Share this email
  
  
ESSENTIALS FOR LEADERS AND THOSE THEY LEAD
Click to get this newsletter weekly
Many a CEO exit has been marked by power struggles, scandals, and dips in the company’s stock price. Now, as record numbers of employees leave the workplace, companies are hard-pressed to find replacements for any job, let alone leadership roles that require years of coaching and experience. may be the last thing on leaders’ minds as they manage the daily upheavals of the postpandemic era. Yet without one, the company risks going rapidly downhill during a changing of the guard, losing revenue and market share. This week, let’s explore some strategies that make it .
. Sustainability, for example, is no longer just a nice-to-have: it is as vital to competitive advantage as agility or digital transformation. So is the ability to develop talent and ensure that people have a . Other priorities include speeding up operations and deploying cloud capabilities to advance innovation and productivity. Do your prospects for leadership roles have the mindset to embrace these challenges and come up with creative solutions? The answer to this question can help you separate the best candidates from the rest.
for every 100 men, according to the latest from McKinsey, in partnership with . This “broken rung” in the corporate ladder results in fewer women reaching the leadership level. Both . Given the recent and increasing public calls for diversity in the workplace, it’s shortsighted to overlook these sources of leadership talent—whether internal or external—as well as previously untapped candidate pools such as differently abled professionals. And with workplaces becoming more remote, virtual, and flexible, your talent search can now extend across geographical boundaries.
The Hobbit , throwing organizations into chaos, exposing critical strategic gaps and endangering their market position. Internal bickering and controversies could ensue if leaders are not transparent about their succession plans and if they do not consider a range of candidates—in age, gender, ethnicity, and background—to fill prominent roles. As such, it’s essential for any succession plan to be legally and ethically watertight.
, you know the trouble that can break out when a founder prepares to leave the business. Well-crafted succession plans fall apart as family members and outsiders battle for control. But that wasn’t the case at online real-estate marketplace PropertyGuru, whose cofounder Steve Melhuish implemented a meticulous three-step plan to ensure an orderly transition to a new CEO. In the process, he gathered in an interview with McKinsey. “The candidate profile we developed placed a heavy emphasis on culture, values, and talent development, as well as experience in building fast-growing businesses,” Melhuish says.
but it just isn’t working out. This is a fairly common scenario: McKinsey research shows that after two years. Newly appointed leaders rarely see value in standard training approaches such as “buddy” networks and orientation programs, but they can take steps in five focus areas to ensure a better transition. To improve the chances of a successful executive transition, consider setting up to develop staff for future leadership roles. It also helps if to their last days on the job, leaving things in good shape for their successors.
Follow our thinking
Did you enjoy this newsletter? so they can subscribe too.
Was this issue forwarded to you? Sign up for it and sample our 40+ other free email subscriptions .

succession planning definition business studies

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Generative AI
  • Business Operations
  • Cloud Computing
  • Data Center
  • Data Management
  • Emerging Technology
  • Enterprise Applications
  • IT Leadership
  • Digital Transformation
  • IT Strategy
  • IT Management
  • Diversity and Inclusion
  • IT Operations
  • Project Management
  • Software Development
  • Vendors and Providers
  • Enterprise Buyer’s Guides
  • United States
  • Middle East
  • España (Spain)
  • Italia (Italy)
  • Netherlands
  • United Kingdom
  • New Zealand
  • Data Analytics & AI
  • Newsletters
  • Foundry Careers
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Copyright Notice
  • Member Preferences
  • About AdChoices
  • Your California Privacy Rights

Our Network

  • Computerworld
  • Network World

What is succession planning? A key talent strategy for business

Succession planning helps businesses cultivate a pool of talented workers who are poised to take over leadership roles as the business grows, changes and develops..

succession planning grow nurture cultivate share hands diversity collaboration

What is succession planning?

Succession planning is a talent management process that builds a pool of trained workers who are ready to fill key roles when leaders and other key employees step down. Organizations with succession planning programs in place foster a talent-oriented culture by recruiting skilled workers and top talent. Once recruited, businesses focus on developing these workers’ skills, expertise and knowledge so they are prepared to take on leadership roles in the event of organizational growth, talent loss or management turnover.

A change in leadership can be sparked by more than a resignation — an employee might retire, get fired, get sick, take leave or quit without notice. Succession planning ensures there’s a strategy in place for someone to step in, get promoted and take over that person’s duties without a loss in productivity and morale.

However, the goal of succession planning isn’t to prepare one person to take over a specific role. That’s called replacement planning, which is different. Succession planning relies on a large pool of talented workers ranging from entry-level to senior leadership who are being prepared for key roles. These employees have the right skills, energy and leadership qualities that will benefit the company across a spectrum of roles, departments and seniority levels. Replacement planning is linear — you are preparing a worker to take over or replace specific senior management positions; succession planning is about cultivating a flexible, large selection of talent.

Succession planning process

The process of succession planning is unique to each company, but there are general guidelines that you can follow to help your business create a successful succession strategy.

  • Identify the most important roles in the organization that would need to be filled quickly if that employee exits the organization.
  • Define the main responsibilities, competencies and requirements for each job, including what personality traits best suit the role.
  • Use the established criteria to assess candidates and to determine who has the potential to grow into a leadership position.
  • Establish a talent pool of workers who are qualified to eventually fill key roles in the organization.
  • Develop these employees through training and valuable work experience so they’re ready to take over leadership positions when the time comes.

Succession planning template

It’s important to create a template that outlines what succession planning will look like in your company. The goal is to create as seamless of a transition as possible and to avoid hurting morale and productivity. The template should reflect the specifics of your succession planning — whether you’re a business owner preparing for the day you pass the company onto someone else or an executive planning your future exit strategy. Some companies even publish their own templates online, which can help offer guidance if you’re struggling to create a template for your business.

Your template should at least include the following:

  • All relevant company information including the date the succession plan was developed.
  • A table of contents that can point readers to different sections of the succession plan.
  • An overview of the succession plan, what the organization wants to achieve with the strategy and any details
  • Any leadership or non-leadership roles that are vital to business operations or have a large impact on the company.
  • A list of roles that you can predict will be open within the next few years due to retirement. If you’re in an industry or area with high competition, consider potential losses from poaching.
  • A list of all potential candidates that are fit for future leadership or high-potential positions.
  • Training programs and career development efforts to train high-performing workers.
  • Any legal documents that need to be considered, including contracts, partnerships and other agreements.

Succession planning best practices

Succession planning is a great way to build your next generation of IT leaders . Your succession plan should take into consideration current and future business challenges, critical skills, future skills, all core and technical competencies and a strong plan for career development. Succession planning involves multiple steps but there are four core objectives that you’ll need to build a strong succession planning strategy .

  • Identify qualified candidates within the organization who will be able to take on more responsibility in the future.
  • Once you identify your top candidates, focus on developing their skills and expertise through training
  • Get leadership engaged in developing future talent and supporting those with high potential in the organization.
  • Create a database of workers so staffing decisions can be made quickly when key positions open.

For more on succession planning best practices, see “ How to build the next generation of IT leaders ” and “ CIO succession planning in the digital age .”

Who benefits from succession planning?

Succession planning is as important in small organizations as it is in large organizations. For smaller companies, with less resources, smaller budgets and fewer employees, succession planning helps avoid disruptions in workflow. This is especially true for owner-operated businesses once the owner steps down or sells the company. In large organizations, succession planning is important because there’s a lot at stake and an unexpected loss can leave the business in chaos. With a complex organizational structure, there needs to be enough talent to go around so leadership and management changes can be addressed quickly.

Succession planning examples

At Apple, Steve Jobs founded Apple University to support succession planning by educating Apple employees and leaders to understand how he built the business and how to think like Steve Jobs. It’s highly secretive, but it’s designed to help keep consistency in the organization. Apple also demonstrated a commitment to succession planning when Tim Cook seamlessly took over as CEO after Jobs stepped down. Cook has since indicated that succession planning is still an important strategy for the organization, with a “deep bench” of successors poised to take over in the future.  

IBM demonstrated its succession planning strategy in 2011, when Samuel J. Palmisano stepped down. The company’s first female CEO, Virginia Rometty, was ready to take over in his place. Rometty worked for IBM for over 30 years, so she already had a deep knowledge of the company culture and business operations. It allowed for an effortless transition, so the company could continue working to its full potential despite the organizational changes.

The future of succession planning

A key component of succession planning is talent development. For key players that are identified as potential candidates for succession planning, it will be important to figure out how to keep them engaged and motivated. Currently, it’s millennials who are coming up in the workforce and are largely the target of succession planning.

Millennials comprise 38 percent of the workforce, according to Gallup, and they’re poised to take over leadership roles as baby boomers start to retire. The report points out that if organizations fail to meet millennial’s needs, they’re more likely to “function as free agents, always looking for fresh opportunities.” The survey found that 60 percent of millennials in the U.S. workforce say they’re “currently looking for a new job opportunity.”

According to a report from Gallup, employees used to care about salary, satisfaction, having a good boss, annual reviews, their weaknesses and their job. But today, employees are focused more on having a purpose, developing their skills and working with mentors. Employees are also less focused on annual reviews, and more concerned with maintaining ongoing discussions about performance throughout the year. These workers are also interested in cultivating their strengths and finding a healthy work-life balance.

The good news is that millennials are eager to learn and grow under “high-quality management.” They want to feel interested in their work, with a sense of purpose, and they want to know they have opportunities to advance. Understanding your employees will make it easier to develop their talent in the modern workplace, so they’re prepared as future leaders.

Succession planning tools and software

Succession planning is a skill that requires business acumen, communication skills, leadership skills and other hard and soft skills. But there are tools and software designed to help make the process of succession planning easier on an organization. Talent management is critical to succession planning, so tools that help manage employee training and progress will give you more insight into how talent develops in the organization. Here are some popular succession planning tools and software:

  • Talent Guard
  • MentorcliQ Employee Mentoring
  • Workday Succession
  • HRToolBench
  • Bullseye Engagement Performance Management System
  • EmployeeConnect

Succession planning training and certification

Succession planning requires collaboration, buy-in and effort from leadership in the organization. It also requires working across departments to understand and fill talent gaps, and then communicating those to HR and recruiters. If you want to get a better understanding of succession planning and how it will fit into your business, here are some training and certification programs you can choose from:

  • EDUCBA — Succession planning video course
  • ASPE Training — Succession planning boot camp
  • Human Capital Institute — Leadership Development & Succession Strategist (LDSS) certification
  • Institute of Organization Development — Leadership Development Certification program (LDCP)
  • MRA — Succession planning training course
  • The American College — Business succession planning certificate

Related content

Scaling gen ai right takes a certain kind of cio. are you one of them, 4 essential lessons in ai governance, broadcom pinnacle partners: guiding enterprises throughout their cloud journeys, balancing innovation with value, cost, and practicality: the cio's guide to future proofing technology investments, from our editors straight to your inbox, show me more, the essential ai checklist: future-proof your workforce in six simple steps.

Image

10 ways AI can make IT more productive

Image

Robots make a smash in Chipotle kitchens

Image

CIO Leadership Live Middle East with Kenan Begovic, Group Director of Information Security, beIN Media Group

Image

Pacific Coast Companies CIO Marty Menard on leveraging vendor partners

Image

CIO Leadership Live UK with Elizabeth Akorita, Group Deputy Director, Digital Delivery, Department for Science and Innovation and Technology

Image

Sponsored Links

  • The cloud shouldn’t be complicated. Unlock its potential with SAS.
  • Visibility, monitoring, analytics. See Cisco SD-WAN in a live demo.
  • Everybody's ready for AI except your data. Unlock the power of AI with Informatica
  • Everyone’s moving to the cloud. Are they realizing expected value?
  • Search Search Please fill out this field.
  • Business Leaders

How to Create a Business Succession Plan

succession planning definition business studies

For many small business owners, maintaining positive cash flow and a stable balance sheet can be an ongoing battle that consumes virtually all of their time. Even retirement often seems like a distant speck on the horizon, let alone plans to hand over the business. However, establishing a sound business succession plan is beneficial for most business owners and can be absolutely necessary for some.

For business owners that are at or near retirement, the issue of succession cannot be ignored. In this article, we will take you through the steps you'll want to take to create a successful succession plan.

Picking a Successor Isn't Easy

Many factors determine whether a succession plan is necessary, and sometimes the logical and easy choice will be to sell the business lock, stock, and barrel simply. However, many owners prefer the thought of their businesses continuing on even after they're gone.

Choosing a successor can be as easy as appointing a family member or assistant to take the owner's place. However, there may be several partners or family members from which the owner will have to choose — each with a number of strengths and weaknesses to be considered. In this case, a lasting resentment by those who were not chosen may happen, regardless of what choice is ultimately made. Partners who do not need or want a successor may simply sell their portion of the business to the other partners of the business in a buy-sell agreement .

How Much Is the Business Worth?

When business owners decide to cash-out (or if death makes the decision for them), a set dollar value for the business needs to be determined, or at least the exiting share of it. This can be done either through an appraisal by a certified public accountant (CPA) or by an arbitrary agreement between all partners involved. If the portion of the company consists solely of shares of publicly-traded stock, then the valuation of the owner's interest will be determined by the stock's current market value.

Life Insurance: The Standard Transfer Vehicle

Once a set dollar value has been determined, life insurance is purchased on all partners in the business. In the event that a partner passes on before ending his relationship with their partners, the death benefit proceeds will then be used to buy out the deceased partner's share of the business and distribute it equally among the remaining partners.

There are two basic arrangements used for this. They are known as "cross-purchase agreements" and "entity-purchase agreements." While both ultimately serve the same purpose, they are used in different situations.

Cross-Purchase Agreements

These agreements are structured so that each partner buys and owns a policy on each of the other partners in the business. Each partner functions as both owner and beneficiary on the same policy, with each other partner being the insured. Therefore, when one partner dies, the face value of each policy on the deceased partner is paid out to the remaining partners, who will then use the policy proceeds to buy the deceased partner's share of the business at a previously agreed-upon price.

As an example, imagine that there are three partners who each own equal shares of a business worth $3 million, so each partner's share is valued at $1 million. The partners want to ensure that the business is passed on smoothly if one of them dies, so they enter into a cross-purchase agreement. The agreement requires that each partner take out a $500,000 policy on each of the other two partners. This way, when one of the partners dies, the other two partners will each be paid $500,000, which they must use to buy out the deceased partner's share of the business.

Entity-Purchase Agreements

The obvious limitation here is that, for a business with a large number of partners (five to ten partners or more), it becomes impractical for each partner to maintain separate policies on each of the others. There can also be substantial inequity between partners in terms of underwriting and, as a result, the cost of each policy.

There can even be problems when there are only two partners. Let's say one partner is 35 years old, and the other is 60 years old — there will be a huge disparity between the respective costs of the policies. In this instance, an entity-purchase agreement is often used instead.

The entity-purchase arrangement is much less complicated. In this type of agreement, the business itself purchases a single policy on each partner and becomes both the policy owner and beneficiary. Upon the death of any partner or owner, the business will use the policy proceeds to purchase the deceased person's share of the business accordingly. The cost of each policy is generally deductible for the business, and the business also "eats" all costs and underwrites the equity between partners.

3 Reasons to Have a Business Succession Plan

Creating and implementing a sound succession plan will provide several benefits to owners and partners:

  • It ensures an agreeable price for a partner's share of the business and eliminates the need for valuation upon death because the insured agreed to the price beforehand.
  • The policy benefits will be immediately available to pay for the deceased's share of the business, with no liquidity or time constraints. This effectively prevents the possibility of an external takeover due to cash flow problems or the need to sell the business or other assets to cover the cost of the deceased's interest.
  • A succession plan can greatly help in establishing a timely settlement of the deceased's estate .

The Bottom Line

Proper business succession planning requires careful preparation. Business owners seeking a smooth and equitable transition of their interests should seek a competent, experienced advisor to assist them in this business decision.

American Bar Association. " Forms of Stock Purchase Agreements ," Page 1.

succession planning definition business studies

  • Terms of Service
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Design for Business
  • Most Recent
  • Presentations
  • Infographics
  • Data Visualizations
  • Forms and Surveys
  • Video & Animation
  • Case Studies
  • Digital Marketing
  • Design Inspiration
  • Visual Thinking
  • Product Updates
  • Visme Webinars
  • Artificial Intelligence

Company Succession Planning: Step-by-Step Guide & Templates

Company Succession Planning: Step-by-Step Guide & Templates

Written by: Idorenyin Uko

Company Succession Planning: Understanding its Process & Documentation [Including Templates]

Company succession planning : it's a winning business strategy that keeps your business future-proof. It helps your company plan for expected and unexpected turnover in all key roles throughout the company—not just leadership roles—while training and developing employees for future roles.

But succession planning isn't just a win for your business; employees benefit from it as well. It boosts their confidence, engagement and motivation as they strengthen their competencies and enhance their careers.

So, how do you execute succession planning in your company? This article will help explain what company succession is, how to execute and succeed at it and templates you can use.

Table of Contents

What is succession planning for a company, benefits of succession planning, succession planning model, the succession planning process for companies, 16 templates you’ll need for company succession planning, faqs on company succession planning.

  • Succession planning is the practice of identifying and developing talent for future roles—not just for leadership positions but for key roles across the company.
  • Investing in succession planning creates a structure for training and development and boosts employee engagement, morale and retention while reducing recruitment costs.
  • Succession planning helps you spot and groom talent, keeps your company disaster-proof and preserves your legacy and institutional knowledge.
  • The three main models of succession planning are the hope model, the nominal model and the robust model.
  • The succession planning process for companies includes the assessment, development and evaluation phases.
  • Visme provides a robust suite of templates, tools and solutions for every phase of your company's succession planning.

Succession planning is the practice of identifying and developing talent for key roles across the company. It prevents talent shortages and ensures a smooth transition when important employees leave, get transferred or change roles.

Preparing employees to take over leadership may take many forms, such as:

  • Offering specialized training, education and executive programs to enhance the skills of potential leaders.
  • Transferring the employee to a specific department or job to gain experience.
  • On-the-job shadowing enables the employees to learn and observe the role being carried out.
  • Developing contingency and crisis plans for unexpected departures or unforeseen circumstances.

Filling the talent and leadership pipeline with trained employees can benefit your business in many ways. Let's take a look at why you should start investing in succession planning today.

1. Build a Structure for Training and Development

Training and development are at the heart of effective succession planning. It provides a platform for high-impact training programs that train and equip high-potential individuals to take on crucial leadership roles in the future.

Training isn't just about providing courses or learning materials. The employee’s professional development may come in the form of coaching, mentoring, job shadowing, or a gradual increase in more advanced responsibilities. In other cases, it may require the candidate to get additional education or professional certification.

2. Boost Employee Engagement, Morale and Retention

Succession plans highlight areas for growth so employees can develop critical skill sets. It empowers potential leaders to thrive now and in the future.

A survey from Better Buys shows that employees who access professional development opportunities have 34% higher retention and are 15% more engaged than those who don’t.

When employees see an opportunity to move up the corporate ladder, they're more engaged. What makes it even better is their motivation to grow with your company. Statistics have shown that more employees will stay with a company that invests in their development.

3. Reduces Recruitment Costs

Recruiting and hiring top talent can cost hundreds to thousands of dollars. And this cost will continue to soar if you don’t have a plan to shape up your talent pipeline with prospective leaders.

With company succession planning, successors come from within the company. This means you can save costs that would have gone into external recruitment. You’ll be able to invest the money in other aspects, like training and development.

4. Keeps Your Company Disaster-Proof

Let's face it. Change is inevitable. Your essential employee could become ill or be poached by another company for higher pay. When unplanned, it can make or break your business. The exit of any important member of your company means important roles will go unfilled for too long.

Let’s say your lead software engineer suddenly resigns. This could put your business's success in jeopardy. Without a successor, your entire system will crumble and you could lose business.

With succession planning, change management becomes a breeze. Since you already have replacements for crucial positions, your business isn't left vulnerable when change happens. The successor simply steps up to the plate and it's business as usual.

5. Spots and Grooms Top Talent

The beauty of having a company succession plan is that it helps you discover gems.

With the right approach to succession planning, you'll easily identify, develop and retain key employees who perform well in top roles.

Having come through the ranks, these talents embody the company's mission. As they grow, they acquire everything it takes to lift your organization to great heights.

Here's another advantage of having a strong talent and leadership pipeline. You're not boxed into picking anyone who's simply available. You can measure your options and make the best decisions regarding potential successors.

Also, you can align your succession pool with your diversity and inclusion goals, ensuring a representative leadership pipeline.

6. Establishes Your Legacy and Preserves Institutional Knowledge

When leaders are cognizant of their potential successors, they can offer mentorship and impart valuable knowledge. This ensures that when leaders step down, their legacy and influence will remain. Not only that, but institutional knowledge is preserved and passed down.

Their successors will carry on the dedication and effort invested over the years, allowing your leaders to imprint a lasting legacy on the organization.

There are three main models of succession planning:

Nominal Model

Robust model.

In this model, companies aren’t proactive with their succession plans. They just hope executives don’t resign, retire or die. And if that happens, they hope they find the right replacement as soon as possible—via recruitment or promotion.

When there's a gap in critical positions, someone within the organization is promoted. As an alternative, external candidates are sourced, interviewed and selected. In this case, it can take up to 12 months for the new hire to settle in fully or become productive. The worst part? Many of these appointments—about 30%—are found to be unsuccessful.

  • There are no ongoing costs for training, capacity development and mentoring.
  • The role can be adapted to suit the strengths of the new recruits.

Disadvantages

  • The cost of searching for new hires is high.
  • There are increased indirect costs while the role is vacant.
  • External candidates may have long learning curves.
  • Recruits may find adjusting to the culture and role expectations difficult.
  • This model has a high failure rate.

The nominal model is a more efficient succession planning model than the Hope model. It involves identifying one to three successors for crucial roles. These individuals should be capable of seamlessly assuming these roles on short notice.

  • The direct costs are minimal.
  • Successors can promptly fill a role without gaps.
  • This model eliminates the uncertainties associated with a replacement search.
  • The newly appointed individual has a shorter learning curve to adapt to expectations.
  • The direct cost is low, but there's an ongoing cost of grooming talent.
  • Expectations are set among the identified successors. This creates the possibility of disappointment and disillusionment if promotions do not materialize.
  • Transitioning into a new role may challenge these individuals beyond their strengths.
  • The role's demands may require different personal characteristics that are challenging or impossible to cultivate.

The robust model is the most effective succession planning model. It entails building a talent pool with individuals who have the potential to assume critical positions at different levels of your organization—not just executive positions.

The next step is to assess their abilities, attitudes and skills, as well as their training and development needs. These individuals are then groomed to fill vacant positions within the organization whenever needed.

  • The organization gains a strategic overview of its talent strengths. This allows for proactive planning of talent requirements well in advance.
  • With individuals 'waiting in the wings' for top roles, the organization can swiftly respond to vacancies.
  • All high-potential talent undergoes development. This enhances their current performance, boosts motivation and engagement and prepares them for more senior roles.
  • Institutional knowledge is preserved and passed on to the next generation.
  • There’s an ongoing cost associated with assessing potential, addressing development needs, implementing development programs and tracking talent.
  • Talents may still leave after you’ve invested in training and grooming them.

Succession planning can look different from organization to organization. However, the general process typically falls into these three critical phases:

Assessment Phase

Evaluation phase, development phase.

Each phase has different steps your company needs to take to develop an effective succession plan.

Step 1:  Understand your company’s strategic direction based on the overall strategic plan and workforce plans . This will help you steer your succession planning efforts to meet your company's evolving needs and sustain success.

Step 2:  Conduct a SWOT analysis to determine where your company stands in terms of succession planning. This helps you identify both internal weaknesses and strengths as well as external opportunities and risks, which can impact expected outcomes.

Step 3: Write down your succession planning goals. Make sure they align with your workforce plan and company-wide goals. For example, your goal could be to:

  • Identify and document potential successors for critical roles within the next six months
  • Ensure knowledge transfer from retiring leaders to successors
  • Increase diversity in the leadership pipeline

Step 4:  Pinpoint the business gaps and challenges that could affect your company in the next 1–10 years if succession planning isn’t executed.

Step 5: Specify roles and positions critical to your business's survival and growth. These are roles that aren't just urgent or catalysts for success but are important for business operations and meeting short and long-term company goals.

Step 6: Identify the important skills, abilities and institutional knowledge that make the company successful and sustainable.

Step 7: Analyze the current workforce to discover whether or not there are qualified individuals to fill these critical positions

Step 8: Develop a Success Profile. This document should detail the education, skills, knowledge and competencies that talents need to succeed in that role. Also, include information about position demographics like age, gender, location, level and experience.

Step 9: Nominate promising employees and potential successors for important roles.

