summative assessment b ed notes

Assessment for learning B.Ed notes | Types of Assessment | Target B.Ed

Assessment for learning is a subject of B.Ed 2nd year. In this article you will get information related to “Assessment for learning” B.Ed notes. This article includes Assessment, purpose of learning, Types of Assessment.

During B.Ed course and after it is very important to have the knowledge of Assessment. Assessment knowledge is required to asses self and others, to get an idea that how things are working and what to do to improve further.

What is Assessment

In Assessment teacher gather, summarize, and interpret data to determine which strategies to implement to further enhance the learning experience.

Assessment are an integral part of teaching and learning.

It requires planning specific ways to use assignments and discussions to discover what students do and do not understand.

The insights we gain by making assessment a regular part of instruction enable us to meet the needs of the students who are eager for more challenges and to provide intervention for those who are struggling.

Read More : What is Evaluation

Purpose of Assessment in Learning

• Assessment of learning
• Assessment for learning

Assessment as learning

Assessment of learning/summative assessment.

Assessment of learning lets the teacher, students and their parents know how well each student has completed the learning tasks and activities.

It provides information about student achievement at the end of a particular task or activity

On that basis teacher plans the further activity.

Assessment for learning/Formative Assessment

Assessment for learning is ongoing assessment that allows teachers to monitor students on a day-to-day basis and modify their teaching based on what the students need to be successful.

This assessment provides students with the timely, specific feedback that they need to make adjustments to their learning.

• Students develop a sense of ownership
• They use self-assessment feedback to make adjustments, improvements and changes to what they understand.
• As students engage in peer and self-assessment, they learn to make sense of information, relate it to prior knowledge and use it for new learning.

Assessment for learning B.Ed notes/ Types of Assessment

Diagnostic assessment.

• It is a kind of pre-assessment which is done before starting a lesson to understand what students already know about the topic.
• It helps in understanding the students’ knowledge, skills, strengths and weaknesses.
• Based on the information collected teacher makes the plan of teaching-learning process.
• Before starting any lesson teacher evaluate the students that how much knowledge students have by asking questions related to topic.

Tools of Diagnostic Assessment

• Oral questions involve the direct verbal interaction between the assessor and the student. The assessor poses questions, and the student responds verbally.
• Oral questions are useful for quickly gauging a student’s understanding, communication skills, and ability to articulate thoughts and ideas.
• Written subjective questions require students to provide detailed, open-ended responses in writing. These questions often involve explanations, opinions, or reflections.
• These questions assess a student’s depth of understanding, critical thinking skills, and ability to express ideas in a written format.
• Written objective questions include formats like multiple-choice, true/false, or matching questions. They have clear and specific correct answers.
• Objective questions are effective for assessing a student’s knowledge, recall abilities, and understanding of specific facts or concepts. They are often used to measure a broad range of content quickly.
• Discussions or debates involve interactive sessions where students engage in a conversation or argument about a specific topic. This can be conducted individually or in groups.
• Discussions and debates assess a student’s ability to analyze, synthesize, and present information. They also evaluate communication skills, critical thinking, and the capacity to articulate and defend opinions.

Formative assessment

Formative assessments help teachers understand student learning while they teach, and adjust their teaching strategies accordingly. The motive behind formative assessments is to screen students learning and give progressing input to teachers and students. It is assessment for learning. If designed appropriately, it helps students identify their strengths and weaknesses, can enable students to improve their self-regulatory skills so that they manage their education in a less haphazard fashion than is commonly found.

It is an ongoing process. It helps in giving feedback to both teachers and students so that they know their mistakes and rectify it. It also provides information to the faculty about the areas students are struggling with so that sufficient support can be put in place.

Formative assessments help you track how student knowledge is growing and changing in your classroom in real-time.

Tools of Formative assessment

• A questionnaire is a set of written or electronic questions designed to gather information, opinions, or feedback from students. It can be used to assess their understanding, preferences, or perceptions.
• Questionnaires in formative assessment provide valuable insights into students’ perspectives, attitudes, and areas where they may need additional support.
• Quizzes are short assessments, often with multiple-choice or short-answer questions, administered during the learning process. They aim to check students’ comprehension of recent material.
• Quizzes in formative assessment help teachers gauge students’ grasp of ongoing lessons, enabling timely adjustments to teaching methods and content.
• A debate involves a structured discussion where students present arguments, counterarguments, and engage in a deliberative exchange of ideas on a specific topic.
• Debates in formative assessment promote critical thinking, public speaking, and the development of persuasive skills. They offer insights into students’ ability to analyze and articulate their viewpoints.
• Essays require students to compose extended written responses, expressing their thoughts, arguments, or reflections on a given topic.
• Essays in formative assessment assess students’ ability to organize and communicate ideas coherently, analyze information, and demonstrate a deep understanding of the subject matter.
• Worksheets are structured activities or exercises that students complete, often involving problems, questions, or tasks related to the lesson.
• Worksheets in formative assessment serve as practical tools to evaluate students’ grasp of concepts and skills. They can offer insights into individual learning progress.
• Lab research involves hands-on experiments or investigations conducted in a laboratory setting, allowing students to apply theoretical knowledge.
• Lab research in formative assessment evaluates students’ practical application of scientific principles, problem-solving abilities, and understanding of experimental procedures.

Summative assessment

Summative assessments measure student progress as an assessment of learning and provide data for you and parents on which you further plan your future strategies.

Summative assessments are given to students toward the finish of an educational period. They are evaluative as opposed to indicative and are utilized to gauge whether a course’s learning goals were met. In contrast to formative appraisals, summative assessments are formal and include clear directions, assumptions and grading to assess student’s learning.

It used to evaluate student learning, skill acquisition, and academic achievement at the conclusion of a defined instructional period—typically at the end of a project, unit, course, semester, program, or school year.

Types of Summative assessment

Standardized tests

Exams created by examiner

End-of-term or midterm exams

Final projects

Final presentations

Ipsative assessments

Ipsative assessments are one of the types of assessment as learning that compares previous results with a second try, motivating students to set goals and improve their skills. 

A two-stage assessment framework helps students learn from their mistakes and motivates them to do better.

In this students evaluate their own work and tries to rectify their errors so that they would not repeat it again. It is a self motivating assessment.

Norm-referenced assessments

Norm-referenced assessments are tests designed to compare an individual to a group of their peers.

It assesses their performance and measures their behavior. This identifies students test is better or worse than others.

It ranks students by comparing with other students of similar group. It determines the lowest and highest performing students.

It also helps in comparing students data with previous year students data to analyze the results.

Criterion-referenced assessments

Criterion-referenced assessments compare the score of an individual student to a learning standard and performance level, independent of other students around them. 

In this students performance is evaluated on the basis of some fixed pre-defined criterion. It is not affected by the performance of other students.

Thank you so much for reading this article.

You can send your valuable feedback, suggestion in the comment box below.

Subscribe our YouTube channel Target B.Ed

What are the types of Assessment

What is diagnostic assessment, leave a comment cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

B.Ed. Notes

Friday 15 april 2016, formative and summative evaluation.

• Summative assessment - Summative assessment is generally carried out at the end of a course or project. In an educational setting, summative assessments are typically used to assign students a course grade.
• Formative assessment - Formative assessment is generally carried out throughout a course or project. Formative assessment, also referred to as "educative assessment," is used to aid learning. In an educational setting, formative assessment might be a teacher (or peer ) or the learner, providing feedback on a student's work , and would not necessarily be used for grading purposes.
• needs assessment determines who needs the program, how great the need is, and what might work to meet the need
• evaluability assessment determines whether an evaluation is feasible and how stakeholders can help shape its usefulness
• structured conceptualization helps stakeholders define the program or technology, the target population, and the possible outcomes
• implementation evaluation monitors the fidelity of the program or technology delivery
• process evaluation investigates the process of delivering the program or technology, including alternative delivery procedures
• It tends to use well defined evaluation designs. [i.e. fixed time and content]
• It provides descriptive analysis. [i.e. in order to give a grade, all the activities done throughout the year are taken into account]
• It tends to stress local effects.
• It is unoppressive and not reactive as far as possible.
• It is positive, tending to stress what students can do rather than what they cannot.
• outcome evaluations investigate whether the program or technology caused demonstrable effects on specifically defined target outcomes
• impact evaluation is broader and assesses the overall or net effects -- intended or unintended -- of the program or technology as a whole
• cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis address questions of efficiency by standardizing outcomes in terms of their dollar costs and values
• secondary analysis reexamines existing data to address new questions or use methods not previously employed
• meta-analysis integrates the outcome estimates from multiple studies to arrive at an overall or summary judgement on an evaluation question

No comments:

Post a comment.

Teaching Commons Conference 2024

Join us for the Teaching Commons Conference 2024 –  Cultivating Connection. Friday, May 10.

