• Skip to Content
  • Skip to Menu
  • Increase Text Size


Structured Settlement Annuity FAQs

Structured settlement annuities common questions, what is a structured settlement.

Structured settlements are a tax-advantaged method of compensating injury victims. Encouraged by the U.S. Congress since 1982, a structured settlement is a voluntary agreement between the injury victim and the defendant for future periodic payments.

With a structured settlement annuity, the injured claimant doesn’t receive compensation for his or her injuries in one lump sum. Rather, the claimant receives a stream of tax-free payments tailored to meet future medical expenses and basic living needs.

A structured settlement may be agreed to privately (for example, in a pre-trial settlement) or it may be required by a court order, which often happens in judgments involving minors.

What kind of flexibility is associated with a structured settlement annuity?

Structured settlement annuities are exceptionally flexible and can be designed to meet virtually any set of needs. A relatively simple payment schedule can be set up that provides for equal payments at set intervals – for example, every month for 20 years.

However, payments need not be made in equal amounts. A claimant who will need a new wheelchair every three years might elect to receive a larger payment every 36 months to help defray the cost. (This would presumably be in addition to the regular payments.)

The inherent flexibility of structured settlement annuities means that they are well-suited to compensate claimants for a wide variety of injuries.

Who determines the amount of Structured Settlement payments and the schedule?

In any physical injury case, the claimant and defendant negotiate matters such as the cost of the injured party’s medical care, basic living, and family needs. Oftentimes, one side (or both) engages an expert, such as a settlement consultant, who provides calculations on the long-term cost of these needs.

Once there is agreement on the total damages, the injured claimant can select a periodic payment plan that meets his or her needs. The defendant must then agree to make future payments via a structured settlement annuity. The defendant assigns the payment obligation to a third-party assignment company, who funds the obligation to make periodic payments through a life insurance company annuity.

As these issues involve complex calculations, specific language for the settlement agreement, and the completion of the appropriate paperwork, the claimant should always consult with his/her attorney and settlement consultant.

Are structured settlement annuities more likely to be used in certain types of cases?

Structured settlement annuities can be ideally suited for many types of cases, including:

  • Persons with temporary or permanent disabilities;
  • Guardianship cases involving minors or legally incompetent adults;
  • Workers’ compensation cases;
  • Wrongful death cases with surviving spouses and/or children; and
  • Severe injury cases, particularly those that involve long-term needs for medical care, living expenses, and familial financial support.

I’m involved in a lawsuit now. Why should I consider a structured settlement annuity?

The tax-free payments from a structured settlement annuity can:

  • Relieve the financial pressures of medical expenses and living needs;
  • Meet long-term rehabilitation or permanent care facility expenses;
  • Provide for the future costs, such as college tuition, a down payment on a home or mortgage payments, or retirement;
  • Provide enhanced protection of the recovery from creditors; and
  • Provide long-term, tax-advantaged financial security.

What are the advantages of a structured settlement annuity over a lump-sum payment?

A structured settlement annuity has several advantages. First, there is security . A structured settlement annuity provides guaranteed* long-term income, giving the injured claimant the ability to recover without spending time and resources determining investment strategies. Regular payments can be tailored to fit the claimant’s specific needs.

A second advantage is financial . When Congress amended the federal tax code to encourage structured settlement annuities, it explicitly provided that 100% of every structured settlement payment received on account of physical injury or sickness within the meaning of IRC 104(a)(2) would be exempt from federal and state income taxes. While the proceeds from a lump sum injury settlement are income-tax free, if the proceeds are placed in a traditional investment, any interest earned may be taxable.

There are many other benefits as well. For instance, the claimant avoids the risk of mismanaging his or her settlement proceeds. Insurance industry statistics show that nearly 25-30% of all injured parties completely dissipate their judgments or settlements within two months of recovery, and 90% of them spend it all within five years. (Source: The Rutter Group, Ltd. from Flahavan, Rea, Kelly & Tener, “California Practice Guide: Personal Injury” (TRG 1992) Ch. 4.)

Finally, using a structured settlement annuity, an injured party can avoid the risk of outliving his or her recovery by transferring the risk to a reliable, experienced financial institution.

*Guarantees are subject to the claims-paying abilities of the issuing insurance company.

What are the disadvantages of a structured annuity?

There are two main disadvantages of a structured settlement annuity:

  • The periodic payments cannot be borrowed against, deferred, accelerated or modified once they’ve been set up. That’s why it is vitally important for claimants to work with an experienced settlement consultant to determine the best individual strategy.
  • Default risk, meaning the life insurance company that is selected becomes unable to make the payments. However, this risk is small due to the well-capitalized life insurance companies that are used for structured settlement annuities. Settlement proceeds can also be spread among several different life insurance companies to lessen default risk.

What are some of the federal tax rules that make structured settlement annuities beneficial?

In the Periodic Payment Settlement Act of 1982 (P.L. No. 97-473), Congress adopted tax rules to encourage the use of structured settlement annuities for resolving physical injury cases.

Section 104(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code clarifies that the full amount of the structured settlement annuity payments are tax-free to the injured party. By contrast, the investment earnings on a lump sum payment are usually fully taxable.

What is a “qualified assignment”?

The defendant or its insurer may transfer the obligation to make future payments through a “qualified assignment” to a financially secure and experienced institution – a life insurance company, for example.

This process relieves the defendant of further responsibility for the payments and transfers the administration and record-keeping responsibilities. The assignment company specializes in these activities and may offer additional financial security to the claimant.

What other federal tax rules govern the use of structured settlement annuities and qualified assignments?

Internal Revenue Code Section 130 specifies the requirements to establish a qualified assignment, which includes:

  • The assignee assumes the liability from the defendant;
  • Both the injured party (and his/her attorney) and the defendant agree that the payment schedule cannot be “accelerated, deferred, increased or decreased”;
  • The payment stream may be excluded from the recipient’s gross income for tax purposes;
  • The injury must be a physical sickness or injury; and
  • A highly secure funding asset (such as an annuity or U.S. Government obligation) must be used to fund the payments.