  • Create a list of potential successors and their current positions. For each candidate, outline an estimated timeline indicating the anticipated duration of their readiness to assume the targeted position.
  • Have conversations with employees about their career aspirations and interests. Assess their past performance and leadership abilities in their current roles to gauge their readiness for higher positions.
  • Make sure to communicate to each potential candidate that they are being considered for critical positions. This helps them understand the opportunity and encourages their commitment to growth.

Step 10: Specify the learning, training and development needs or experiences necessary for your successors to excel in leadership positions and other critical areas within the organization.

Step 11: Create a training and development plan . Ensure each plan is tailored to each role and succession candidate and is designed to help candidates close skill or experience gaps. Align training plans to the knowledge, skills, languages and capabilities required for current and future roles.

Step 12: Execute training and a career development plan.

Creating corporate training programs helps potential successors cultivate and enhance their skills. Professional development can take various forms, including mentoring, coaching, task or job rotation, job shadowing or assuming higher responsibilities. They may also need to enroll in formal degree programs, courses and workshops or pursue professional certifications to further enrich their skill sets.

Step 13: Discuss with current leaders how they can pass on knowledge before leaving the organization. Implement a structured blueprint for knowledge transfer, facilitating the exchange from experienced employees to those in the learning phase.

This can involve initiatives such as mentoring programs, coaching sessions and on-the-job training , ensuring a seamless transfer of expertise and wisdom within the team.

Step 14: Evaluate progress and measure the success of your succession planning efforts.

Review, compare and communicate progress with different stakeholders every 6–12 months. You can monitor the effectiveness of your succession plan using metrics like bench strength, career path ratio, retention, time to fill, diversity metric, risk of loss, cost savings and more. These indicators will help you communicate progress to senior leadership, succession candidates and the organization as a whole.

Succession planning is a winning strategy for longevity and business success. However, you need to deploy the right tools and templates at every step to ensure a streamlined company success planning process.

Let's check out some of the tools and templates you should have in your stack.

1. Succession Plan

Creating a strong plan for when employees leave is crucial, whether it's due to retirement or other reasons. This company succession plan example is here to help you build a solid strategy, ensuring you're ready for any changes.

Executive Succession Plan

It provides crucial information about the leadership pipeline, ideal candidate profile, assessment, training and more. You can easily customize everything in Visme, from colors to text and fonts. Visme also has a rich library of stock images , icons and videos to make your document engaging. Feel free to make this template your own. Use the features in Visme to create a succession plan that fits your needs and looks great too.

Leadership Succession Plan

Here’s another succession plan that can secure your business’s long-term success. This plan offers a clear roadmap for developing successors who can elevate your business to new heights. It helps ensure important aspects of succession planning don't slip through the cracks.

2. Business Plan

Use this business plan template to ensure your succession planning efforts are directly aligned with your company’s strategic direction. With Visme’s data visualization tool , you can visualize data such as:

  • Budget and financial projections
  • Market trends
  • Historical patterns in your business data
  • Customer segmentation

Modern Business Plan

You’ll find different types of graphs, charts, maps and widgets to present data in a captivating way. As you groom successors, share your business plan with them. It will help them understand where your company is headed and continue to work towards the same objective.

Business Plan Workbook

Creating a business plan facilitates a smooth transition. It also sets the stage for the continued success of your organization. Keep the plan up-to-date with changes in business and industry trends. This way, you can ensure that the succession plan meets the needs of your organization as it evolves.

3. SWOT Analysis

Conducting a SWOT analysis helps you assess the strengths and weaknesses of potential successors. Knowing these strengths helps you harness and build on them. By pointing out their weaknesses, you can develop training and development plans to address these gaps before they assume leadership roles.

Use this template to assess your company’s readiness for succession planning. You can visualize future opportunities and threats to leadership transitions in your organization.

succession planning definition business studies

If you have a succession plan strategy, the SWOT framework can still work. You can use it to evaluate the status or effectiveness of your succession plan.

succession planning definition business studies

​​It’s also effective for making informed decisions about the best candidates for leadership roles and development initiatives, as well as making potential adjustments to the succession plan based on the external environment.

4. Market Research Report

Succession planning isn’t just about replacing leaders. It’s a strategic approach that considers external factors that influence leadership transitions like industry trends, market analysis and the competitive landscape.

Conducting market research will keep your company in tune with the realities of your business landscape. Armed with this knowledge, you can ensure your successors are equipped to navigate industry shifts and capitalize on emerging opportunities. It enables you to align leadership development strategies with the external forces shaping your industry.

Use this template below to capture the report of your market analysis.

succession planning definition business studies

Add interactive elements like hover effects or clickable pop-ups to make it navigable and engaging. Visme also offers animated icons, GIFs , illustrations and special effects to give your report a special touch.

5. Financial Projections/Reports

Succession planning doesn’t come cheap. A lot of money goes into searching, recruitment, onboarding, training and integration. Tools, technology and compensation for current and potential leaders are critical cost components as well.

Use this template to forecast the financial investment required for leadership planning. Put together financial contingency plans to ensure your financial resources are aligned with strategic priorities.

succession planning definition business studies

After sharing the report, you can use the analytics tool to see how your audience has engaged with it. The tool lets you measure metrics like Views, Unique Visits, Average time, Average Completion and more.

6. Organizational Chart

Visualize the current leadership structure using this customizable template. It provides a clear overview of the hierarchy. You can easily identify crucial roles and understand the reporting relationships between employees.

By looking at the org chart, you can easily spot a lack of depth in the leadership pipeline. It’s also easy to spot where and which successors need to be groomed. Here’s an organizational chart template you can use to simulate various succession scenarios.

Construction Organizational Chart

Keep your org chart on brand with the help of Visme's brand wizard . Once you input your URL, the tool pulls up your brand assets and adds them to your brand kit. That way, you don't have to manually add your branding every time you create designs.

7. Employee Handbook

Streamline the process of onboarding internal and external hires with this employee handbook. It brings your successors up to speed with the various company policies that apply to the different leadership cadres. This template features sections like:

  • Company overview
  • Employment basis
  • Workplace policies
  • Code of conduct
  • Benefits and Perks
  • Compensation
  • Working hours

With a modern design, sharp color scheme, tech-inspired icons and visuals, this template presents essential information in a captivating format.

Tech Company Employee Handbook

8. Performance Metrics and KPIs

Tracking metrics and KPIs help assess the impact of your succession planning initiative and how well-prepared your company is in the case of an unexpected event.

With this template below, you can report metrics such as bench strength, career path ratio, retention, time to fill, diversity metric, risk of loss, cost savings and more.

Show senior managers and stakeholders that your plan is future-proof with the help of this fully customizable report template. It has a delightful color combo and an eye-catching selection of fonts, images and icons which makes it an excellent pick for a variety of business needs.

Monthly HR KPI Report

Just replace the placeholder text in this report template then tweak the visual elements until you have a design you love.

9. Risk Management Plan

Succession comes with a lot of risks. Some of them may include:

  • Talent shortfalls
  • Overreliance on a few individuals
  • Resistance to change
  • Insufficient investment in training and development programs
  • Successor unpreparedness

With a solid risk management plan, you can mitigate the impact of these risks on your company. It helps you anticipate potential challenges and develop contingency plans for unexpected events.

succession planning definition business studies

But that's not the only reason you need a risk management plan. When the successor eventually assumes the position, this plan keeps them aware of potential risks in the business or market and empowers them to make informed decisions.

10. Crisis Communication Plan

Successful leadership transitions thrive on effective communication. An effective communication plan helps you build transparency and trust, increase employee engagement, mitigate resistance and manage expectations.

With this template, you can develop a clear and transparent strategy for communicating the succession plan to all stakeholders, including employees, clients, investors and other relevant parties.

Crisis Communication Plan

Navigate the difficulty associated with this process and stay winning with this template. This communication plan explains how crucial information will be communicated to stakeholders during succession planning.

It also highlights who will be receiving the communication, how and when they will receive it and how often they should expect to get that info.

When creating your plan, make it a collaborative process. Use Visme's collaboration tool to ensure everyone participates in the planning process. Team members can leave feedback, comments or even draw annotations in real time.

The Workflow feature makes communication even better. You can assign pages to different team members, set due dates and review submissions.

11. Training Plan

Training and development serve as the cornerstones of a robust succession plan. They equip employees with the skills, knowledge and experience required to take on bigger responsibilities.

Use this template to create a robust training plan that caters to the individual needs of each employee. It clearly highlights the training program outline and describes how the program will be delivered along with an evaluation and follow-up process.

Change Management Training Plan

Build a robust succession pipeline that boosts employee engagement and increases retention rates. Start by identifying the skill gaps for each employee and create training programs to address those gaps.

Save time and create quality training content in minutes using Visme's AI text generator . Just describe what kind of content you want to create and watch it generate your text in seconds.

12. Strategic Plan

Your succession planning document isn't a replacement for your company's strategic plan . The succession plan must be in sync with your company's broader goals and vision.

A strategic plan helps you identify potential risks and uncertainties in the business environment. Integrating your company-wide goals and succession planning helps you identify and develop a diverse pool of talent for leadership positions.

Use this template below to develop a strategic plan that sets the foundation for purpose-driven leadership, continuous improvement and long-term sustainability.

Brand General Strategic Plan

Share your plan with your audience online or download in multiple formats (PDF, image, PPTX, HTML) and share offline via other channels.

13. Surveys and Feedback Forms

Surveys and feedback forms are valuable tools for obtaining information about the employee's development needs. You can use it to gauge employees' strengths and how to harness them. On the flip side, it also reveals their weaknesses and how you can address them as well.

If you're looking to improve the number of employees who engage with your forms, we recommend using Visme Forms.

Visme's no-code feedback form creator helps lift feedback form metrics so you get a better insight into the minds of your employees. Read this case study to see how Visme can increase your form conversion rates by 207%!

14. Employee Evaluation Forms

Assess how well employees are absorbing the training and development program with this employee evaluation form template.

What makes employee evaluation so important is that it:

  • Enables you to provide constructive feedback to both trainers and trainees.
  • Helps you identify high-performing individuals who may be ready for additional challenges or leadership roles.
  • Creates a sense of accountability and encourages participants to take the training seriously.
  • Allows you to measure training effectiveness and ROI.
  • Provides a framework for improving your succession planning initiatives.

Simple 30 60 90 Employee Evaluation Report

This template has a clean layout with crisp fonts and a minimalistic design. These attributes make it suitable for businesses across different sectors. Customize it to your taste by adding your brand elements with just a few clicks.

Easily customize this template for different trainees with the help of the dynamic fields feature. You can create custom fields and values that repeat across different projects or documents.

Q. What Is Succession Planning?

Succession planning is the practice of identifying and developing talent for future roles—not just for leadership positions but for critical roles across the company. It's about finding and training new leaders from inside (and sometimes outside) the company to make sure the shift in responsibilities goes smoothly.

Q. What is Succession Planning and Diversity?

Succession planning and diversity are two different concepts.

Combining succession planning with diversity initiatives ensures that the pool of potential leaders is not only skilled but also representative of a diverse range of backgrounds and perspectives.

Diversity in succession planning helps organizations avoid groupthink, encourages innovation and reflects the changing demographics and global perspectives in the business landscape.

Q. What are the 4 stages of succession planning?

Here are the four main stages of succession planning:

  • Identifying crucial positions that are essential for the success and continuity of your business.
  • Conducting a thorough assessment of your current talent pool. This involves evaluating employees' skills, competencies and potential to determine their suitability for future leadership roles.
  • Implementing training programs, mentorship opportunities and other initiatives to enhance the skills and capabilities of potential successors.
  • Transitioning from the outgoing leader to the successor. Additionally, there is a continuous monitoring process to ensure the new leader succeeds in their role, with adjustments made as necessary.

Q. What should a business succession plan include?

A business success plan should include the following elements:

1. Identification of Key Positions: Clearly define the critical roles within the organization that are pivotal for its success and require succession planning.

2. Talent Assessment: Conduct a comprehensive evaluation of current employees to identify individuals with high potential for leadership roles.

3. Leadership Development Programs: Implement structured training and development initiatives to enhance the skills and capabilities of potential successors.

4. Communication Plan: Develop a clear and transparent strategy for communicating the succession plan to all stakeholders, including employees, clients, investors and other relevant parties.

5. Knowledge Transfer: Establish a plan for transferring critical knowledge and skills from current leaders to potential successors, ensuring a smooth transition.

6. Legal and Financial Considerations: Address legal and financial aspects related to succession, including estate planning, tax implications and the legal structure of the business.

7. Contingency Planning: Develop contingency plans to handle unexpected events, such as sudden departures or the incapacitation of important leaders.

8. Diversity and Inclusion: Consider diversity and inclusion in succession planning to ensure a varied pool of potential successors.

9. Regular Review and Updates: Periodically review and update the succession plan to align with strategy, structure or personnel changes.

10. Succession Readiness Assessments: Implement a system for assessing the readiness of potential successors and addressing any development needs.

Q. What is the role of HR in succession planning?

Human Resources (HR) plays a pivotal role in succession planning. They collaborate with leadership to identify critical roles, conduct talent assessments and develop a pipeline of high-potential individuals.

HR is also responsible for planning and implementing leadership development programs, ensuring transparent communication and fostering diversity. They also monitor the readiness of potential successors to facilitate smooth transitions and long-term organizational success.

Use Visme to Create Dynamic Documents & Plans for Your Company

There you go—everything you need to know about company succession planning, including tools and templates to help you get started.

Succession planning isn't just a replacement plan for senior-level positions. It involves nurturing potential successors for any position—whether it's junior, mid-level or senior-level executives.

Another thing you should know is that it goes beyond mere replacement strategies. It's a proactive approach to identifying and grooming a diverse pool of talent within your company.

The truth is, you need robust business productivity tools like Visme to pull it off. Visme has a rich library of templates and tools you can use to streamline the entire company succession planning process.

Whether you're in HR , sales and marketing , training and development , or project management , Visme has solutions for you. What are you waiting for? Contact sales to find out how Visme can help your business thrive.

Discover the Business Value of Team-Based Interactive Content.

succession planning definition business studies

Trusted by leading brands

Capterra

Recommended content for you:

10 New Hire Checklist Templates & Best Practices

Create Stunning Content!

Design visual brand experiences for your business whether you are a seasoned designer or a total novice.

succession planning definition business studies

About the Author

succession planning definition business studies

Your Business Needs a Succession Plan: Here Are the Basics

Succession planning may be the single-most neglected aspect of business ownership. Don’t make the same mistake that so many others do. Instead, get started with your plans today.

  • Newsletter sign up Newsletter

A man stands alone in a boardroom

In Part 1 and Part 2 of this series on selling your business, we’ve examined the questions facing owners who entered 2020 ready to make their move, breaking down how the COVID-19 pandemic changes the situation and how to increase a business’s value if you decide to delay bringing it to market. There’s another way forward, though — standing pat and not selling.

Tax Wrinkles for Work-at-Home Employees During COVID-19

If you were a business owner who was considering putting your company on the market but decided not to sell (or at least not anytime soon), what steps should be you taking now? The goals are to ensure preservation of the current business, as well as provide for an orderly and stable future transition when the proper time to sell arrives. Accordingly, the first and most critical step is setting a goal to implement both a business continuity plan and a business succession plan. The sooner, the better.

We have all learned a valuable lesson from the COVID-19 pandemic: A significant business disruption can happen with very little advance notice, and not being prepared can be disastrous.

Subscribe to Kiplinger’s Personal Finance

Be a smarter, better informed investor.

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/hwgJ7osrMtUWhk5koeVme7-200-80.png

Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters

Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.

Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.

Developing a Business Continuity Plan

Armed now with the knowledge of how the pandemic impacted your own business operations, you can now plan. Did the travel restrictions impair your sales efforts? Did the substantial increase in employees working remotely overburden your IT infrastructure? Did your vendors and suppliers make requests that you couldn’t respond to effectively?

The goal of a business continuity plan is to identify that which is essential and that which is not and to place the business in a position where it can continue to operate during a disruption. Ideally, the business continuity plan would include:

  • A comprehensive strategy for keeping the business operating day-to-day.
  • An assessment of essential and non-essential operations and processes.
  • An analysis of key employees/positions and how each would be impacted by a disruption and, specifically, the potential loss or unavailability of key employees.
  • A review of facilities and analysis of how the business operates if one or more location becomes unavailable.
  • A plan to protect, secure, back up and replicate, if necessary, critical data systems, infrastructure and applications.

These are only a few of the many issues for consideration when developing a business continuity plan. Many of the details are industry-specific, and you need to work with your key employees and advisers to address the challenges likely to face your particular industry. Consider meeting and discussing with your vendors, customers and suppliers the challenges that were presented by the COVID-19 restrictions. Get their views on how things could have been handled more effectively. Information is key to developing a plan that will actually work.

There’s Never Been a Better Time for Business Owners to Make a Move

Once you develop a plan, revisit it regularly and adjust and update it so that it is always ready to go when you need it. If, for example, your CFO retires, you will need to consider how the loss of that person and their particular knowledge will affect the plan. Will their successor have the wealth of historical knowledge necessary to obtain and transfer information in a timely manner? If not, consider how you address the gap. Every organization seems to have those “go-to” people who have been there forever and without whom things run much less smoothly. Consider how the plan is impacted if those individuals are unavailable. The key takeaway is that the plan needs to grow and change with the business in order to work effectively when the disruption happens.

Developing a Business Succession Plan

No matter what your plans are for the future of the business, eventually, you will transition it to someone. Perhaps that someone is a purchaser, or perhaps you will transition to your family, key employees or some combination of the two groups. The point is that transition will eventually be unavoidable. Ideally, you get to control and be part of the process. That, however, is not always the case. Unexpected death of an owner, key executive or employee can cripple a business if no successor has been identified and there is no plan for transitioning management.

Every business succession plan looks different. Not every business owner wants to transition their business in the same way or at the same time. Some owners want to exit completely at a certain date. Others want to stay involved to a lesser degree over time but never exit entirely. These issues, as well as many others, must be considered. The plan should be designed to:

  • Address anticipated timing.
  • Identify one or more successor.
  • Address the value of the business.
  • Provide for implementation of the plan.
  • Discuss communication with employees, customers and family.
  • Include tax planning.
  • Provide for contingencies.

In my long career as a business lawyer, I have observed that succession planning is the single-most neglected aspect of business ownership. Maybe it’s human nature to think that we’ll always have time to deal with it later. The truth is, if you don’t get around to it and the unexpected occurs, the impact on your family and employees could be devastating. Also, we see many executive job candidates asking about a company’s transition planning before they are ready to commit to working there. Lack of a transition plan can therefore have a negative impact on attracting and retaining talented employees and executives.

The best way to approach the process, in my experience, is by dedicating a year to the effort. Spend three or four months discussing the process with your family, executive employees, your bank and other key stakeholders. Get your lawyer and accountant or other tax adviser involved from the outset. Develop and refine the plan over the next few months, and implement it over the last three or four months. One year is what you need. Negotiate the fees with your professional advisers in advance and get a budget for each phase. When it’s done, you’ll thank yourself, and your business will be better off for having gone through the process.

Final thoughts

As touched on in this article and the other parts of this series, the COVID-19 pandemic was and remains a major disruption that couldn’t have been foreseen by most business owners at the start of 2020. The confusion of the early days, however, is beginning to clear. For owners who were planning for a transition, there is path forward — be it bringing the business to a changed market, delaying the decision or staying put for a time.

No matter the decision, proper preparation and organization will make it easier.

Help! I Can’t Afford to Sell My Business

This article was written by and presents the views of our contributing adviser, not the Kiplinger editorial staff. You can check adviser records with the SEC or with FINRA .

To continue reading this article please register for free

This is different from signing in to your print subscription

Why am I seeing this? Find out more here

Get Kiplinger Today newsletter — free

Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.

Patricia Farrell is a corporate law attorney in Pittsburgh. With a primary practice in business services, she regularly represents privately held businesses in mergers, acquisitions, divestitures and other major transactions, both in the United States and in Europe, Asia and Australia. She also has a broad corporate practice where she assists with corporate governance as well as succession planning for business owners and a variety of other day-to-day business issues.

closeup of stock market chart with white bars and blue volume bars

Tesla was the best S&P 500 stock Tuesday after the EV maker disclosed its second-quarter deliveries report.

By Karee Venema Published 2 July 24

Senior couple walking on beach.

Attention Florida-bound retirees: There's more to the Sunshine State than Disney, golf and beaches.

By Bob Niedt Published 2 July 24

A grandma hugs her grandkid on the sofa.

Of course you want to spoil your grandchildren. Who doesn't? You can do it in ways that won't teach them bad habits or set unrealistic expectations, though.

By Neale Godfrey, Financial Literacy Expert Published 2 July 24

Multiple question marks against a blue background.

A business book author answers some key questions a budding entrepreneur might have before making the leap to small-business owner.

By H. Dennis Beaver, Esq. Published 2 July 24

A man writes a personal check.

Irrevocable trusts can be set up so that the trust maker no longer pays income taxes, and the taxes are instead paid by the trust. What are the pros and cons?

By Rustin Diehl, JD, LLM Published 1 July 24

A couple sit on the floor in front of their sofa and look at a laptop together.

Knowing what to give, how to give and where to give can help ensure your charitable giving aligns with your values and maximizes your impact.

By Nicole Jackson-Leslie, JD, 21/64 Certified Advisor Published 1 July 24

A golfer watches where his ball goes after teeing off.

The easy swing and follow-through of retirement planning starts with simple fundamentals. Start with your stance (aka your financial plan), choose the right club (aka asset allocation) and go from there.

By Evan T. Beach, CFP®, AWMA® Published 30 June 24

The acronym IOU is taped over the front of a hundred-dollar bill.

These steps, including converting to Roth IRAs, using a Roth 401(k) and leveraging life insurance and annuities, can help reduce your taxes in retirement.

By William Decker, Investment Advisor Representative Published 29 June 24

An older woman sitting on the side of her bed stretches after waking up.

One way to build wealth is to max out your company’s retirement plans, but doing it in tax-efficient ways can make an even bigger difference.

By Michael Aloi, CFP® Published 28 June 24

A driver shrugs while sitting behind the steering wheel of her car.

Insurance agents hear all the excuses, but speeding and distracted driving, especially when the weather is bad, are well within drivers’ control.

By Karl Susman, CPCU, LUTCF, CIC, CSFP, CFS, CPIA, AAI-M, PLCS Published 28 June 24

  • Contact Future's experts
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Advertise with us

Kiplinger is part of Future plc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site . © Future US, Inc. Full 7th Floor, 130 West 42nd Street, New York, NY 10036.

succession planning definition business studies

what is succession planning

The leader’s guide to effective succession planning

Reading time: about 6 min

What is succession planning?

The succession planning process helps organizations recruit, identify, and develop employees to take on new leadership positions or replace current leaders when they retire or leave the company.

A necessary part of business success is preparing for every possible outcome. Proper planning means the difference between weathering a storm and drowning beneath the inevitable changing tide.

Succession planning, then, should be treated as a necessary failsafe against change and a way to keep your business running smoothly.

A responsible and self-aware owner, human resources department, or senior executive embraces change and knows that a rotating employee base is natural to any company, even while striving for employee retention. The most enlightened leaders know that sometimes top performers will outperform their position and need to move on. Some may even change careers entirely, moving on for more fulfillment, more money, more opportunity, or myriad reasons people leave positions behind. And it doesn’t have to be bad.

In fact, with proper planning, effective people management, and responsible communication, your succession plan may end up serving the company even better in the future as you navigate through changes.

Succession planning is the process whereby an organization ensures that employees are recruited and developed to fill each key role within the company. During the succession planning process, you ensure that you will never have a key role open for which another employee is not prepared. This process is also significant as you develop your talent bench strength within your organization.

Effective succession planning involves having a long-term vision of your company and may involve lateral moves, assignments to special projects, leadership within teams, and internal or external development opportunities.  Understanding the needs of both leadership and employees is vital to the succession process, as it can involve both vertical and lateral advancement for company employees.

Ever wonder why NFL teams keep a second and third-string quarterback ready? This is a key example of effective succession planning. A proper succession plan not only prepares for unexpected employee turnover—it plans for employee promotion and leadership development, creating a self-sustained internal advancement model from the mailroom to the boardroom.

succession planning org chart

Benefits of a succession planning process

Organizations at every size benefit from organizational succession planning. Consider even the small 10- to 12-person team of a lean startup: Succession planning for companies of this size leverages against the risk of losing a vital team member who takes up a much larger relative percentage of the work output.

By cross-training all members of an organization, a leadership team can mitigate against the often volatile startup space by having employees ready to fill in roles for anyone who may transition within or outside of the company.

Perhaps the company wants to cut costs by eliminating a position and redistributing responsibilities laterally within the company. Succession planning, then, would entail making sure that current employees are trained on the duties of the role to be eliminated. Management succession planning for small companies could also mean preparing current employees to onboard a new process, new service offering, or even developing a new leadership position.

