we look at a company like Google, the cost structure will be primarily comprised of traffic acquisition costs, data center costs, R&D costs, and sales and marketing costs.
Why? Because all those costs help Google’s business model keep its competitiveness.
However, if we had to focus on the main cost to keep Google making money we would primarily look at its traffic acquisition costs (you’ll see the example below).
This ingredient is critical as – especially in the tech industry – many people focus too much on the revenue growth of the business.
But they lose sight of the costs involved to run the company and the “price of growth .”
Defined as the money burned to accelerate the rate of growth of a startup.
Too often startups burn all their resources because they’re not able to create a balanced business model , where the cost structure can sustain and generate enough revenues to cover the major expenses and also leave ample profit margins.
Companies like Google have been pretty successful in building up a sustainable business model thanks to their efficient cost structure.
Indeed, from a sustainable cost structure can be built a scalable business model .
In the Blitzscaling business model canvas , to determine operational scalability, Reid Hoffman asks:
Are your operations sustainable at meeting the demand for your product/service? Are you revenues growing faster than your expenses?
Blitzscaling is a particular process of massive growth under uncertainty that prioritizes speed over efficiency and focuses on market domination to create a first-scaler advantage in a scenario of high uncertainty.
Reid Hoffman uses the term operational scalability as the ability of a company at generating sustainable demand for its products and services while being profitable.
Indeed, lacking the ability to build operational scalability represents a key growth limiter, and the second key element (together with lack of product/market fit ).
While most startups’ dream is to grow at staggering rates. Growth isn’t easy to manage either.
As if you grow at a fast rate, but you also burn cash at a more rapid rate, chances are your company or startup might be in jeopardy.
That is why a business model that doesn’t make sense from the operational standpoint is doomed to collapse over time!
A cost structure is an important component of any business model, as it helps to assess its sustainability over time.
While a startup’s business models, trying to define a new space might not be able to be profitable right away, it’s important to build long-term unit economics.
I know you might think Google is too big of a target to learn any lessons from it.
However, the reason I’m picking Google is that the company (besides its first 2-3 years of operations) was incredibly profitable.
Many startups stress and get hyped on the concept of growth . However, it exists a universe of startups that instead managed to build a sustainable business model .
Google is an example of a company that came out of the ashes of the dot-com bubble thanks to a hugely profitable business model :
To appreciate Google’s business model strength, it is critical to look at its TAC rate .
TAC stands for traffic acquisition costs, and that is a crucial component to balance Google’s business model sustainability.
More precisely the TAC rate tells us the percentage of how Google spends money to acquire traffic, which gets monetized on its search results pages.
For instance, in 2017 Google recorded a TAC rate on Network Members of 71.9% while the Google Properties TAX Rate was 11.6%.
Over the years, Google managed to keep its cost structure extremely efficient, and that is why Google has managed to scale up!
Part of Google’s cost structure is useful for keeping together the set of processes that help the company generate revenues on its search results pages, comprising:
How do we judge the ability of Google’s advertising machine ?
I envisioned a metric called traffic monetization multiple, which is the ability of the company to monetize its traffic:
As you can notice from the above, this is a purely financial metric, which needs to be balanced out with a qualitative analysis of why the metric increased in the first place.
Indeed, it’s critical to keep into account these questions:
All these questions are critical to answer, because, financially Google’s advertising machine seems as strong as ever.
There are hidden risks underlying it, which might, all of a sudden threaten its overall business model.
The points above, are some of the things you want to look at, qualitatively, to really understand what’s going on, with the changing cost structure of the company.
When we look at the overall Netflix business model it’s important to understand a couple of things in order to frame its cost structure:
Netflix runs an on-demand streaming platform, on top of a subscription service.
Members pay a fixed subscription monthly or yearly price, in exchange for having access to a library of content that continuously updates.
If Netflix revenues are higher than the cost that it takes to run the platform, then the platform is profitable.
Is Netflix profitable? It is indeed. However, to understand its cost structure we need to have a deeper look at Netflix’s capital expenditure.