Summative Assessment and Feedback

Main navigation.

Summative assessments are given to students at the end of a course and should measure the skills and knowledge a student has gained over the entire instructional period. Summative feedback is aimed at helping students understand how well they have done in meeting the overall learning goals of the course.

Effective summative assessments

Effective summative assessments provide students a structured way to demonstrate that they have met a range of key learning objectives and to receive useful feedback on their overall learning. They should align with the course learning goals and build upon prior formative assessments. These assessments will address how well the student is able to synthesize and connect the elements of learning from the entirety of the course into a holistic understanding and provide an opportunity to provide rich summative feedback.

The value of summative feedback

Summative feedback is essential for students to understand how far they have come in meeting the learning goals of the course, what they need further work on, and what they should study next. This can affect later choices that students make, particularly in contemplating and pursuing their major fields of study. Summative feedback can also influence how students regard themselves and their academic disciplines after graduation.

Use rubrics to provide consistency and transparency

A rubric is a grading guide for evaluating how well students have met a learning outcome. A rubric consists of performance criteria, a rating scale, and indicators for the different rating levels. They are typically in a chart or table format. 

Instructors often use rubrics for both formative and summative feedback to ensure consistency of assessment across different students. Rubrics also can make grading faster and help to create consistency between multiple graders and across assignments.

Students might be given access to the rubric before working on an assignment. No criteria or metric within a summative assessment should come as a surprise to the students. Transparency with students on exactly what is being assessed can help them more effectively demonstrate how much they have learned.  

Types of  summative assessments

Different summative assessments are better suited to measuring different kinds of learning. 

Examinations

Examinations are useful for evaluating student learning in terms of remembering information, and understanding and applying concepts and ideas. However, exams may be less suited to evaluating how well students are able to analyze, evaluate, or create things related to what they've learned.

Presentation

A presentation tasks the student with teaching others what they have learned typically by speaking, presenting visual materials, and interacting with their audience. This can be useful for assessing a student's ability to critically analyze and evaluate a topic or content.

With projects, students will create something, such as a plan, document, artifact, or object, usually over a sustained period of time, that demonstrates skills or understanding of the topic of learning. They are useful for evaluating learning objectives that require high levels of critical thinking, creativity, and coordination. Projects are good opportunities to provide summative feedback because they often build on prior formative assessments and feedback. 

With a portfolio, students create and curate a collection of documents, objects, and artifacts that collectively demonstrate their learning over a wide range of learning goals. Portfolios usually include the student's reflections and metacognitive analysis of their own learning. Portfolios are typically completed over a sustained period of time and are usually done by individual students as opposed to groups. 

Portfolios are particularly useful for evaluating how students' learning, attitudes, beliefs, and creativity grow over the span of the course. The reflective component of portfolios can be a rich form of self-feedback for students. Generally, portfolios tend to be more holistic and are often now done using ePortfolios .

• NAEYC Login
• Member Profile
• Hello Community
• Accreditation Portal
• Online Learning
• Online Store

Popular Searches:   DAP ;  Coping with COVID-19 ;  E-books ;  Anti-Bias Education ;  Online Store

Quick and Easy Notes: Practical Strategies for Busy Teachers

You are here

Accreditation standard 4: assessment of child progress.

Teachers’ knowledge of each child helps them to plan appropriately challenging environments and activities that are tailored to the children’s strengths and needs. Assessing children regularly is essential to build that individualized knowledge—and to identify children who may benefit from more specialized supports. This article offers practical tips for you to engage in systematic, observation-based assessment by keeping anecdotal records on each child.

With so many required assessments, it’s understandable why the word itself may bring up negative feelings for teachers. But understanding the different types of assessment and how you can use them to support your reflection and planning is important.

High-stakes summative assessments are used to gauge children’s learning against a standard or benchmark. Summative assessments are often given at the end of the year and are sometimes used to make important educational decisions about children.

In contrast, formative assessments are ongoing and tend to be based on teachers’ intentional observations of children during specific learning experiences. Many teachers find formative assessments most useful when planning learning experiences, activities, and environments. Your notes about what children are able to do while they engage in real-life tasks such as block building, retelling a story, or climbing on a playground structure provide a wealth of information. Getting started with the quick, easy strategies in this article will help you develop a system for taking useful notes. These notes will ground your teaching decisions and enrich children’s portfolios with examples of their everyday learning.

From notes to records to planning

Anecdotal records are brief notes teachers take as they observe children. The notes document a range of behaviors in areas such as literacy, mathematics, social studies, science, the arts, social and emotional development, and physical development. When recording observations, it’s important to include a concrete description and enough details to inform future teaching strategies. For example, a statement such as “The student was on task” provides no information about the task or the behavior, but a statement like “The student built a tower from colored cubes, creating an AB pattern after looking at a card that showed a similar alternating pattern” provides concrete evidence.

To avoid vague notes, list the associated learning center or subject area and include a specific description of what the child is doing. Of course, time is always a concern in preschool classrooms, and children move quickly from one task to the next! Abbreviations can help capture detailed observations in an efficient way.

For example, instead of stating, “Leah uses inventive spelling,” an anecdotal note could include an abbreviation for the center Leah is playing in and evidence of her inventive spelling: “Leah—DP [dramatic play center]—Wrote grocery list: BACN, aGS, sreL.” (If time is short, Leah’s teacher could also take a photo of Leah’s writing and embed it along with the anecdotal record in Leah’s portfolio.) The evidence in Leah’s note gives insight into the consonants and vowels she is learning and the letter forms she can produce. It also aids the teacher in better understanding Leah’s progress on the continuum toward standard spelling, helping her be more informed about how to support Leah instructionally.

When taking anecdotal records, it’s important to consider word choice. Statements that begin with words like can’t or doesn’t promote a deficit view and do not support future instructional planning. For example, the statement “Logan doesn’t identify all his letters” is very different from “Logan identifies the uppercase letters A, B, G, N, L, T, Z.” Writing what children can do ensures that instructional decisions are grounded in children’s strengths.

Being a Neutral Observer

It’s easy to draw conclusions about a child, especially when you have a history with the family, such as previously teaching a sibling. But no two children are exactly alike, even if they share the same family, community, or culture. Familiarity with children and families may make it easier for you to develop the home–school connection, but it shouldn’t affect how you view or treat a child. Similarly, familiarity with a child’s community or culture may give you helpful context, but it should not lead to making assumptions—positive or negative. Anecdotal records are intended to be neutral observations of a child’s behaviors and interactions, so it’s important to guard against assumptions and biases.

It’s helpful to periodically review your notes to look for examples of bias. To do this, reflect on ways the notes have been written to see if they’re objective. Then look for patterns in the notes to see if subjective comments are linked to any one child or to a group of children. Identifying these patterns can help reveal unconscious assumptions and can assist in writing more objective notes in the future. You can also ask a trusted colleague to review your notes for the same purposes.

Organizing and managing your anecdotal records

Daily anecdotal notes can be quick to write and easy to file and organize. They should also serve as the basis for reflective practice.

Be selective about the behaviors you observe. Having a specific focus can help you pay attention to the most important details during observations, making your anecdotal records more useful for planning or for individualizing future instruction. In addition, it removes the unreasonable expectation of documenting everything for every child every day.

One suggestion for getting started is to divide the class into small groups of about five students. Assign each group a day of the week, and then concentrate on observing just those five students on their assigned day. These daily focus groups are a good way to organize and manage record keeping—and they prevent children from slipping through the cracks. Here are a couple examples of anecdotal record-keeping systems that use daily focus groups.

Post-it notebook

A Post-it notebook uses a form for each child that has six boxes. Teachers often choose to label the boxes Reading, Writing, Math, Science/Social Studies, Social/Emotional, and Other, but the form can be tailored to highlight any content areas or learning domains that you choose! As you make observations, record them on a sticky note and place it on a clipboard. At the end of the day, transfer the notes to the child’s form in the appropriate category. Keep the forms in a three-ring binder with dividers separating each daily focus group, or organize the forms alphabetically.

Index cards

The index card system uses individual index cards color-coded by daily focus group (for example, Monday’s group is assigned green index cards, Tuesday’s group is yellow). Use a binder clip to keep each group’s index cards together, then use the cards throughout the day as you capture and record observations on group members’ individual cards. At the end of the day, file the cards in a box, and then pull the cards for the next day.

You may choose to record literacy behaviors (or any other content area you’re emphasizing) on one side of the card and math behaviors (or another content area) on the other side. Additional cards can be used to capture behaviors in other areas, or a card can be subdivided. Once a child’s card is full, issue a new one. You can also easily take the cards outdoors when observing and recording children’s social interactions on the playground.