Let's break down how succession planning will specifically benefit management, HR, and individual employees.

The value of a management succession plan

Managing a successful operation becomes increasingly difficult when you rely on many employees to support your company, from creating the actual products and services to reinforcing the mission statement and vision. Losing key members puts all of those ends at risk. You need prepared employees to step into leadership roles as the company grows or shifts directions.

A management succession plan, which ultimately results in more prepared, well-trained employees, will enable your company to create or supplement leadership positions based on industry growth potential rather than scrambling to adjust and undertraining, potentially missing major opportunities.

Now especially is a time for established companies to actively invest in succession planning for management as baby boomers reach retirement age. As new technology provides a range of business opportunities for digital natives, management succession planning is the perfect opportunity to transition companies into a digital future.

The value of human resource succession planning

HR succession planning begins at the recruitment phase. Companies save valuable time in the succession planning process by onboarding exceptional employees and drawing from their built-in human resource pool rather than headhunting for new positions when leadership roles become available. The human resource cost can add up—in time, money, and energy—and bringing on the right people from the beginning is the best way to both prevent added HR cost and to increase HR value in the long run.

Succession planning for HR begins with H promoting on-the-job shadowing for the right employees, facilitating transfers to different jobs, and developing a top-notch recruitment plan. All of this ensures that there is a systematic succession process for preparing employees to fill key roles as they become vacant. The goal for all future-minded companies should always be to prepare employees for advancement or promotion into ever more challenging roles within the organization.

The value of an employee succession plan

Entering a new company comes with a range of emotional and mental processing: the stress and excitement of learning entirely new information, the rush and anxiety of meeting new co-workers and superiors, the wonder and uncertainty of your future within the organization. Employee succession planning has a myriad of positive benefits for the employees as they make this often awkward transition into a new space.

When succession planning for employees, consider Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs. When new hires are primed with the knowledge that the company plans on advancing them internally, it fulfills not only a vital career need of security but also a need for social belonging. 

Additionally, employees who know that a higher position awaits them receive a boost of self-confidence and self-respect as a result of feeling valued. This confidence enhances their performance within the organization. By fulfilling these more basic needs, employees can start working toward self-actualization, where they develop their skills and find creative solutions to problems. 

Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs

Further, as an added bonus to management and leadership, employees who feel valued, who are looking forward to additional responsibility, and who share that information within the company are likely to contribute to training or preparing other employees to fill their role. A shared effort to continuously train employees improves overall company culture and saves valuable human resource time and energy expenditures.

Planning out succession will make an already effective leader look like a genius. But doing it properly requires transparency across your organization, prepping potential leaders by arming them with the necessary information for any potential transition. Take the next step and learn how to succession plan.

succession planning definition business studies

See our 9 steps for creating a succession plan and preparing for change.

About Lucidchart

Lucidchart, a cloud-based intelligent diagramming application, is a core component of Lucid Software's Visual Collaboration Suite. This intuitive, cloud-based solution empowers teams to collaborate in real-time to build flowcharts, mockups, UML diagrams, customer journey maps, and more. Lucidchart propels teams forward to build the future faster. Lucid is proud to serve top businesses around the world, including customers such as Google, GE, and NBC Universal, and 99% of the Fortune 500. Lucid partners with industry leaders, including Google, Atlassian, and Microsoft. Since its founding, Lucid has received numerous awards for its products, business, and workplace culture. For more information, visit lucidchart.com.

Related articles

How to plan the future of your organization with lucidchart.

Lucidchart was built to maximize flexibility so you can model the future of your organizational structure before you have to start implementing organizational change. See the process of planning your organizational structure for the future in Lucidchart.

4 steps to strategic human resource planning

Many CEOs believe that their employees are the most important factor in their company’s economic success, so if you want to succeed, find and keep the best talent. Learn how to develop your strategic human resource plan.

Bring your bright ideas to life.

or continue with

By registering, you agree to our Terms of Service and you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Privacy Policy .

  • Site Search
  • Candidate Portal Login
  • Meet the Team
  • Testimonials
  • Investor Relations
  • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
  • Work at Airswift
  • Talent Acquisition
  • Global Employment Outsourcing
  • Global Mobility
  • Workforce & HR Consulting
  • RPO & Managed Services
  • Infrastructure
  • Oil & Gas
  • Process, Mining & Manufacturing
  • Renewable Energy
  • Asia Pacific
  • Latin America
  • Middle East
  • North America
  • Case Studies
  • Country Hiring Guides

How to create a succession plan for business continuity and growth

Diyaa Mani

By Diyaa Mani April 2, 2024

Updated April 2, 2024

What is succession planning, and why is it so important?

Succession planning is vital to organisational development and extends beyond the C-suite and upper management roles. It's essential for all levels of an organisation, ensuring a seamless transition of talent and skills.  

Following are the topics we will cover in this article:

  • Succession planning definition
  • Key elements of an effective succession plan  
  • Risk mitigation and adaptation strategies
  • Implementing succession plans for mission-critical roles

How to create a succession plan

Succession planning case studies: implementing in various business contexts.

  • Common succession planning challenges and how to overcome them
  • Key takeaways
  • Invest in your business' future with Airswift

Let's start with a clear succession planning definition

Succession planning is the process of identifying and preparing promising executives for greater future responsibilities and is significant in modern business environments because it ensures leadership continuity and success. 

According to Neil Manfred, Group IT Director at Airswift, "Succession planning is about making sure the whole organisation continues to run smoothly by identifying reliable individuals."  

The two main components of succession planning encompass staff retention and talent development. 

Staff retention 

Staff retention is critical for maintaining business continuity and growth. It involves strategies and practices to retain talented employees and reduce turnover rates.

Says Charles Pfauwadel, Senior Vice President of ASPAC at Airswift, succession planning is "by far the best way to retain people because the longer someone is with the organisation, the more they contribute because they have fostered strong relationships with clients and within the business."

  • Boosts morale and motivation: Recognition of potential through succession planning increases employee commitment and drive. 
  • Demonstrates investment: Training, mentorship, and leadership development programs show the company values employee growth. 
  • Reduces turnover costs: Investing in existing employees reduces recruitment and training costs associated with high turnover. 

Career path clarity: Defined career paths within succession planning keep employees engaged and motivated.

Career progression is very much linked to succession planning. We want to make sure leaders elevate and promote team members, which often leads to replacing managers and opening up new roles. – Charles Pfauwadel  

Talent development 

Talent development in succession planning is integral to a robust and adaptable workforce. "Empowering individuals based on their strengths and interests can contribute significantly to the organisation. In technical fields such as IT, tailoring projects based on what individuals enjoy doing can lead to remarkable achievements, such as leading ISO certification efforts," says Manfred.

Here are several benefits to developing talent:

  • Identifies and nurtures potential: Programs assess skills and potential to develop future leaders from within.  
  • Enhances skills and competencies: Training focuses on leadership, communication, and decision-making to prepare employees for future challenges. 
  • Adapts to changing needs: Programs evolve alongside the business landscape to ensure employees have the latest skills needed for success. 
  • Improves succession readiness: Investing in development creates a pipeline of prepared leaders to mitigate risks from staff departures. Pfauwadel emphasises that succession planning helps businesses anticipate sudden changes. "It ensures tasks and knowledge are not lost overnight and allows for preparation and training in advance." he says.
  • Fosters continuous learning: A culture of ongoing growth is encouraged through employee development opportunities.

Two people having a discussion with a document and laptop placed before them

Key elements of effective succession planning 

Succession planning is a theoretical exercise and builds organisational resilience. A robust succession plan comprises several components that ensure its success in identifying, nurturing, and transitioning talent. 

Proactive training and skills documentation

Effective succession plans begin with identifying and documenting critical skills and competencies for various roles. Training programs are then implemented to develop these skills among employees, ensuring they are well-prepared to step into leadership positions.  

Leadership pipeline creation 

Establishing a leadership pipeline involves identifying high-potential employees and providing them with opportunities for advancement and development. This includes rotational assignments, stretch assignments , and targeted development programs designed to groom future leaders from within the organisation. 

Mentorship and coaching programs 

These play a crucial role in succession planning by providing guidance and support to emerging leaders . Experienced executives can mentor younger employees, sharing their knowledge, insights, and experiences to help them develop leadership skills. According to Pfauwadel, "it's all about identifying high-potential people as early as possible and supporting their development and growth.”

Succession readiness assessments 

Regular assessments are conducted to evaluate the readiness of potential successors to step into key roles. This may include performance reviews, competency assessments, and leadership potential evaluations to identify gaps and development areas. 

Contingency planning 

"Being ready for unexpected situations is crucial. If someone resigns, and you don't have succession planning in place, especially if this person is a salesperson, for example, you may lose the business because you don't have a backup plan."     - Charles Pfauwadel

Effective succession planning includes contingency planning for unexpected events such as sudden departures, retirements, or incapacitation of key personnel. Contingency plans outline alternative strategies for filling critical roles on short notice, minimising disruption to business operations. 

The role of open communication and collaborative goal-setting 

I'm a massive believer in one-to-ones with my direct reports, speaking at least once a week. I want everybody to feel like they can come to me and say, ‘Hey, I'm struggling with this area’, without worrying about retribution or retaliation. -Neil Manfred

Open communication and collaborative goal-setting are essential to a transparent and aligned organisation. Employees who feel empowered to share ideas bring diverse perspectives to inform decisions and spark innovation.

Collaborative goal setting ensures everyone understands the company's vision and their role in achieving it, fostering a sense of ownership, boosting motivation and productivity. This combination creates a high-performing workforce. 

Two women facing a laptop

Risk mitigation and adaptation strategies 

Succession planning involves identifying and mitigating risks associated with leadership transitions. The steps highlighted below ensure business continuity in the face of unforeseen challenges. 

Diversifying the leadership pipeline 

Succession planning involves diversifying the leadership pipeline. This includes identifying and developing a pool of talented individuals across different departments and levels of the organisation who have the potential to step into leadership roles. By broadening the talent pool, organisations can reduce dependency on specific individuals and increase resilience to unexpected departures or changes in leadership. 

Cross-training employees 

Cross-training employees is an effective strategy for building versatility and flexibility within the workforce. Organisations can ensure that multiple individuals can perform critical tasks and responsibilities by providing opportunities for employees to gain experience and skills outside their primary roles.  

Succession planning is about finding individuals who have the inclination to move into another area. It's about giving them a well-rounded ability across each department.   – Neil Manfred

Implementing succession plans for mission-critical roles 

Specific roles within an organisation are essential for maintaining business operations and continuity. Succession planning involves identifying these mission-critical roles and developing specific succession plans to ensure qualified individuals are ready to step in when needed.  

With good succession planning, you can smoothly transition someone new into a vacant role. It's all about ensuring the company can plan and think long-term. - Charles Pfauwadel

Scenario planning and contingency plans 

Organisations engage in scenario planning to anticipate and prepare for various potential outcomes and challenges associated with leadership transitions. This involves identifying potential scenarios, assessing their likelihood and impact, and developing contingency plans to address them.  

Regular review and updates 

Risk mitigation and adaptation strategies should be regularly reviewed and updated to reflect changes in the organisational landscape and evolving business priorities. Succession plans should be dynamic and responsive to emerging risks and opportunities, with regular assessments to ensure effectiveness.  

A group of people having a discussion

Effective succession planning involves deliberate strategies to identify, nurture, and prepare talent to seamlessly transition into key roles. This ensures organisational resilience and long-term success.

Here are eight ways to ensure effective succession planning strategies:

Start early : Begin succession planning well in advance. Preparing multiple candidates for key positions to address sudden changes and aligning this process with your company's growth objectives for a steady stream of leadership talent is vital.

Be open-minded : Cultivate high-potential employees at all levels. Overlooking seniority, focus on the skills and attitudes needed for leadership roles. Promote a culture where growth and learning are supported through training and mentorship.

Document skills : Keep detailed records of employees' skills, roles, and job requirements. Update these regularly to mirror any shifts in responsibilities, laying the groundwork for promotions and identifying areas for improvement.

Identify skill gaps : Regularly assess employees to spot skill shortages, using this analysis to guide development plans. This keeps your succession plan informed and targeted.

Engage and align : Foster transparent discussions about employees' career goals, aligning their aspirations with the company's needs. This collaboration ensures mutual benefits and satisfaction.

Plan together : Collaborate with managers to tailor succession strategies, offering tools and advice to harness their insight into team dynamics and potential leaders.

Practice and assess : Use temporary leadership roles, like covering for vacations, as trial periods to evaluate candidates' readiness, providing feedback and additional training where necessary.

Hire strategically : Align your hiring strategy with your succession plan, leveraging internal talent evaluations to guide external recruitment, thereby maintaining a consistent approach to talent development and leadership continuity.

Infographic: Leveraging succession planning for business growth and innovation

Succession planning is dynamic and should be tailored to various businesses' unique characteristics.

This requires a nuanced understanding of organisational structures, resources, and cultures in small, medium, or large enterprises.

Small enterprise: Huntswood

Unique considerations for small businesses

Succession planning for Huntswood is focused on its 226 employees and 4,000 contractors. This highlights the company's commitment to internal development and talent management.

Huntswood's succession planning strategy extends beyond its employees to include contractors, emphasising the importance of building a solid leadership pipeline. The company's approach involves strategic hiring and developing internal successors to ensure continuity in key roles. 

Huntswood's proactive approach to succession planning showcases the company's dedication to regulatory compliance, quality, and customer outcomes. By focusing on internal development and talent management, Huntswood positions itself to navigate challenges and sustain leadership continuity effectively.  

Medium enterprise: GoPro  

Adapting leadership to a rapidly changing market for wearable technology, GoPro faced intense competition and needed leaders who could navigate this dynamic environment. 

Unique considerations for medium businesses

GoPro's approach has been more reactive at times. Nick Woodman, the founder and long-time CEO, stepped down in 2020. The company brought outsiders with experience in areas like enterprise software (CEO Lisa Su from AMD) to address their evolving needs.

Flexibility is needed for medium-sized companies in fast-paced industries. They may need to look outside for specific expertise while nurturing internal talent. 

Large enterprise: Samsung  

For Samsung , its main challenge was maintaining stability and growth for a complex multinational corporation with a family-oriented leadership structure. 

Unique considerations for large businesses

The multinational conglomerate utilises a multi-pronged approach. They strongly focus on internal development through programs like the Samsung Leadership Institute, which grooms future leaders from within the company. Additionally, they leverage their global presence by considering qualified candidates from various regions for leadership roles. 

Samsung has seen relatively smooth leadership transitions despite its complex structure. This can be attributed to their focus on internal development and a global talent pool. 

Common succession planning challenges and how to overcome them 

Organisations can maximise succession planning efforts and ensure long-term success by proactively addressing and overcoming common challenges.

Resistance to change 

Prioritise clear communication and transparency throughout the succession planning process to overcome resistance to change.

Engage employees in open dialogue about the rationale behind succession planning and its benefits to individuals and the organisation. Provide support and resources to help employees adapt to new roles, emphasising the opportunities for growth and development. 

Lack of resources 

Prioritise resource allocation for succession planning, recognising it as a strategic investment in long-term sustainability.

This involves investing in training, technology for talent management, and allocating time and personnel for succession planning. Additionally, organisations can explore partnerships with external consultants or educational institutions to supplement internal resources. 

Inadequate leadership buy-in 

Emphasise the strategic importance of succession planning and its alignment with broader organisational goals to cultivate leadership buy-in.

Provide education and training for senior leaders on the benefits of succession planning and their role in its success. Encourage leaders to actively engage in talent development efforts and lead by example in promoting a culture of succession readiness and continuous learning. 

Insufficient talent development  

Prioritise talent development as a core component of succession planning.

Implement structured training programs, mentorship initiatives, and leadership development courses to nurture the skills and capabilities of high-potential employees.

Encourage continuous learning and skill-building at all levels of the organisation, empowering employees to take ownership of their career growth and advancement. 

Lack of talent pool diversity

Prioritise diversity and inclusion in their succession planning efforts, actively seeking and developing talent from diverse backgrounds.

Implement strategies to remove biases from talent identification and selection processes, such as blind screening techniques or structured interview protocols. Foster an inclusive culture where all employees feel valued and empowered to contribute their unique perspectives and talents. 

Succession plan rigidity 

Design flexible succession plans, allowing for adjustments based on changing circumstances and emerging talent trends.

Incorporate regular reviews and updates into the succession planning process to ensure alignment with evolving business strategies and talent priorities. Encourage a culture of agility and adaptability, where employees are encouraged to explore new roles and opportunities for growth within the organisation. 

Key takeaways 

  • Succession planning is proactive, not reactive . Don't wait for a crisis to hit. Begin cultivating your future leaders today. 
  • It's a continuous process, not a one-time event. Regularly re-evaluate and adapt your plan to align with evolving needs and opportunities. 
  • Benefits extend far beyond filling key roles. A well-implemented plan fosters  employee engagement, knowledge transfer, innovation, and organisational resilience.  
  • Communication and collaboration are key.  Transparent discussions, collaborative goal-setting, and open career development pathways build trust and motivation. 
  • It's an investment in your future .  You secure your organisation's long-term sustainability and success by nurturing talent and preparing for transitions .  
  • Succession planning is not just for giant corporations or impending CEO retirements; it's a strategic approach applicable to any organisation . 

Man and woman in business attire high five each other

Invest in your business' future with Airswift 

Organisations can weather changes and thrive in an ever-evolving landscape by prioritising succession planning as a strategic investment.  

At Airswift, we understand the importance of talent management and succession planning in driving business continuity and growth. Whether you seek strategic workforce solutions or expert guidance in mobilising international talent we can support your journey towards a resilient and sustainable future.  

Reach out to us today to learn how we can partner with you to secure your organisation's long-term success.

Share the knowledge

Latest jobs.

14 Jun 2024

Aurora, North Carolina, United States

R&D Lab Technician

Airswift has been tasked by one of our major clients to find a R&D Lab ...

Kitimat , British Columbia, Canada

Project Manager (Remote)

Airswift is seeking a Project Manager to join one of our major Mining clients ...

13 May 2024

Cologne, Germany

Engineering assistant

About Airswift: Airswift is a global workforce solutions provider specializing ...

S&F Airswift newsletter form graphic

Fast-track your STEM career

  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Design Manchester by Carbon Creative

Page Tips

Home / Resources / ISACA Journal / Issues / 2021 / Volume 3 / Succession Planning for Business Continuity

Succession planning for business continuity.

j21v3-Succession

In this digital age, when discussing business continuity, the first things that come to mind are technology and related processes. However, it is important to note that the critical elements of human resources (HR) and processes have equal weight. The challenge of succession planning is not limited only to technology teams, but it is actually a business concern. US founding father, statesman, philosopher and inventor Benjamin Franklin once said, “If you fail to plan, you are planning to fail.” 1

Executives across the world emphasize having a succession plan in place to enable organizations to continue after a disrupting event or disaster scenario. However, most enterprises are actually unprepared for such challenges. According to the US National Association of Corporate Directors, only 23 percent of enterprise boards say they have a formal succession plan in place. 2 The study also notes that public enterprise boards have become more focused on succession planning in recent years.

Enterprises struggling to manage the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic have highlighted the crucial need to have a strategy in place if senior management gets sick. A disastrous situation may prevent core management from staying connected with their teams. A risk-based plan to create possible disaster scenarios should be developed. Internal leaders who can take up the necessary roles in disaster situations must be in place. Identified individuals should go through periodic assessments to evaluate their capability and capacity to tackle such scenarios. Pragmatic risk management practices such as the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard ISO 31000:2018 Risk management—Guidelines 3 and the COBIT ® 2019 framework 4 control objectives should be considered when performing risk assessment exercises.

Succession planning cannot take place in a vacuum. It should also be an intensive, comprehensive initiative, much more than a preparation of a list of names that will be tabled if the chief executive officer (CEO) is hit by a bus. Similarly, succession plans will not increase the productivity growth rate of the firm if they are designed only to allow the internal auditor to tick the box: ‘Succession plan in place.’ 5

The main objective of a successful succession plan is: Should there be a disruptive change, the enterprise can continue to operate under the right leadership. These scenarios can include retirement, resignation, redundant resources, or even the unfortunate events of sickness or death. The high-level approach to succession planning includes the following steps:

  • Review enterprise objectives and identify mission-critical operations.
  • Identify the positions critical for these enterprise operations.
  • Identify the candidates who have the required skills, knowledge and experience.
  • Develop a training plan.
  • Provide development opportunities.
  • Perform a trial run of the succession plan.
  • Maintain a skills inventory.

Nearly all industry best practices, standards and regulatory frameworks require enterprises to have a business continuity plan (BCP) in place. As the BCP touches all aspects of an organization, enterprises cannot ignore the fact that succession planning and business continuity planning go hand in hand.

From Succession Planning to Succession Management

As the name suggests, succession planning should be supported by a plan in line with enterprise strategy, values and culture ( figure 1 ).

Figure 1

Strategy Succession planning is a multifaceted discipline in which an overall strategy lays the foundation. When developing the plan, consider the enterprise operating environment; the expectations of the board, shareholders and customers; and legal and compliance requirements (i.e., laws and regulations). These considerations help identify the expectations of future leadership. The ultimate goal is to preserve the enterprise’s values and maintain growth and continuity of business governance practices.

The goals and objectives of succession planning should be identified and agreed on by senior management. Management commitment will:

  • Minimize the challenges of allocation of resources
  • Provide consistency in the decision-making process
  • Establish the basis for performance evaluations
  • Establish practices for succession planning

Once management endorsement is obtained, an overall plan for succession that covers critical management and key business operations positions must be developed. The goals and objectives identified provide a sound basis for identifying skills and competencies required at various management levels.

Job profiles should be developed for each key position. This should also include key success factors, performance evaluation criteria, skills, experience and attributes.

Figure 2 illustrates a proposed maturity model for transition from succession planning to succession management.

Figure 2

Some key questions to answer while developing a succession management system include:

  • Which positions are key to organizational success?
  • What are the aspects of exemplary performance for these positions?
  • How will these positions be filled?
  • How many key positions need to have at least one identified successor?
  • How will employees or contractors be identified for succession?
  • How will employees be developed, tested and retained?

Governance Enterprises with sound governance practices are able to weather challenges. Successors will be better able to perform if the enterprise has established its mission, vision and values supported by appropriate policies, procedures and organizational structure. A smooth transition is the aim of an effective succession management system, and the board and executive management are accountable for having an effective BCP in place to aid this smooth transition. A successful succession management system provides individuals with exemplary skills and attributes to fulfill the position requirements. Good corporate governance practices provide required resources (i.e., people, processes, finance, facilities, infrastructure) for the success of a succession system.

A SUCCESSFUL SUCCESSION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROVIDES INDIVIDUALS WITH EXEMPLARY SKILLS AND ATTRIBUTES TO FULFILL THE POSITION REQUIREMENTS.

Developing a succession plan.

Once the enterprise has identified the requirements for succession planning, such as the overall strategy, approval and resource availability, the next phase is the development of the plan.

Developing a succession plan is a multifaceted activity that comprises three broad phases:

  • Initiation — The overall framework for controlling and managing the whole exercise needs to be developed before entering the planning phase. These activities include but are not limited to risk assessments, contextualization of key positions for success management, documentation of criteria for exemplary performance, performance assessment criteria and a strategy for the skills gap. Roles and responsibilities of various stakeholders, namely HR, C-level management and the board, are also explicitly documented and approved. Development of the career ladder and process for successors is also part of this phase.
  • Planning —Based on assessments performed in the previous phase, key positions for succession planning are identified. Identified individuals are screened based on job profiles. Based on assessments and the identified skills gap, individual development plans are created. Similarly, succession plans are put in place for each identified position. Successors for each position along with their development plans are approved by senior management.
  • Development —Subsequent to approval, successors will be developed per the approved plan. Management should consider challenging the skills and knowledge gained by successors. This may include BCP testing or trials of real-life scenarios.

An important aspect of succession management is continuous improvement, where succession management systems outputs are used for improving the succession planning and development process.

DESPITE THE BENEFITS EXPECTED FROM SUCCESSION MANAGEMENT, ORGANIZATIONS MAY FACE CHALLENGES THAT RANGE FROM A MAJOR STRUCTURAL ISSUE TO A FINEGRAINED PROBLEM.

Challenges deploying a succession management system.

Despite the benefits expected from succession management, organizations may face challenges that range from a major structural issue to a fine-grained problem. As organizations identify potential candidates to be successors, there is the possibility that they may hit a wall in the process due to internal friction within management. Challenges deploying a succession management system include the following:

  • Lack of management support —Management support provides the base for successful succession management. To obtain senior management support, the value and benefits as well as any compliance and regulatory requirements should be articulated.
  • Lack of resources —A crunch in resource availability can impact the effectiveness of succession planning. Successors may not possess the required skills and attributes. Any challenges to obtaining the resources necessary for adequate training and development should be escalated to management.
  • Lack of successors —In this situation, management should consider external hiring. However, this needs due diligence based on the management level of the successor.
  • Challenges in talent retention —It is quite challenging to retain talent. The best way to retain talent is to provide career development opportunities. There are several reasons other than financial for people to switch jobs. These can be managed through empowerment, recognition and skills development opportunities.