In short, in order for Netflix to keep generating revenues in the long-term, it needs to have a library of content that is guaranteed in the coming 5-10 years.
How can the company do that?
It can do that by either licensing or producing content.
Those mechanisms have two different dynamics.
In fact, for most of its life, Netflix has been spending a massive amount of resources to license content and make it available on its platform.
This is the epitome of a platform business model .
Thus, Netflix invested capital to guarantee a continuous flow of content on top of its platform.
This advanced capital would be repaid back, with revenues coming from memberships.
This also means that for most of its history Netflix run at a negative cash flow cost structure.
Meaning that Netflix had to advance the money needed to license the content.
This money would be recouped many times over, in the long run, as the platform kept growing its members’ base.
On the other hand, starting in 2013, Netflix started to invest more and more into produced content.
What we know today as “Netflix Originals” or a library of content exclusive to paying members.
This sort of investment, while similarly, to licensing content, makes Netflix advance the costs of content, which would be recouped over the years.
It also gives the company the ability to freely distribute this content and dispose of this content over the years.
In conclusion, even though the content production investment doesn’t change the Netflix cost structure in the short term, it will change it in the long run.
Thus, we might expect Netflix to move from a cash flow negative cost structure, to a cash flow positive cost structure as it moves from the platform (investing primarily in licensed content) to a media powerhouse (as investments in produced content pass those in licensed content).
Thus, what I like to call “the mediafication” of Netflix, will be a key component of its business model advantage, in the long term.
How do we assess the evolution in this process?
This process of “mediafication” started in 2013. And while today, 66% of the content investments on Netflix are still about licensed content, the company is ramping up its investments in owned content, further.
From a formal standpoint, when new content investments in produced content will pass the license ones, we can officially call Netflix a Media Powerhouse!
And for now, it’s critical for the company to keep “arbitrating content:”
When we look at the overall Amazon business model it’s important to understand a couple of things in order to frame its cost structure:
When it comes to Amazon, in particular, understanding its cost structure is a bit trickier, as the company runs a business model with many moving parts, business units, and cost structures.
In fact, it’s important to look at Amazon’s business model, according to two perspectives:
When it comes to the Amazon e-commerce platform, its primary mission is to enable variety, low costs, and a great customer experience.
Thus, Amazon runs it (as a choice) with very tight profit margins. However, this doesn’t give us a complete picture of its e-commerce cost structure.
Indeed, while the Amazon e-commerce platform has tight profit margins, it still runs with a widely positive cash flow structure.
How? Through its cash conversion cycle:
In short, Amazon is able to turn its inventories very quickly, get paid quickly by customers, and pay back suppliers with a wider term, thus enabling the company to generate wide cash margins, in the short-term, invested back into the business.
When instead, we look at Amazon’s Enterprise/B2B platform, Amazon AWS , we need to frame this in a different light:
You can see how over the years Amazon AWS profitability has been running at wide margins. As the infrastructure costs are well paid for, from its revenues.
This is true also today (2021), where Amazon AWS contributed to 55.5% of the overall Amazon operating margins.
This means, that if you were to spin off Amazon AWS from Amazon’s operations, you would get a much lower operating profit figure.
Amazon AWS, while also requiring substantial technological investments, for now, it enjoys market dominance (In 2021 Amazon AWS had revenues of over $62 billion, whereas Microsoft Intelligent Cloud, for over $60 billion, and Google Cloud, for over $19 billion) and wide margins, which might last over the next 5 years, as more startups move to AI, as a core paradigm of software companies (Amazon AWS is becoming the leading infrastructure powering up the AI and software industry).
When we look at Spotify’s cost structure, it’s important to emphasize the difference between the two main revenue streams:
When it comes to cost structure, therefore, it’s worth noticing:
In other words, in this specific case, the cost structure analysis helps us frame the importance of the free platform.
As if we were to analyze that from the perspective of revenues along, the free platform would not be justified.
In fact, the free platform has tight margins, and it generates costs the more it widens up.
In fact, the more free users on the platform, the more royalties Spotify has to pay back to creators for the streamed content.