Reflecting and using anecdotal notes

A manageable system (like those described earlier) makes it easy to collect the information you need to reflect about what the children are learning. Reflection and anecdotal notes should be tightly linked and should serve as the foundation for instructional planning, helping you think more deeply about children’s growth and learning. Also, reflecting on these records allows you to generate questions and hypotheses that fuel additional observations and anecdotal records.

Adopting a child-centered approach to assessment helps you view students from a strengths-based perspective and match teaching to individuals’ needs. As a result, children receive more tailored instruction as you become better informed about each child’s progress. Reflecting on anecdotal notes can also help you with grouping decisions. Small groups in the classroom should be flexible, and using observational data can assist you in re-forming groups to mirror children’s changing needs.

You may find it useful to write out your reflections and add them to a child’s collection of anecdotal records; as months go by, being able to review both anecdotal notes and timely reflections can be very informative. The information collected from the anecdotal records can also be transferred to more formal assessments, like developmental checklists.

When a challenging situation arises, such as a child not making progress as expected, you can share your notes and reflections with colleagues to generate new ideas about lessons and activities to try. And if a comprehensive or diagnostic assessment seems called for, you have a rich set of records to share with families and specialists.

Anecdotal notes are also a great source of information when meeting with a family. During a family conference, you can use ancecdotal notes to provide the family with concrete examples of their child’s learning and development and give them insight into their child’s school day. The information can also assist in communicating to families the variety of ways they can support their child at home. Additionally, being able to share detailed descriptions of a child’s cognitive and social behaviors during a conference and in other communications can help families better understand their child’s learning trajectory.

Developing a manageable system for taking and using anecdotal notes in the preschool classroom is the foundation for reflective practice and intentional instruction. A well-organized system frees you to focus on the children instead of on the “how to” aspects of record keeping. Notes with clear language, abbreviations, and evidence provide concrete documentation of children’s emerging behaviors, knowledge, and skills, and they also ground your ongoing reflective practices. This type of intentional, supportive assessment contributes to children’s learning and development.

Selected Accreditation Assessment Items Related to Anecdotal Records

4A.1 Show that your written child assessment plan describes how children are assessed (e.g., by whom; in groups or individually; timeline; familiarity with adults involved).

4B.2 If child portfolios are used as an assessment method, show or describe how the results are used to create activities or lesson plans.

4D.1 Show two examples of how information from an observational assessment you conducted was used to create an individualized activity.

4D.7 Show two examples of observational assessments you conducted, in which you noted a child’s strengths, interests, and needs.

Read more about anecdotal records in the longer version of this article, “ Anecdotal Records: Practical Strategies for Taking Meaningful Notes ,” in the July 2019 issue of  Young Children .

Photographs: top of article  © Getty Images; images within article, courtesy of the author. 

Celeste C. Bates , PhD, is an associate professor of literacy education and the director of the Clemson University Reading Recovery and Early Literacy Center, in Clemson, South Carolina.  [email protected] .

Stephanie Madison Schenck , MA, NBCT, is a graduate research assistant and doctoral candidate in the Literacy, Language, and Culture program at Clemson University. A former Spanish teacher, Stephanie studies issues of cultural and linguistic diversity.  [email protected] .

Hayley J. Hoover , MEd, is a graduate research assistant and a doctoral student in the Literacy, Language, and Culture program at Clemson University. Hayley has taught in elementary classrooms in special education and in general education settings.  [email protected] .

Vol. 13, No. 1

Print this article

6 Summative Assessments

Summative assessments are designed to measure and summarize a student’s overall performance in relation to the learning outcomes at the end of a specific period, such as a term or a semester. They are typically used for grading and making decisions about a student’s progress or readiness to move on to the next level.

Examples of summative assessments in higher education include the following:

• Final Exams: In a biology course, a comprehensive final exam is a summative assessment evaluating students’ knowledge of the entire semester’s content.
• Midterm Exams: A midterm exam is a summative assessment evaluating students’ knowledge of the first term’s content.
• Term Papers: In an English literature class, a term paper submitted at the end of the term is a summative assessment that assesses students’ research, analysis, and writing skills.
• Capstone Projects: In an engineering program, a capstone project serves as a summative assessment to demonstrate the students’ mastery of their discipline through a culminating project.

If you would like to complete your Course Design Plan as you go, your assigned instructional designer can help you do so as you work through each part of the Foundations of Course Design experience. Otherwise, you can complete the plan at the end. The following link contains instructions for the second section of the Course Design Plan :

• Section 2: Course Outcomes and Summative Assessments

Foundations of Course Design Copyright © 2024 by Office of Teaching and Learning, Utah Valley University. All Rights Reserved.

Share This Book

Eberly Center

Teaching excellence & educational innovation, what is the difference between formative and summative assessment, formative assessment.

The goal of formative assessment is to monitor student learning to provide ongoing feedback that can be used by instructors to improve their teaching and by students to improve their learning. More specifically, formative assessments:

• help students identify their strengths and weaknesses and target areas that need work
• help faculty recognize where students are struggling and address problems immediately

Formative assessments are generally low stakes , which means that they have low or no point value. Examples of formative assessments include asking students to:

• draw a concept map in class to represent their understanding of a topic
• submit one or two sentences identifying the main point of a lecture
• turn in a research proposal for early feedback

Summative assessment

The goal of summative assessment is to evaluate student learning at the end of an instructional unit by comparing it against some standard or benchmark.

Summative assessments are often high stakes , which means that they have a high point value. Examples of summative assessments include:

• a midterm exam
• a final project
• a senior recital

Information from summative assessments can be used formatively when students or faculty use it to guide their efforts and activities in subsequent courses.

CONTACT US to talk with an Eberly colleague in person!

• Faculty Support
• Graduate Student Support
• Canvas @ Carnegie Mellon
• Quick Links

Continuous And Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE) Notes

Continuous and comprehensive evaluation | cce | continuous and comprehensive evaluation cce notes for b.ed pdf.

Meaning Of Continuous And Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE)

• Objectives Of Continuous And Comprehensive Evaluation
• Features Of CCE
• Functions Of CCE

Objectives Of The Scholastic Assessment

• Features Of Formative Assessment
• Features Of Summative Assessment

Physical Education And Summative Assessment

• Co-Scholastic Assessment
• Grading System

Continuous And Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE) Refers To A System Of School-Based Evaluation Of The Learner That Covers All Aspects Of The Learner Development.

This Development Profile Of The Learner Is Facilitated Through Continuous Assessment Of

• One’s Learning Content,
• The Responses,
• The Nature And Success Of Its Applications And
• The Behavioral Outcomes And Further By The Measurement Of The Holistic Development Through Comprehensive Tools Of Assessment.

The Term ‘Continuous’ Implies That Evaluation Of Diverse Aspects Of Learners’ Growth And Development Is ‘Built Into The Total Teaching-Learning Process And Spread Over The Entire Span Of The Academic Session.

• It Means Regular Assessment Of Every Student.
• It Is More A Process Than An Event.
• Such Assessment Would Help To Diagnose Learning Gaps And Pave The Way For Remedial Measures.

The Second Term 'Comprehensive' Acknowledges To The Fact That Learning Can Be Both Formal And Informal; It Can Occur Through Several Facets Of Activities And Therefore The Learning Profile Of The Learners Needs To Be Assessed In Different Contexts Of Learning Both Formal And Informal.

• Thus It Endorses The Expression Of Learning Through A Variety Of Activities And Hence Their Assessments Through Multiple Tools Of Assessment.
• In Short, It Is Intended To Scan The Entire Learning Map Of The Each Student.

OBJECTIVES OF CCE (CONTINUOUS AND COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION)

• To Help Develop Cognitive, Psychomotor, And Affective Skills
• To Lay Emphasis On Thought Process And De-Emphasize Memorization.
• To Make Evaluation An Integral Part Of Teaching-Learning Process
• To Use Evaluation For Improvement Of Student’s Achievement And Teaching-Learning Strategies On The Basis Of Regular Diagnosis Followed By Remedial Instructions
• To Use Evaluation As A Quality Control Device To Maintain Desired Standard Of Performance
• To Determine Social Utility, Desirability Or Effectiveness Of A Programme And Take Appropriate Decisions About The Learner, The Process Of Learning And The Learning Environment
• To Make The Process Of Teaching And Learning A Learner-Centered Activity

FEATURES OF CONTINUOUS AND COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION (CCE)

CCE Involves The Process Of Assessing Continuously And Comprehensively Through A Variety Of Tools And Techniques.

• Continuous And Comprehensive Evaluation Is Broad-Based And Covers All The Aspects Of Learner’s Growth & Development.
• It Is Non-Threatening And Helps In Reducing Learner’s Stress By Assessing Meaningful Small Portions Of The Curricular Content.

