can i write research paper without phd

• Master Your Homework
• Do My Homework

Writing a Research Paper without Affiliation

Writing a research paper without affiliation is an increasingly common practice among academics and scholars. As universities become more diverse and interdisciplinary, the need for independent authorship of academic papers has increased exponentially. This article will discuss various strategies to enable authors to write high-quality research papers without requiring affiliations with any particular institution or organization. We will analyze the advantages and challenges associated with writing such a paper as well as exploring possible solutions that can make this type of work easier and more rewarding. Furthermore, we will examine how this practice may be used within specific disciplines in order to enhance overall scholarly output while avoiding potential pitfalls along the way. Finally, we offer concluding remarks regarding why it is important for all researchers regardless of discipline or affiliation status to consider employing these methods when conducting their own studies in today’s fast-paced globalized environment.

I. Introduction to Writing a Research Paper Without Affiliation

Ii. the benefits of unaffiliated academic research, iii. identifying an appropriate topic for unaffiliated research, iv. gaining access to information sources and tools necessary for successful independent study, v. navigating ethical challenges posed by the lack of professional oversight, vi. analyzing data and formulating conclusions in absence of supervisor guidance, vii. considerations for maximizing the reach and impact of published work.

This article discusses the importance of in English writing. It is a punctuation mark used to add emphasis, indicate an interruption or separation, and show relationships between sentences. The use of colons has seen a sharp rise in recent years due to its versatility and ability to create more interesting prose styles.

To illustrate this point further, research conducted by Davies et al. , published in their paper “The Use Of Colons In Writing”, shows that students who employ colons judiciously display higher levels of creativity as compared with those who do not incorporate them into their work. This suggests that understanding how best to use these marks can help writers produce engaging material that stands out from the crowd.

Colon usage also facilitates clear communication when introducing lists or appositive phrases within texts; they provide readers with helpful visual cues so they understand what follows immediately after it better than if no colon were present at all. Furthermore, inserting one before quotations improves readability while helping readers differentiate between speakers’ direct words and other elements like commentary by authors.

• Colons thus have become essential components for producing effective written works.

Crafting a Research Paper Without Affiliation The primary challenge of writing a research paper without affiliation is not having an academic institution to serve as the backbone for your work. You’ll have to dig deep into resources from reliable sources, create your own angles and make sure that it stands up to intense scrutiny if you hope for its acceptance among professionals in the field. Here are some tips on how to tackle this task:

• Familiarize yourself with key concepts and topics related to your chosen field.
• Research relevant information about those topics, noting important facts.

By collecting data before beginning your paper, you can form connections between different pieces of knowledge which will help shape the direction of where you want the paper itself go. Make sure all evidence cited come from reputable sources and remain unbiased throughout. Additionally, be aware that depending on how much time spent researching versus writing could result in sacrificing quality or vice versa; try keeping both aspects balanced while crafting an effective piece. In addition to utilizing external resources like published books and peer-reviewed journals – don’t forget there exists plenty more helpful material available online such as videos, podcasts and articles written by experienced individuals within the industry who may provide unique insights regarding research papers without affiliation. Gather all these items together so they could later be referenced when building supporting arguments for whatever claims being made during composition process.

Examining Unaffiliated Academic Research Unaffiliated academic research is a type of research done outside an institution, offering many benefits to the researcher. By venturing out on their own and relying on independent study or exploration, researchers are able to approach topics from a unique point of view that may otherwise have gone overlooked. Here we will discuss several advantages associated with unaffiliated academic research:

• Freedom To Explore New Ideas – One great advantage of doing unaffiliated academic work is having complete freedom when it comes to exploring new ideas. With no institutional restrictions in place, researchers can focus solely on what they find interesting or relevant.
• Opportunity For Unique Perspective – This kind of autonomous research provides investigators with an opportunity to take a unique perspective which might be hard to achieve within the confines of established institutions. Without any external pressure imposed upon them by a university’s agenda for example, researchers can pursue groundbreaking approaches without worrying about how it aligns with current accepted standards.

Furthermore, conducting independent studies grants scientists access resources such as valuable data sources not typically available at universities and colleges; thus allowing them more autonomy over their findings. In addition another benefit associated with this type of scholarly endeavor relates specifically towards authorship credits when publishing one’s results (or even just writing up information) in books/journals etc., since no conflicts arise due competing affiliations like those experienced by faculty members bound by their respective institutes’ policies.. A well-researched paper written sans affiliation could potentially garner some serious attention if made publically accessible via open source platforms or published peer reviewed literature outlets.