Human assets are more important than any other asset category. Unique learning abilities and individual personality attributes make human resources a special factor of production for any organization. Unlike other factors of production (i.e., land, capital), labor productivity and capabilities can be enhanced through training and other motivational factors such as financial, recognition of efforts and empowerment.

One way to recognize contributions to the organization is through succession and providing a career path. Creating a succession management system can provide a conducive HR environment and help prepare an organization for business continuity in the face of disruption or disaster. Succession management systems perform best with a clear strategy and good corporate governance practices.

1 KPMG, “The 3 Keys to a Good Family Business Succession Plan,” 2 June 2015, https://home.kpmg/xx/en/home/insights/2015/06/3-keys-good-family-business-succession-plan.html 2 Edgerton, B.; “New Research Spotlights CEO Succession Challenges,” NACD Board Talk , 18 April 2019, https://blog.nacdonline.org/posts/new-research-spotlights-ceo-succession-challenges 3 International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO 31000:2018 Risk Management—Guidelines , Switzerland, 2018, https://www.iso.org/standard/65694.html 4 ISACA ® , COBIT ® 2019: Introduction and Methodology , USA, 2018, https://www.isaca.org/resources/cobit 5 Cantor, P.; “Succession Planning: Often Requested, Rarely Delivered,” Ivey Business Journal , 2005, https://iveybusinessjournal.com/publication/succession-planning-often-requested-rarely-delivered/

Muhammad Asif Qureshi, CISA, ACMA, CIA, CISSP, PMP

Is an experienced governance, risk management and compliance (GRC) professional with a background in information systems auditing. He is a GRC manager at Tawazun Economic Council. Qureshi actively participates in mentoring and coaching activities for young learners in schools and colleges. He has been a guest speaker on cybersecurity-related topics for young students on numerous occasions. Qureshi worked with a dedicated team to build the information security architecture and establish an information security department in his organization from ground zero.

succession planning definition business studies

Cart

  • SUGGESTED TOPICS
  • The Magazine
  • Newsletters
  • Managing Yourself
  • Managing Teams
  • Work-life Balance
  • The Big Idea
  • Data & Visuals
  • Reading Lists
  • Case Selections
  • HBR Learning
  • Topic Feeds
  • Account Settings
  • Email Preferences

The Key to Successful Succession Planning for Family Businesses

  • James Vardaman

succession planning definition business studies

Don’t exclude non-family members from the discussion.

Successfully passing the baton to the next generation is a goal for many family business leaders. It can also be a sound business move if the right steps are taken. By clearly communicating family succession intentions, developing strong relational bonds, and proving the fitness of next generation leaders, family firms can achieve buy-in from their nonfamily employees. Not only will this make for a smooth leadership transition, but it can also increase nonfamily identification with both the family and the firm, creating a more productive and satisfied workforce that propels the firm for years to come.

The succession process is one of the biggest challenges facing family firms, as most fail to remain a family business past the second generation. Among those that do succeed, a key concern is how nonfamily personnel will receive a successor. Perceptions of nepotism in succession can undermine nonfamily employee commitment to the business and their continued participation in the firm. Addressing this common issue can be difficult because the ability to choose a family successor and provide employment opportunities for family members is often a primary aim of family business owners. Thus, a key challenge for family businesses is gaining buy-in from nonfamily employees for the next generation of family leadership .

  • WT Will Tabor is an Assistant Professor of Business Administration at Mississippi College. His research focuses on family businesses and organizational ethics. His work has been published in Family Business Review and The Journal of Business Ethics .
  • JV James Vardaman holds the Chair of Excellence in Free Enterprise at the University of Memphis and is the author of Global Talent Retention: Understanding Employee Turnover Around the World .

Partner Center

More From Forbes

Can your business survive without you 9 succession planning tips for business owners.

  • Share to Facebook
  • Share to Twitter
  • Share to Linkedin

Adi Vaxman, the Founder & CEO of Sheba Consulting and a seasoned leader with 30+ years of experience growing businesses and leading change.

As a business owner, you've poured your heart and soul into building your company from the ground up, and often, you may feel that your business simply cannot survive without you. However, this mindset is dangerous. The truth is, no matter how integral you are to your company's success, your business can and must be able to thrive without you.

In my many years of experience working with a wide range of businesses across various industries, I've seen the critical importance of succession planning firsthand. It’s a crucial aspect of ensuring the long-term success and sustainability of any business, yet many owners fail to prioritize it.

This isn't just about preparing for death or retirement; it's also about maintaining continuity during short-term absences and planning for future changes in ownership or leadership. Without a solid plan, your company could face significant, avoidable challenges, from leadership vacuums to financial instability and the loss of key stakeholders.

To set your business up for long-term success, here are nine essential steps to incorporate into your succession planning strategy:

‘The Acolyte’ Episode 6 Recap And Review: These Short Episodes Were A Big Mistake

Wealth of thailand’s 50 richest on forbes list declines nearly 12% to $153 billion, nate diaz vs. jorge masvidal: date, time and how to watch, 1. identifying and developing potential successors.

Identify and develop potential successors who can take the reins when the time comes. Look beyond technical skills and experience, considering leadership potential, cultural fit and alignment with your company's values and mission.

Start with your current employees; identify those who have demonstrated leadership skills, a strong work ethic, a deep understanding of your business operations and, most importantly, trustworthiness and loyalty.

However, don't limit yourself to internal candidates; external hires can bring fresh perspectives, skills and experience. Just make sure you identify candidates who not only meet the job requirements but also embody your company's values and culture.

2. Investing In Successor Development

Invest in your successor’s development through mentoring, training and stretch assignments to prepare them for leadership. Create a structured development plan with regular check-ins, feedback and growth opportunities.

Communicate your plans to your potential successors by letting them know they are being considered for future leadership roles. This transparency can foster loyalty and commitment, increasing the likelihood that they remain by your side and make your investment worthwhile.

3. Nurturing Key Relationships

Expose your successor to relationships that are critical to your business. Have them work with the same clients, suppliers, vendors and partners as you. Let them attend meetings, join discussions and build a rapport with key stakeholders. This will help make the transition much smoother.

4. Documenting Critical Processes And Knowledge

Document your knowledge and processes on an ongoing basis. Whenever you find yourself doing something by heart, take a moment to write it down or implement technology that will record it for you, such as password managers and CRMs that track email activity or AI tools that summarize meetings.

Draft standard operating procedures (SOP) outlining step-by-step instructions, but recognize that this is an ongoing process, not a static one. Make a habit of consistently contributing to your knowledge repository over time and ensure it's accessible to your successors.

5. Timing And Structure Of The Transition

Decide on the timing and structure of the transition. Consider your business's current state, upcoming milestones or challenges, and the readiness of your potential successors.

Think about your personal timeline and goals, including whether you want to retire completely or stay involved in some capacity. Choose between a clean break where you hand over the reins all at once or a more gradual approach where you phase out your involvement over time. The right choice will depend on your unique situation and goals.

Regardless of what you choose, consider doing a trial run with your successor ahead of your prolonged absence, such as having them take over while you are on vacation, and evaluate how they do.

6. Contingency Planning For Unexpected Events

Create contingency plans for sudden unexpected events like illness, disability or death. Work with professional advisors like lawyers, accountants and succession planning specialists to ensure your business is prepared for any eventuality.

Designate who will take over key roles and responsibilities in the event of an unexpected absence, focusing on the immediate needs of the business in a crisis. This might include temporary leadership appointments, emergency contact information for key stakeholders and protocols for maintaining critical operations.

Develop a clear communication plan for informing employees, clients and other stakeholders in the event of an unexpected absence or transition. For example, you could create pre-drafted email templates, scripts for phone calls or other communication tools that can be quickly deployed.

Fractional leaders, such as a fractional CEO or COO, can be invaluable in these situations; they can step in to provide leadership and ensure continuity while your designated successors prepare to take over permanently. (Full disclosure: My company provides fractional leadership services.)

7. Insurance Considerations

Consider purchasing key person insurance, disability insurance or life insurance, depending on your business's nature and your role within it. These policies can protect your business and loved ones by providing critical financial support to keep your business running and ensure your successors have the resources needed to step into their new roles.

8. Legal Documentation

Have clear, legally binding documents that outline what should happen in the event of an unexpected absence or incapacitation. These might include a will, trust or power of attorney designating who will make decisions on your behalf if you are unable to do so. Work with a qualified attorney to draft these documents, as they can have significant legal and financial implications for your business.

9. Continuous Planning

Review and update your succession plan regularly to ensure it remains relevant and effective as your business evolves and grows. Treat succession planning as an ongoing process requiring regular attention and refinement, not a one-time event.

Succession planning is ultimately about creating a lasting legacy that extends beyond your personal involvement. By following these steps, you can not only secure your company's future but also foster employee growth, strengthen stakeholder relationships and build a resilient, adaptable organization that benefits you even while you're in charge. So don't wait until it's too late—start laying the groundwork for a successful transition today, and watch your business thrive for generations to come.

Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?

Adi Vaxman

  • Editorial Standards
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Environment
  • Science & Technology
  • Business & Industry
  • Health & Public Welfare
  • Topics (CFR Indexing Terms)
  • Public Inspection
  • Presidential Documents
  • Document Search
  • Advanced Document Search
  • Public Inspection Search
  • Reader Aids Home
  • Office of the Federal Register Announcements
  • Using FederalRegister.Gov
  • Understanding the Federal Register
  • Recent Site Updates
  • Federal Register & CFR Statistics
  • Videos & Tutorials
  • Developer Resources
  • Government Policy and OFR Procedures
  • Congressional Review
  • My Clipboard
  • My Comments
  • My Subscriptions
  • Sign In / Sign Up
  • Site Feedback
  • Search the Federal Register

The Federal Register

The daily journal of the united states government.

  • Legal Status

This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.

The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status. For complete information about, and access to, our official publications and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA's archives.gov.

The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for legal research should verify their results against an official edition of the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Threatened Species Status for Mount Rainier White-Tailed Ptarmigan With a Section 4(d) Rule

A Rule by the Fish and Wildlife Service on 07/03/2024

Document Details

Information about this document as published in the Federal Register .

Published Document

This document has been published in the Federal Register . Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Enhanced Content - Table of Contents

This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents. This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links has no substantive legal effect.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Supplementary information:, executive summary, previous federal actions, peer review, summary of changes from the proposed rule, summary of comments and recommendations, peer reviewer comments, public comments, comments from federal agencies, comments from states, other comments, i. final listing determination, regulatory and analytical framework, regulatory framework, analytical framework, analysis units, summary of biological status and threats, factors influencing the status of mount rainier white-tailed ptarmigan, regulatory and voluntary conservation mechanisms, summary of factors influencing the status of the species, current condition, future condition, determination of mount rainier white-tailed ptarmigan's status, status throughout all of its range, status throughout a significant portion of its range, determination of status, available conservation measures, ii. final protective regulations issued under section 4(d) of the act, provisions of the 4(d) rule, iii. critical habitat, required determinations, national environmental policy act ( 42 u.s.c. 4321 et seq. ), government-to-government relationship with tribes, references cited, list of subjects in 50 cfr part 17, regulation promulgation, part 17—endangered and threatened wildlife and plants, enhanced content - submit public comment.

  • This feature is not available for this document.

Enhanced Content - Read Public Comments

Enhanced content - sharing.

  • Email this document to a friend

Enhanced Content - Document Print View

  • Print this document

Enhanced Content - Document Tools

These tools are designed to help you understand the official document better and aid in comparing the online edition to the print edition.

These markup elements allow the user to see how the document follows the Document Drafting Handbook that agencies use to create their documents. These can be useful for better understanding how a document is structured but are not part of the published document itself.

Enhanced Content - Developer Tools

This document is available in the following developer friendly formats:.

  • JSON: Normalized attributes and metadata
  • XML: Original full text XML
  • MODS: Government Publishing Office metadata

More information and documentation can be found in our developer tools pages .

Official Content

  • View printed version (PDF)

This PDF is the current document as it appeared on Public Inspection on 07/02/2024 at 8:45 am. It was viewed 29 times while on Public Inspection.

If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507 . Learn more here .

Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

Final rule.

We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), determine threatened species status for the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan ( Lagopus leucura rainierensis ), a bird subspecies in Washington, under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). This rule adds the subspecies to the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and extends the Act's protections to the subspecies. We also finalize a rule under the authority of section 4(d) of the Act that provides measures that are necessary and advisable to provide for the conservation of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan.

This rule is effective August 2, 2024.

This final rule is available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R1-ES-2020-0076 and at https://www.fws.gov/​office/​washington-fish-and-wildlife . Comments and materials we received are available for public inspection at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R1-ES-2020-0076. Supporting materials we used in preparing this rule, such as the species status assessment report, are also available at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R1-ES-2020-0076.

Brad Thompson, State Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington Fish and Wildlife Office, 510 Desmond Drive, Suite 102, Lacey, WA 98503; telephone 360-753-9440. Individuals in the United States who are deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability may dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access telecommunications relay services. Individuals outside the United States should use the relay services offered within their country to make international calls to the point-of-contact in the United States.

Why we need to publish a rule. Under the Act, a species warrants listing if it meets the definition of an endangered species (in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range) or a threatened species (likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range). If we determine that a species warrants listing, we must list the species promptly and designate the species' critical habitat to the maximum extent prudent and determinable. We have determined that the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan meets the Act's definition of a threatened species; therefore, we are listing the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan as a threatened species. Listing a species as an endangered species or threatened species can be completed only by issuing a rule through the Administrative Procedure Act rulemaking process ( 5 U.S.C. 551 et seq. ).

What this document does. This rule makes final the listing of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan as a threatened species under the Act and adopts a rule under section 4(d) of the Act for the subspecies.

The basis for our action. Under the Act, we may determine that a species is an endangered species or threatened species because of any of five factors: (A) The present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of its habitat or range; (B) overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes; (C) disease or predation; (D) the inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; or (E) other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued existence.

We have determined that the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan meets the definition of a threatened species due to habitat loss and degradation resulting from climate change within the foreseeable future. Rising temperatures associated with climate change are expected to have direct and rapid impacts on individual birds. Changing habitat conditions, such as loss of suitable alpine vegetation and reduced snow quality and quantity, are expected to cause populations to decline. This threat and responses are reasonably foreseeable because some are already evident in the range of the subspecies, and the best available information indicates that the effects of climate change will continue to alter the subspecies' habitat within the foreseeable future. Furthermore, it is unlikely that the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan will adapt to the changing climate by moving northward because alpine areas north of the subspecies' current range are expected to undergo similar impacts due to climate change and any potential connectivity to areas north of the current range is expected to decline.

Please refer to the proposed listing rule ( 86 FR 31668 ; June 15, 2021) for a detailed description of previous Federal actions concerning the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan.

A species status assessment (SSA) team prepared an SSA report for Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan. The SSA report represents a compilation of the best scientific and commercial data available concerning the status of the subspecies, including the impacts of past, present, and future factors (both negative and beneficial) affecting the subspecies. In accordance with our joint policy on peer review published in the Federal Register on July 1, 1994 ( 59 FR 34270 ), and our August 22, 2016, memorandum updating and clarifying the role of peer review of listing actions under the Act, we solicited independent scientific review of the information contained in the draft SSA report. We sent the draft SSA report to seven independent peer reviewers including scientists with expertise in white-tailed ptarmigan as well as climate science; we received three responses. The peer reviews and the draft SSA report they commented on can be found at https://www.regulations.gov . We also sent the draft SSA report to three agency partners for review; we received comments from one agency—the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. We incorporated the results of these reviews, as appropriate, into the 2021 SSA report (version 1.0, USFWS 2021, entire), which was the foundation for the proposed rule and this final rule. Additionally, new information provided to us during the public comment period on the proposed rule was incorporated into both the final rule as well as version 2.0 of the SSA report (USFWS 2023, entire). A summary of the peer review comments and our responses can Start Printed Page 55092 be found in the Summary of Comments and Recommendations below.

In preparing this final rule, we reviewed and fully considered comments and new information received from the public on the June 15, 2021, proposed rule. This final rule does not make any substantive changes to the determinations made in the proposed rule. We updated the SSA report to version 2.0 (USFWS 2023, entire), revising it based on all new information and comments received. The new information received from our agency partners and others on genetics, diet, habitat characteristics, adaptive divergence, and range and distribution was incorporated into version 2 of the SSA but not incorporated into this final rule because it did not lead to substantive changes in the determinations made in the proposed rule. The changes we made to this final rule are as follows:

(1) We shorten the Background section to a condensed discussion of the general information for the subspecies on taxonomy/genetics, species description, range/distribution, life history, and habitat (for the full updated discussion on these topics see version 2 the SSA Report (USFWS 2023));

(2) We shorten the Summary of Biological Status and Threats section to include only a brief discussion of recreation and the full discussion of the effects of climate change (for the full updated discussion on factors influencing the status of the subspecies see version 2 the SSA Report (USFWS 2023));

(3) We make many clarifications and minor corrections in this rule to ensure better consistency with the updated SSA report (USFWS 2023), we clarify some information, and we update or add new references.

(4) We remove language referencing low connectivity between populations from this final rule.

(5) We revise table 6 in the final rule (and table 17 the SSA (USFWS 2023, p. 81) by correcting the following:

  • We adjust the future condition score under Scenario 4 for the North Cascades-West Population Unit to poor, to be consistent with that unit's Scenario 2 score. Under both scenarios, we predict a lack of future availability of breeding and post-breeding habitat (USFWS 2023, chapter 6.0).
  • We adjust the future condition scores for Mount Adams under Scenarios 1 and 3 from good to fair, to better reflect predicted future conditions for Mount Adams, as explained in the SSA report (version 2.0, USFWS 2023, chapter 6.0).

(6) In light of the April 5, 2024, regulation revisions to 50 CFR 424.12 , that pertain to circumstances when a designation of critical habitat may be not prudent, we indicate we will reevaluate the prudency analysis for the ptarmigan and issue a critical habitat determination in a separate Federal Register document.

(7) We make revisions to the description of the prohibitions and exceptions in our rule issued under section 4(d) of the Act (“4(d) rule”) in the preamble of this final rule to be consistent with the regulatory text that sets forth the 4(d) rule.

(8) We revise the regulatory text that sets forth the 4(d) rule by making the following changes:

  • In § 17.41(i)(1), we add the full suite of section 9 prohibitions. We want to prevent declines in the species' status, and section 4(d) provides that the Secretary shall promulgate regulations that are necessary and advisable to provide for the conservation of the species. Although threatened species are not currently in danger of extinction like endangered species, we have determined those species are likely to become in danger of extinction within the foreseeable future, and we have an opportunity to try to prevent that from happening for newly listed species. Further, we often lack a complete understanding of the causes of a species' decline, and taking a precautionary approach to applying protections would proactively address potentially unknown threats. In addition, the initial listing of a species may bring new attention to the species and that attention may increase the risk of collection or sale. Therefore, this approach of applying section 9 prohibitions assists our goal of putting in place protections that will both prevent the species from becoming endangered and promote the recovery of species. As we learn more about the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan and the reasons for its decline over time, we have the option to revise the 4(d) rule accordingly.
  • In § 17.41(i)(2)(ii), we remove reference to 17.21(c)(5) as this was an error in the proposed rule.
  • In § 17.41(i)(2)(v), we remove the exception for Law Enforcement and On-the-job Wildlife Professionals. The intent of this exception is already satisfied by exceptions in § 17.41(i)(2)(i)-(iv), making this stand-alone this exception duplicative.
  • In § 17.41(i)(2)(iv)(F), we add developed ski areas and helicopter landing pads to the list of examples of infrastructure where incidental take of Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan can occur during routine maintenance. This revision ensures consistency between our description of the exception in the preamble of this document and in the regulatory text that sets forth the 4(d) rule. In addition, we keep references to trails as part of infrastructure, but remove any references to trails separate from infrastructure to eliminate redundancy in both the preamble and promulgation.

We conclude that the information we received during the comment period for the June 15, 2021, proposed rule did not change our previous analysis of the magnitude or severity of factors influencing the subspecies or our determination that the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan meets the definition of a threatened species.

Prior to developing the proposed rule, we solicited peer review and received comments on the draft SSA report (USFWS 2021) as discussed below. In our June 15, 2021, proposed rule ( 86 FR 31668 ), we requested that all interested parties submit written comments on the proposal by August 16, 2021. We also contacted appropriate Federal and State agencies, Tribes, scientific experts and organizations, and other interested parties and invited them to comment on the proposed rule. Newspaper notices inviting general public comment were published in the Seattle Times on June 21, 22, and 23, 2021, and we did not receive any requests for a public hearing. All substantive information provided during the public comment period either has been incorporated directly into this final rule or is addressed below.

As discussed in Peer Review, above, we received comments from three peer reviewers on the draft SSA report. We reviewed all comments we received from the specialists for substantive issues and new information regarding Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan. The reviewers generally concurred with our methods and conclusions, and provided additional information, clarifications, and suggestions to improve the SSA report and this final rule. The SSA peer review comments mainly fell into categories pertaining to the subspecies' life history, influence factors, and population needs. Revisions per peer reviewer comments and expert opinions are incorporated into the SSA report (version 1.0, USWFS 2021, entire; Start Printed Page 55093 version 2.0, USFWS 2023, entire) and this final rule as appropriate.

We received 14 public comment letters in response to the June 15, 2021, proposed rule. We reviewed all comments we received during the public comment period for substantive issues and new information regarding the proposed rule. A majority of the commenters supported the listing determination and one opposed the determination. Eight commenters provided substantive comments or new information concerning the proposed listing and 4(d) rule for Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan. Below, we provide a summary of the substantive issues raised in the public comments we received; however, comments outside the scope of the proposed rule, and those without supporting information, did not warrant an explicit response and, thus, are not presented here. Identical or similar comments have been consolidated. As noted below in Critical Habitat, any substantive comments regarding critical habitat received during the comment period on the 2021 proposed rule will be responded to in a separate determination in the future in the Federal Register .

(1) Comment: The U.S. Forest Service (USFS) asked for clarification regarding species and habitat responses to climate change, including why the representative concentration pathway (RCP) 8.5 model predicted good food abundance if there is overall habitat loss and whether habitat loss is related to heat.

Our Response: We determined with our expert elicitation group that Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan need both an adequate quality and quantity of foraging habitat in each season, but habitat quality is no longer relevant if habitat quantity is zero. The expert elicitation group included biologists from USFS, the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), and the National Park Service (NPS) with local expertise on the subspecies and its habitat.

As described in the SSA report (USFWS 2023, chapter 3.0), we developed a list of species' needs and their indicators prior to the future condition analysis that includes the RCP8.5 scenario. The USFS comment is correct in noting an apparent contradiction between the ratings for habitat loss and food abundance, but the term “abundance of food resources” was chosen to represent the quality and quantity of foraging habitat within remaining breeding, post-breeding, and wintering habitat. We used a variety of indicators to represent “abundance of food resources,” including acres of winter forage vegetation, distance to water during the breeding season, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI; an index of plant growth) during early brood rearing, peak timing of NDVI, soil moisture, and the width of the unvegetated area of the glacial forefront not yet colonized by forage plants. Of these, the only indicator available for future scenarios was a measure of soil moisture. In forb-dominated alpine environments, soil moisture will drive productivity in the face of climate warming (Walker et al. 1994, p. 402; Winkler et al. 2016, p. 1553). Soil moisture was projected to remain within one standard deviation of historical means (Northwest Climate Toolbox, developed by members of the Applied Climate Science Lab at the University of Idaho (Pacific Northwest Climate Impacts Research Consortium, CIRC, 2019)), and therefore remains within the range of a “good” rating for some of the population units in some future scenarios. We chose measures within one standard deviation of historical means as representative of a “good” rating because our expert elicitation group concluded that historical forage vegetation conditions adequately support populations of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan.

With regard to the potential relationship of habitat loss and heat, the overall loss of ptarmigan habitat is not directly due to a warming climate or desiccation of alpine meadows, but to a shift from open meadow vegetation to forest (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2019, p. SPM-25; Jackson et al. 2015, p. 440; Steuve et al. 2009, entire; USFWS 2023, pp. 57-61). This future shift to forest represents a loss of habitat for the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan, and for other species dependent on alpine tundra vegetation.

(2) Comment: USFS questioned why alpine meadow habitat would not expand into areas where glaciers have retreated.