It Is A School-Based Evaluation Consisting Of Both Scholastic And Co-Scholastic Aspects.

• The Scholastic Component Of CCE Conceptualizes Evaluation Of All-Academic Subjects As Spread Over The Entire Span Of The Learning Period (Term).
• It Also Includes Physical Education In Its Scope Of Assessment.

CCE Is Carried Out Through Formative Assessment (FA) And Summative Assessment (SA)

• Formative Assessment Is Criterion Based, Diagnostic, And Remedial. It Offers Feedback To The Teacher And Learners. Descriptive Indicators Are Used To Assess The Achievement Profile Of The Learners In Formative Assessment.
• Summative Assessment Involves Regular And Norm-Based Assessment Of All-Academic Subjects At The End Of A Term
• Co-Scholastic Evaluation Is The Assessment Of Many Informal And Formal Developmental Areas Such As Life Skills, Attitude And Values, Wellness, Service Activities And Work Education

FUNCTIONS OF CONTINUOUS AND COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION (CCE)

• CCE Helps The Teacher To Organize Effective Teaching Strategies .
• Continuous Evaluation Helps In Regular Assessment To The Extent And Degree Of Learner’s Progress.
• Continuous Evaluation Serves To Diagnose Weaknesses And Permits The Teacher To Ascertain An Individual Learner’s Strengths And Weaknesses And Her Needs.
• It Provides Immediate Feedback To The Teacher, Who Can Then Decide Whether A Particular Unit Or Concept Needs A Discussion Again In The Whole Class Or Whether A Few Individuals Are In Need Of Remedial Instruction.
• By Continuous Evaluation, Children Can Know Their Strengths And Weaknesses.
• It Provides The Child A Realistic Self-Assessment Of How He/She Studies.
• It Can Motivate Children To Develop Good Study Habits, To Correct Errors, And To Direct Their Activities Towards The Achievement Of Desired Goals.
• CCE Helps A Learner To Determine The Areas Of Instruction In Where More Emphasis Is Required.
• Continuous And Comprehensive Evaluation Identifies Areas Of Aptitude And Interest.
• It Helps In Identifying Changes In Attitudes And Value Systems
• Continuous And Comprehensive Evaluation Helps In Making Decisions For The Future, Regarding Choice Of Subjects, Courses, And Careers.
• It Provides Information/Reports On The Progress Of Students In Scholastic And Co-Scholastic Areas And Thus Helps In Predicting The Future Success Of The Learner

SCHOLASTIC ASSESSMENT

• Desirable Behavior Related To The Learner’s Knowledge, Understanding, Application, Evaluation, Analysis And The Ability To Apply It In An Unfamiliar Situation.
• To Improve The Teaching-Learning Process.
• Assessment Should Be Both Formative And Summative.

FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT

It Is A Tool Used By The Teacher To Continuously Monitor Student Progress In A Non-Threatening, Supportive Environment.

It Involves

• Regular Descriptive Feedback,
• A Chance For The Student To Reflect On The Performance,
• Take Advice And Improve Upon It.
• It Involves The Students’ Being An Essential Part Of Assessment From Designing Criteria To Assessing Self Or Peers.
• If Used Effectively, It Can Improve Student Performance Tremendously While Raising The Self-Esteem Of The Child And Reducing The Work Load Of The Teacher.
• Formative Assessment Is Carried Out During A Course Of Instruction For Providing Continuous Feedback To Both The Teachers And The Learners.
• It Is Also Carried Out For Taking Decisions Regarding Appropriate Modifications In The Transactional Procedures And Learning Activities.

FEATURES OF FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT

• Formative Assessment Is Diagnostic And Remedial.
• It Makes Provision For Effective Feedback.
• Formative Assessment Provides A Platform For The Active Involvement Of Students In Their Own Learning.
• It Enables Teachers To Adjust Teaching To Take Account Of The Results Of Assessment.
• It Recognizes The Profound Influence Assessment Has On The Motivation And Self-Esteem Of Students, Both Of Which Are Crucial Influences On Learning
• It Recognizes The Need For Students To Be Able To Assess Themselves And Understand How To Improve.
• It Builds On Students’ Prior Knowledge And Experience In Designing What Is Taught.
• It Incorporates Varied Learning Styles To Decide How And What To Teach.
• Formative Assessment Encourages Students To Understand The Criteria That Will Be Used To Judge Their Work.
• It Offers An Opportunity To Students To Improve Their Work After They Get The Feedback
• It Helps Students To Support Their Peer Group And Vice-Versa.

SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT

It Is Carried Out At The End Of A Course Of Learning. It Measures Or „Sums-Up‟ How Much A Student Has Learned From The Course.

It Is Usually A Graded Test, I.e., It Is Marked According To A Scale Or Set Of Grades.

• Assessment That Is Predominantly Of Summative Nature Will Not By Itself Is Able To Yield A Valid Measure Of The Growth And Development Of The Student.
• It, At Best, Certifies The Level Of Achievement Only At A Given Point Of Time.
• The Paper Pencil Tests Are Basically A Onetime Mode Of Assessment And To Exclusively Rely On It To Decide About The Development Of A Student Is Not Only Unfair But Also Unscientific.

Overemphasis On Examination Marks That Focus On Only Scholastic Aspects, In Turn, Makes Student Assume That Assessment Is Different From Learning, Resulting In The „Learn And Forget‟ Syndrome.

Besides Encouraging Unhealthy Competition, The Overemphasis On Summative Assessment System Also Produces Enormous Stress And Anxiety Among The Learners.

FEATURES OF SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT

Summative Assessment Is Assessment Of Learning.

It Is Generally Taken By Students At The End Of A Unit Or Semester To Demonstrate The “Sum” Of What They Have Or Have Not Learned

Summative Assessment Methods Are The Most Traditional Way Of Evaluating Student Work

Physical Education Is An Integral Part Of Scholastic Assessment. It Is Assessed Similar To Core Subjects Such As Tamil, English, Mathematics, Science, And Social Science. The Students Are To Be Assessed In Physical Education Based On The Following Indicators.

• Physical Fitness
• Initiative And Interest
• Proficiency
• Following The Rules Of The Game
• Sportsmanship

CO-SCHOLASTIC ASSESSMENT

The Desirable Behavior Related To Learner’s Life Skills, Attitudes, Interests, Values, Co-Curricular Activities, And Physical Health Are Described As Skills To Be Acquired In Co-Scholastic Domain.

The Process Of Assessing The Students’ Progress In Achieving Objectives Related To Scholastic And Co-Scholastic Domain Is Called Comprehensive Evaluation.

It Has Been Observed That Usually Under The Scholastic Domain Such As Knowledge And Understanding Of The Facts, Concepts, Principles Etc. Of A Subject Are Assessed.

The Co-Scholastic Elements Are Either Altogether Excluded From The Evaluation Process Or They Are Not Given Adequate Attention.

For Making The Evaluation Comprehensive, Both Scholastic And Co-Scholastic Aspects Should Be Given Importance.

Simple And Manageable Means Of Assessment Of Co-Scholastic Aspects Of Growth Must Be Included In The Comprehensive Evaluation Scheme.

GRADING SYSTEM

Grading Is A Process Where In Subjects Or Pupils May Be Classified On The Basis Of Predefined Standards And Aimed At Minimizing Misclassification.

• In Grading, Students Are Categorized Into A Few Ability Groups On The Basis Of Their Performance And Proficiency.
• It Involves The Use Of A Set Of Specialized Symbols Or Numerals Whose Meaning Ought To Be Clearly Defined And Uniformly Understood By The Students, Teachers, Parents, And All Other Stakeholders.
• The Grading Symbols Must Have The Same Meaning For All Who Use Them To Serve The Purpose Of Communication Meaningful And Precise.

The Grading Process Depends On Many Things Such As Nature Of The Subject Matter, The Difficulty Of The Question Paper, The Different Abilities Such As Intellectual, Physical, Emotional, Personal, Social Etc Assessed By Tools Of Evaluation And Precision Is Required In The Evaluation Program.

One Of The Major Objectives Of The School Education Is To Prepare A Student For Life. For Realizing This Objective CCE ( CONTINUOUS AND COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION) Stress On The Development Of Scholastic And Co-Scholastic Areas Of The Child.

CCE Aims At Creating Good Citizens Possessing Sound Health, Appropriate Skills, And Desirable Qualities Besides Excellence. For That, It Is Important To Equip Teachers With the Required Skills And Competencies Of Evaluation Well With The Teaching-Learning Process.

The CCE System Demands Continuous And Comprehensive Assessment Of Both Scholastic And Co-Scholastic Aspects Of The Child. Assessment In Co-Scholastic Areas Needs To Be Done Systematically And Methodologically By Using Specific Observable And Measurable Indicators And Finding Grade Points Resulting Into Grades.