Learn More About Structures

Helping attorneys maximize the full value of their fees.

Attorneys now have the option to let their contingency fees be managed by their own personal financial advisor or an established and reputable financial institution that has been designated for the program.

If attorneys want their fees to be invested pursuant to a comprehensive investment plan as of their choosing or with the guidance of their financial advisor — on a fully tax-deferred basis — the compounding opportunity provided by FSP can’t be beat!

Get Started

Learn About Our Comprehensive Solutions

  • First Name: Please enter your first name.
  • Last Name: Please enter your name.
  • Phone This isn't a valid phone number. Please enter your phone number. You entered an invalid number.
  • Email: This isn't a valid email address. Please enter your email address.
  • Are you a new client? Are you a new client? Yes, I am a potential new client No, I'm a current existing client I'm neither Please make a selection.
  • How Can We Help? How Can We Help? Structured Settlement Annuity Fixed-Indexed Annuity Alternative Insurance Solutions Fee Structure Plus® Settlement Plus™ Treasury Funded Structured Settlement™ International Wire Solutions Settlement Management Trusts Special Needs Trusts Pooled Trusts Please make a selection.
  • Message Please enter a message.

26 U.S. Code § 130 - Certain personal injury liability assignments

Any amount received for agreeing to a qualified assignment shall not be included in gross income to the extent that such amount does not exceed the aggregate cost of any qualified funding assets .

A prior section 130 was renumbered section 140 of this title .

1997—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 105–34, § 962(a)(1) , inserted “, or as compensation under any workmen’s compensation act,” after “(whether by suit or agreement)” in introductory provisions.

Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 105–34, § 962(a)(2) , inserted “or the workmen’s compensation claim,” after “agreement,”.

Subsec. (c)(2)(D). Pub. L. 105–34, § 962(a)(3) , substituted “paragraph (1) or (2) of section 104(a)” for “section 104(a)(2)”.

1988—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 100–647 , in par. (2), redesignated subpars. (D) and (E) as (C) and (D), respectively, struck out former subpar. (C) which provided that the assignee does not provide to the recipient of such payments rights against the assignee which are greater than those of a general creditor, and as concluding provisions, inserted at end “The determination for purposes of this chapter of when the recipient is treated as having received any payment with respect to which there has been a qualified assignment shall be made without regard to any provision of such assignment which grants the recipient rights as a creditor greater than those of a general creditor.”

1986—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 99–514 inserted “(in a case involving physical injury or physical sickness)”.

Pub. L. 105–34, title IX, § 962(b) , Aug. 5, 1997 , 111 Stat. 892 , provided that:

Pub. L. 100–647, title VI, § 6079(b)(2) , Nov. 10, 1988 , 102 Stat. 3710 , provided that:

Pub. L. 99–514, title X, § 1002(b) , Oct. 22, 1986 , 100 Stat. 2388 , provided that:

Pub. L. 97–473, title I, § 101(c) , Jan. 14, 1983 , 96 Stat. 2606 , provided that:


The Top 5 Reasons to Consider a Structured Settlement

Lump sum vs. structured settlement: what’s the better choice, qualified vs. non-qualified assignments: what do they mean for settlement proceeds.

what is qualified assignment

Structured Annuities: How They Work

If a claimant decides to utilize a structured settlement, the defendant (or insurance company) “assigns” its obligation to pay to a third-party assignment company. The assignment company then uses the settlement proceeds to purchase a structured settlement annuity that provides regular payments to the claimant based on a schedule previously chosen by the claimant.

When an attorney chooses a fixed annuity as the financial vehicle for their attorney fee deferral , the process is essentially the same: the defendant or insurance company directs the fees to an assignment company, which then uses the funds to purchase an annuity. The attorney receives the annuity payments on a pre-determined schedule.

Qualified Assignments

A “qualified assignment” simply means one that qualifies for income tax exclusion based on the criteria defined in Internal Revenue Code §§104(a)(2) and 130. Settlement proceeds from personal injury, wrongful death, and workers’ compensation cases all fall under this designation. Not only are the settlement proceeds income-tax free, but if placed in a structured settlement annuity, the growth on the proceeds is also income tax-free.

Non-Qualified Assignments

A “non-qualified” assignment is—you guessed it—one that does not qualify for income tax exclusion. However, certain types of non-injury settlements do still have the option for tax-favored treatment . If placed in a structured annuity, taxes are only due on the proceeds as they are received. Rather than getting hit with a large tax bill for a cash lump sum payment, the tax obligation can be spread out over time.

A non-qualified assignment can be used for attorney fee deferrals and for a multitude of legal settlements, including: age discrimination, Americans with Disabilities Act, athletes’ endorsement fees, celebrity endorsement fees, construction defects, divestment, divorce settlements, environmental settlements, legal fee disputes, legal malpractice/professional errors and omissions, race discrimination, sexual harassment, structured sales, and wrongful termination.

Contact Traci Kaas to learn more about your options        

To learn more about financial options for injury and non-injury settlements, contact the experienced team at Traci Kaas today. We can be reached at [email protected] or 800-354-2258.

Related posts

How to reap long-term financial benefits in a taxable damages case: the latest options for settlements outside of the realm of physical injury, physical sickness, or wrongful death, vote for tsaw as california’s #1 structured settlement provider.

404 Not found

What’s the Difference Between Qualified vs. Non-Qualified Settlements?

what is qualified assignment

What is the difference between a “ qualified ” structured settlement and a “ non-qualified ” structured settlement?

When describing a structured settlement, the terms “ qualified ” and “ non-qualified ” generally refer to “ assignments ” and IRC Section 130. The primary tax difference, from a structured settlement recipient’s perspective, is that “ qualified ” structured settlement periodic payments are excluded from income tax whereas “ non-qualified ” structured settlement periodic payments are deferred until actually received.