Instead, the free platform needs to be judged beyond revenue generation along. And the cost structure analysis of the premium members helps us assess that.
The free users’ platform is critical to enhancing Spotify’s sales model, thus increasing the chances of free users becoming paid members.
And it plays a key role to enhance the brand and visibility of Spotify, as a consumer platform.
In short, chances are that if to become a premium member, you were a free member first.
Therefore, on the one hand, the ad-supported business is key to amplifying the brand of the company.
On the other hand, the ad-supported business is critical to funneling free users into premium members.
That is why, it’s important to perform bot a revenue model analysis, combined with a cost structure analysis.
To understand the reasons for running certain business segments, that go beyond revenues alone.
Another incredible example, of how a cost structure changes according to a business model, it’s Apple.
Apple has been among the few companies that managed to build one of the most incredible business platforms of the last fifteen years.
Indeed, we can argue, that Apple is the major business platform of the last fifteen years (since on Stage, in 2008, Steve Jobs announced the App Store, after having announced it almost a year before the iPhone).
Of course, when it comes to Apple we can easily argue that its business model depends too much on its iPhone sales and that the company managed to keep its manufacturing costs for the iPhone, by outsourcing most of the manufacture in China, while keeping the design in-house.
And those are all true facts.
Yet, Apple is the only company that managed to build such a massive business, at scale, on a device, which turned into a platform.
This completely affected the company’s cost structure.
First, let me explain what’s the difference between a product and a platform.
A product is simply a physical/digital thing that can be exchanged from the company to the customer.
A platform, instead, is something that goes beyond the physical/digital product itself, and it gains value based on the utility that can grow exponentially, of the underlying product.
This utility comes from the fact, that other people (developers, and entrepreneurs) can extend and expand the capability of the product to design features and a whole set of applications that final users find compelling.
When the iPhone transformed from a product (in 2007) to a platform (in 2008), that was the turning point.
You no longer get a commodifiable good, which over time would depreciate.
Instead, thanks to the fact that the iPhone became de facto the dominating mobile platform of the last fifteen years, it enabled Apple to use a reverse razor strategy .
In other words, other players had to gain market shares by decreasing the price of their products.
Apple could keep growing by increasing the price of the iPhone, as its utility (thanks to the App Store) grew.
This deeply affected Apple’s cost structure.
Where the company managed to keep its cost of making the iPhone low, while keep increasing its prices, as utility grew.
In addition to that, Apple successfully built a service business, on top of the iPhone, thanks to its market strength.
The service business further expanded on top of the iPhone dominance and it’s now become among the most important revenue streams for Apple.
For that, it’s critical to look at the evolution of Apple’s business model .
Today the App Store represents a 30% tax on the mobile web, which Apple is able to keep cashing out on, thanks to the success of hardware + software (Operating System) + Marketplace (App Store) what today we know as a Business Platform!
You need to understand two key elements to have insights into how companies “think” in the current moment.
The first is how they make money.
The second is how they spend money.
When you combine those two elements, you can understand the following:
In this article, we focused on operational scalability and cost structure, and we saw how Google managed to build an extremely efficient cost structure.
Here are some more cost structure examples from a few well-known companies.
According to Statista, Walmart has a total of almost 11,000 stores around the world with a sophisticated and optimized supply chain.
The company benefits from a cost-driven structure characterized by economies of scale and scope, but it nevertheless must meet numerous expenses.
One of the main costs Walmart must absorb is labor. This is no surprise since the company at one point was the third largest employer in the world after the United States and Chinese armed forces.
Employee wages are the main component of the labor costs, but the company’s strong anti-union stance means it is frequently embroiled in various legal disputes over worker rights.
The company also spent $107.1 billion on selling, general, and administrative expenses in 2019 (around 20.5% of total revenue).
Cost of sales for the same period was $385.3 billion, which includes the cost of product transportation, warehousing, and import distribution .
As a premium manufacturer of sports cars, Ferrari utilizes a value-driven cost structure.