• Evaluation, Statistics, And Research In Education Dr.K.Rajammal Rajagopal
• Shantha Publishers
• Assessment Of Learning Aslam
• Everest Publications
• Evaluation In Education ES -333
• IGNOU Study Material
• Continuous And Comprehensive Evaluation Manual For Teachers On School-Based Assessment CBSE, India
• Continuous And Comprehensive Evaluation General Guidelines - Teachers’ Manual
• State Council Of Educational Research And Training, Chennai

Continuous And Comprehensive Evaluation Notes For B.Ed in English

Continuous and comprehensive evaluation study material, continuous and comprehensive evaluation meaning, continuous and comprehensive evaluation pdf, continuous and comprehensive evaluation ppt, continuous and comprehensive evaluation project, continuous and comprehensive evaluation assignment, continuous and comprehensive evaluation practical file, continuous and comprehensive evaluation, cce notes for b.ed in english, cce study material, cce meaning, definition, nature, scope, types, features, characteristics, objectives, cce project, cce assignment.

CCE Practical File/Study Material and Exam Notes for B.Ed and D.El.Ed

Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation is a system of school-based assessment which covers all aspects of a student’s development. The CCE takes care of the assessment of the all-around development of the child’s personality. It includes assessment in both scholastic and co-scholastic aspects in student’s growth. Students will be evaluated both in scholastic and non - scholastic areas as per the guidelines and norms of the CBSE.

In teacher training programs like B.Ed, DELED, DED, and BTC CCE (continuous and comprehensive evaluation is included). Here you can download CCE continuous and comprehensive evaluation practical file material, study examination notes, and pdf E-books free for BEd and DELED in both Hindi and English medium. these are the CCE pdfs of CBSE, NCERT, NIOS, Delhi government, and Haryana government official websites. Those student teachers pursuing a diploma in elementary education DELED and DEGREE in education B.Ed of any semester or year must know about CCE continuous and comprehensive evaluation system of primary, secondary, senior secondary, and higher secondary schools. So that they can evaluate the students annually, yearly, half-yearly, monthly, and weekly performance in academics and examinations. The links to download these BEd, DED files, and notes and given below. Just click on the links to download cce continuous and comprehensive evaluation files.

• CCE short exam notes pdf
• CCE File in Hindi and English
• CCE NCERT BOOK
• CCE NCERT HINDI
• CCE NIOS ENGLISH
• CCE Evaluation English
• सतत एवं मूल्यांकन सामग्री (प्राथमिक सत्र ) (ncert)
• प्राथमिकस्तर पर सतत एवं मूल्यांकन लागु करने के लिए अध्यापक संदर्शिका (विद्यालय शिक्षा विभाग हरियाणा )

Reference: www.cbse.nic.in, mooc.nios.ac.in, certharyana.gov.in, delhi.gov.in

BED Deled first and second year CCE continuous and comprehensive evaluation pdf practical files, books, and notes free download in Hindi and English

Similar Posts

💁Hello Friends, If You Want To Contribute To Help Other Students To Find All The Stuff At A Single Place, So Feel Free To Send Us Your Notes, Assignments, Study Material, Files, Lesson Plan, Paper, PDF Or PPT Etc. - 👉 Upload Here

अगर आप हमारे पाठकों और अन्य छात्रों की मदद करना चाहते हैं। तो बेझिझक अपने नोट्स, असाइनमेंट, अध्ययन सामग्री, फाइलें, पाठ योजना, पेपर, पीडीएफ या पीपीटी आदि हमें भेज सकते है| - 👉 Share Now

If You Like This Article, Then Please Share It With Your Friends Also.

Bcoz Sharing Is Caring 😃

• [1000+] B.Ed Lesson Plans
• B.Ed Practical Files and Assignments
• B.Ed Books and Notes PDF
• B.Ed Files Pics and Charts Collection
• BEd Model / Sample and Previous Year Papers
• All Subject Lesson Plans for Teachers

Please Share your views and suggestions in the comment box

can u help me to save this file

Post a Comment

Contact form.

Types of Rubrics as an Assessment Tool B.ED Notes

Back to: Assessment for Learning

A rubric can be considered as an assessment tool that indicates clearly achievement criteria across all the components of any kind of student work, from written to oral to visual. It can be used for marking assignments, class participation, or overall grades. 

Brookhart defines rubric as,

“coherent set of criteria for students’ work that includes descriptions of levels of performance quality on the criteria.”

Types of Rubrics

There are two types of rubrics which are as follows:

• analytical.

Holistic Rubrics

It refers to single criteria rubrics that are one-dimensional in nature. These rubrics are used for assessing the overall achievement of the participants on an activity or item according to the predefined achievement levels.  The descriptions of the performance are usually written in full sentences and paragraphs.

Analytic Rubrics

This type of rubrics refers to two-dimensional rubrics with columns representing levels of achievement and rows representing assessment criteria. It helps you in assessing the achievements of participants using a single rubric but based on multiple criteria. Different weights or value can be assigned to different criteria and overall achievement can be included by totaling the criteria. It is mostly written in a table form.

Characteristics of Rubrics as Tools of Assessment

The characteristics of rubrics as tools of assessment are as follows: 

Evaluative Criteria

It is used to represent the dimensions based on which the evaluation of the student’s activity or artifact occurs. 

Quality Definitions

It consists of qualitative descriptions which helps in differentiating the performance of students for a given criterion across a continuum.

Scoring Strategy

The scoring strategy involves the articulation of the process of converting the student performance’s qualitative evaluations related to reach criterion into an overall judgment. 

Stevens & Levi, 2005 , state,

“As a grading tool, rubrics can address these and other issues related to assessment: they reduce grading time; they increase objectivity and reduce subjectivity; they convey timely feedback to students and they improve students’ ability to include required elements of an assignment.

• Understanding Summative Evaluation: Definition, Benefits, and Best Practices
• Learning Center

This article provides an overview of summative evaluation, including its definition, benefits, and best practices. Discover how summative evaluation can help you assess the effectiveness of your program or project, identify areas for improvement, and promote evidence-based decision-making. Learn about best practices for conducting summative evaluation and how to address common challenges and limitations.

Table of Contents

What is Summative Evaluation and Why is it Important?

Summative evaluation: purpose, goals, benefits of summative evaluation, types of summative evaluation, best practices for conducting summative evaluation, examples of summative evaluation in practice, examples of summative evaluation questions, challenges and limitations of summative evaluation, ensuring ethical considerations in summative evaluation, future directions for summative evaluation research and practice.

Ready to optimize your resume for a better career? Try Our FREE Resume Scanner!

Optimize your resume for ATS with formatting, keywords, and quantified experience.

• Compare job description keywords with your resume.
• Tailor your resume to match as many keywords as possible.
• Grab the recruiter’s attention with a standout resume.

Summative evaluation is a type of evaluation that is conducted at the end of a program or project, with the goal of assessing its overall effectiveness. The primary focus of summative evaluation is to determine whether the program or project achieved its goals and objectives. Summative evaluation is often used to inform decisions about future program or project development, as well as to determine whether or not to continue funding a particular program or project.

Summative evaluation is important for several reasons. First, it provides a comprehensive assessment of the overall effectiveness of a program or project, which can help to inform decisions about future development and implementation. Second, it can help to identify areas where improvements can be made in program delivery, such as in program design or implementation. Third, it can help to determine whether the program or project is a worthwhile investment, and whether it is meeting the needs of stakeholders.

In addition to these benefits, summative evaluation can also help to promote accountability and transparency in program or project implementation. By conducting a thorough evaluation of the program or project, stakeholders can be assured that their resources are being used effectively and that the program or project is achieving its intended outcomes.

Summative evaluation plays an important role in assessing the overall effectiveness of a program or project, and in informing decisions about future development and implementation. It is an essential tool for promoting accountability, transparency, and effectiveness in program or project implementation.

Summative evaluation is an approach to program evaluation that is conducted at the end of a program or project, with the goal of assessing its overall effectiveness. Here are some of the key purposes and goals of summative evaluation.

Purpose of Summative Evaluation

• Assess effectiveness: Summative evaluation is focused on assessing the overall effectiveness of a program or project in achieving its intended goals and objectives.
• Determine impact: Summative evaluation is used to determine the impact of a program or project on its intended audience or stakeholders, as well as on the broader community or environment.
• Inform decision-making: Summative evaluation is used to inform decision-making about future program or project development, as well as resource allocation.

Goals of Summative Evaluation

• Measure program outcomes: Summative evaluation is used to measure program outcomes, including the extent to which the program achieved its intended goals and objectives, and the impact of the program on its intended audience or stakeholders.
• Assess program effectiveness: Summative evaluation is used to assess the overall effectiveness of a program, by comparing program outcomes to its intended goals and objectives, as well as to similar programs or initiatives.
• Inform program improvement: Summative evaluation is used to inform program improvement by identifying areas where the program could be modified or improved in order to enhance its effectiveness.