Our Response: In the June 15, 2021, proposed rule, and as explained in the SSA report (USFWS 2023, p. 60), as glaciers retreat and expose soil-less, unvegetated bedrock (called the glacial forefront), we estimate a minimum of 20 years for the development of white-tailed ptarmigan forage plants, and 70 to 100 years for maturation to full meadow and subshrub habitat within that area. This represents a time gap in development of breeding and post-breeding habitat of 5 to 24 generations of ptarmigan ( 86 FR 31668 , June 15, 2021, p. 31681), and thus in the foreseeable future, habitat loss is expected to exceed habitat gains. At some point after glacial retreat (beyond our projected timeline), the exposed areas will be suitable ptarmigan habitat with alpine meadows and remain so for a period of time. Eventually, however, any alpine habitat that develops there will become forest (USFWS 2023, pp. 57-61).

(3) Comment: USFS questioned our use of 50- to 80-year climate models as “foreseeable” and asked for clarification on the projected effects of warming temperatures on forage plant growth.

Our Response: As discussed below under Regulatory Framework, the foreseeable future extends as far into the future as the Service can make reasonably reliable predictions about the threats to the species and the species' responses to those threats. Analysis of the foreseeable future uses the best scientific and commercial data available and should consider the timeframes applicable to the relevant threats and to the species' likely responses to those threats in view of its life-history characteristics and the species' biological response. For the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan, we could make reasonably reliable predictions 50 to 80 years into the future with respect to the primary driver of the subspecies' status (climate change) and our understanding of information available on the subspecies' survival, generational framework, and physiology (see the discussion in Climate Change under Summary of Biological Status and Threats, below, and section 6.1 of SSA report (USFWS 2023, p. 73).

(4) Comment: USFS asked what metric we used to estimate the low connectivity between populations discussed under Status Throughout all its Range in the proposed rule, given that the subspecies is able to fly relatively long distances.

Our Response: In the June 15, 2021, proposed rule, we erred in stating that connectivity between populations is currently low ( 86 FR 31668 at p. 31685). Current connectivity levels between populations are not negatively impacting the viability of the subspecies; therefore, we removed language referencing low connectivity between populations from this final rule. For the SSA, we analyzed current connectivity between types of habitat within each population. Appendix F in the SSA report (USFWS 2023, pp. 120-138) provides information on current connectivity between breeding, post-breeding, and winter habitat within Start Printed Page 55094 each population unit. The categories of “poor,” “fair,” “good,” and “very good” are based on the size and abundance of habitat gaps within a population unit. Current connectivity for each population was categorically rated based on expert opinion (WDFW partners), but future condition estimates of connectivity were left blank (see appendix G in the SSA report (USFWS 2023, pp.138-156) because available vegetation models are not sensitive enough to model small-scale areas, which would be necessary to make a definitive statement of future condition of this indicator. Therefore, this indicator was not used to rate future condition of any population unit or the subspecies.

We clarified the language under Executive Summary, above, and Status Throughout All of Its Range, below, to make clear that this information was for evaluating connectivity between breeding, post-breeding, and winter habitat within populations, as opposed to connectivity between populations. We also clarified that the metric was only used for analysis of current condition for each population.

(5) Comment: The British Columbia Ministry of Environment and Climate Change remarked that the amount of existing recreation in British Columbia is similar to that occurring in the United States, with the same resultant effects to the species. USFS noted that recreational use of high-elevation habitats has been increasing, exponentially in recent years, but did not provide data to support or further explain this statement.

Our Response: We agree that factors influencing Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan populations in British Columbia are similar to those affecting populations in the State of Washington. We thoroughly analyzed the best available information on the scope, magnitude, and intensity of recreation in the range of the subspecies (USFWS 2023, pp. 42-48). Based on this analysis, recreation of any type or timing in the range does not appear to currently affect any more than individual ptarmigan in localized areas. Although both established recreation in designated areas as well as recreation away from established roads and trails will likely increase in the future, we do not have information at this time to analyze whether future increases in recreation would rise beyond individual-level impacts such that it is likely to affect the resiliency of populations of Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan.

(6) Comment: Three commenters, including British Columbia Ministry of Environment and Climate Change and USFS's Region 6, questioned the wording in the discussion of taxonomy and genetics in the June 15, 2021, proposed rule and suggested the Service refer to Taylor (1920, entire) and specific sections within Langin et al. (2018) in our final rule. These commenters questioned our identified boundary for the northern white-tailed ptarmigan, further suggesting the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan may not be a valid subspecies based on peer review comments and statements in Langin et al. (2018, entire).

Our Response: The June 15, 2021, proposed rule provided only a summary of the taxonomic and genetic information from the SSA report for the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan. As noted in the SSA report (USFWS 2023, p. 23), the 1957 American Ornithological Union (AOU, now American Ornithological Society (AOS)) taxonomic classification of the subspecies relies on a 1920 description (Taylor 1920, entire) of the subspecies based on a comparison of specimens taken only from Mount Rainier National Park. We adopted the 1957 AOU classification of the subspecies for delineating the range of the subspecies for the SSA analysis and explain in the SSA report that the AOU mapping of the subspecies' border at the international boundary was likely a convenience; the range of the subspecies likely extends slightly farther north than the U.S.-Canada border because habitat is contiguous across the border (USFWS 2023, p. 23; Langin et al. 2018, figures S10 and S14).

As explained in our June 15, 2021, proposed rule, a combination of sightings, dispersal distance, occurrence and distribution of suitable alpine/subalpine habitat, and forests, agriculture, cities, and highways that occur west of the range of the subspecies in British Columbia was used to determine the northern range limit. A 2018 genetics study referenced by commenters (Langin et al. 2018) raised some uncertainty regarding the taxonomic validity of several of the subspecies of white-tailed ptarmigan. However, Langin et al. (2018) stated that sampling was sparse in the area at the border of Washington and British Columbia, “. . . making it infeasible to identify the start and end points of putative genetic groups.” Furthermore, additional research by another group found that individuals are genetically clustered largely by their recognized subspecies (Zimmerman et al. 2021, p. 125).

We acknowledge there is some remaining uncertainty over the relationship between the subspecies in question and the exact boundary between L. l. rainierensis and other subspecies in the genus. However, there has been no change to the official nomenclature of Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan, and the best available science leads us to find that the Fraser River represents the northern terminus of the range of the L. l. rainierensis subspecies. We have incorporated additional information in the discussion of taxonomy and genetics in the SSA report (USFWS 2023, pp. 4-6). All substantive peer review and expert elicitation comments were incorporated into the SSA report (version 1.0. USFWS 2021, entire; version 2.0, USFWS 2023, entire) and considered in development of the June 15, 2021, proposed rule and this final rule.

Section 4(i) of the Act states that the Secretary shall submit to the State agency a written justification for the failure to adopt regulations consistent with the agency's comments or petition. Comments we received from State agencies regarding the proposal to list the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan as threatened under the Act are addressed below. We received comments from WDFW related to biological information, influence factors, and the 4(d) rule. WDFW provided a number of recommended technical corrections, clarifications, or edits to the proposed listing determination for the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan. As noted in the Summary of Changes from the Proposed Rule, we have evaluated and incorporated this information into this final rule where appropriate to clarify the final listing determination.

(7) Comment: Citing a 1905 text by Judd, WDFW indicated the historical range of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan may have extended south to Mt. Hood and Mount Jefferson in Oregon.

Our Response: We contacted biologists at WDFW to discuss this comment. Past research by WDFW biologists has shown that such historical observations may be in error. Because the Judd text did not provide any information on who or when someone may have seen the subspecies in that area, their recommendation was to mention the possible past occupancy of the subspecies in the area of Mt. Hood and Mount Jefferson, but not to list the area as a historical population. A clarification to this effect has been added to the SSA report (USFWS 2023).

(8) Comment: WDFW suggested that sections of the proposed rule that cite results from research conducted within Start Printed Page 55095 the range of the southern white-tailed ptarmigan should be cited as such, as those results may not accurately represent conditions or life-history traits for the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan.

Our Response: In this final rule, we clarify where information came from in studies of southern white-tailed ptarmigan and other subspecies of white-tailed ptarmigan under the Summary of Biological Status and Threats, below.

(9) Comment: Several commenters from nongovernmental organizations and other groups noted their repeated and extensive, yet unsuccessful, searches for Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan over the last several years, concluding that the subspecies' range is likely contracting.

Our Response: We incorporated the search effort information provided by the commenters into the final SSA report and this rule (see Background, below), and we considered the information in our determination.

We completed a comprehensive assessment of the biological status of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan and prepared a report of the assessment (SSA report; USFWS 2023, entire), which provides a thorough account of the subspecies' overall viability and risks to that viability. Please refer to the SSA report as well as our June 15, 2021, proposed rule ( 86 FR 31668 ) for a full summary of subspecies information. Both are available at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R1-ES-2020-0076. Below, we summarize the key results and conclusions of the SSA report.

The Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan, one of five subspecies of white-tailed ptarmigan (AOU 1998, p. xii; ITIS 2019; Clements et al. 2019, entire), is found in alpine and subalpine areas of the Cascade Mountains (Cascades) in Washington State and southern British Columbia, Canada. Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan's historical range extended along the Cascade Range from southern Canada south to and including Mount St. Helens and Mount Adams. Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan regularly occurred on Mount St. Helens before the active volcano lost approximately 400 meters (m) (1,314 feet (ft)) of elevation when it erupted in 1980 (Brantley and Myers 1997, p. 2). The population on Mount St. Helens is now presumed extirpated (Schroeder et al. 2021, p 4). We consider the current range of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan to include alpine and subalpine areas in the Cascade Mountains, extending from the southern edge of Mount Adams in Washington State to approximately Lytton, British Columbia, Canada, east of the Fraser River. Recent searches for the subspecies noted the recession or loss of previously permanent snowfields, as well as a marked decline in sightings or density of sightings of individuals (Garner 2021, in litt.; Isley 2021, in litt.).

The four other recognized subspecies of white-tailed ptarmigan are the southern white-tailed ptarmigan ( L. l. altipetens ) primarily in Colorado; the Kenai white-tailed ptarmigan ( L. l. peninsularis ) in Alaska; the Vancouver Island white-tailed ptarmigan ( L. l. saxatilis ) in British Columbia, Canada; and the northern white-tailed ptarmigan ( L. l. leucura ) in northern Montana, and the provinces of British Columbia and Alberta, Canada. In the following paragraphs, we rely on studies conducted on other subspecies of white-tailed ptarmigan because most life-history studies either do not differentiate between the subspecies or focus on the more well-studied southern white-tailed ptarmigan subspecies. Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan are cryptic birds that are resident or short-distance elevation migrants with numerous adaptations for snow and extreme cold in winter, including snow roosting behavior and heavily feathered feet that act as snowshoes to support them as they walk across the snow (Braun et al. 2011, Distinguishing Characteristics section). The subspecies molts frequently throughout the year to remain cryptic, appearing entirely white in winter (except for black eyes, dark toenails, and a black beak), mottled with brown and white in spring, and brown in summer; the tail feathers remain white year-round and distinguish the white-tailed ptarmigan from other ptarmigan species (Braun et al. 2011, Distinguishing Characteristics section; Braun et al. 1993, Appearance section; Hoffman 2006, p. 12). Males and females share similar body size and shape, with adult body lengths up to 34 centimeters (cm) (13.4 inches (in)), and body masses up to approximately 378 grams (g) (0.83 pounds (lb)) (Martin et al. 2015, table 3).

Pairs of ptarmigan form shortly after females arrive on breeding areas in late April to mid-May (Martin et al. 2015, Phenology section). Due to the short breeding season, female white-tailed ptarmigan raise only one brood per year (Sandercock et al. 2005, p. 2177). Within 6 to 12 hours after all eggs have hatched, broods gradually move upslope, depending on where forage and cover for chicks are found (Braun 1969, p. 140; Schmidt 1988, p. 291; Giesen and Braun 1993, p. 74; Hoffman 2006, p. 21; Martin et al. 2015, Young Birds section). Records of longevity for wild white-tailed ptarmigan include a 12-year-old female and a 15-year-old male (Martin et al. 2015, Life Span and Survivorship section). There have been no population-scale density estimates for populations in the range of the Mount Rainier subspecies but estimates for other subspecies range from fewer than 1 to about 14 birds per square kilometer (km 2 ) (2.6 to 36 birds per square mile (mi 2 )) (Clarke and Johnson 1990, p. 649). Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan populations may or may not be within this wide range reported for other subspecies (USFWS 2023, p. 26).

Chicks younger than 3 weeks old primarily eat invertebrates (May 1975, p. 28), but adult white-tailed ptarmigan, as well as chicks older than approximately 5 weeks old, are herbivorous (May 1975, pp. 28-29). Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan in the North Cascades were observed eating, in order of preference: dwarf huckleberry ( Vaccinium deliciosum ), red mountain heather ( Phyllodoce empetriformes ), black-headed sedge ( Carex nigricans ), white mountain heather ( Cassiope mertensiana ), crowfoot ( Luetkea pectinata ), Tolmie's saxifrage ( Saxifraga tolmiei ), spiked wood rush ( Luzula spicata ), and mosses (Skagen 1980, p. 4). A suitable microclimate is important for this cold-adapted bird. Because white-tailed ptarmigan have the lowest evaporative cooling efficiency of any bird (Johnson 1968, entire) and will pant at temperatures above 21 °C (70 °F), adults are likely limited by warm temperatures during the breeding and post-breeding seasons. Thermal behavioral adaptations include seeking cool microsites such as the edges of snowfields, near snowbanks, in the shade of boulders, or near streams where temperatures are cool; the absence of these microsites may preclude presence of the species (Johnson 1968, p. 1012). Use of snow in late summer may be important.

Breeding and brood-rearing habitat of white-tailed ptarmigan is within the alpine zone, defined by treeline at its lower elevation limit and permanent snow or barren rock at its upper elevation limit. As with breeding habitat, the lower elevation limit of post-breeding habitat is likely defined by treeline and proximity to water (Frederick and Gutierrez 1992, p. 895). Start Printed Page 55096 At high elevations in the Pacific Northwest, winter snowpack can store a significant portion of winter precipitation and release it to the soil during spring and early summer, thereby reducing the duration and magnitude of summer soil water deficits (Peterson et al. 2014, p. 26). At the basin scale, glacier melt supplies 2 to 14 percent of summer discharge in the Cascades and up to 28 percent of discharge by September (Frans et al. 2018, p. 11); the proportion is likely much greater in the high-elevation subbasins occupied by Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan, which have a smaller catchment area to supply discharge from snow or rain.

No studies of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan's use of winter habitat have been conducted, however, white-tailed ptarmigan in Colorado shelter from winter wind and cold in snow roosts (Braun et al. 1976, p. 2; Braun and Schmidt 1971, p. 245). Snow-roosting sites for white-tailed ptarmigan have deep, fluffy snow with high insulation value; this generally means snow that is cold, is relatively dry, and has abundant air spaces. Wind influences snow deposition patterns and the availability of snow roosts (Braun et al. 1976, p. 3). During the day when ptarmigan are not feeding, they seek shelter beneath or on the lee side of dwarf conifers growing along ridges, but snow on the ridges is often shallow and covered with a hard crust, making conditions unsuitable for night roosting. Thus, at dusk, the birds move from ridges to areas of deeper and softer snow along treeline, where they can burrow beneath the surface of the snow (Braun and Schmidt 1971, p. 245). When weather conditions are harsh, flocks will move below treeline to stream bottoms and avalanche paths (Braun et al. 1976, p. 4).

The Cascades of the Pacific Northwest have some of the deepest snowpack in North America. Willow stands along valley bottoms similar to those relied on by southern white-tailed ptarmigan are rare and are likely buried by heavy winter snows on the steep slopes within the range of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan (Schroeder 2019, pers. comm.). Based on limited observations and information from other subspecies, we expect wintering Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan will use alpine areas, open areas in subalpine parklands, and openings created by stream courses, landslides, and avalanches within subalpine forests, and refer to these habitat types as “alpine” or “potentially suitable” habitat herein. Approximately 76.5 percent of the total suitable habitat for the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan is found in the United States, and almost all of that area is federally owned (94.5 percent, see table 1, below).

Table 1—Mount Rainier White-Tailed Ptarmigan Suitable Habitat by Land Ownership, in Hectares

[Acres]

Population unitAlpine LakesGoat RocksMount AdamsMount RainierNorth Cascades EastNorth Cascades WestWilliam O. DouglasTotalPercent ownership
Federal:
USFS132,208 (326,693)34,901 (86,242)14,116 (34,881)36,090 (89,180)354,484 (875,949)366,774 (906,318)25,096 (62,014)963,669 (2,381,277)59
NPS00055,917 (138,174)18,860 (46,604)139,639 (345,056)0214,416 (529,833)13
Other Federal275 (680)000402 (993)00677 (1,673)<1
State1618,5220024,3962,5762935,6842
(398)(21,058)(60,283)(6,364)(71)(88,177)
Tribal017,9408,087000026,0272
(44,331)(19,983)(64,314)
Private/Other8763,4881,2483601411,56207,675<1
(2,166)(8,619)(3,084)(889)(348)(3,860)(18,965)
British Columbia:
Provincial Parks000060,479 (149,448)39,596 (97,845)0100,075 (247,291)6
Private/Other0000188,077 (464,748)95,801 (236,730)0283,878 (701,477)17
Total133,52064,85123,45192,367646,839645,94825,1251,632,101
(329,935)(160,250)(57,949)(228,244)(1,598,374)(1,596,172)(62,085)(4,033,009)

Section 4 of the Act ( 16 U.S.C. 1533 ) and the implementing regulations in title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations set forth the procedures for determining whether a species is an endangered species or a threatened species, issuing protective regulations for threatened species, and designating critical habitat for endangered and threatened species. On April 5, 2024, jointly with the National Marine Fisheries Service, the Service issued a final rule that revised the regulations in 50 CFR 424 regarding how we add, remove, and reclassify endangered and threatened species and what criteria we apply when designating listed species' critical habitat ( 89 FR 24300 ). On the same day, the Service published a final rule revising our protections for endangered species and threatened species at 50 CFR 17 ( 89 FR 23919 ). These final rules are now in effect and are incorporated into the current regulations. Our analysis for this final decision applied our current regulations. Given that we proposed listing for this species under our prior regulations (revised in 2019), we have also undertaken an analysis of whether our decision would be different if we had continued to apply the 2019 regulations; we concluded that the listing decision would be the same. However, we will reevaluate our not prudent determination, as discussed below under Critical Habitat, in a separate Federal Register notice. The analyses under both the regulations currently in effect and the 2019 regulations are available on https://www.regulations.gov .

The Act defines an “endangered species” as a species that is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range, and a “threatened species” as a species that is likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range. The Act requires that we determine Start Printed Page 55097 whether any species is an endangered species or a threatened species because of any of the following factors:

(A) The present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of its habitat or range;

(B) Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes;

(C) Disease or predation;

(D) The inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; or

(E) Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued existence.

These factors represent broad categories of natural or human-caused actions or conditions that could have an effect on a species' continued existence. In evaluating these actions and conditions, we look for those that may have a negative effect on individuals of the species, as well as other actions or conditions that may ameliorate any negative effects or may have positive effects.

We use the term “threat” to refer in general to actions or conditions that are known to or are reasonably likely to negatively affect individuals of a species. The term “threat” includes actions or conditions that have a direct impact on individuals (direct impacts), as well as those that affect individuals through alteration of their habitat or required resources (stressors). The term “threat” may encompass—either together or separately—the source of the action or condition or the action or condition itself.

However, the mere identification of any threat(s) does not necessarily mean that the species meets the statutory definition of an “endangered species” or a “threatened species.” In determining whether a species meets either definition, we must evaluate all identified threats by considering the expected response by the species, and the effects of the threats—in light of those actions and conditions that will ameliorate the threats—on an individual, population, and species level. We evaluate each threat and its expected effects on the species, then analyze the cumulative effect of all of the threats on the species as a whole. We also consider the cumulative effect of the threats in light of those actions and conditions that will have positive effects on the species, such as any existing regulatory mechanisms or conservation efforts. The Secretary determines whether the species meets the definition of an “endangered species” or a “threatened species” only after conducting this cumulative analysis and describing the expected effect on the species now and in the foreseeable future.

The Act does not define the term “foreseeable future,” which appears in the statutory definition of “threatened species.” Our implementing regulations at 50 CFR 424.11(d) set forth a framework for evaluating the foreseeable future on a case-by-case basis which is further described in the 2009 Memorandum Opinion on the foreseeable future from the Department of the Interior, Office of the Solicitor (M-37021, January 16, 2009; “M- Opinion,” available online at https://www.doi.gov/​sites/​doi.opengov.ibmcloud.com/​files/​uploads/​M-37021.pdf ). The foreseeable future extends as far into the future as the Services can make reasonably reliable predictions about the threats to the species and the species' responses to those threats. The Services need not identify the foreseeable future in terms of a specific period of time. The Services will describe the foreseeable future on a case-by-case basis, using the best available data and taking into account considerations such as the species' life-history characteristics, threat-projection timeframes, and environmental variability. In other words, the foreseeable future is the period of time over which we can make reasonably reliable predictions. “Reliable” does not mean “certain”; it means sufficient to provide a reasonable degree of confidence in the prediction, in light of the conservation purposes of the Act.

The SSA report (USFWS 2023, entire) documents the results of our comprehensive biological review of the best scientific and commercial data regarding the status of a species, including an assessment of the potential threats to that species. The SSA report does not represent our decision on whether a species should be listed as an endangered or threatened species under the Act. However, it does provide the scientific basis that informs our regulatory decisions, which involve the further application of standards within the Act and its implementing regulations and policies.

To assess the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan's viability for the SSA, we used the three conservation biology principles of resiliency, redundancy, and representation (Shaffer and Stein 2000, pp. 306-310). Briefly, resiliency is the ability of a species to withstand environmental and demographic stochasticity (for example, wet or dry, warm or cold years); redundancy is the ability of a species to withstand catastrophic events (for example, droughts, large pollution events); and representation is the ability of a species to adapt to both near-term and long-term changes in its physical and biological environment (for example, climate conditions or pathogens). In general, species viability will increase with increases in resiliency, redundancy, and representation (Smith et al. 2018, p. 306). Using these principles, we identified the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan's ecological requirements for survival and reproduction at the individual, population, and subspecies levels, and described the beneficial and risk factors influencing the subspecies' viability.

The SSA process can be categorized into three sequential stages. During the first stage, we evaluated the individual species' life-history needs. The next stage involved an assessment of the historical and current condition of the species' demographics and habitat characteristics, including an explanation of how the species arrived at its current condition. The final stage of the SSA involved making predictions about the species' responses to positive and negative environmental and anthropogenic influences. Throughout all of these stages, we used the best available information to characterize viability as the ability of a species to sustain populations in the wild over time. We use this information to inform our regulatory decision.

Occurrence data are quite limited, and we do not know whether the abundance of Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan has changed over time. To facilitate the assessment of the current and projected future status of the subspecies across its range, we used the limited occurrence data and expert elicitation to delineate representation areas and population units. We separated the range into two representation areas, the North Area and the South Area, to represent the known ecological variation between the two regions. Within those two representation areas, we identified seven current population units based on observations, elevation, and vegetation types from Landfire vegetation maps (see table 2, below).

We refined the boundaries of these units by selecting vegetation types on recently refined NPS vegetation maps and Landfire vegetation maps for USFS lands. Our refined population unit maps contain nearly all observations of the subspecies obtained from agency partners. One of the population units in the South Area, William O. Douglas, has suitable habitat but unknown occupancy. Another historical population in the South Area is Start Printed Page 55098 considered extirpated due to the 1980 eruption of the Mount St. Helens volcano. We did not include the presumed extirpated Mount St. Helens population unit in our analysis of current or future condition because we conclude that it does not constitute suitable habitat now and is unlikely to within the foreseeable future. Similarly, we did not consider Mt. Hood or Mount Jefferson because records there are more than 100 years old and are questionable.

Table 2—Number of Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan observations by population unit

Representation areaPopulation unitNumber of observations
NorthNorth Cascades—East484
NorthNorth Cascades—West315
NorthAlpine Lakes98
SouthMount Rainier289
SouthWilliam O. Douglas0
SouthGoat Rocks4
SouthMount Adams2

The following is a summary of the key results and conclusions from the SSA report (USFWS 2023); the full SSA report can be found at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R1-ES-2020-0076.

In this discussion, we review the biological condition of Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan and its resources, and the threats that influence the subspecies' current and future condition, in order to assess the subspecies' overall viability and the risks to that viability.

The petition to list the southern and Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan subspecies as threatened (Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) 2010, entire) identified the following influences as threats: effects to habitat from global climate change, recreation, livestock grazing, and mining; hunting; predation; inadequacy of regulatory mechanisms; population isolation or limited dispersal distances; and population growth rates and physiological response to a warming climate. Our 90-day finding on the petition ( 77 FR 33143 ; June 5, 2012) concluded that the petition presented substantial information to indicate that the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan may warrant listing due to the effects of climate change on habitat and population growth rates, and the physiological response of the subspecies to a warming climate.