While it is difficult to compare exact data, manufacturing relatively bespoke vehicles by hand is more expensive than churning out thousands of the same model on a production line.
Nevertheless, estimates suggest Ferrari only makes about $6,000 in profit for each car that sells for an average price of $200,000.
Ferrari’s main costs are incurred from:
Wizz-Air is a Hungarian ultra-low-cost airline carrier that unsurprisingly employs a cost-driven structure to provide the most value to travelers.
Like Walmart, Wizz Air can undercut the vast majority of competition by using economies of scale.
In 2020, for example, it was offering two-hour flights for as little as $21 each way .
Wizz Air can offer these extremely low ticket prices because it chooses to collect a smaller profit from more passengers rather than earning a larger profit on fewer passengers.
This means populating each of the company’s Airbus A320s with as many seats as possible and removing business class altogether.
The aircraft themselves are also turned around as quickly as possible to ensure they spend the maximum amount of time in the air.
The company also minimizes costs with the following initiatives:
Company Name | Key Aspects of Cost Structure | Outcome |
---|---|---|
Walmart | Economies of scale, low-cost supplier relationships | Lower prices for customers, high market share |
Southwest Airlines | Low-cost carrier model, operational efficiency | Low fares, high customer volume, profitability |
Amazon | Cost leadership, economies of scale, automation | Competitive pricing, extensive product range, market dominance |
IKEA | Flat-pack design, efficient supply chain, low-cost materials | Affordable pricing, high customer satisfaction, global expansion |
Toyota | Lean manufacturing, just-in-time inventory | Reduced waste, high efficiency, cost savings |
McDonald’s | Standardized processes, bulk purchasing | Consistent product quality, cost savings, global consistency |
Zara | Fast fashion model, efficient supply chain | Quick response to trends, low inventory costs, high turnover |
Apple | Premium pricing, high fixed costs in R&D and marketing | High profit margins, strong brand loyalty, market leadership |
Tesla | High fixed costs in manufacturing, economies of scale | Cost reduction over time, high innovation, market disruption |
Dell | Direct-to-consumer sales model, build-to-order production | Lower inventory costs, customization, competitive pricing |
Ryanair | Ultra low-cost carrier model, ancillary revenue streams | Low fares, high ancillary revenue, strong profitability |
Costco | Membership model, bulk purchasing, efficient operations | Low prices, high customer loyalty, steady revenue stream |
Netflix | Subscription model, high fixed costs in content creation | Steady revenue stream, strong market position, high customer retention |
Uber | Variable cost structure, gig economy model | Flexibility, scalability, rapid market penetration |
Airbnb | Platform-based model, minimal fixed costs | High profitability, global reach, strong brand presence |
Microsoft | High fixed costs in software development, economies of scale | High margins, market dominance, continuous innovation |
Procter & Gamble | High fixed costs in marketing, economies of scale | Strong brand presence, high market share, cost efficiency |
Nike | High marketing and endorsement costs, efficient production | Strong brand loyalty, high profit margins, global market presence |
Starbucks | Premium pricing, high fixed costs in location and ambiance | High customer loyalty, strong brand image, consistent profitability |
Unilever | Economies of scale, diversified product portfolio | Cost efficiency, risk diversification, strong market presence |
Cost Structure | Description | Implications | Example |
---|---|---|---|
Fixed Cost Structure | In a fixed cost structure, a significant portion of a business’s costs remains constant regardless of production or sales volume. | – Predictable and stable expenses. – High initial investment in assets. – Economies of scale can lower fixed costs per unit. | A manufacturing facility has substantial rent and depreciation costs, which do not change significantly whether it produces 1,000 or 10,000 units of a product. |
Variable Cost Structure | Variable cost structures entail costs that vary in direct proportion to production or sales volume. | – Costs directly tied to output. – Lower initial capital requirements. – Scalability and flexibility in cost management. | A bakery’s primary variable cost is the cost of raw ingredients like flour, sugar, and eggs, which increase as it produces more cakes and pastries. |
Mixed Cost Structure | In a mixed cost structure, businesses have both fixed and variable costs, resulting in a combination of cost elements. | – Combines stability with scalability. – Challenges in cost analysis and decision-making. – Managing the balance between fixed and variable costs. | A call center incurs fixed costs like rent and salaries for supervisors (fixed) but also variable costs tied to call volume, such as agent wages and telecommunication expenses (variable). |
Step Cost Structure | Step cost structures feature costs that remain constant within certain production or activity levels but increase abruptly at specific production thresholds. | – Cost jumps occur at specific production or activity levels. – Requires careful planning to optimize production within each cost bracket. – Cost predictability within the predefined range. | A shipping company may need to lease additional trucks and hire more drivers once its shipping volume exceeds a certain threshold, resulting in step increases in costs. |
Semi-Variable Structure | Semi-variable cost structures comprise both fixed and variable elements, but the fixed and variable portions do not vary in direct proportion. | – Complex cost behavior. – Challenges in cost allocation and budgeting. – Necessitates detailed analysis to differentiate fixed and variable components. | An internet service provider has a base subscription fee (fixed) but also charges for data usage (variable), where additional data usage may not lead to a linear increase in costs. |
Fourweekmba squared triangle business model.