Summative evaluation is a critical tool for assessing the overall effectiveness and impact of programs or projects, and for informing decision-making about future program or project development. By measuring program outcomes, assessing program effectiveness, and identifying areas for program improvement, summative evaluation can help to ensure that programs and projects are meeting their intended goals and making a positive impact on their intended audience or stakeholders.

Summative evaluation is an important tool for assessing the overall effectiveness of a program or project. Here are some of the benefits of conducting summative evaluation:

• Provides a Comprehensive Assessment: Summative evaluation provides a comprehensive assessment of the overall effectiveness of a program or project, which can help to inform decisions about future development and implementation.
• Identifies Areas for Improvement : Summative evaluation can help to identify areas where improvements can be made in program delivery, such as in program design or implementation.
• Promotes Accountability and Transparency: Summative evaluation can help to promote accountability and transparency in program or project implementation, by ensuring that resources are being used effectively and that the program or project is achieving its intended outcomes.
• Supports Evidence-Based Decision-Making : Summative evaluation provides evidence-based data and insights that can inform decisions about future development and implementation.
• Demonstrates Impact : Summative evaluation can help to demonstrate the impact of a program or project, which can be useful for securing funding or support for future initiatives.
• Increases Stakeholder Engagement : Summative evaluation can increase stakeholder engagement and ownership of the program or project being evaluated, by involving stakeholders in the evaluation process and soliciting their feedback.

Summative evaluation is an essential tool for assessing the overall effectiveness of a program or project, and for informing decisions about future development and implementation. It provides a comprehensive assessment of the program or project, identifies areas for improvement, promotes accountability and transparency, and supports evidence-based decision-making.

There are different types of summative evaluation that can be used to assess the overall effectiveness of a program or project. Here are some of the most common types of summative evaluation:

• Outcome Evaluation: This type of evaluation focuses on the outcomes or results of the program or project, such as changes in behavior, knowledge, or attitudes. Outcome evaluation is often used to determine the effectiveness of an intervention or program in achieving its intended outcomes.
• Impact Evaluation: This type of evaluation focuses on the broader impact of the program or project, such as changes in the community or society. Impact evaluation is often used to assess the overall impact of a program or project on the target population or community.
• Cost-Benefit Evaluation: This type of evaluation focuses on the costs and benefits of the program or project, and is often used to determine whether the program or project is a worthwhile investment. Cost-benefit evaluation can help to determine whether the benefits of the program or project outweigh the costs.

The type of summative evaluation used will depend on the specific goals and objectives of the program or project being evaluated, as well as the resources and data available for evaluation. Each type of summative evaluation serves a specific purpose in assessing the overall effectiveness of a program or project, and should be tailored to the specific needs of the program or project being evaluated.

Conducting a successful summative evaluation requires careful planning and attention to best practices. Here are some best practices for conducting summative evaluation:

• Clearly Define Goals and Objectives : Before conducting a summative evaluation, it is important to clearly define the goals and objectives of the program or project being evaluated. This will help to ensure that the evaluation is focused and relevant to the needs of stakeholders.
• Use Valid and Reliable Measures: The measures used in a summative evaluation should be valid and reliable, in order to ensure that the results are accurate and meaningful. This may involve selecting or developing appropriate evaluation tools, such as surveys or assessments, and ensuring that they are properly administered.
• Collect Data from Multiple Sources : Data for a summative evaluation should be collected from multiple sources, in order to ensure that the results are comprehensive and representative. This may involve collecting data from program participants, stakeholders, and other relevant sources.
• Analyze and Interpret Results : Once the data has been collected, it is important to analyze and interpret the results in order to determine the overall effectiveness of the program or project. This may involve using statistical analysis or other techniques to identify patterns or trends in the data.
• Use Results to Inform Future Development : The results of a summative evaluation should be used to inform future program or project development, in order to improve the effectiveness of the program or project. This may involve making changes to program design or delivery, or identifying areas where additional resources or support may be needed.

Conducting a successful summative evaluation requires careful planning, attention to detail, and a commitment to using the results to inform future development and improvement. By following best practices for conducting summative evaluation, stakeholders can ensure that their programs and projects are effective and relevant to the needs of their communities.

Summative evaluation is an important tool for assessing the overall effectiveness of a program or project. Here are some examples of summative evaluation in practice:

• Educational Programs : A school district may conduct a summative evaluation of a new educational program, such as a reading intervention program. The evaluation may focus on the program’s outcomes, such as improvements in reading skills, and may involve collecting data from multiple sources, such as teacher assessments, student tests, and parent surveys.
• Health Interventions : A public health agency may conduct a summative evaluation of a health intervention, such as a vaccination campaign. The evaluation may focus on the impact of the intervention on health outcomes, such as reductions in disease incidence, and may involve collecting data from multiple sources, such as healthcare providers, patients, and community members.
• Social Service Programs: A non-profit organization may conduct a summative evaluation of a social service program, such as a job training program for disadvantaged youth. The evaluation may focus on the impact of the program on outcomes such as employment rates and job retention, and may involve collecting data from multiple sources, such as program participants, employers, and community partners.
• Technology Products : A software company may conduct a summative evaluation of a new technology product, such as a mobile app. The evaluation may focus on user satisfaction and effectiveness, and may involve collecting data from multiple sources, such as user surveys, user testing, and usage data.
• Environmental Programs : An environmental organization may conduct a summative evaluation of a conservation program, such as a land protection initiative. The evaluation may focus on the impact of the program on environmental outcomes, such as the protection of natural habitats or the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, and may involve collecting data from multiple sources, such as program participants, community members, and scientific data.

Summative evaluation can be used in a wide range of programs and initiatives to assess their overall effectiveness and inform future development and improvement.

Summative evaluation is an important tool for assessing the overall effectiveness of a program or project. Here are some examples of summative evaluation questions that can be used to guide the evaluation process:

• Did the program or project achieve its intended outcomes and goals?
• To what extent did the program or project meet the needs of its intended audience or stakeholders?
• What were the most effective components of the program or project, and what areas could be improved?
• What impact did the program or project have on its intended audience or stakeholders?
• Was the program or project implemented effectively, and were resources used efficiently?
• What unintended consequences or challenges arose during the program or project, and how were they addressed?
• How does the program or project compare to similar initiatives or interventions in terms of effectiveness and impact?
• What were the costs and benefits of the program or project, and were they reasonable given the outcomes achieved?
• What lessons can be learned from the program or project, and how can they inform future development and improvement?

The questions asked during a summative evaluation are designed to provide a comprehensive understanding of the impact and effectiveness of the program or project. The answers to these questions can inform future programming and resource allocation decisions and help to identify areas for improvement. Overall, summative evaluation is an essential tool for assessing the overall impact and effectiveness of a program or project.

Summative evaluation is an important tool for assessing the overall effectiveness of a program or project. However, there are several challenges and limitations that should be considered when conducting summative evaluation. Here are some of the most common challenges and limitations of summative evaluation:

• Timing: Summative evaluation is typically conducted at the end of a program or project, which may limit the ability to make real-time improvements during the implementation phase.
• Resource Constraints: Summative evaluation can be resource-intensive, requiring significant time, effort, and funding to collect and analyze data.
• Bias: The data collected during summative evaluation may be subject to bias, such as social desirability bias, which can affect the accuracy and reliability of the evaluation results.
• Difficulty of Measurement: Some outcomes of a program or project may be difficult to measure, which can make it challenging to assess the overall effectiveness of the program or project.
• Difficulty of Generalization: The results of a summative evaluation may not be generalizable to other contexts or settings, which can limit the broader applicability of the evaluation findings.
• Limited Stakeholder Involvement: Summative evaluation may not involve all stakeholders, which can limit the representation of diverse perspectives and lead to incomplete evaluation findings.
• Limited Focus on Process: Summative evaluation typically focuses on outcomes and impact, which may not provide a full understanding of the program or project’s implementation process and effectiveness.

These challenges and limitations of summative evaluation should be considered when planning and conducting evaluations. By understanding these limitations, evaluators can work to mitigate potential biases and limitations and ensure that the evaluation results are accurate, reliable, and useful for program or project improvement.

While conducting summative evaluation, it’s imperative to uphold ethical principles to ensure the integrity and fairness of the evaluation process. Ethical considerations are essential for maintaining trust with stakeholders, respecting the rights of participants, and safeguarding the integrity of evaluation findings. Here are key ethical considerations to integrate into summative evaluation:

Informed Consent: Ensure that participants are fully informed about the purpose, procedures, risks, and benefits of the evaluation before consenting to participate. Provide clear and accessible information, allowing participants to make voluntary and informed decisions about their involvement.