As part of our analysis of the viability of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan, we looked at the previously identified potential environmental and anthropogenic influences on viability, as well as any new ones identified since the publication of our 90-day finding. We analyzed population isolation and limited dispersal distances in the context of our resiliency, redundancy, and representation analysis for the subspecies. We also looked at the regulatory and voluntary conservation mechanisms that may reduce or ameliorate the effect of those stressors. To provide the necessary context for our discussion of the magnitude of stressors, we first discuss our understanding of existing regulatory and voluntary conservation mechanisms.

A majority of the land (70 percent) within the national parks and forests in the U.S. portion of the range of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan is congressionally designated wilderness under 16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq. and 54 U.S.C. 100101 et seq. This designation bans roads along with the use of motorized and nonmotorized vehicles. In North Cascades National Park, 94 percent of the land is designated as the Steven Mather Wilderness (259,943 ha (642,333 ac) of the total 275,655 ha (681,159 ac)) (NPS 2020, entire). There are 16 designated wilderness areas on USFS land in the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan's range; the percentage of designated wilderness in each population unit is summarized below in table 3. Additionally, 6 percent of the total suitable habitat for Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan is located on land owned by British Columbia Provincial Parks (BC-Parks 2020, entire). Provincial parks are multiuse areas that contain some remote wilderness and allow activities such as hiking, camping, and winter recreation. The wilderness designation areas and Provincial Park lands in the range of Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan are shown below in figure 1.

Table 3—Percent of Mount Rainier White-Tailed Ptarmigan Habitat in U.S. Designated Wilderness by Population Unit

Population unitTotal hectares (acres) of habitatHectares (acres) of habitat in wildernessPercent of habitat in unit designated as wilderness
North Cascades—East (U.S. portion)398,283 (984,179)232,041 (573,387)58
North Cascades—West (U.S. portion)510,551 (1,261,599)394,529 (974,902)77
Alpine Lakes133,520 (329,935)100,566 (248,504)75
Mount Rainier92,367 (228,244)83,339 (205,935)90
Start Printed Page 55099
William O. Douglas25,125 (62,085)19,468 (48,106)78
Goat Rocks64,851 (160,250)25,375 (62,703)39
Mount Adams23,451 (57,949)13,266 (32,781)57
Total1,248,148 (3,084,241)868,584 (2,146,318)70

succession planning definition business studies

The WDFW considers the white-tailed ptarmigan a game bird but does not have a hunting season on the species. Take or possession of the species would be a violation of the Revised Code of Washington, section 77.15.400 (Washington State Legislature 2020, entire). Hunting of ptarmigan is allowed in a relatively small portion of the Canadian portion of the North Cascades-West population unit from mid-September through mid-December (BC-Parks Canada 2020, entire).

White-tailed ptarmigan are a “Species of Greatest Conservation Need” in the Washington State Wildlife Action Plan (WDFW 2015, pp. 3-18). The WDFW is making efforts to better understand the distribution and abundance of the species by soliciting observations from Start Printed Page 55101 birding enthusiasts, hikers, backpackers, mountaineers, skiers, snowshoers, and other recreationists that visit ptarmigan habitat. The Transboundary Connectivity Project (Krosby et al. 2016, entire) included white-tailed ptarmigan as a focal species, and members created conceptual models of stressors to the species and designed strategies to abate threats.

Critical habitat for Canada lynx ( Lynx canadensis ) overlaps the range of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan in most of the North Cascades—East population unit, and about half of the North Cascades—West population unit ( 79 FR 54782 , September 12, 2014; 50 CFR 17.95(a) ). One of the identified physical and biological features essential to the conservation of Canada lynx is snow conditions (winter conditions that provide and maintain deep fluffy snow for extended periods). This critical habitat designation may provide some benefit to the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan if it results in the regulation of activities that would reduce the quantity and quality of snow within these population units, but such a situation would not likely happen at a scale that would benefit the resiliency of the population unit.

We analyzed a variety of stressors that potentially influence the current status of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan or may influence the subspecies' future status. We again reviewed all of the factors identified in the petition, as well as any potential additional influences in the range of the subspecies. Neither the petition nor our 90-day finding identified disease as a threat, and we did not find information in our analysis to indicate that disease is currently, or is likely to be in the future, a threat to the resiliency of any population unit or the overall viability of the subspecies. Our SSA concluded that the available information on several potential stressors, including mining, hunting, grazing, browsing, the invasive willow borer beetle ( Cryptorhynchus lapathi ), predation, and infrastructure development, indicated that these did not operate at a level affecting the resiliency of any population unit, or the overall viability of the subspecies (USFWS 2023, pp. 37-41).

While the effects from recreation have not been investigated in the field, recreation is the primary human activity throughout the range of the subspecies. As discussed in the Proposed Rule and the SSA Report (USFWS 2023, section 4.8), a wide array of recreation regularly occurs year-round within all Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan population units. Although no published studies exist that directly link recreation to individual-level, population-level, or subspecies-level effects to the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan, effects to individual Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan have been observed, and studies have shown effects of recreation on closely related species (USFWS 2023, p. 42-43). However, available information does not indicate that recreation has impacted the historical abundance and distribution of Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan. Further, although we do not know the true overlap of recreational areas (mainly trails) with concentrated Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan use areas, the history of established recreation, the overall small amount of area occupied by trails in Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan habitat (0.02 percent as shown in Table 9, USFWS 2023, p. 47), and the large percentage of protected wilderness in the range (70 percent of the range of the subspecies in the United States as shown in Table 4, USFWS 2023, p. 41) all likely reduce the risk of exposure of the subspecies to this stressor. The best available information does not indicate that recreation currently has a population-level effect on the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan. Although both established recreation in designated areas as well as recreation away from established roads and trails will likely increase in the future, available information does not indicate that future increases in recreation would rise beyond individual-level impacts such that it is likely to affect subspecies' redundancy or representation.

The effects of climate change are already evident in Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan habitat, and the projected future increase in those effects may decrease the viability of the subspecies. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2019, pp. 2-9) projects with very high confidence that surface air temperatures in high mountain areas will rise by 0.54 °F (0.3 °C) per decade, generally outpacing global warming rates regardless of future emission scenario. As temperatures increase, glaciers initially melt quickly and contribute an increased volume of water to the system, but as glacial mass is lost, their contribution of meltwater to the system decreases over time. Global climate models project declines in current glacier area throughout the Washington and northern Oregon Cascades (Frans et al. 2018, p. 13) that will result in a corresponding decline in associated snowpack and glacial melt contribution to summer discharge. Scenario representation concentration pathway (RCP) 4.5 is a moderate emissions scenario, and RCP8.5 is a high emissions scenario (Alder and Hostetler 2016, entire). In the North Cascades, glaciers are projected to retreat 92 percent between 1970 and 2100 under RCP4.5, and 96 percent between 1970 and 2100 under RCP8.5 (Gray 2019, p. 34).

The effects of climate change have already led to some glacial recession in Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan habitat (Snover et al. 2013, pp. 2-3). Geologic mapping data, old maps and aerial photos, and recent inventories indicate that glacier area declined 56 percent in the North Cascades between 1900 and 2009 (Dick 2013, p. 59). On Mount Adams, total glacier area decreased by 49 percent from 1904 to 2006, at about 0.15 km 2 (0.06 mi 2 ) per year (Sitts et al. 2010, p. 384). Other individual glaciers in Washington have receded from 12 percent (Thunder Creek; 1950-2010) to 31 percent (Nisqually River; 1915-2009) (Frans et al. 2018, p. 10), and throughout the Cascades, glaciers continue to recede in both area and volume (Snover et al. 2013, pp. 2-3; Dick 2013, p. 59).

Glacier melt in many of the watersheds of the eastern Cascade Range and low-moderate elevation watersheds of the western Cascades has already peaked or will peak in the current decade (Frans et al. 2018, p. 20). The variation in the timing of peak discharge from glacier to glacier will initially lead to decreases in available moisture to some alpine meadows but increases in others. Later in the century, we expect all areas to suffer significant losses of glacier melt (Frans et al. 2018, p. 20). Total discharge in August and September from snowmelt, rain, and glacial melt in a sample of Cascades watersheds is already below the 1960-2010 mean and is expected to continue to drop through 2080 (Frans et al. 2018, p. 15). Glaciers on the east side of the Cascade crest, where the precipitation regime is drier, show the strongest response to climate in both historical and future time periods, and will be the most sensitive to a changing climate (Frans et al. 2018, p. 17).

Spring snowpack fluctuates substantially from year to year in Washington but has declined overall by 30 percent from 1955 to 2016 and is expected to further decline by up to 38 percent under RCP4.5 and up to 46 percent under RCP8.5 by midcentury (Roop et al. 2019, p. 6). Changes in snowpack in the colder interior mountains will largely be driven by decreases in precipitation, while Start Printed Page 55102 changes in snowpack in the warmer maritime mountains will be driven largely by increases in temperature (Hamlet 2006, pp. 40-42). Although some high-elevation sites that maintain freezing winter temperatures may accumulate additional snowpack as additional winter precipitation falls as snow, overall, perennial snow cover is projected to decrease with climate change (Peterson et al. 2014, p. 25). A substantial decrease in perennial snow cover is projected for the North Cascades, with many areas of current snow cover replaced by bare ground (Patil et al. 2017, pp. 5600-5601). Field studies in the North Cascades-East population unit of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan indicate that despite above-average snowfall in the winter of 2020-2021, the date of complete melt and disappearance of an important snowbank for male flocks and some broods was the earliest recorded in 13 field seasons since 1997 (Schroeder et al. 2021, p. 11).

Projected increases in air temperatures will also lead to changes in the quality of available snow through increases in rain-on-snow events and the refreezing of the surface of snowpack that melts in the heat of the day. The refreezing of snow creates a hard surface crust (Albert and Perron, Jr. 2000, p. 3208) that may make burrowing for roosting sites difficult for ptarmigan, who prefer soft snow for their roosts (Braun and Schmidt 1971, p. 244; Braun et al. 1976, pp. 3-4). Furthermore, warm winter temperatures that create wet, heavy snow may also make burrowing difficult for ptarmigan, and thus less suitable for snow roosts.

Reduced snowpack, earlier snowmelt, elimination of permanent snowfields, and higher evapotranspiration rates are likely to enhance summer soil drying and reduce soil water availability to alpine vegetation communities in the Cascades (Elsner et al. 2010, p. 245). As the climate becomes warmer, vegetation communities are also expected to shift their distributions to higher elevations. Globally, treelines have either risen or remained stable, with responses to recent warming varying among regions (Harsch et al. 2009, entire). Strong treeline advances have already been found in some areas of Washington, such as Mount Rainier National Park (Stueve et al. 2009, entire). As treeline rises at the lower limit of the alpine zone, Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan habitat will be lost as open, alpine vegetation communities become forested. Creation of new habitat by upward expansion of the alpine zone will be constrained by cliffs, parent rock material, ice, remaining glaciers, permanent snow, and the top of mountain ranges. Where glaciers and permanent snow recede, primary succession will need to occur before the underlying parent material can support alpine meadows. Succession of the Lyman glacial forefront (the newly exposed area under a receding glacier) in the North Cascades took 20-50 years to develop early successional plant species.

Decreased winter wind associated with climate change may be contributing to observed declines in snowpack and stream flows (Luce et al. 2013, p. 1361). Continued decreases in wind are expected throughout the Cascades (Luce 2019, p. 1363), potentially decreasing the availability of forage for Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan, as well as allowing some krummholz to grow taller into tree form, which can reduce the suitability of habitat. Decreased wind may reduce snowbanks and thereby limit the availability of snow roosting sites for the subspecies, increasing the exposure of Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan to temperatures below their tolerance, or increasing stress levels in the winter. Delayed snowfall could also create plumage mismatch, leading to increased predation. White-tailed ptarmigan are adapted to be cryptic through all seasons by changing plumages frequently to match the substrate as snow cover changes. A change in timing of molt, or timing of snow cover, could limit the effectiveness of this strategy, leading to higher predation risk to individuals. Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan in white plumage have already been detected in snow-free areas in fall (Riedell 2019, in litt.).

Climate change may affect Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan through direct physiological effects on the birds such as increased exposure to heat in the summer. White-tailed ptarmigan experience physiological stress when ambient temperatures exceed 21 °C (70 °F; Johnson 1968, p. 1012), so their survival during warmer months depends on access to cool microrefugia in their habitat; these cooler areas are created by boulders and meltwater near glaciers, permanent snowfields, snowbanks, and other areas of snow in alpine areas. The projected increases in temperature and related decreases in snowpack and meltwater will reduce the availability of these microrefugia in the foreseeable future to populations of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan.

The timing of peak plant growth influences the availability of appropriate seasonal forage to ptarmigan, as well as the availability of insects. When the peak of plant abundance falls outside a crucial post-hatch period, the resulting phenological mismatch affects chick survival (Wann et al. 2019, entire). Projected effects of climate change could alter the growing season and abundance of the ptarmigan's preferred vegetation and the timing of the emergence and abundance of the insects necessary for foraging. If these changes result in significant asynchrony, populations of Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan may not have adequate forage availability.

Where upslope migration of alpine plant communities is able to occur in the face of climate change, breeding and post-breeding habitat for white-tailed ptarmigan will still not be available unless, or until, primary succession proceeds to the stage where dwarf willows, sedges, and other ptarmigan forage species are present in sufficient abundance and composition to support foraging ptarmigan and insect populations for chicks. If it takes at least 20 years to develop limited white-tailed ptarmigan forage plants ( Saxifrage species), and 70-100 years to mature to full habitat with lush meadows and ericaceous subshrubs, this would represent a gap in breeding and post-breeding habitat for 5 to 24 generations (assuming a generation length of 4.1 years) (Bird et al. 2020, supplement table 4). Thus, we do not expect new breeding and post-breeding habitat for the subspecies to be created at the same rate at which it is lost. Climate change will also convert subalpine forest openings ( e.g., meadows) to subalpine forests, which are not suitable winter habitat for white-tailed ptarmigan. Infill of subalpine openings with trees has already occurred at Mount Rainier National Park (Stueve et al. 2009, entire). Subalpine tree species have increasingly filled in subalpine meadows throughout northwestern North America (Fagre et al. 2003, p. 267).

Species distribution models for all three species of ptarmigan in British Columbia (rock ptarmigan ( Lagopus muta ), willow ptarmigan ( Lagopus lagopus ), and white-tailed ptarmigan)) project that all three species will experience upward shifts in elevation and latitude, habitat loss, and subsequent range reductions throughout the province (Scridel et al. 2021, p. 1764). The white-tailed ptarmigan, including individuals in the area southeast of the Fraser River Valley included in our SSA, is projected to experience an upward elevation gain of 254 m (833 ft), an upward latitude shift of 1.11°, and a range decline of 86 percent by the 2080s (Scridel et al. 2021, Start Printed Page 55103 p. 1764). Projected distribution maps indicate that all habitat within the range of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan in British Columbia will be lost by the 2080s (Scridel et al. 2021, p. 1765). Although this study focused on British Columbia, climate change projections for vegetation in Washington State are comparable, and range declines of Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan in Washington State are expected to be similar in both area and timing to those predicted for British Columbia. As the distribution of white-tailed ptarmigan habitat in British Columbia contracts, the habitat gap between white-tailed ptarmigan in Washington and white-tailed ptarmigan north of the Fraser River Valley will increase (Scridel et al. 2021, p. 1765). This increased habitat gap will decrease the likelihood of genetic exchange between the subspecies.

A 1998 study assessed the potential vulnerability of wildlife species within the Interior Columbia River Basin to effects of climate change and reported that the species of white-tailed ptarmigan ( Lagopus leucura ) seemed particularly at risk (Marcot et al. 1988, pp. 58-63). The study noted this species occurs only in alpine tundra habitats within the Interior Columbia River Basin, in isolated locations that, under climate change projections, would potentially undergo upward shifts in elevation, further isolation, and reduction in area or local elimination. The study determined white-tailed ptarmigan (at the species level) was most at risk of all species in their analysis area, as it uses only alpine tundra habitats (Marcot et al. 1998, p. 60).

In summary, the future condition of Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan habitat will likely be affected by several factors associated with climate change, including the following: exposure to heat stress (caused by increasing ambient temperatures coupled with decreasing availability of the cool summer refugia supplied by snow and glaciers); loss of winter snow roosts that protect ptarmigan from winter storms; changes in snow deposition patterns that may affect both snow roosts and forage availability; loss of alpine vegetation due to both hydrologic changes caused by decreases in meltwater from snowpack and glaciers as well as rising treelines; and phenological mismatch between ptarmigan hatch and forage availability. These changes are likely to impact the habitat at levels that measurably affect the resiliency of all populations. Although a reasonable projection of future population trend is limited by the lack of demographic data, the projected degradation and loss of habitat, as well as likelihood of increased physiological stress of individuals across the range, would have negative effects on the future population growth rate of the subspecies. The scope and intensity of these combined effects is likely to affect the future resiliency of every extant population of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan and the redundancy and representation of those units across the range. Therefore, the effects of climate change are likely to affect the overall viability of the subspecies.

We reviewed the environmental and anthropogenic factors that may influence the viability of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan, including regulatory and voluntary conservation measures and potential stressors. The subspecies is provided some measure of protection from the large amount of Federal management and congressionally designated wilderness in its range, the management of some of its range in Canada by British Columbia Provincial Parks, the subspecies' State designation in Washington, and the overlap of its range with designated critical habitat for the Canada lynx.

The best available information does not indicate that disease has previously, is currently, or will in the future affect the resiliency of any Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan population units. Although mining, hunting, grazing, browsing, the invasive willow borer beetle, predation, infrastructure development, and recreation may have localized effects to individual Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan, the best available information does not indicate they affect the overall viability of the subspecies, and adequate future projections are not available to determine if these influence factors increase in the future to a level that will affect the viability of the subspecies. However, the effects of climate change are already evident in Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan habitat, and the likely projected future increase in the scope, magnitude, and intensity of those effects will decrease the viability of the subspecies.

Based on our assessment of the biological information on the subspecies, we identified 10 key resiliency attributes for populations of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan: (1) connectivity among seasonal use areas, (2) cool ambient summer temperatures, (3) a suitable hydrologic regime to support alpine vegetation, (4) winter snow quality and quantity, (5) abundance of forage, (6) cool microsites, (7) suitable population structure and recruitment, (8) adequate population size and dynamics, (9) total area of alpine breeding and post-breeding habitat, and (10) total area of winter habitat. We developed a table of these key population needs with one or more measurable indicators of each population need (USFWS 2023, pp. 68-69).

To evaluate current condition, we took information for the current value of each indicator and assigned it to a condition category (USFWS 2023, pp. 68-69). We created condition categories based on what we consider an acceptable range of variation for the indicator based on our understanding of the subspecies' biology and the need for human intervention to maintain the attribute (Conservation Measures Partnership 2013, entire) (see table 4, below). Categorical rankings were defined as follows:

Poor—Restoration of the population need is increasingly difficult (may result in loss of the local population);

Fair—Outside acceptable range of variation, requiring human intervention (this level would be associated with a decreasing population);

Good—Indicator within acceptable range of variation, with some intervention required for maintenance (this would be associated with a stable population); and

Very Good—Ecologically desirable status, requiring little intervention for maintenance (this would be associated with a growing population).

Table 4—Metrics for Both Current and Future Condition Indicator Ratings for Habitat Attributes of Mount Rainier White-Tailed Ptarmigan

Population needIndicatorIndicator ratings descriptions
PoorFairGoodVery good
Cool ambient temperatures in summerMaximum summer temperature>38°C (100 °F)21.1-38 °C (70.1-100 °F)13.4-21 °C (56-70 °F)7.3-13.3 °C (45-56 °F)
Start Printed Page 55104
Cool ambient temperatures in summerNumber of days above 30 °C>31 to 30-10
Hydrologic regimeGlacier melt (discharge normalized to 1960-2010 mean)<0.50.5 to 0.75>0.75 to 1>1
Hydrologic regimeSnow water equivalent (April 1)>2 standard deviations from historical mean1-2 standard deviations from historical mean<1 standard deviation from historical meanPre-1970 levels
Abundance of food resourcesDistance to water during breeding season>200 m61-200 m11-60 m<10 m
Abundance of food resourcesSoil moisture>2 standard deviations from historical mean1-2 standard deviations from historical mean<1 standard deviation from historical meanPre-1970 levels
Total area of modeled summer habitatArea of alpine vegetation modeled from MC2<7 sq km (1,730 ac)1,731-4,000 ac4,000-12,000 ac>12,000 ac
Total area of modeled summer habitatArea of alpine vegetation modeled from biome climatic niche models<7 sq km (1,730 ac)1,731-4,000 ac4,000-12,000 ac>12,000 ac

Eight additional indicators had data available for current condition, but we did not have models that allowed us to project them into the future, so we did not use them to assess future condition. These additional indicators include connectivity within population units between breeding, post-breeding, and winter habitat, which is important for less-mobile broods; area of willow, alder, or birch (winter forage); distance to water during breeding season; unvegetated area of glacial forefront (not colonized by forage plants yet, less is better); cover or distribution of large boulders (breeding and post-breeding seasons); a qualitative assessment of vegetation quality; mapped area of alpine vegetation from Landfire and NPS vegetation maps; and mapped area of subalpine vegetation from Landfire and NPS vegetation maps.

Current resiliency ratings are captured below in table 5. Redundancy is limited to six known extant population units in “good” or “fair” condition across the range of the subspecies. With respect to ecological variation, three extant populations occur in the South representation area and three extant populations occur in the North representation area. Although Mount Adams has poor landscape context due to large gaps in habitat limiting connectivity throughout the unit, and the condition is poor due to low quality of vegetation, the availability of microrefugia and summer habitat are very good, so the overall condition score of the population unit was scored as fair. The historical population at Mount St. Helens was extirpated as a result of the volcanic eruption in 1980. Historical populations that may have existed in Oregon Cascades (Judd 1905, p. 47) have been extirpated for many years, as we know of no observations in the past several decades. The William O. Douglas Wilderness contains potential habitat, but we have no records of white-tailed ptarmigan in the area and consider occupancy unknown. Habitat for populations in the South representation area is more limited and isolated than habitat for populations in the North representation area. Observations on record and expert opinion indicate there are only a small number of birds in the Goat Rocks population unit in the South representation area and the Alpine Lakes population unit in the North representation area.

Table 5—Current Condition for Each Mount Rainier White-Tailed Ptarmigan population

Representation areaPopulation unitCondition metricsResiliency rating
Landscape context *Condition(Habitat) size
NorthNorth Cascades—EastGoodGoodFairGood.
NorthNorth Cascades—WestGoodFairVery GoodGood.
NorthAlpine LakesGoodFairFairFair.
SouthMount RainierGoodFairVery GoodGood.
SouthGoat RocksGoodFairFairFair.
SouthMount AdamsPoorPoorGoodFair.
* Landscape context describes the combined condition of habitat connectivity within population units, ambient temperature, hydrologic regime, and winter snow.

To better understand the projected future condition of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan, we developed four future scenarios based on global climate models at RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 to depict a range of plausible potential outcomes for the subspecies' habitat over time.

Projected changes in climate and related impacts can vary substantially across and within different regions of the world (IPCC 2007, pp. 8-12). Therefore, we use “downscaled” projections when they are available and are developed through appropriate scientific procedures, because such projections provide higher resolution information that is more relevant to spatial scales used for analyses of a given species (Glick et al. 2011, pp. 58-61). We used data obtained from the Northwest Climate Toolbox, developed by members of the Applied Climate Science Lab at the University of Idaho Start Printed Page 55105 (Hegewisch and Abatzoglou 2019, entire). In addition to past and current data, the Northwest Climate Toolbox provides modeled future projections of climate and hydrology based on the effects of potential degrees of greenhouse gas emissions reported by the IPCC (IPCC 2014, entire).

We estimated area of alpine vegetation from vegetation models based on the RCP4.5 or RCP8.5 scenarios (MC2 models) (Bachelet et al. 2017, entire; Sheehan et al. 2015, entire). We also estimated area of alpine vegetation from biome climatic niche models based on three earlier global climate projections (CGCM3 1 A2 2090, Hadley A2 2090, and Consensus A2 2090). These models were used to project alpine area (and other vegetation type areas) for the Transboundary Connectivity Project (Krosby et al. 2016, entire, based on the projections supplied by Rehfeldt et al. 2012, entire). Alpine area from the NPS and Landfire vegetation maps provides the most reliable and important measure of current population resiliency. We reported subalpine area for each analysis unit but did not use it as an indicator of future resilience because this measure does not differentiate between subalpine forests (which are not suitable for the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan) and subalpine openings (suitable winter habitat for the subspecies). We also included a management variable in our scenarios to assess if specific management of recreation impacts and habitat enhancement and restoration would make a difference to the projected status of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan in the future. These management variable factors ultimately made minimal difference in the outcome of our scenarios in comparison to the impact of climate projections.