The term “ qualified assignment ” is defined for tax purposes by IRC Section 130. “ Qualified assignment ” means that a defendant or its liability insurer first gives the claimant a promise to pay structured settlement periodic payments in the future; next transfers that obligation to a substituted obligor pursuant to IRC Section 130; and thereby extinguishes its contractual liability for the obligation it transferred.

IRC Section 130 provides that any amount received by an assignee for assuming a periodic payment obligation may be excluded from the assignee’s gross income so long as seven requirements are satisfied:

  • The tort claim involves personal physical injury or physical sickness;
  • The periodic payments are excludable by the recipient under IRC Section 104(a)(2);
  • The assignor is a party to the suit or agreement which gives rise to the obligation;
  • The periodic payments are fixed and determinable as to amount and time of payment;
  • The periodic payments cannot be accelerated, deferred, increased or decreased by the recipient of the payments;
  • The assignee’s periodic payment obligation is no greater than that of the assignor; and
  • The assignee purchases qualified funding assets (either annuities or U.S. Government obligations) to fund the periodic payment obligations.

Although IRC Section 130 does establish any restrictions on what types of companies or legal entities may serve as assignees, most qualified assignments are funded with life insurance annuities and the assignees are almost always affiliates of the life insurance companies that issue those annuities. For example, Independent Assignment Company serves as the assignment company for all of Independent Life’s qualified structured settlement assignments.

Qualified Assignments can also be made out of an IRC Section 468B  Qualified Settlement Fund (QSF)  and can be utilized to fund structured attorney fees for tort cases that involve personal physical injury or physical sickness – whether or not the claimant decides to structure his or her settlement.

Not all settlements involve tort claims, however, and not all tort claims involve “ physical personal injury or physical sickness ” – which is one of the requirements of IRC Section 130.

A “ non-qualified assignment ” represents the transfer of a structured settlement periodic payment obligation that does not qualify under Section 130 of the Internal Revenue Code. This means the assignee is subject to applicable taxation on the amount it receives from the defendant or liability insurer that assigns the structured settlement periodic payment obligation when it receives money to purchase the annuity(s) to fund the obligation to the claimant.

“ Non-qualified assignments ” therefore allow litigating parties the ability to settle a claim and to fund a periodic payment obligation using a “ Section 130-like ” transfer when neither the claim being settled nor the agreed periodic payments qualify for treatment under IRC 104(a)(1) or Section 104(a)(2). Unlike “ qualified ” structured settlement cases, however, the income taxation on these “ non-qualified ” structured settlement periodic payments are deferred rather than excluded.

There are many types of cases that may be resolved through non-qualified structured settlements such as:

  • Employment disputes
  • Wrongful termination
  • Psychological/emotional harassment
  • Sexual harassment
  • Attorney fees
  • Wrongful incarceration
  • Punitive damages

An assignee of a non-qualified assignment based in the United States will be subject to corporate income tax on any funds paid to it in exchange for assuming assignee obligations. For this reason, companies offering “ non-qualified ” assignments typically utilize non-domestic assignment companies.

Independent Life is one of the few structured settlement annuity providers that offers both “ qualified ” and “ non-qualified ” structured settlements.  For “ non-qualified ” cases, we leverage the strength and market recognition of two non-domestic assignment companies,  Structured Assignments  (SAI) of Barbados and  Kenmare Assignment Company Limited  (Kenmare) of Ireland. By utilizing an offshore assignment company, Independent Life can offer fully customizable payout patterns of fixed and guaranteed payments to settlement planners and their claimants including deferred, lump sum, fixed period or lifetime payments.

Turbocharge your firm with our free resources

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Independent Life Logo

Deep expertise combined with unparalleled access. Market-leading underwriting and pricing, plus turnaround times that redefine industry benchmarks. Innovative solutions that challenge convention. Impressive credentials plus best-in-class partners to back it all up.

  • Testimonials
  • Qualified Settlements
  • Non-Qualified Settlements
  • Attorney Fee Structures
  • Payee Protection Policy
  • iStructure Annuity

P.O. Box 679053 Dallas, Texas 75267-9053

Any discussion of taxes herein is for general informational purposes only and does not purport to be complete or cover every situation. Independent Life, its affiliates, its distributors, and its and their respective representatives do not provide tax, accounting, or legal advice. You should confer with your qualified legal, tax and accounting advisors based on your particular circumstances. All guarantees are obligations of Independent Life Insurance Company.


Call a settlement expert now, non-qualified structured settlements.

Structured Settlements for Taxable Damages and Other Business and Personal Financial Solutions

How Structured Settlements Help Resolve Taxable Damage Lawsuits

What is a non-qualified structured settlement.

A non-qualified structured settlement is a settlement planning option that uses customized streams of periodic payments to receive taxable damages in a tax efficient way. Depending on the nature of the case, all or a portion of the settlement may be structured with a non-qualified structured settlement in a taxable damage case, as well as the taxable portion of a personal injury settlement .  Ask 4structures' John Darer for details.

4structures.com LLC has a variety of fixed and market based non-qualified structured settlement solutions are available, by way of domestic and offshore non-qualified assignments, funding agreements, periodic payment assumption reinsurance and domestic Periodic Payment Agreements (PPAs)A non-qualified structured settlement is an important settlement planning tool for trial lawyers earning contingency fees, plaintiffs whose settlement involves taxable damages and parties to certain types of personal or business financial transactions such as installment sales.

What is a Non-Qualified Assignment? 

A non-qualified assignment is a form of assignment of periodic payment obligations used to (1) resolve legal disputes, or claims for taxable damages and (2) damages that might be tax exempt but that do not fall within the realm of physical injury, physical sickness, wrongful death or workers compensation .  For example, a wrongful incarceration case presents damages that are excludable under IRC 139F, but payments under IRC 139F are not exempt to a qualified assignee under IRC 130, so a non-qualified assignment is used. (3) Other types of lawsuits such as Construction Defect claims might have untaxed elements, but do not fall under IRC 130. (4) A non qualified assignment is also useful where market based structured settlements or investment backed structured settlements are desired as part of a settlement planning allocation.  and (5) Certain index linked settlement planning solutions.   For example, IStructure, the structured settlement industry's first uncapped index linked structured settlement annuity, underwritten by Independent Life Insurance Company, uses an offshore non-qualified assignment companies for both qualified and non qualified cases.  See more by scrolling down below the videos.