Confidentiality and Privacy: Safeguard the confidentiality and privacy of participants’ information throughout the evaluation process. Implement secure data management practices, anonymize data whenever possible, and only share findings in aggregate or de-identified formats to protect participants’ identities.

Respect for Diversity and Inclusion: Respect and embrace the diversity of participants, acknowledging their unique perspectives, backgrounds, and experiences. Ensure that evaluation methods are culturally sensitive and inclusive, avoiding biases and stereotypes, and accommodating diverse communication styles and preferences.

Avoiding Harm: Take proactive measures to minimize the risk of harm to participants and stakeholders throughout the evaluation process. Anticipate potential risks and vulnerabilities, mitigate them through appropriate safeguards and protocols, and prioritize the well-being and dignity of all involved.

Beneficence and Non-Maleficence: Strive to maximize the benefits of the evaluation while minimizing any potential harm or adverse effects. Ensure that evaluation activities contribute to the improvement of programs or projects, enhance stakeholders’ understanding and decision-making, and do not cause undue stress, discomfort, or harm.

Transparency and Accountability: Maintain transparency and accountability in all aspects of the evaluation, including its design, implementation, analysis, and reporting. Clearly communicate the evaluation’s objectives, methodologies, findings, and limitations, allowing stakeholders to assess its credibility and relevance.

Equitable Participation and Representation: Foster equitable participation and representation of diverse stakeholders throughout the evaluation process. Engage stakeholders in meaningful ways, valuing their input, perspectives, and contributions, and address power differentials to ensure inclusive decision-making and ownership of evaluation outcomes.

Continuous Reflection and Improvement: Continuously reflect on ethical considerations throughout the evaluation process, remaining responsive to emerging issues, challenges, and ethical dilemmas. Seek feedback from stakeholders, engage in dialogue about ethical concerns, and adapt evaluation approaches accordingly to uphold ethical standards.

By integrating these ethical considerations into summative evaluation practices, evaluators can uphold principles of integrity, respect, fairness, and accountability, promoting trust, credibility, and meaningful impact in program assessment and improvement. Ethical evaluation practices not only ensure compliance with professional standards and legal requirements but also uphold fundamental values of respect for human dignity, justice, and social responsibility.

Summative evaluation is an important tool for assessing the overall effectiveness of a program or project. Here are some potential future directions for summative evaluation research and practice:

• Incorporating Technology: Advances in technology have the potential to improve the efficiency and accuracy of summative evaluation. Future research could explore the use of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and other technologies to streamline data collection and analysis.
• Enhancing Stakeholder Engagement: Future research could explore ways to enhance stakeholder engagement in summative evaluation, such as by involving stakeholders in the evaluation planning and implementation process.
• Increasing Use of Mixed Methods: Future research could explore the use of mixed methods approaches in summative evaluation, such as combining qualitative and quantitative methods to gain a more comprehensive understanding of program or project effectiveness.
• Addressing Equity and Inclusion: Future research could focus on addressing issues of equity and inclusion in summative evaluation, such as by ensuring that evaluation methods are sensitive to the needs and experiences of diverse stakeholders.
• Addressing Complexity: Many programs and projects operate in complex and dynamic environments. Future research could explore ways to address this complexity in summative evaluation, such as by developing more adaptive and flexible evaluation methods.
• Improving Integration with Formative Evaluation: Summative evaluation is typically conducted after a program or project has been completed, while formative evaluation is conducted during program or project implementation. Future research could explore ways to better integrate summative and formative evaluation, in order to promote continuous program improvement.

These future directions for summative evaluation research and practice have the potential to improve the effectiveness and relevance of summative evaluation, and to enhance its value as a tool for program and project assessment and improvement.

David Ndiyamba

Quite comprehensive Thank you

Fation Luli

Leave a comment cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published.

How strong is my Resume?

Only 2% of resumes land interviews.

Land a better, higher-paying career

Recommended Jobs

Request for information – collecting information on potential partners for local works evaluation.

• Washington, USA

Principal Field Monitors

Technical expert (health, wash, nutrition, education, child protection, hiv/aids, supplies), survey expert, data analyst, team leader, usaid-bha performance evaluation consultant.

• International Rescue Committee

Manager II, Institutional Support Program Implementation

Senior human resources associate, energy and environment analyst – usaid bureau for latin america and the caribbean, intern- international project and proposal support, ispi, deputy chief of party, senior accounting associate, monitoring & evaluation technical specialist (indicators & data).

• Washington, DC, USA
• United States Department of Treasury, Office of Technical Assistance

Project Assistant

Services you might be interested in, useful guides ....

How to Create a Strong Resume

Monitoring And Evaluation Specialist Resume

Resume Length for the International Development Sector

Types of Evaluation

Monitoring, Evaluation, Accountability, and Learning (MEAL)

LAND A JOB REFERRAL IN 2 WEEKS (NO ONLINE APPS!)

Sign Up & To Get My Free Referral Toolkit Now:

What are The Advantages and Disadvantages of Summative Assessment

Back to: Measurement and Evaluation in Education B.ed Notes, M.A Notes, IGNOU Notes and Graduation Notes

Advantages of Summative Assessment

There are various advantages to using a summative evaluation in the academic setting. Some of them are listed below.

• To determine if pupils have understood: A summative evaluation employs specific evaluation procedures such as assignments, examinations, projects, and so on. The instructor can tell if the pupils have learnt and grasped the material in several ways. The manner an assignment is used determines whether it is summative or formative, not the design of the exam, assignment, or self-evaluation. This allows the instructor to determine how well the pupils comprehended the topic that was delivered.
• They determine achievement: Summative assessments are often completed at the end of any teaching period. As a result, rather than being described as diagnostic, summative evaluation is seen as evaluative. The underlying significance is that this evaluation is utilised to determine learning development and achievement. They are also used to assess the efficacy of educational initiatives. Another significant advantage is that they are used to track progress toward objectives and goals. Furthermore, summative assessment is used to make course placement decisions.
• They create academic records: Summative evaluation findings are recorded as scores or grades in students’ academic records. 1 They can take the form of test results, letter grades, or report cards and be utilised in the college admissions process. Summative assessment is a significant element in the grading system for many schools, districts, and courses.
• Provides opportunity: The availability of summative evaluation is a motivation since it supports individuals and allows them to create a learning environment. This is a learning evaluation that is based on the outcome.
• Boosts individuals: When the summative evaluation result is good, it is termed a boosting factor. This form of review boosts confidence and also serves as a springboard for specific behaviour changes at the workplace or institution.
• Weak areas can be identified: Using summative assessment findings, trainers and instructors can identify weak areas where outcomes are consistently poor. Alternative approaches can be used to enhance the outcomes in this manner. New training can be implemented for future events with the goal of success.
• Training success may be measured: This form of evaluation aids in measuring the success of training techniques and programmes. They are compared and rated to others.
• They are evaluation tools: Summative evaluations are considered evaluation tools because they can evaluate the usefulness of any programme, they work towards the improvement of the school or institution, they aid in curriculum alignment, and they assist students in being placed in the appropriate programmes. They are quite helpful since they provide a lot of information in the classroom. Another significant advantage of summative evaluation is that it assists in making instructional changes and interventions during the learning process.
• Summative design: The summative design is used as an assessment approach in instructional design. Summative assessment provides useful information depending on the effectiveness of the intervention. During the conclusion, the value or worth of the intervention is assessed using summative evaluation.
• Measures educator performance: The supervisor might assess the educational staff or the teacher using summative evaluation. This assessment may be used to assess the performance of all teachers and instructors. Summative assessment meets the school’s demand for teacher accountability. The evaluation is carried out using a form that includes a checklist and a few brief narratives. Professionalism, classroom atmosphere, planning, instruction, and preparation are all evaluated.

CCE Notes [Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation Assignment]

CCE Notes Assignment : Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE) is an educational assessment system that focuses on evaluating a student’s performance on a regular basis throughout the academic year. It is a departure from the traditional examination-oriented approach and aims to provide a holistic understanding of a student’s abilities and progress. In this article, we will explore the key aspects of CCE and its benefits in the educational landscape.

INTRODUCTION (CCE)

Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE) is an educational framework that aims to assess a student’s progress and learning outcomes continuously throughout their academic journey. It is a student-centric approach that goes beyond the conventional examination system, emphasizing a comprehensive evaluation of a student’s knowledge, skills, and overall development.

CCE aims to provide a more accurate and holistic understanding of a student’s abilities, allowing educators to tailor instruction accordingly.

TYPES OF CCE

CCE consists of two main components:

• Formative Assessment (FA) and,
• Summative Assessment (SA).