The future scenarios we developed based on the climate-based vegetation models include:

(1) Projected climate change effects under RCP4.5 with no management for Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan populations or habitat;

(2) Projected climate change effects under RCP8.5 with no management for Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan populations or habitat;

(3) Projected climate change effects under RCP4.5 with management to maintain Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan populations and habitat; and

(4) Projected climate change effects under RCP8.5 with management to maintain Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan populations and habitat.

The scenarios demonstrated that the projected effects of climate change could result in the loss of up to 95 percent of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan's currently available alpine tundra habitat (USFWS 2023, appendix A) and could lead to a related decrease in the availability of thermal microrefugia for the subspecies. Although vegetation models yield different acreage projections, trajectories of both vegetation models and all scenarios are similar in indicating only one or two populations are likely to have any breeding season habitat remaining by 2069. Mount Rainier is consistently projected to be one of the remaining populations in all four future scenarios. This is due to its high elevation, which results in a much larger amount of current and future suitable habitat compared to other populations in the subspecies' range. The management actions (which include both reduced recreational impacts and habitat enhancement and restoration) are not projected to affect the status of any population unit in the Global Climate models (GCM). Table 6 summarizes the future condition for all known currently extant population units; possible ratings include poor, fair, good, or very good.

Table 6—Future Condition Rating for Each Mount Rainier White-Tailed Ptarmigan Population

Representation areaPopulation unitCurrent conditionFuture condition
Scenario 1Scenario 2Scenario 3Scenario 4
NorthNorth Cascades—EastGoodPoorPoorPoorPoor.
NorthNorth Cascades—WestGoodPoorPoorPoorPoor.
NorthAlpine LakesFairPoorPoorPoorPoor.
SouthMount RainierGoodGoodGoodGoodGood.
SouthGoat RocksFairPoorPoorPoorPoor.
SouthMount AdamsFairFairFairFairFair.

Currently, population units of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan maintain fair to good resiliency across the subspecies' range; no population unit has very good resiliency. The continuing effects of climate change threaten Mount Rainier with-tailed ptarmigan in the following ways: increased physiological stress due to elevated temperatures; reduced availability of moist alpine vegetation and associated insects; loss of snow cover and reduction of snow quality for climate microrefugia and camouflage; and, most importantly, loss of breeding and post-breeding habitat as a result of changes in precipitation, wind, and temperature.

There is evidence of local adaptive divergence among subspecies of the white-tailed ptarmigan based on variables that are likely to be negatively impacted by climate change (Zimmerman et al. 2021, pp. 126-127). This suggests the adaptive capacity ( i.e., representation) of each subspecies, including Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan, may be negatively impacted. Results from additional studies which are discussed under Climate change, above, support that suggestion, as they project a range decline of 86 percent for white-tailed ptarmigan throughout British Columbia, Canada, by the 2080s; we would expect to see a similar change in Washington State (Scridel et al. 2021, entire).

After developing four future scenarios based on downscaled climate and vegetation models, we found that the South representation area maintains much better future resiliency and redundancy than the North representation area. Mount Rainier is the only population unit in the range of the subspecies projected to have good resiliency across all four future scenarios. Mount Adams is also projected to remain extant, though with fair resiliency. Goat Rocks, however, along with all three population units in the North representation area, has poor resiliency in all four future scenarios. Overall, the number of sufficiently resilient population units will decrease in the future, reducing redundancy across the range. If population units in the North representation area decrease in resiliency to the point of extirpation, Start Printed Page 55106 the ecological diversity present in the North representation area will be lost.

We note that, by using the SSA framework to guide our analysis of the scientific information documented in the SSA report, we have not only analyzed individual effects on the subspecies, but we have also analyzed their potential cumulative effects. We incorporate the cumulative effects into our SSA analysis when we characterize the current and future condition of the subspecies. To assess the current and future condition of the subspecies, we undertake an iterative analysis that encompasses and incorporates the threats individually and then accumulates and evaluates the effects of all the factors that may be influencing the subspecies, including threats and conservation efforts. Because the SSA framework considers not just the presence of the factors, but to what degree they collectively influence risk to the entire subspecies, our assessment integrates the cumulative effects of the factors and replaces a standalone cumulative effects analysis.

Section 4 of the Act ( 16 U.S.C. 1533 ) and its implementing regulations ( 50 CFR part 424 ) set forth the procedures for determining whether a species meets the definition of an endangered species or a threatened species. The Act defines an “endangered species” as a species in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range and a “threatened species” as a species likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range. The Act requires that we determine whether a species meets the definition of “endangered species” or “threatened species” because of any of the following factors: (A) The present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of its habitat or range; (B) overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes; (C) disease or predation; (D) the inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; or (E) other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued existence.

We evaluated the environmental and anthropogenic factors influencing Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan and assessed the cumulative effect of those influences under the Act's section 4(a)(1) factors. The habitat-based stressors of climate change, mining, grazing, browsing, the invasive willow borer beetle, development, and recreation demonstrated varying degrees of localized effects to individual birds, but none of these stressors demonstrated effects to habitat at a level that is currently impacting the viability of the subspecies (Factor A). The best available information does not suggest that hunting (Factor B) or predation or disease (Factor C) are threats to the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan. Habitat for the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan is currently supporting populations of the subspecies, and approximately 70 percent of the entire range is protected from habitat loss as a result of development due to its wilderness designation (Factor D). We also evaluated disturbance associated with recreation effects, but the best available information does not indicate any current effect to populations or the viability of the subspecies (Factor E). We further examined the current information available on demographics and distribution of the subspecies, as well as availability and quality of suitable habitat in the subspecies' range. The best available information does not demonstrate any discernible trend for the condition ( e.g., increasing, declining, or stable) of the known populations of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan. Although evidence of climate change related impacts to habitat already exists and these impacts are likely to continue in the foreseeable future, the subspecies currently exhibits adequate resiliency, redundancy, and representation. Thus, after assessing the best available information, we determined that the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan is not currently in danger of extinction throughout all of its range.

After assessing all the same stressors for future condition, we determined that mining, grazing, browsing, the invasive willow borer beetle, hunting, and disease will not affect the viability of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan within the foreseeable future. Additionally, although the level of predation, development, and recreation may increase in the future, the best available information at this time does not indicate that they are reasonably likely to increase to a degree that will impact the viability of the subspecies within the foreseeable future.

In contrast, habitat loss and degradation resulting from climate change will affect the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan's viability within the foreseeable future. The best available scientific information indicates that changing habitat conditions associated with future climate change, such as loss of alpine vegetation and reduced snow quality and quantity (Factor A), are expected to cause populations of Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan to decline. Furthermore, rising temperatures associated with climate change are expected to have direct impacts on individual birds (Factor E), which experience physiological stress at temperatures above 21°C (70 °F).

Two independent vegetation models (Bachelet et al. 2017, Rehfeldt et al. 2012) project that within the foreseeable future all alpine tundra vegetation will be lost to forest expansion in all but two of the population units (USFWS 2023, Appendix A). In the North Cascades, glaciers are projected to retreat between 92 percent and 96 percent within the next 50 to 80 years. Glacier melt in many of the watersheds of the eastern Cascade Range and low-moderate elevation watersheds of the western Cascades has already peaked or will peak in the current decade. Total discharge in August and September from snowmelt, rain, and glacial melt in Cascades watersheds has notably declined and is expected to continue to drop through 2080. Spring snowpack in Washington has already declined overall by 30 percent from 1955 to 2016 and is expected to further decline from 38 to 46 percent by midcentury. The projected decreases in snowpack and glaciers and their associated meltwater, as well as changes in snow quality, decreasing wind, and advancing treeline and infill, could result in the loss of greater than 99 percent of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan's currently available alpine tundra habitat and a related loss in the availability of thermal microrefugia for the subspecies (USFWS 2023, Appendix A).

Within 50 years, the climate within available suitable Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan breeding and post-breeding habitat is expected to change significantly, such that the subspecies may remain in only one or two of the six current known extant population units. We can make reasonably reliable predictions about this threat and the subspecies' response; notable glacial retreat and tree expansion into alpine and subalpine meadows have already occurred in the range due to warming temperatures, and the best available information does not indicate that the rate of climate change will slow within the foreseeable future. The maximum two populations projected to remain in 50 years are insufficient to support the viability of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan. Furthermore, it is unlikely that the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan will adapt to the changing climate by moving northward because alpine areas north of the Start Printed Page 55107 subspecies' current elevational range are expected to undergo similar impacts due to climate change (Scridel et al. 2021, entire).

Thus, after assessing the best available information, we determined that the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan is likely to become in danger of extinction within the foreseeable future throughout all of its range.

Under the Act and our implementing regulations, a species may warrant listing if it is in danger of extinction or likely to become so within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range. The court in Center for Biological Diversity v. Everson, 435 F. Supp. 3d 69 (D.D.C. 2020) ( Everson ), vacated the aspect of the Final Policy on Interpretation of the Phrase “Significant Portion of Its Range” in the Endangered Species Act's Definitions of “Endangered Species” and “Threatened Species” (Final Policy; 79 FR 37578 , July 1, 2014) that provided that the Service does not undertake an analysis of significant portions of a species' range if the species warrants listing as threatened throughout all of its range. Therefore, we proceed to evaluating whether the species is endangered in a significant portion of its range—that is, whether there is any portion of the species' range for which both (1) the portion is significant; and (2) the species is in danger of extinction in that portion. Depending on the case, it might be more efficient for us to address the “significance” question or the “status” question first. We can choose to address either question first. Regardless of which question we address first, if we reach a negative answer with respect to the first question that we address, we do not need to evaluate the other question for that portion of the species' range.

Following the court's holding in Everson, we now consider whether there are any significant portions of the species' range where the species is in danger of extinction now ( i.e., endangered). In undertaking this analysis for the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan, we choose to address the status question first—we consider information pertaining to the geographic distribution of both the subspecies and the threats that the subspecies faces to identify portions of the range where the subspecies may be endangered.

We evaluated the range of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan to determine if the subspecies is in danger of extinction now in any portion of its range. The range can theoretically be divided into portions in an infinite number of ways. We focused our analysis on portions of the subspecies' range that may meet the definition of an endangered species. For the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan, we considered whether the threats or their effects on the subspecies are greater in any biologically meaningful portion of the subspecies' range than in other portions such that the subspecies is in danger of extinction now in that portion.

We assessed the best available science on factors influencing the status of the subspecies, analyzing the scope, magnitude, and intensity of all potential stressors, including predation, disease, browsing, hunting, grazing, development, recreation, timber harvest, the invasive willow borer beetle, and effects of climate change. Although several of these factors may have localized effects on individual ptarmigan, we determined that no stressor is currently impacting the viability of the subspecies. However, changing habitat conditions associated with ongoing climate change, including reduced snow quality and quantity, reduced glacial melt and associated loss of alpine vegetation, and decreasing wind, are expected to cause populations of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan to decline within the foreseeable future, adversely impacting the future condition and overall viability of the subspecies.

The statutory difference between an endangered species and a threatened species is the time horizon in which the species becomes in danger of extinction; an endangered species is in danger of extinction now while a threatened species is not in danger of extinction now but is likely to become so within the foreseeable future. Thus, we considered the time horizon for the effects of climate change, which are the threats that are driving the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan to warrant listing as a threatened species throughout all of its range. We then considered whether these threats are occurring in any portion of the subspecies' range such that the subspecies is in danger of extinction now in that portion of its range.

The best scientific and commercial data available indicate that the time horizon within which the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan will experience the effects of and respond to climate change is within the foreseeable future. Though some effects of climate change are already evident in parts of the range, the best scientific and commercial data available do not indicate that the resiliency of any Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan populations is currently low. Therefore, we determine that the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan is not in danger of extinction now in any portion of its range, but that the subspecies is likely to become in danger of extinction within the foreseeable future throughout all of its range. This does not conflict with the courts' holdings in Desert Survivors v. U.S. Department of the Interior, 321 F. Supp. 3d 1011, 1070-74 (N.D. Cal. 2018), and Center for Biological Diversity v. Jewell, 248 F. Supp. 3d 946, 959 (D. Ariz. 2017) because, in reaching this conclusion, we did not apply the aspects of the Final Policy, including the definition of “significant,” that those court decisions held to be invalid.

Our review of the best scientific and commercial data available indicates that the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan meets the Act's definition of a threatened species. Therefore, we are listing the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan as a threatened species in accordance with sections 3(20) and 4(a)(1) of the Act.

Conservation measures provided to species listed as endangered or threatened species under the Act include recognition as a listed species, planning and implementation of recovery actions, requirements for Federal protection, and prohibitions against certain practices. Recognition through listing results in public awareness and conservation by Federal, State, Tribal, and local agencies, private organizations, and individuals. The Act encourages cooperation with the States and other countries and calls for recovery actions to be carried out for listed species. The protection required by Federal agencies, including the Service, and the prohibitions against certain activities are discussed, in part, below.

The primary purpose of the Act is the conservation of endangered and threatened species and the ecosystems upon which they depend. The ultimate goal of such conservation efforts is the recovery of these listed species so that they no longer need the protective measures of the Act. Section 4(f) of the Act calls for the Service to develop and implement recovery plans for the conservation of endangered and threatened species. The goal of this process is to restore listed species to a point where they are secure, self-sustaining, and functioning components of their ecosystems. Start Printed Page 55108

The recovery planning process begins with development of a recovery outline made available to the public soon after a final listing determination. The recovery outline guides the immediate implementation of urgent recovery actions while a recovery plan is being developed. Recovery teams (composed of species experts, Federal and State agencies, nongovernmental organizations, and stakeholders) may be established to develop and implement recovery plans. The recovery planning process involves the identification of actions that are necessary to halt and reverse the species' decline by addressing the threats to its survival and recovery. The recovery plan identifies recovery criteria for review of when a species may be ready for reclassification from endangered to threatened (“downlisting”) or removal from protected status (“delisting”), and methods for monitoring recovery progress. Recovery plans also establish a framework for agencies to coordinate their recovery efforts and provide estimates of the cost of implementing recovery tasks. Revisions of the plan may be done to address continuing or new threats to the species, as new substantive information becomes available. The recovery outline, draft recovery plan, final recovery plan, and any revisions will be available on our website as they are completed ( https://www.fws.gov/​program/​endangered-species ), or from our Washington Fish and Wildlife Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT ).

Implementation of recovery actions generally requires the participation of a broad range of partners, including other Federal agencies, States, Tribes, nongovernmental organizations, businesses, and private landowners. Examples of recovery actions include habitat restoration ( e.g., restoration of native vegetation), research, captive propagation and reintroduction, and outreach and education. The recovery of many listed species cannot be accomplished solely on Federal lands because their range may occur primarily or solely on non-Federal lands. To achieve recovery of these species requires cooperative conservation efforts on private, State, and Tribal lands.

Once this subspecies is listed, funding for recovery actions will be available from a variety of sources, including Federal budgets, State programs, and cost-share grants for non-Federal landowners, the academic community, and nongovernmental organizations. In addition, pursuant to section 6 of the Act, the State of Washington will be eligible for Federal funds to implement management actions that promote the protection or recovery of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan. Information on our grant programs that are available to aid species recovery can be found at: https://www.fws.gov/​service/​financial-assistance .

Please let us know if you are interested in participating in recovery efforts for the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan. Additionally, we invite you to submit any new information on this subspecies whenever it becomes available and any information you may have for recovery planning purposes (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT ).

Section 7 of the Act is titled Interagency Cooperation and mandates all Federal action agencies to use their existing authorities to further the conservation purposes of the Act and to ensure that their actions are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of listed species or adversely modify critical habitat. Regulations implementing section 7 are codified at 50 CFR part 402 . Section 7(a)(2) states that each Federal action agency shall, in consultation with the Secretary, ensure that any action they authorize, fund, or carry out is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of a listed species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of designated critical habitat. Each Federal agency shall review its action at the earliest possible time to determine whether it may affect listed species or critical habitat. If a determination is made that the action may affect listed species or critical habitat, formal consultation is required ( 50 CFR 402.14(a) ), unless the Service concurs in writing that the action is not likely to adversely affect listed species or critical habitat. At the end of a formal consultation, the Service issues a biological opinion, containing its determination of whether the federal action is likely to result in jeopardy or adverse modification.

Examples of discretionary actions for the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan that may be subject to consultation procedures under section 7 are land management or other landscape-altering activities on Federal lands administered by the U.S. Forest Service and National Park Service as well as actions on State, Tribal, local, or private lands that require a Federal permit (such as a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under section 404 of the Clean Water Act ( 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. ) or a permit from the Service under section 10 of the Act) or that involve some other Federal action (such as funding from the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Aviation Administration, or the Federal Emergency Management Agency). Federal actions not affecting listed species or critical habitat—and actions on State, Tribal, local, or private lands that are not federally funded, authorized, or carried out by a Federal agency—do not require section 7 consultation. Federal agencies should coordinate with the local Service Field Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT ) with any specific questions on Section 7 consultation and conference requirements.

It is the policy of the Services, as published in the Federal Register on July 1, 1994 ( 59 FR 34272 ), to identify to the extent known at the time a species is listed, specific activities that will not be considered likely to result in violation of section 9 of the Act. To the extent possible, activities that will be considered likely to result in violation will also be identified in as specific a manner as possible. The intent of this policy is to increase public awareness of the effect of a listing on proposed and ongoing activities within the range of the species. Although most of the prohibitions in section 9 of the Act apply to endangered species, sections 9(a)(1)(G) and 9(a)(2)(E) of the Act prohibit the violation of any regulation under section 4(d) pertaining to any threatened species of fish or wildlife, or threatened species of plant, respectively. Section 4(d) of the Act directs the Secretary to promulgate protective regulations that are necessary and advisable for the conservation of threatened species. As a result, we interpret our policy to mean that, when we list a species as a threatened species, to the extent possible, we identify activities that will or will not be considered likely to result in violation of the protective regulations under section 4(d) for that species.

At this time, we are unable to identify specific activities that will or will not be considered likely to result in violation of section 9 of the Act beyond what is already clear from the descriptions of prohibitions and exceptions established by protective regulation under section 4(d) of the Act.

Questions regarding whether specific activities would constitute violation of section 9 of the Act should be directed to the Washington Fish and Wildlife Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT ).

Section 4(d) of the Act contains two sentences. The first sentence states that the Secretary shall issue such Start Printed Page 55109 regulations as she deems necessary and advisable to provide for the conservation of species listed as threatened species. Conservation is defined in the Act to mean the use of all methods and procedures which are necessary to bring any endangered species or threatened species to the point at which the measures provided pursuant to the Act are no longer necessary. Additionally, the second sentence of section 4(d) of the Act states that the Secretary may by regulation prohibit with respect to any threatened species any act prohibited under section 9(a)(1), in the case of fish or wildlife, or section 9(a)(2), in the case of plants. With these two sentences in section 4(d), Congress delegated broad authority to the Secretary to determine what protections would be necessary and advisable to provide for the conservation of threatened species, and even broader authority to put in place any of the section 9 prohibitions, for a given species.

The courts have recognized the extent of the Secretary's discretion under this standard to develop rules that are appropriate for the conservation of a species. For example, courts have upheld, as a valid exercise of agency authority, rules developed under section 4(d) that included limited prohibitions against takings (see Alsea Valley Alliance v. Lautenbacher, 2007 WL 2344927 (D. Or. 2007); Washington Environmental Council v. National Marine Fisheries Service, 2002 WL 511479 (W.D. Wash. 2002)). Courts have also upheld 4(d) rules that do not address all of the threats a species faces ( see State of Louisiana v. Verity, 853 F.2d 322 (5th Cir. 1988)). As noted in the legislative history when the Act was initially enacted, “once an animal is on the threatened list, the Secretary has an almost infinite number of options available to [her] with regard to the permitted activities for those species. [She] may, for example, permit taking, but not importation of such species, or [she] may choose to forbid both taking and importation but allow the transportation of such species” (H.R. Rep. No. 412, 93rd Cong., 1st Sess. 1973).

The 4(d) rule was developed considering our understanding of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan's physical and biological needs, which in large part relies upon information from other white-tailed ptarmigan subspecies. Although there is some information on the subspecies' habitat, the majority of habitat and demographic information comes from other subspecies (particularly the southern white-tailed ptarmigan in Colorado, where there is considerable habitat connectivity and a very different climate). Given the unique aspects of the landscape and climate in the Cascades, significant uncertainty remains regarding the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan's specific needs and how and to what degree stressors are operating in the subspecies' habitat. For example, we do not fully understand the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan's winter habitat requirements, its winter food resources, or its reliance on snow roosting. We do not understand why some areas of apparently suitable habitat lack observational records of the subspecies. We also lack the demographic information necessary to understand to the degree to which the subspecies is at risk in the future from various forms of disturbance.

Considering these uncertainties and our requirement to develop a recovery plan for the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan, our 4(d) rule is designed to promote the subspecies' conservation by facilitating the viability of current populations, scientific study of the subspecies, and conservation and restoration of its habitat. As we learn more about the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan and its habitat, we will refine our conservation recommendations for the subspecies. The provisions of this 4(d) rule are some of many tools that we will use to promote the conservation of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan.

Section 7(a)(2) of the Act requires Federal agencies, including the Service, to ensure that any action they fund, authorize, or carry out is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered species or threatened species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of designated critical habitat of such species. These requirements are the same for a threatened species with a species-specific 4(d) rule. Section 7 consultation is required for Federal actions that “may affect” a listed species regardless of whether take caused by the activity is prohibited or excepted by a 4(d) rule. A 4(d) rule does not change the process and criteria for informal or formal consultations and does not alter the analytical process used for biological opinions or concurrence letters. For example, as with an endangered species, if a Federal agency determines that an action is “not likely to adversely affect” a threatened species, the action will require the Service's written concurrence ( 50 CFR 402.13(c) ). Similarly, if a Federal agency determines that an action is “likely to adversely affect” a threatened species, the action will require formal consultation and the formulation of a biological opinion ( 50 CFR 402.14(a) ). Two Federal agencies, the NPS and USFS, manage approximately 95 percent of the U.S. portion of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan's range (Table 1). Because consultation obligations and processes are unaffected by 4(d) rules, we may consider developing tools to streamline future intra-Service and inter-Agency consultations for actions that result in forms of take that are not prohibited by the 4(d) rule (but that still require consultation). These tools may include consultation guidance, Information for Planning and Consultation effects determination keys, template language for biological opinions, or programmatic consultations.

Exercising the Secretary's authority under section 4(d) of the Act, we have developed a rule that is designed to address the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan's conservation needs. As discussed previously in Summary of Biological Status and Threats, we have concluded that the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan is likely to become in danger of extinction within the foreseeable future primarily due to the projected effects of climate change, especially increasing temperatures and a loss of the conditions that support suitable alpine habitat (above treeline). Section 4(d) requires the Secretary to issue such regulations as she deems necessary and advisable to provide for the conservation of each threatened species and authorizes the Secretary to include among those protective regulations any of the prohibitions that section 9(a)(1) of the Act prescribes for endangered species. We are not required to make a “necessary and advisable” determination when we apply or do not apply specific section 9 prohibitions to a threatened species ( In re: Polar Bear Endangered Species Act Listing and 4(d) Rule Litigation, 818 F. Supp. 2d 214, 228 (D.D.C. 2011) (citing Sweet Home Chapter of Cmtys. for a Great Or. v. Babbitt, 1 F.3d 1, 8 (D.C. Cir. 1993), rev'd on other grounds, 515 U.S. 687 (1995))). Nevertheless, even though we are not required to make such a determination, we have chosen to be as transparent as possible and explain below why we find that the protections, prohibitions, and exceptions in this rule as a whole satisfy the requirement in section 4(d) of the Act to issue regulations deemed necessary and advisable to provide for the conservation of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan. Start Printed Page 55110

The protective regulations for the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan incorporate prohibitions from section 9(a)(1) to address the threats to the species. Section 9(a)(1) prohibits the following activities for endangered wildlife: importing or exporting; take; possession and other acts with unlawfully taken specimens; delivering, receiving, carrying, transporting, or shipping in interstate or foreign commerce in the course of commercial activity; or selling or offering for sale in interstate or foreign commerce. This protective regulation includes all of these prohibitions because the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan is at risk of extinction in the foreseeable future and putting these prohibitions in place will help to preserve the subspecies' remaining populations, slow their rate of decline, and decrease cumulative or synergistic, negative effects from other threats.