In short, a non-qualified assignment, is an important settlement planning tool to help plaintiffs keep more of their taxable damage settlements while the defendants get a complete release. 

There are many different ways to use nonqualified assignments. Scroll down to see an expanded list below . The tax benefits vary with the type of transaction.

When a plaintiff spreads out the payments from a taxable settlement, they may avoid the heavy taxation that accompanies a taxable lump sum payment in the tax year of settlement. One can also avoid losing various government benefits due to a sudden increase in income, and non-qualified assignments are one path to provide more flexibility for investing settlement monies with tax efficiency. 

What Are the Tax Benefits of a Non-Qualified Structured Settlement?

Tax deferral is the primary benefit using a non-qualified structured settlement with non-qualified assignment to plaintiffs when there are taxable damages.

The tax benefits vary by the type of settlement or transaction, but generally one can:

  • Earn interest tax deferred.
  • Earn in interest on the deferred taxes tax deferred.
  • Earn interest on the interest tax deferred.

In addition to the tax benefit, a non-qualified structured settlement, using a non qualified assignment, allows the plaintiff to avail themselves of popular benefits associated with structured settlements, such as stable income for a fixed period of transition or, if desired, over a life time. For each type of application there may be a different nuance and procedure. 4structures.com LLC can help the parties achieve their objectives. If your preferred method of absorbing information is by listening/watching please be sure to check our our videos on non-qualified assignments right below.

 How Does a Non-Qualified Assignment Work?

Generally a non qualified assignment works like this:

  • The parties come to an agreement.
  • The parties then execute a settlement agreement and release (sales agreement in the case of structured installmentsales) that includes periodic payments as part of the consideration.
  • There are fixed annuity, US Treasury,  funding agreement (with non-qualified assignment), Indexed, reinsurance and market based funding options for non qualified assignments.
  • With an annuity or funding agreement funded non qualified assignment, the payments are fixed and determinable as to amounts and payment dates.
  • With a non qualified assignment not funded by an annuity such as a market based option, the periodic payments are set as to payment date. Payment amounts are based on a fixed and determinable or objective formula. For more details please contact us.
  • The non qualified assignee accepts the funds with which it purchases the funding instrument(s), along with the obligation to make the periodic payments to the plaintiff, or payee.

Non Qualified Assignment Options are a Pathway to Settlements of Many Types

Of non-personal injury claims and lawsuits.

  • Non-qualified structured settlement solutions are available through relationships with domestic assignment companies such as MetLife Assignment Company, Inc.
  • Non-qualified structured settlement solutions are also available through offshore non-qualified assignment options include Structured Assignments, SCC, Dominion Assignment Company, Havelet Assignments Ltd and Kenmare Assignments, Ltd and others.  A Barbados-domiciled non qualified assignment company is often used. The U.S.-Barbados tax treaty does not impose a U.S. tax on the lump sum payment received by a Barbados entity or on the investment income earned by a Barbados entity subject to certain conditions. See United States-Barbados Income and Capital Tax Convention, U.S.-Barb., Dec. 31, 1984, 1991-2 C.B. 436. Other non-qualified assignment companies are domiciled in Ireland and Switzerland to support different non qualified assignment solutions.
  • For those comfortable with them, offshore non-qualified assignment companies open up the possibility of a deferred payment mechanism with a fixed structured settlement annuity issued by a Texas based life insurer, an uncapped index linked structured settlement annuity issued by a Texas based life insurer, a private placement annuity, or a customized managed portfolio that could include different asset classes or one managed by the Payee's own money manager.  Contact John Darer for details .  
  • For the most conservative, another non annuity alternative is a non-qualified assignment using Treasury Funded Structured Settlements. United States Treasury obligations are purchased by a trust, administered by a domestic trust company, to back up the assigned periodic payment obligation. At the very least this offers an opportunity to diversify risk.

The assignment in a non-qualified assignment is a general assignment unrelated to qualified assignments under IRC §130 used in personal physical injury, physical sickness, wrongful death and workers compensation settlements.

Periodic Payments from a non-qualified structured settlement are generally fully taxable to the payee in the tax year that each periodic payment is received. The type of tax applied will depend on the transaction.

Damages in wrongful conviction or wrongful imprisonment cases, while excluded under IRC §139F, can be paid using a structured settlement, but must be established using a non-qualified assignment because IRC §130 only covers assignments of damages that are excluded under IRC §104(a)(1) and §104(a)(2), namely damages payable for physical injury, physical sickness, wrongful death or workers compensation.

Note that other cases such as construction defect settlements are nuanced and may include significant non-taxed elements. Be sure to work with settlement consultants that understand these nuances.  See Construction Defect Structured Settlements (4structures.com)

Non-Qualified Structured Settlements with Non-Qualified Assignments Can Be Used on these types of cases 

Examples of cases involving taxable damages or payouts, where settling parties to a lawsuit, claim, dispute, or contract, may benefit from a non-qualified structured settlement using a non-qualified assignment:

A. Employment Law Suits 

  • Age, Gender, Race or Religious Discrimination settlements
  • Disability Buyout settlements
  • Failure to Promote
  • Sexual Harassment/Sexual Assault settlements arising out of actors in Hollywood, Television, Music industry, Universities, Religious Institutions and sexual harassment in employment.
  • Wrongful Termination settlements/ Wrongful Dismissal

B. Corporate/Professional

  • Company paid LTD Settlements
  • Construction Defects settlements
  • Director’s & Officers and related claim settlements
  • Errors & Omissions claim settlements
  • Environmental claims including clean up and monitoring of cleanup sites
  • Funding of Lotteries and Contest Winnings
  • Intellectual Property Claims of Inventors and Copyright and Trademark Holders
  • Lease Buyouts (cash basis taxpayer, other solutions for accrual basis taxpayers)
  • Pre August 5, 1997 Workers' Compensation Claims
  • Punitive Damages Awards