This framework has been thought for any type of business model , be it digital or not. It’s a framework to start mind mapping the key components of your business or how it might look as it grows. Here, as usual, what matters is not the framework itself (let’s prevent to fall trap of the Maslow’s Hammer ), what matters is to have a framework that enables you to hold the key components of your business in your mind, and execute fast to prevent running the business on too many untested assumptions, especially about what customers really want. Any framework that helps us test fast, it’s welcomed in our business strategy .
An effective business model has to focus on two dimensions: the people dimension and the financial dimension. The people dimension will allow you to build a product or service that is 10X better than existing ones and a solid brand . The financial dimension will help you develop proper distribution channels by identifying the people that are willing to pay for your product or service and make it financially sustainable in the long run.
This framework is well suited for all these cases where technology plays a key role in enhancing the value proposition for the users and customers. In short, when the company you’re building, analyzing, or looking at is a tech or platform business model , the template below is perfect for the job.
A tech business model is made of four main components: value model ( value propositions, mission , vision ), technological model (R&D management), distribution model (sales and marketing organizational structure ), and financial model (revenue modeling, cost structure, profitability and cash generation/management). Those elements coming together can serve as the basis to build a solid tech business model .
Download The VTDF Framework Template Here
Business Engineering
Asymmetric Business Models
Business Competition
Technological Modeling
Transitional Business Models
Minimum Viable Audience
Business Scaling
Market Expansion Theory
Speed-Reversibility
Asymmetric Betting
Growth Matrix
Revenue Streams Matrix
Revenue Modeling
Pricing Strategies
Additional Resources:
Leave a reply cancel reply, discover more from fourweekmba.
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
Type your email…
Continue reading
COMMENTS
Low-Cost Customer Segments: Price-sensitive customers are the main target of low-cost businesses, but you can say that this is pretty much a mass-market as well. Low-Cost Value Propositions: Low-cost businesses offer no-frills products or services for which the non-essential features have been removed to keep the price low. Low-Cost Channels: Digital stores like companies own e-commerce ...
Business Model: A business model is a company's plan for how it will generate revenues and make a profit . It explains what products or services the business plans to manufacture and market, and ...
8 Types of Business Models to Explore. 1. Product. A product is a tangible item of value. To run a successful product-focused business, try to produce the item for as low a cost as possible while maintaining a reasonable level of quality.
A low-cost leadership strategy is a business strategy where a company aims to become the most cost-efficient player in its industry, often by producing goods or providing services at a lower cost than its competitors. The overall goal is to increase market share or achieve higher profitability. The low-cost leader in an industry often sets the ...
Low cost Model is a business. strategy where organizations offer lower costs for their. services or products to attract high demand and increase. their market share. This model can be adopted by ...
Ramon Casadesus-Masanell is a professor at Harvard Business School and the author, with Joan E. Ricart, of "How to Design a Winning Business Model" (HBR January-February 2011). JR. Joan E ...