Under the Act, “take” means to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct. Some of these provisions have been further defined in regulation at 50 CFR 17.3 . Take can result knowingly or otherwise, by direct and indirect impacts, intentionally or incidentally. Regulating take will support the conservation of existing populations of the subspecies by facilitating their viability in the face of these projected environmental changes. Therefore, we are prohibiting take of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan, except for take resulting from those actions and activities specifically excepted by the 4(d) rule. Exceptions to the prohibition on take include the general exceptions to take of endangered wildlife as set forth in 50 CFR 17.21 and additional exceptions, as described below.

Despite these prohibitions regarding threatened species, we may under certain circumstances issue permits to carry out one or more otherwise prohibited activities, including those described above. The regulations that govern permits for threatened wildlife state that the Director may issue a permit authorizing any activity otherwise prohibited with regard to threatened species. These include permits issued for the following purposes: for scientific purposes, to enhance propagation or survival, for economic hardship, for zoological exhibition, for educational purposes, for incidental taking, or for special purposes consistent with the purposes of the Act ( 50 CFR 17.32 ). The statute also contains certain exceptions from the prohibitions, which are found in sections 9 and 10 of the Act.

In addition, to further the conservation of the species, any employee or agent of the Service, any other Federal land management agency, the National Marine Fisheries Service, a State conservation agency, or a federally recognized Tribe, who is designated by their agency or Tribe for such purposes, may, when acting in the course of their official duties, take threatened wildlife without a permit if such action is necessary to: (i) Aid a sick, injured, or orphaned specimen; or (ii) Dispose of a dead specimen; or (iii) Salvage a dead specimen that may be useful for scientific study; or (iv) Remove specimens that constitute a demonstrable but nonimmediate threat to human safety, provided that the taking is done in a humane manner; the taking may involve killing or injuring only if it has not been reasonably possible to eliminate such threat by livecapturing and releasing the specimen unharmed, in an appropriate area.

We recognize the special and unique relationship that we have with our State natural resource agency partners in contributing to conservation of listed species. State agencies often possess scientific data and valuable expertise on the status and distribution of endangered, threatened, and candidate species of wildlife and plants. State agencies, because of their authorities and their close working relationships with local governments and landowners, are in a unique position to assist us in implementing all aspects of the Act. In this regard, section 6 of the Act provides that we must cooperate to the maximum extent practicable with the States in carrying out programs authorized by the Act. Therefore, any qualified employee or agent of a State conservation agency that is a party to a cooperative agreement with us in accordance with section 6(c) of the Act, who is designated by his or her agency for such purposes, will be able to conduct activities designed to conserve the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan that may result in otherwise prohibited take without additional authorization.

The 4(d) rule will also provide for the conservation of the species by allowing exceptions that incentivize conservation actions or that, while they may have some minimal level of take of Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan, are not expected to rise to the level that would have a negative impact ( i.e., would have only de minimis impacts) on the species' conservation. The following exceptions to these prohibitions are expected to have negligible impacts to the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan and its habitat:

  • Take that is incidental to facilitating human safety (such as rescue, fire, and other emergency responses) and the protection of natural resources. During emergency events, the primary objective of the responding agency must be to protect human life and property and this objective takes precedence over considerations for minimizing adverse effects to the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan.
  • Take that is incidental to a person's lawfully conducted outdoor recreational activities such as hiking (including associated authorized pack animals and domestic dogs handled in compliance with existing regulations), camping, backcountry skiing, mountain biking, snowmobiling, climbing, and hunting where these activities are allowed. We consider outdoor recreation lawful if it is carried out in accordance with the recreation rules and limits established by the State, Federal, or Tribal agency managing the land. This exception does not apply to recreation planning activities by Federal or State agencies. Based on available information, these types of activities have the potential to disturb individual ptarmigan in localized areas representing a very small portion of the available habitat in the subspecies' range. Also, there are aspects of recreation that can be beneficial to the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan and other alpine species. USFS and NPS, through their recreational planning activities, can help educate the public and build advocacy for conservation of alpine habitats and species that are facing habitat loss due to climate change, including the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan. These and other partners can train alpine recreationists to become citizen scientists, helping us to better understand specific aspects of the biology of this subspecies that we are lacking. In the future, should recreation become a threat to the species, the Service may reconsider this exception.
  • Take that is incidental to authorized habitat restoration actions consistent with the conservation needs of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan. Activities associated with habitat restoration ( e.g., weeding, planting native forage plants, establishing watering areas) are likely to cause only short-term, temporary adverse effects, especially in the form of harassment or disturbance of individual ptarmigan. In the long term, the risk of these effects to both individuals and populations is expected to be mitigated as these types of activities will likely benefit the Start Printed Page 55111 subspecies by helping to preserve and enhance the habitat of existing populations over time. We consider habitat restoration and enhancement activities authorized if they are consistent with Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan conservation prescriptions or objectives that are specifically included in established Federal, State, or Tribal conservation plans.
  • Take that is incidental to conducting lawful, authorized control of predators of Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan, provided reasonable care is practiced to minimize effects to Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan. For example, the common raven is currently managed within the range of greater sage-grouse in Washington and common ravens have large home ranges. A professional biologist documented travel of a raven collared at the Terrace Heights landfill in Yakima to Mount Rainier National Park (White 2021, in litt.). Ptarmigan are threatened in the foreseeable future by climate change and the persistence of the subspecies will rely on the conservation of existing populations, so predator control may be authorized by the Service for the purposes of conservation of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan. Therefore, take of Mount Rainier white-tailed-ptarmigan associated with authorized predator control coordinated in advance with the Service will not be prohibited, as the benefit to the subspecies from this activity outweighs the risk to individual ptarmigan. Predator control activities may include the use of fencing, trapping, shooting, and toxicants to control predators, and related activities such as performing efficacy surveys, trap checks, and maintenance duties. Reasonable care for predator control may include, but would not be limited to, procuring and implementing technical assistance from a qualified biologist on habitat management activities, and best efforts to minimize Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan exposure to hazards ( e.g., predation, habituation to feeding, entanglement, etc.). Any predator control conducted for the purposes of conservation of Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan is considered authorized if it is carried out in accordance with the rules and limits established by the State, Federal, or Tribal agency managing the land and coordinated in in advance with the Service.
  • Take that is incidental to lawfully conducted timber harvest or forest management activities, separate from those actions covered under the habitat restoration actions exception described above. During the summer, when timber harvest or forest management activities are likely to occur, white-tailed ptarmigan are rarely found in the vicinity of forested areas, but they may occur in alpine areas adjacent to treeline and thus would be within sight and sound of such activities. In the winter, ptarmigan may be found in openings in forested areas adjacent to their alpine habitat. Forest management activities in proximity to ptarmigan habitat may cause short-term, temporary adverse effects, especially in the form of harassment or disturbance of individual ptarmigan using habitats adjacent to forested areas; however, in the long term, these activities may benefit the subspecies by reducing the risk of wildfire near ptarmigan habitat, or by opportunistically creating alpine area openings that ptarmigan may use in winter. Legal and authorized forest management activities include, but are not limited to, timber harvest and fire and vegetation management. We consider forest management activities legal and authorized if they are carried out in accordance with the forest practices rules and limits established by the State, Federal, or Tribal agency managing the land.
  • Take that is incidental to the authorized maintenance of any public or private infrastructure ( e.g., buildings, roads, parking lots, viewpoints, trails, designated camp sites, developed ski areas, and helicopter landing pads) and supporting infrastructure ( e.g., benches, signs, safety features) within or adjacent to Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan habitat. Within the subspecies' range, most development and infrastructure, the largest of which is associated with Mount Rainier National Park, has been in place for decades or longer. The amount of land developed for roads, buildings, trail head facilities and parking lots, trails, benches, signs, safety features, designated camping sites, developed ski areas, and helicopter landing pads is a very small percentage of the subspecies' range, and available suitable habitat is abundant and remote. The maintenance of trails and infrastructure within the subspecies' range has the potential to temporarily disturb individual ptarmigan in localized areas. The best available information does not indicate that these types of routine maintenance are a threat to the species. We consider maintenance activities authorized if they are carried out in accordance with the rules established by the State, Federal, or Tribal agency managing the land. This exception would not extend to take associated with the development of new infrastructure.

As discussed above under Summary of Biological Status and Threats, increasing temperatures (Factor E) and a loss of the conditions that support suitable alpine habitat (Factor A) are driving the current and future status of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan. A range of current and future activities could directly and indirectly impact the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan via direct take or loss of habitat. These activities may cause disturbance, harm, or mortality to individual ptarmigan, trampling of habitat, introduction of invasive species in habitat, and loss of habitat. These activities include: human safety and emergency response; the work of law enforcement and on-the-job wildlife professionals; lawful outdoor recreation in alpine areas in summer, or subalpine areas in winter; habitat restoration and predator control actions for purposes of Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan conservation; forest management actions; and routine maintenance of infrastructure ( e.g., roads, trails, buildings, parking lots, etc.). The best available information indicates that these activities, when conducted in accordance with the law, will not put the viability of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan at risk. Allowing the continuation of these activities while also prohibiting all other forms of take will facilitate Federal agencies in managing their land according to their priorities without unnecessary regulation while still supporting the conservation of the subspecies.

Nothing in this 4(d) rule will change in any way the recovery planning provisions of section 4(f) of the Act, the consultation requirements under section 7 of the Act, or the ability of the Service to enter into partnerships for the management and protection of the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan. However, interagency cooperation may be further streamlined through planned programmatic consultations for the subspecies between Federal agencies and the Service.

Section 4(a)(3) of the Act requires that, to the maximum extent prudent and determinable, we designate a species' critical habitat concurrently with listing the species. Critical habitat is defined in section 3 of the Act as:

(1) The specific areas within the geographical area occupied by the species, at the time it is listed in accordance with the Act, on which are Start Printed Page 55112 found those physical or biological features

(a) Essential to the conservation of the species, and

(b) Which may require special management considerations or protection; and

(2) Specific areas outside the geographical area occupied by the species at the time it is listed, upon a determination that such areas are essential for the conservation of the species.

Section 4(a)(3) of the Act, as amended, and implementing regulations ( 50 CFR 424.12 ) require that, to the maximum extent prudent and determinable, the Secretary shall designate critical habitat at the time the species is determined to be an endangered or threatened species. At the time of our June 15, 2021, proposed rule, we determined that a designation of critical habitat would not be prudent. Our regulations ( 50 CFR 424.12(a)(1) ) in place at that time stated that the Secretary may, but is not required to, determine that a designation would not be prudent in the following circumstances:

(i) The species is threatened by taking or other human activity and identification of critical habitat can be expected to increase the degree of such threat to the species;

(ii) The present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of a species' habitat or range is not a threat to the species, or threats to the species' habitat stem solely from causes that cannot be addressed through management actions resulting from consultations under section 7(a)(2) of the Act;

(iii) Areas within the jurisdiction of the United States provide no more than negligible conservation value, if any, for a species occurring primarily outside the jurisdiction of the United States;

(iv) No areas meet the definition of critical habitat; or

(v) The Secretary otherwise determines that designation of critical habitat would not be prudent based on the best scientific data available.

However, on April 5, 2024, jointly with the National Marine Fisheries Service, we published a final rule revising the regulations in 50 CFR 424.12 regarding circumstances when designation of critical habitat may not be prudent ( 89 FR 24300 ). In light of these regulation revisions, we will reevaluate our 2021 determination that the designation of critical habitat for the ptarmigan is not prudent under these revised regulations and publish a separate determination in the future in the Federal Register . In that determination, we will also respond to any comments related to critical habitat we received during the public comment period on the June 15, 2021, proposed rule ( 86 FR 31668 ).

Regulations adopted pursuant to section 4(a) of the Act are exempt from the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq. ) and do not require an environmental analysis under NEPA. We published a notice outlining our reasons for this determination in the Federal Register on October 25, 1983 ( 48 FR 49244 ). This includes listing, delisting, and reclassification rules, as well as critical habitat designations and species-specific protective regulations promulgated concurrently with a decision to list or reclassify a species as threatened. The courts have upheld this position ( e.g., Douglas County v. Babbitt, 48 F.3d 1495 (9th Cir. 1995) (critical habitat); Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2005 WL 2000928 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2005) (concurrent 4(d) rule)).

In accordance with the President's memorandum of April 29, 1994 (Government-to-Government Relations with Native American Tribal Governments; 59 FR 22951 ), Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments), and the Department of the Interior's manual at 512 DM 2, we readily acknowledge our responsibility to communicate meaningfully with federally recognized Tribes on a government-to-government basis. In accordance with Secretary's Order 3206 of June 5, 1997 (American Indian Tribal Rights, Federal-Tribal Trust Responsibilities, and the Endangered Species Act), we readily acknowledge our responsibilities to work directly with Tribes in developing programs for healthy ecosystems, to acknowledge that Tribal lands are not subject to the same controls as Federal public lands, to remain sensitive to Indian culture, and to make information available to Tribes. All potentially affected Tribes were sent a letter highlighting our assessment of this subspecies and requesting information about the subspecies or other feedback. These Tribes included the three adjacent to the range of Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan, the Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe, Snoqualmie Indian Tribe, and Yakama Nation, as well as others (the Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation; Cowlitz Indian Tribe; Lummi Nation; Muckleshoot Indian Tribe; Nisqually Indian Tribe; Nooksack Indian Tribe; Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe; Puyallup Tribe of Indians; Samish Indian Nation; Squaxin Island Tribe; Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians; Suquamish Tribe; Swinomish Indian Tribal Community; Tulalip Tribes; and Upper Skagit Tribe). We did not receive any replies. We also sent notification of the impending publication of our proposed listing rule with an invitation to comment to all Tribes in the State of Washington on June 14, 2021; we received no comments from Tribes during the proposed rule's comment period.

A complete list of references cited in this rulemaking is available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov and upon request from the Washington Fish and Wildlife Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT ).

The primary authors of this final rule are the staff members of the Fish and Wildlife Service's Species Assessment Team and the Washington Fish and Wildlife Office.

  • Endangered and threatened species
  • Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
  • Transportation

Accordingly, we amend part 17, subchapter B of chapter I, title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations , as set forth below:

1. The authority citation for part 17 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361-1407 ; 1531-1544; and 4201-4245, unless otherwise noted.

2. In § 17.11, in paragraph (h), amend the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife by adding an entry for “Ptarmigan, Mount Rainier white-tailed” in alphabetical order under Birds to read as follows:

(h) * * * Start Printed Page 55113

Common nameScientific nameWhere listedStatusListing citations and applicable rules
*         *         *         *         *         *         *
*         *         *         *         *         *         *
Ptarmigan, Mount Rainier white-tailed Wherever foundT89 FR [INSERT PAGE WHERE THE DOCUMENT BEGINS], 7/3/2024; .
*         *         *         *         *         *         *

3. Amend §  17.41 by adding paragraph (i) to read as follows:

(i) Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan ( Lagopus leucura rainierensis ).

(1) Prohibitions. The following prohibition that applies to endangered wildlife also applies to the Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan. Except as provided under paragraph (i)(2) of this section and § 17.4, it is unlawful for any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to commit, to attempt to commit, to solicit another to commit, or cause to be committed, any of the following acts in regard to this species:

(i) Import or export, as set forth at § 17.21(b) for endangered wildlife.

(ii) Take, as set forth at § 17.21(c)(1) for endangered wildlife.

(iii) Possession and other acts with unlawfully taken specimens, as set forth at § 17.21(d)(1) for endangered wildlife.

(iv) Interstate or foreign commerce in the course of a commercial activity, as set forth at § 17.21(e) for endangered wildlife.

(v) Sale or offer for sale, as set forth at § 17.21(f) for endangered wildlife.

(2) Exceptions from prohibitions. With regard to this subspecies, you may:

(i) Conduct activities as authorized by a permit under § 17.32.

(ii) Take, as set forth at § 17.21(c)(2) through (4) for endangered wildlife.

(iii) Take, as set forth at § 17.31(b).

(iv) Possess and engage in other acts with unlawfully taken wildlife, as set forth at § 17.21(d)(2) for endangered wildlife.

(v) Take in accordance with these provisions:

(A) Human safety and emergency response. A person may incidentally take Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan in the course of carrying out official emergency response activities related to human safety and the protection of natural resources.

(B) Lawful outdoor recreation. A person may incidentally take Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan in the course of lawfully conducting outdoor recreational activities, such as hiking (including associated authorized pack animals and domestic dogs handled in compliance with existing regulations), camping, backcountry skiing, mountain biking, snowmobiling, climbing, and hunting where these activities are allowed. We consider outdoor recreation lawful if it is carried out in accordance with the recreation rules and limits established by the State, Federal, or Tribal agency managing the land.

(C) Habitat restoration actions. A person may incidentally take Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan in the course of carrying out authorized habitat restoration consistent with the conservation needs of Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan. We consider habitat restoration and enhancement activities authorized if they are consistent with Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan conservation prescriptions or objectives that are specifically included in established Federal, State, or Tribal conservation plans and documents.

(D) Predator control. A person may incidentally take Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan in the course of carrying out lawful, authorized predator control for the purpose of Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan conservation if reasonable care is practiced to minimize effects to Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan. Predator control activities may include the use of fencing, trapping, shooting, and toxicants to control predators, and related activities such as performing efficacy surveys, trap checks, and maintenance duties. Any predator control conducted for the purposes of conservation of Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan is considered authorized if it is carried out in accordance with the rules and limits established by the State, Federal, or Tribal agency managing the land and coordinated in in advance with the Service.

(E) Forest management. A person may incidentally take Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan in the course of carrying out legal and authorized forest management activities, including, but not limited to, timber harvest, and fire and vegetation management. We consider forest management activities legal and authorized if they are carried out in accordance with the forest practices rules and limits established by the State, Federal, or Tribal agency managing the land.

(F) Routine maintenance to infrastructure. A person may incidentally take Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan in the course of carrying out authorized routine maintenance of public or private infrastructure ( e.g., buildings, roads, parking lots, viewpoints, trails, designated camp sites, developed ski areas, and helicopter landing pads) and supporting infrastructure ( e.g., benches, signs, safety features) within or adjacent to Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan habitat. We consider maintenance activities authorized if they are carried out in accordance with the rules established by the State, Federal, or Tribal agency managing the land. This exception does not extend to take associated with the development of new infrastructure.

(G) Reporting and disposal requirements. Any take (injury or mortality) of Mount Rainier white-tailed ptarmigan associated with the actions excepted under paragraphs (i)(2)(v)(A) through (G) of this section must be reported to the Service and authorized State wildlife officials within 72 hours, and specimens may be disposed of only in accordance with directions from the Service. Reports should be made to the Service's Office of Law Enforcement; contact information for that office is located at 50 CFR 10.22 .

Martha Williams,

Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

BILLING CODE 4333-15-P

BILLING CODE 4333-15-C

[ FR Doc. 2024-14315 Filed 7-2-24; 8:45 am]

  • Executive Orders

Reader Aids

Information.

  • About This Site
  • Accessibility
  • No Fear Act
  • Continuity Information

IMAGES

  1. Succession Planning: Its Importance & Process [with 10+ Examples]

    succession planning definition business studies

  2. What is Succession Planning? Process and Steps to Take

    succession planning definition business studies

  3. Succession Planning: Essential Guide for HR

    succession planning definition business studies

  4. Succession Planning: Definition, Objectives, Steps

    succession planning definition business studies

  5. Succession Planning Basics: How It Works, Why It's Important

    succession planning definition business studies

  6. Succession Planning: Definition, Importance + 5 Benefits

    succession planning definition business studies

VIDEO

  1. Financial Planning (Definition, Characteristics, Considerations and steps in Financial Planning)

  2. Management Meaning, Definition. Business studies

  3. What is Succession Planning

  4. How succession planning can secure your business' future

  5. Succession Planning

  6. Succession and Wealth Management Planning for Family Business

COMMENTS

  1. Succession Planning: What the Research Says

    Some key takeaways: Though turnover among CEOs is rising, only 54% of boards are grooming a specific successor, and 39% have no viable internal candidate. The consequences of poor planning are ...

  2. The High Cost of Poor Succession Planning

    Better succession planning could, by contrast, help the large-cap U.S. equity market add a full point to the 4% to 5% annual gains Wall Street projects for it. The Advice

  3. Succession Planning: What the Research Says

    While every organization inevitably must replace its CEO, most firms are ill-prepared for succession. In this article, HBR senior editor Eben Harrell reviews the most salient studies of succession planning and offers context from the experts. Some key takeaways: (1) Though turnover among CEOs is rising, only 54% of boards are grooming a specific successor, and 39% have no viable internal ...

  4. Succession Planning Basics: How It Works, Why It's Important

    Succession Planning: A strategy for passing each key leadership role within a company to someone else in such a way that the company continues to operate after the incumbent leader is no longer in ...

  5. Succession planning for successful leadership: Why we need to talk

    Succession planning for successful leadership: Why we need to talk about succession planning! ... are by definition a sign of defeat and failed leadership…and pose enormous risks to the future of the enterprise, cost a ton to boot…and fail to pan out as planned. ... Margaret Ritchie is a doctoral student in the Educational Leadership and ...

  6. Succession planning

    Succession planning Magazine Article. Melvin Sorcher. James Brant. When the time comes to hire or promote, executives routinely overvalue certain traits and skills while overlooking other ...

  7. (PDF) SUCCESSION PLANNING AS A CRITICAL MANAGEMENT ...

    A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. This paper conducted a sy stematic review of succession planning (S P) articles published over. the last decade. The Systematic Quantitative A ssessment Technique was used to ...

  8. Leading Off: Effective succession planning: A leader's guide

    If you've watched the popular TV series Succession, you know the trouble that can break out when a founder prepares to leave the business. Well-crafted succession plans fall apart as family members and outsiders battle for control. But that wasn't the case at online real-estate marketplace PropertyGuru, whose cofounder Steve Melhuish implemented a meticulous three-step plan to ensure an ...

  9. What is succession planning? A key talent strategy for business

    Succession planning is a talent management process that builds a pool of trained workers who are ready to fill key roles when leaders and other key employees step down. Organizations with ...

  10. How to Create a Business Succession Plan

    3 Reasons to Have a Business Succession Plan. Creating and implementing a sound succession plan will provide several benefits to owners and partners: It ensures an agreeable price for a partner's ...

  11. Succession Planning: What It Is and Why It Matters

    Succession planning is the strategic process of identifying and developing internal talent and preparing them to move into critical roles. This process is crucial to ensuring continuity and maintaining operational stability, but it's only become more complicated as companies continue to widen their scope.

  12. Company Succession Planning: Step-by-Step Guide & Templates

    Increase diversity in the leadership pipeline. Step 4: Pinpoint the business gaps and challenges that could affect your company in the next 1-10 years if succession planning isn't executed. Step 5: Specify roles and positions critical to your business's survival and growth.

  13. (PDF) Succession Planning Best Practices for Organizations: A

    In this regard, succession planning is a systematic approach to ensure that employees in organizations are sufficiently competent for development (Davoudi et al., 2018;Janahmadigol et al., 2023).

  14. Your Business Needs a Succession Plan: Here Are the Basics

    The goal of a business continuity plan is to identify that which is essential and that which is not and to place the business in a position where it can continue to operate during a disruption ...

  15. The leader's guide to effective succession planning

    Effective succession planning involves having a long-term vision of your company and may involve lateral moves, assignments to special projects, leadership within teams, and internal or external development opportunities. Understanding the needs of both leadership and employees is vital to the succession process, as it can involve both vertical ...

  16. 5 Case Studies In Successful Succession Planning

    Planning by the global managing director for this succession is crucial. "If a bunch of people leave after the vote, it is not a good sign," concludes Barton. Key advice: "If you go around ...

  17. How to create a succession plan for business continuity and growth

    Succession planning case studies: Implementing in various business contexts Succession planning is dynamic and should be tailored to various businesses' unique characteristics. This requires a nuanced understanding of organisational structures, resources, and cultures in small, medium, or large enterprises.

  18. A Comprehensive Guide To The Leadership Succession Planning ...

    Essential Steps In The Leadership Succession Planning Process. 1. Look at critical vs. vulnerable positions. When figuring out which leadership positions to plan for first, you want to look at two ...

  19. Succession Planning for Business Continuity

    The high-level approach to succession planning includes the following steps: Review enterprise objectives and identify mission-critical operations. Identify the positions critical for these enterprise operations. Identify the candidates who have the required skills, knowledge and experience. Develop a training plan.

  20. The Key to Successful Succession Planning for Family Businesses

    Summary. Successfully passing the baton to the next generation is a goal for many family business leaders. It can also be a sound business move if the right steps are taken. By clearly ...

  21. 9 Succession Planning Tips For Business Owners

    Start with your current employees; identify those who have demonstrated leadership skills, a strong work ethic, a deep understanding of your business operations and, most importantly ...

  22. Federal Register :: Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants

    Where glaciers and permanent snow recede, primary succession will need to occur before the underlying parent material can support alpine meadows. Succession of the Lyman glacial forefront (the newly exposed area under a receding glacier) in the North Cascades took 20-50 years to develop early successional plant species.