C. Individuals

  • Divorce Settlements |Secure periodic payments of divorce alimony or spousal support and equity distribution2
  • Emotional Distress and Psychological Claims, if not derived from physical injury.
  • Structured Installment Sales (Business and/or Property Sales or Oil & Gas Lease Bonuses)3

D. Miscellaneous

  • Breach of Contract claims
  • Wrongful incarceration /False Arrest (Note that per IRC §139F such damages are exempt, but IRC §139F is not part of IRC §130 so a qualified assignment can't be used).
  • Fraud Claims

Non-Qualified Structured Settlement Benefits for the Plaintiff

The decision to accept distribution by way of a "non-qualified structured settlement" is based upon which form of distribution puts the largest amount of net settlement proceeds into his or her pocket. In a non-qualified tort settlement, the net settlement proceeds represent the gross settlement less attorney fees, liens and taxes. With a lump sum settlement, the plaintiff may end up being taxed at the highest rate. They might be subject to Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). With a non-qualified structured settlement, the plaintiff may be taxed at a lower rate that is applied to comparatively smaller periodic payments, thus producing a smaller tax burden than that created by a lump sum settlement. When used as part of the resolution of a divorce case, a non-qualified structured settlement might be used to fund alimony, or spousal support, and child support, a non-qualified structured settlement provides vital payment assurance to the recipient spouse.

Pay Taxes and Do Better on Your Investments than a Non-Qualified Structured Settlement?

If you think you can do better on investments, consider that if you opt for a lump sum settlement in a taxable damages case, you must first earn enough just to replace what you lost in up-front taxes and return to par with your starting point had you agreed to a structured settlement. Moreover, you have the opportunity to 'have your cake and eat it too' with market based non-qualified structured settlement options.

Non-Qualified Structured Settlement Benefits for the Defendant

Unlike with a qualified structured settlement, the tax deduction here may be taken over time as payments are made to the plaintiff. This may be offset by the following advantages:

  • Tax savings accruing to the Plaintiff may be so great that the Defendant or Payor gains leverage to negotiate a potentially lower settlement cost enabling the parties to bridge the gap in negotiations.
  • Facilitates settlement thereby avoiding trial costs
  • Avoid risk of punitive damages
  • Avoid exposure to runaway jury verdicts
  • Avoid adverse jury finding that could lead to appeal and post appeal expense

We have customized solutions to solve your problems and to accommodate specific cash flow needs and preferences of our clients.

1. While it has many of the same features of a structured settlement, and may commonly be referred to as such, since the introduction of IRC §5891 in 2001 a non-qualified assignment is technically not a structured settlement. What is a structured settlement? 

2.The tax issues of certain aspects of divorce settlements may be different that the standard non-qualified assignment described above. However, it is a extremely viable application. Follow link for more details. If interested in exploring how this strategy can be applied we can discuss with you in conjunction with your professional tax advisor.

3. The documentation for structured installment sales of property or business differs from non-qualified assignments in the other scenarios. However. it is relatively simple. We have all of the necessary forms for you.

#nonqualifiedstructuredsettlementconsultants  #nonqualifiedassignment #nonqualifiedstructuredsettlementexpert  #marketbasedstructuredsettlements  #taxablesettlements  #nonqualifiedstructuredsettlement #attorneyfeedeferrals  #lumpsumsettlement   #Havelet  #assuratrust  #structuredassignments  # AGLassignment

Last updated March 30, 2024

This web site is not endorsed by, directly affiliated with, maintained, authorized, or sponsored by any insurance or other company referenced herein. All products, services and company names are the registered trademarks of their original owners. The use of any trade name or trademark is for identification and reference purposes only and does not imply any association, sponsorship or endorsement between the trademark holder and the operators of this web site.

John Darer 4structures

Non-Qualified Assignments

Have a question about non-qualified structured settlements? I'm here to help.  Call John Darer at 888-325-8640, or fill out this form, press send now and I’ll be in touch.

Contact Us | Top Listed  Structured Settlement Annuity Companies | Ethics | Structured Settlement Watchdog Blog | FAQ | Glossary | Privacy | Terms and Conditions

4structures.com, LLC

 The Structured Settlements and Settlement Planning Company 

43 Harbor Drive, #309 Stamford, CT 06902 USA



New York City (Manhattan, Bronx, Brooklyn, Queens, Staten Island), Westchester(NY), Nassau County (NY) , Suffolk County on Long Island (NY),  Albany County (NY), Oswego County (NY), Steuben County (NY),  Broome County (NY), Onondaga County (NY), Monroe County (NY), Fairfield County (CT),  New Haven County (CT), Hartford County (CT) New London County (CT),  Tolland County (CT),  Litchfield (CT), Middlesex (CT) , Bergen County (NJ),  Middlesex County (NJ), Ocean County (NJ)

Structured Settlement Experts and Settlement Planning Consultants for settlements  from claims or lawsuits  arising out of Aviation accidents, Medical Malpractice, settlements involving Serious Personal Injury, Wrongful Death,  Wrongful Incarceration, Employment,  Civil Rights, Discrimination of any type,  Auto accidents, Motorcycle accidents, Maritime accidents, Workers' Compensation, Product Liability,  Real Estate Liability, Construction Defect claims or lawsuits, Landlord/Tenant,

Property, Attorney Fee Deferrals,  Funding Agreements, Structured Installment Sales, Environmental Liability and Commercial Dispute settlements.

Structured settlements and structured settlement brokerage, settlement planning, Sudden Money®, financial transitionist, funding agreements and insurance related services provided by 4structures.com LLC.   

          Financial Advisory Services provided through  Groove Financial Advisors , LLC, and its service partners.

   Fiduciary services, including the custody and administration of trusts provided via service partners.