Low-Cost Producer: A company that can provide goods or services at a low cost. In general, low-cost producers utilize economies of scale in order to execute their strategy of low prices. Consumers ...
A low-cost business strategy is of paramount importance in today's competitive market. By implementing cost-saving measures and optimizing operations, organizations can gain a competitive edge, improve profitability, and achieve long-term success. It enhances competitiveness, attracts price-conscious customers, and fosters customer loyalty.
Introducing a better business model into an existing market is the definition of a disruptive innovation, as written about by Clay Christensen. Rita McGrath offers that your business model is ...
Get your deck! No Frills is a business model that aims to reach a broad, price-sensitive audience by offering minimal products and services at significantly lower prices. This strategy relies on consistently adjusting processes to minimize costs and consistently utilizing production capacities through standardization of offerings.
Low- cost strategy (also Low-cost price) is a pricing strategy characterized by low prices of goods and services using various saving methods. The company skillfully reduces real costs, which contributes to more customers and thus increases its sales.For example, two companies produce the same product, sell at the same price, but a company with ...
A business model defines how a company creates, delivers, and captures value. It acts as a blueprint for the operations, strategies, and potential profitability of a business. This article explores the various facets of business models, their importance, and the different types that are prevalent in today's business environment.
value concept in the business model definition and focussing on value creation, (2) presenting four core dimensions that business model elements need to cover, ... business models are SouthWest Airlines' low-cost car-rier model, Rolls Royce's 'power-by-the-hour' model and Threadless' 'customer is the company' model. Busi-
Low cost strategy is a type of pricing strategy in which the firm offers the products at low price. This strategy helps to stimulate the demand & gain higher market share. The firm can gain cost advantages by increasing their efficiency, taking advantage of economies of scale, or by getting the raw material at low cost.
A low-cost business model is one in which the company's operations are designed to minimize overhead costs while still producing competitive, quality products or services. It is a strategy that allows the business to stay competitive in the market while keeping the costs of operation low. This approach can be quite beneficial for small ...
Cost structures can have the following characteristics: Fixed costs: in these structures, the expenses of the business are always the same, regardless of the size of the production. Costs are time-limited, as is the case with salaries and rentals. And value propositions focus on low price, maximum automation and extensive outsourcing.
The cost structure is a fundamental component of the business model canvas, a strategic management and entrepreneurial tool that allows businesses to describe, design, challenge, invent, and pivot their business model. The cost structure refers to the total cost a company must incur to operate its business model, create value, deliver value, and generate revenue.
By using a low-cost business model, 3D printing construction companies can motivate incumbent manual construction companies to flee upmarket. This disruptive technology is one to watch. 2. Toyota and General Motors in the Auto Industry. Another example of low-end disruption is Toyota's entrance into the automobile industry.
Cost Structure in Business Model Canvas. Cost structures play a key role in the Cost Model of your Business Model Canvas. The cost structure concept helps guide how you target innovation and value proposition development. Through understanding cost structures, you can aim to reduce costs, as well as make the most from every cost your business incurs.
Low Cost Strategy. A pricing strategy in which a company offers a relatively low price to stimulate demand and gain market share. It is one of three generic marketing strategies (see differentiation strategy and focus strategy for the other two) that can be adopted by any company, and is usually employed where the product has few or no ...
Business model A SunExpress Boeing 737-800 at Zurich Airport. The low-cost carrier business model practices vary widely. Some practices are more common in certain regions, while others are generally universal. The common theme among all low-cost carriers is the reduction of cost and reduced overall fares compared to legacy carriers.
Low cost of production in relation to that of a company's competition can endow a business with durable competitive advantages within commodity businesses. While LCP moats are similar in nature to EoS moats with low costs being the primary factor, there are important distinguishing factors that necessitate the application of a differentiated ...
Cost structure and unit economics. A cost structure is an important component of any business model, as it helps to assess its sustainability over time. While a startup's business models, trying to define a new space might not be able to be profitable right away, it's important to build long-term unit economics.