Let’s know about them:

1. FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT (FA)

Formative Assessment is an ongoing process that takes place during regular classroom activities. It involves various methods such as class discussions, quizzes, projects, presentations, and assignments.

The primary purpose of formative assessment is to monitor and provide feedback on a student’s progress, allowing teachers to identify areas where additional support or guidance is required. FA encourages active participation, self-reflection, and the development of critical thinking skills.

2. SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT (SA)

Summative Assessment is conducted at the end of a learning cycle, such as a term or academic year. It evaluates a student’s overall performance and understanding of the curriculum.

SA typically involves formal examinations or assessments that measure a student’s knowledge, comprehension, application, and analytical skills. Unlike formative assessment, summative assessment provides a summary of a student’s achievements and helps determine their readiness for the next level of education.

ADVANTAGES OF CCE

Implementing Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation offers several benefits to students, educators, and the overall educational system.

1. INDIVIDUALIZED LEARNING

CCE recognizes the unique strengths, weaknesses, and learning styles of individual students. By providing regular feedback and personalized assessments, it enables teachers to tailor their instruction to meet the diverse needs of students. This approach promotes individualized learning, allowing each student to progress at their own pace and maximize their potential.

2. HOLISTIC DEVELOPMENT

One of the primary goals of CCE is to foster holistic development. Assessing not only academic performance but also other aspects such as co-curricular activities, life skills, and values, encourages a well-rounded education. CCE promotes the development of critical thinking, problem-solving abilities, creativity, communication skills, and social-emotional intelligence.

3. REDUCED EXAM STRESS

Traditional examination systems often create immense stress and anxiety among students. CCE mitigates this by distributing the assessment process throughout the year, reducing the burden associated with high-stakes exams. Incorporating a variety of assessment methods, including non-written forms, It provide students with multiple opportunities to demonstrate their understanding and progress.

4. REGULAR FEEDBACK

CCE emphasizes the importance of continuous feedback to students. It allows teachers to provide timely feedback on a student’s performance, highlighting their strengths and areas requiring improvement. Regular feedback fosters a growth mindset, encourages self-reflection, and enables students to take ownership of their learning journey.

5. SKILL DEVELOPMENT

In addition to subject knowledge, CCE focuses on the development of essential life skills such as critical thinking, problem-solving, collaboration, and effective communication. By integrating skill-based assessments, CCE equips students with the competencies necessary for success in the 21st-century workforce.

CHALLENGES IN IMPLEMENTING CCE

While Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation offers numerous benefits, its implementation comes with certain challenges.

1. TRAINING AND ORIENTATION

Effective implementation of CCE requires adequate training and orientation for teachers. They need to be familiar with the assessment techniques, criteria, and methodologies involved in formative and summative assessments. Continuous professional development programs and workshops can help address this challenge and equip educators with the necessary skills.

2. STANDARDIZATION

Maintaining standardization in assessment across different schools and educational boards can be a challenge. There is a need for clear guidelines and frameworks to ensure consistent evaluation practices, especially when it comes to summative assessments. Collaboration among educational authorities can help establish common standards and ensure the credibility of CCE.

3. EVALUATION BIAS

The subjective nature of assessments can lead to evaluation bias. It is crucial to have mechanisms in place to minimize bias and ensure fair and objective evaluations. Transparent evaluation criteria, multiple evaluators, and regular moderation can help address this challenge and maintain the integrity of the assessment process.

STRATEGIES FOR EFFECTIVE CCE IMPLEMENTATION

To overcome the challenges associated with implementing Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation, certain strategies can be adopted:

1. CLEAR ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

Establishing clear assessment criteria and rubrics is essential to ensure consistency and transparency in evaluations. Clear guidelines help both teachers and students understand the expectations and standards of assessment.

2. TEACHER TRAINING AND SUPPORT

Providing comprehensive training and support to teachers is vital for the effective implementation of CCE. Regular workshops, professional development programs, and mentoring can enhance teachers’ understanding of assessment techniques, align their practices with CCE objectives, and equip them with the necessary skills.

3. ENGAGING PARENTS AND GUARDIANS

Involving parents and guardians in the assessment process can contribute to a student’s overall development. Regular communication, parent-teacher meetings, and progress reports help create a collaborative environment that supports the student’s growth.

Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE) has revolutionized the assessment landscape in education. By focusing on regular assessments, feedback, and holistic development, CCE promotes a learner-centered approach that caters to the individual needs of students.

While challenges exist, the benefits of CCE, such as individualized learning, reduced exam stress, and skill development, make it a valuable framework for nurturing well-rounded individuals.

CCE NOTES ASSIGNMENT

This CCE Notes assignment content has been contributed by Meenakshi Sahu . She turned out to be a great contributor to our website and has been helping us and our readers with her best material.

In the PDF given below, Meenakshi has covered all the important details of the CCE Notes, and we truly appreciate that.

Q1: How does CCE differ from traditional examinations?

CCE differs from traditional examinations by emphasizing continuous assessment throughout the academic year, incorporating a variety of evaluation methods, and providing regular feedback to students.

Q2: Does CCE only assess academic performance?

No, CCE goes beyond academic performance. It assesses various aspects of a student’s development, including co-curricular activities, life skills, and values.

Q3: How can CCE benefit students?

CCE benefits students by offering individualized learning, reducing exam stress, providing regular feedback, and promoting the development of essential skills.

Q4: Is CCE implemented globally?

CCE is implemented in different countries, although the specific approaches and practices may vary. Many educational systems have recognized the need for comprehensive evaluation beyond traditional exams.

Q5: How can schools ensure fair evaluations in CCE?

Schools can ensure fair evaluations in CCE by establishing clear assessment criteria, training teachers on unbiased evaluation practices, and implementing moderation and multiple evaluators where appropriate.

See all B.Ed Assignments here

We hope that this article has been beneficial to you. If you have any quarry or questions regarding the content on our website, feel free to contact us here .

Follow us on our social media handles to get regular updates-

Useful books

• Best CTET books for paper 1 and paper 2
• First-year books
• Second-year books
• CTET Cracker books

B.Ed Project Files

• ICT File [Computerized]
• ICT Notes English
• Information and Communication Technology File Punjabi
• ICT File PDF Hindi
• Drama and Art in Education File [ENGLISH]
• Drama and Art in Education File [Hindi]
• Sessional Work [Drama and Art]
• Reading and Reflecting on Texts File [ENGLISH]
• Reading and Reflecting on Texts file [HINDI]
• Understanding the Self file [English]
• Understanding the Self file [HINDI]
• Slideshare App Review project work for B.Ed

Lesson Plans

• English Lesson Plans
• Biology Lesson Plans
• Chemistry Lesson Plans
• Commerce Lesson Plans
• Social Science Lesson Plans
• Mathematics Lesson Plans
• Physical Science Lesson Plans
• Hindi Lesson Plans
• Economics Lesson Plans
• Accountancy Lesson Plans
• Accounts Lesson Plan 2
• Business Studies Lesson Plans HINDI
• Biology Lesson Plans Bengali

Trending Articles

• JAMIA FREE UPSC Coaching
• What do you mean by parenting? How does it influence the development aspects of children and adolescents?
• Define assessment. How is it useful in the school education system?
• Discipline, Its Types, and Importance.
• संज्ञानात्मक विकास का सिद्धांत।
• कोहलबर्ग के नैतिक विकास का सिद्धांत।
• मूल्यांकन, आकलन तथा मापन में अंतर।
• परीक्षा क्या है?
• आकलन क्या है?
• ज्ञान प्राप्ति के स्रोत कौन-कौन से हैं?
• एरिक्सन के मनो-सामाजिक विकास के सिद्धांत की व्याख्या कीजिये।
• परवरिश से आप क्या समझते हैं?

If you also wish to contribute and help our readers find all the stuff in a single place, feel free to send your notes/assignments/PPTs/PDF notes/Files/Lesson Plans, etc., on our WhatsApp number +91- 8920650472 Or by mailing us at [email protected] , we will give full credits to you for your kind contribution.

CCE Notes Assignment, CCE Notes Assignment, CCE Notes Assignment, CCE Notes Assignment, CCE Notes for MDU, CCE Notes for CRSU, CCE Notes for KUK, CCE Notes for IGNOU, CCE Notes for CCSU, CCE Notes for JAMIA, CCE Notes for Delhi University, CCE Notes for AMU, CCE Notes for GGSIPU, CCE Notes Assignment, CCE Notes Assignment, CCE Notes Assignment, CCE Notes Assignment, CCE Notes for MDU, CCE Notes for CRSU, CCE Notes for KUK, CCE Notes for IGNOU, CCE Notes for CCSU, CCE Notes for JAMIA, CCE Notes for Delhi University, CCE Notes for AMU, CCE Notes for GGSIPU