            Securities and Insurance Products are NOT Insured by the FDIC, nor by any other Federal or State Government Agency, are NOT a Deposit of and are NOT Guaranteed by a Bank or any Bank Affiliate, and securities MAY lose value.

4structures (USPTO Reg. 4640532) , 4structures.com (USPTO Reg. 4640531) , We Know Structured Settlements (USPTO Reg. 3089738),

Because Certain Sells  (USPTO Reg. 6237309)  and We Know Structured Sales (USPTO Reg. 3490489), are Registered Trademarks of 4structures.com LLC. 

 John Darer is a Registered Trademark of John Darer (USPTO Reg. 4674907)

John Darer California insurance license 0761076

4structures.com LLC  CA license OF19785 d/b/a 4structures Settlement Insurance Agency

4structures' John Darer is a  long time member of the NSSTA

Copyright ©2024 4structures.com LLC

All rights reserved.

structured settlement experts

We use cookies.

A cookie is a piece of data stored by your browser or device that helps websites like this one recognize return visitors. We use cookies to give you the best experience. Some cookies are also necessary for the technical operation of our website. If you continue browsing, you agree to this site’s use of cookies.

Privacy Policy: Our Policies regarding the Collection of Information

  • Subchapter B

Sec. 130. Certain Personal Injury Liability Assignments

More information, 24 / 7 help desk.

  • 1-833-697-9559
  • [email protected]
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Bloomberg.com
  • Accessibility

Should you give job applicants an assignment during the interview process? Be thoughtful about the ask

Employers have to ask themselves whether they are willing to turn off a strong candidate by asking them to do additional work.

Hiring is a time-consuming and expensive endeavor. Companies need candidates who offer the right skills and experience for a given role, and who align with their organization’s vision and mission.

To find the best fit, many companies still lean on a strategy that continues to generate debate : the assignment. Some candidates believe their experience and interviews should give prospective employers enough information to determine whether they will fit the role. Employers have to ask themselves whether they are willing to turn off a strong candidate by asking them to do additional work.

Is the assignment valuable enough to the evaluation process that they cannot move someone forward without it? Sometimes it is—sometimes they help an employer decide between two strong candidates. And if they are necessary, how can employers make assignments fair and equitable for the candidate or candidates?

When done right, assignments help assess practical skills and problem-solving abilities, giving a clearer picture of a candidate beyond what their resume or interview reveals. But employers should be thoughtful about the ask. While it may make sense for roles that require specific technical expertise or creative thinking, it isn’t appropriate for all roles—so assignments should always be given with a clear reason for why they are needed.

Plus, they don’t just benefit the employer. For job seekers, an assignment during the interview process might also help them stand out from the competition. It can also offer a window into what their day-to-day in the new role might entail. Remember that the candidate should be interviewing the company, too. Having a test run of the work they’d be asked to do is a great way to see whether they believe the role is a fit.

However, there is a rift in how people perceive the assignment as part of the interview process. Workers today span many generations, each with unique values and expectations. Whereas older workers often prioritize stability and loyalty, younger millennials and Gen Zers are more focused on flexibility and work well-being, Indeed data shows .

This mindset impacts the amount of time and energy a candidate is willing to devote to each application. After multiple rounds of interviews and prep, taking on an in-depth assignment may feel like a bridge too far—especially if the expectations for the assignment are not clearly communicated ahead of time.

Some candidates are wary of providing free labor to a company that may use their work and not hire them. Hiring managers should be clear about how the work will be used. They may also consider offering compensation if the assignment requires more than a couple hours of someone’s time, or if they plan to use the work without hiring the candidate.

The key for early career candidates in particular is to ensure their time and efforts are respected. This is a win-win for employers: By providing clarity and transparency, they not only elicit the additional information they want from candidates, but they demonstrate that the organization is transparent and fair.

Equity is also imperative: Which candidates are being asked to complete assignments? Is the hiring team consistent in giving out assignments across ages, experience levels, and roles? There should always be a process and clear evaluation criteria in place to ensure fairness.

As we adapt to the rapidly evolving world of work, we must continue to think critically about each step in the hiring process. Candidate assignments can be a valuable tool, but only with appropriate respect for job seekers’ time and contributions.

With the right strategy, we can bridge the gap between generations in the workplace and build a hiring culture that values efficiency, talent, and integrity.

Eoin Driver is the global vice president of talent at Indeed.

More must-read commentary:

  • Fannie Mae  CEO: Beyoncé is right. Climate change has already hit the housing market—and  homeowners aren’t prepared

Congress could soon spell the end of employment arbitration—but it’s not all good news for American workers

  • Outdated laws prevent gig economy workers from getting benefits. This pilot program shows the path forward
  • No, combustion engines won’t be supplanted by electric vehicles—and they’re  critical for sustainable transport

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of  Fortune .

Latest in Commentary

For each death, there are 100 women who come close to dying, which is terrifying and unacceptable in the 21st century.

Birthing mothers’ near-death experience rates are 100 times higher than maternal mortality—and we don’t even know exactly why

Employers have to ask themselves whether they are willing to turn off a strong candidate by asking them to do additional work.

Shark Tank entrepreneur: E-commerce giants are eating my sister’s lunch—and destroying the American Dream

Under the proposed Arbitration Fairness Act, all arbitration agreements would be made after the employment dispute arises. An agreement to arbitrate made at any other time would be automatically unenforceable.

I’m the CTO of Canada’s biggest airport. AI isn’t destroying jobs in aviation—it’s giving us superpowers to improve air travel

Andy Dunn, American entrepreneur and the co-founder of Bonobos Inc

Ask Andy: I’m a founder struggling with mental-health issues. How can I step away from my startup?

Most popular.

what is qualified assignment

Meet the boomers who’d rather spend $100k to renovate their homes than risk the frozen housing market: ‘It would be too hard to purchase anything else’

what is qualified assignment

‘Housing has hit rock bottom’: Top real estate CEO says high home prices are shutting people out of the market

what is qualified assignment

Hedge fund billionaire Ken Griffin says college protests are the result of a ‘cultural revolution’ and Harvard should ’embrace our Western values’

what is qualified assignment

Apple cofounder Steve Wozniak was expelled from the school where he just delivered his commencement speech—’be leaders, not followers’

what is qualified assignment

Bumble’s Whitney Wolfe Herd says your dating ‘AI concierge’ will soon date hundreds of other people’s ‘concierges’ for you

what is qualified assignment

China’s economy is headed for a ‘dead-end,’ and Beijing won’t do anything to stop it, scholar says

  • Clinical Trials

Survival Gains Seen With Assignment to Experimental Group in Cancer Trials

Medically reviewed by Carmen Pope, BPharm . Last updated on April 30, 2024.

By Elana Gotkine HealthDay Reporter

TUESDAY, April 30, 2024 -- For patients with solid tumors , assignment to an experimental group in trials of investigational drugs yields significant survival gains, according to a review published online April 30 in the Annuals of Internal Medicine .

Renata Iskander, from McGill University in Montreal, and colleagues estimated progression-free survival and overall survival advantage of assignment to experimental groups in randomized trials of investigational drugs for six solid tumors. A total of 128 trials with 141 comparisons of a new drug and comparator were included in the sample, with 47,050 patients.

The researchers found that the pooled hazard ratio was 0.80 for progression-free survival, indicating significant benefit for patients in experimental groups and corresponding to a median progression-free survival advantage of 1.25 months. For overall survival, the pooled hazard ratio was 0.92, corresponding to a 1.18-month increase in survival. The absolute risk for a serious adverse event was 29.56 percent for comparator group patients compared with a 7.40 percent increase in risk for patients in experimental groups.

"Our findings provide a reassuring picture of current practices in drug regulation and research and can also help inform decisions about patient referral to trials, research policy, and consent discussions," the authors write.

Abstract/Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

Disclaimer: Statistical data in medical articles provide general trends and do not pertain to individuals. Individual factors can vary greatly. Always seek personalized medical advice for individual healthcare decisions.

' width=

© 2024 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Posted April 2024

Read this next

Symptom burden prevalent in childhood cancer survivors.

THURSDAY, May 9, 2024 -- Symptom burden is prevalent among young childhood cancer survivors, with caregiver anxiety and greater neighborhood deprivation associated with greater...

Most Socially Vulnerable Counties Less Likely to Have Cancer Trials

TUESDAY, May 7, 2024 -- The most socially vulnerable counties are less likely to have any cancer clinical trial, according to a research letter published online May 7 in JAMA...

Mortality Risk Up for Cancer Survivors With Elevated Loneliness

MONDAY, May 6, 2024 -- Cancer survivors with elevated loneliness have a higher mortality risk, according to a study published online April 25 in the Journal of the National...

More news resources

  • FDA Medwatch Drug Alerts
  • Daily MedNews
  • News for Health Professionals
  • New Drug Approvals
  • New Drug Applications
  • Drug Shortages
  • Clinical Trial Results
  • Generic Drug Approvals

Subscribe to our newsletter

Whatever your topic of interest, subscribe to our newsletters to get the best of Drugs.com in your inbox.

Myhibbin (mycophenolate mofetil) is an antimetabolite immunosuppressant used...

Beqvez (fidanacogene elaparvovec-dzkt) is an adeno-associated virus...

Xolremdi (mavorixafor) is a CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) antagonist...

More drug approvals


  1. What is a Qualified Assignment?

    what is qualified assignment

  2. How to Find a Qualified and Professional Assignment Expert

    what is qualified assignment


    what is qualified assignment

  4. Fillable Online Qualified Assignment Release and Pledge Fax Email Print

    what is qualified assignment

  5. Get Immediate Help with Assignment Writing from Qualified Professionals

    what is qualified assignment

  6. Real Assignment Writing: Qualified Assignment Experts

    what is qualified assignment


  1. Assignment -3... Discount, Qualified and valid number...#nxtwave #viral #codingpractice

  2. MGT301 Assignment solution 1 fall semester 2023

  3. Submitting assignments in Google Classroom

  4. The Article Writing Process with Craig Lambert

  5. Assignment (law)

  6. Xavier Onassis Bloomingdale


  1. What is a Qualified Assignment?

    A qualified assignment is a transfer of a contractual obligation to make future periodic payments, which satisfies the requirements of Internal Revenue Code (IRC) §130. In a structured settlement agreement, the original obligor (the defendant, insurance carrier for the defendant, or the trustee of an IRC 468B qualified settlement fund ...

  2. Qualified Assignments 101, What is a Qualified Assignment?

    What is a qualified assignment? A qualified assignment is a transfer of a contractual obligation to make future periodic payments under a settlement agreement, which satisfies the requirements of Internal Revenue Code (IRC) §130. In a structured settlement agreement the original obligor (the defendant, insurance carrier for the defendant, or ...

  3. Asbury Newton

    Asbury Newton | Home

  4. Structured Settlement Annuity FAQs

    The assignment company specializes in these activities and may offer additional financial security to the claimant. What other federal tax rules govern the use of structured settlement annuities and qualified assignments? Internal Revenue CodeSection 130 specifies the requirements to establish a qualified assignment, which includes:

  5. PDF What Lawyers Should Know About Structured Settlements

    The terms "qualified" and "nonqualified" assignments are often used when describing structured settlements. A qualified assignment refers to a plaintiff's structure for tax-free periodic payments for personal physical injury or wrongful death damages. A nonqualified assignment is one where the payments are taxable.

  6. What's A Qualified Assignment

    A qualified assignment is an important step in any structured settlement transaction involving payment of damages for personal physical injury, physical sick...

  7. Qualified Assignment

    An assignment is considered a "qualified assignment" if the settlement proceeds are excluded from income taxes under IRC §104a (2). To be excluded, the proceeds must be for compensatory damages from a case involving physical injury or illness. IRC§130 (c) states that payments can be made in the form of future periodic payments as long as ...

  8. Structured Settlements with Inclusive Qualified Assignments

    A qualified assignment enables the Defendant or Insurer, or QSF trustee, to get a novation, with the qualified assignment company substituted as the obligor of the future periodic payments. See flow chart at the bottom of the post. Steps 2 and 3 show how a qualified assignment fits into the process of establishing a structured settlement.

  9. Definition: qualified assignment from 26 USC § 130(c)

    qualified assignment. For purposes of this section, the term "qualified assignment" means any assignment of a liability to make periodic payments as damages (whether by suit or agreement), or as compensation under any workmen's compensation act, on account of personal injury or sickness (in a case involving physical injury or physical ...

  10. 26 U.S. Code § 130

    (c) Qualified assignment For purposes of this section, the term "qualified assignment" means any assignment of a liability to make periodic payments as damages (whether by suit or agreement), or as compensation under any workmen's compensation act, on account of personal injury or sickness (in a case involving physical injury or physical sickness)—

  11. PDF Structured Settlements and Qualified Assignments

    qualified assignment under Internal Revenue Code section 130. • An assignee who has assumed the defendant's periodic payment obligation under a section 130 qualified assignment must fund such periodic payments to the claimant using an annuity (or U.S. Treasury obligation) under which— (1) the timing and amount of the payments under

  12. Qualified vs. Non-Qualified Assignments: What Do They Mean for

    Qualified Assignments. A "qualified assignment" simply means one that qualifies for income tax exclusion based on the criteria defined in Internal Revenue Code §§104(a)(2) and 130. Settlement proceeds from personal injury, wrongful death, and workers' compensation cases all fall under this designation.

  13. What is a Qualified Assignment? / Non-Qualified Structured Settlements

    A qualified assignment is part of the process on establish a structuring settlement that enables a Defendant, Insurer, instead Qualified Arrangement Fund, to erringen a finish novation of the our periodic payment claim established by suit other license, through a substitution of obligors.

  14. What's the Difference Between Qualified vs. Non-Qualified Settlements

    The primary tax difference, from a structured settlement recipient's perspective, is that " qualified " structured settlement periodic payments are excluded from income tax whereas " non-qualified " structured settlement periodic payments are deferred until actually received. The term " qualified assignment " is defined for tax ...


    How do I become joint qualified? There are several paths to becoming joint qualified. 1) Officers may serve a minimum of 24 months in a Standard-Joint Duty Assignment List (S-JDA) position, and complete JPME I and II to be nominated for full JQO (Joint qualified officer) status. This is the primary method for obtaining JQO status.

  16. Army implements joint duty assignment credit guidance for officers

    The guidelines also included an update to award Army skill identifiers related to joint tour credit and qualifications, namely 3A (Joint Duty Assignment Qualified) and 3L (Joint Qualified Officer).

  17. PDF Internal Revenue Service

    You represent that pursuant to a Qualified Assignment and Release Agreement, Xwill assign to Assignee, and Assignee will assume from Xthe sole responsibility for making periodic payments to Claimant. In addition, Claimant will accept the assignment and release Xfrom its obligation to make periodic payments. X was a party to the lawsuit as

  18. How Structured Settlements Work

    The qualified assignment company owns the "qualified funding asset" and may either make payments itself or may direct that the annuity issuer makes the payments. If an alternative permissible "qualified funding asset" is used, there may be a segregated trust for each claimant that holds the alternative permissible "qualified funding asset".


    Assignor and Assignee wish to effect a "qualified assignment" within the meaning and subject to the conditions of Section 130(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). Now, therefore, in consideration of the foregoing and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows: Assignment and ...

  20. What's the difference between a mortgage assignment and an ...

    An assignment transfers all the original mortgagee's interest under the mortgage or deed of trust to the new bank. Generally, the mortgage or deed of trust is recorded shortly after the mortgagors sign it, and, if the mortgage is subsequently transferred, each assignment is recorded in the county land records.

  21. RFQ-23-701

    The purpose of this RFQ is to initiate a competitive bid process to select a highly qualified On-Call DCBO Firm to assist the STEP Division with compliance oversight for approved project modifications or emergency power plant facility changes for a contract cycle of three years. With the DCBO's assistance, the Compliance Office can ensure that these modifications are completed on schedule ...

  22. HHC 113 Brigade Support Battalion- WPCPT0- E8 First Sergeant Vacancy

    The INARNG is accepting applications for the following vacancy: Unit and UIC: HHC, 113 Brigade Support Battalion / WPCPT0 Location: 401 North Country Club Road, Muncie, IN 47303 MOS: 92A Preferred Qualities / Qualifications (if applicable): None Special Considerations (if applicable): None Who may apply: Any E7/E8 on the current INARNG State First Sergeant Best Qualified (BQ) list. Any ...

  23. What are Non Qualified Structured Settlements and Non Qualified

    A non-qualified assignment is a form of assignment of periodic payment obligations used to (1) resolve legal disputes, or claims for taxable damages and (2) damages that might be tax exempt but that do not fall within the realm of physical injury, physical sickness, wrongful death or workers compensation. For example, a wrongful incarceration ...

  24. Sec. 130. Certain Personal Injury Liability Assignments

    Certain Personal Injury Liability Assignments. I.R.C. § 130 (a) In General —. Any amount received for agreeing to a qualified assignment shall not be included in gross income to the extent that such amount does not exceed the aggregate cost of any qualified funding assets. I.R.C. § 130 (b) Treatment Of Qualified Funding Asset —.

  25. Should you give job applicants assignment during interview process

    However, there is a rift in how people perceive the assignment as part of the interview process. Workers today span many generations, each with unique values and expectations. Whereas older ...

  26. Survival Gains Seen With Assignment to Experimental Group in Cancer

    TUESDAY, April 30, 2024 -- For patients with solid tumors, assignment to an experimental group in trials of investigational drugs yields significant survival gains, according to a review published online April 30 in the Annuals of Internal Medicine. Renata Iskander, from McGill University in Montreal, and colleagues estimated progression-free ...