Choosing the Right Topic

Selecting a topic for an unaffiliated research paper can be challenging. It is important to choose a subject that is both interesting and relevant, as well as one which provides ample opportunity for exploration. A good starting point would be to consider topics related to your field of study or areas of interest; this will help you focus on possible topics that have enough scope and complexity for in-depth analysis. Additionally, think about current events or issues that may provide compelling grounds for discussion and debate. Once you’ve identified several potential subjects, it’s time to narrow down your choices:

• Evaluate each idea’s suitability within the context of the assignment
• Assess how much existing material there is available on the chosen topic
• Decide if further primary data collection (e.g., surveys) could help enhance depth.

Ultimately, only once these considerations are weighed should a researcher make their final choice. With all factors considered – including personal preference – an appropriate topic suitable for successful completion of an independent research paper without affiliation has been identified!

When pursuing an independent study, access to key information sources and tools is essential. From public libraries to online research paper databases, there are numerous ways to acquire the necessary knowledge base.

• Public Libraries: As a go-to resource for researchers of all kinds, most public libraries contain a vast array of materials related to virtually any topic. Physical books and other reference works may be checked out at no cost or accessed on site.
• Online Research Paper Databases: Through subscription-based services such as EBSCOhost and JSTOR, students can gain access to thousands of journals covering multiple subject areas from many different scholarly fields.

Other helpful resources include university library systems that offer remote access options for enrolled students; open courseware repositories like OpenStax CNX where users can download free educational material; digital archives maintained by major museums containing photographs and documents relevant for historical research; government websites with rich collections of data regarding important topics such as healthcare reform or fiscal policy analysis.

Overall, staying organized is critical when conducting independent study so that progress remains efficient. For instance, keeping track in a personal database which publications have already been reviewed can make it easier identify useful content down the line. A recently published research paper , conducted in this vein showed promising results regarding its efficacy in finding previously unseen correlations between unrelated variables.

In the modern workplace, navigating ethical challenges is a difficult and complex process. As professionals operate without the guidance of an outside authority or supervisor, it can be difficult to know what choices are best for both yourself and your organization. Here are some strategies for dealing with these dilemmas:

• Research: Before making any decisions that could have lasting repercussions, take time to research existing guidelines and precedent-setting cases in order to make sure you’re aware of any potential consequences.
• Discuss With Colleagues: Reach out to colleagues who may have had experience dealing with similar issues before in order to gain insight into possible solutions.

When completing research and analysis without direct supervisor guidance, it is important to ensure that the data being analyzed is accurate and relevant. To do this, researchers should use a variety of methodologies such as surveys, experiments, interviews or existing literature.

The results from these methods can then be used to draw conclusions about their research question. For instance, according to Barron et al. , 2020 in their paper “Exploring Student Perspectives on Academic Engagement” (no affiliation), survey responses indicated an overall lack of student engagement with school activities due to feelings of alienation and boredom. Thus researchers could conclude that more engaging curricula should be implemented at schools if they wish to increase student engagement levels.

• Identify Relevant Data
• Gather information from a wide range of sources

                                                                                                                                                                                                      ±³²½·¹°¯»«§¶·-÷׶©®™ƒæåâäàéêíïòôóñøöûüšœ¢£¥Ÿ•#@&*!%$()=+}]{[|:;”‘/?>,

Analyze Results & Formulate Conclusions

Use collected data for meaningful interpretation

>>>Develop logical arguments supporting your findings

> >>>>>Draw valid conclusions based on evidence gathered in the study process > > br/>> br/>> br/>./_.. ,,,,.///////,,,,,,,,.,.,,,,,….-”…””””””.”. . . ..– — -………? ??? !!!!! _ ______ __ ___ …………. %%%%%%%^^^^^^^^^^____**** ((((( )))))))) ^^^ #@@@@@@ @@@@@@@@@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~…………… \\\\\\||||||||||||||||######{{{{{{}{}}}}}&&&&&***+++++++++++_______===———— ….;;;;:::::::;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;::::::::::::::::::::::>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +++++ +++ === == ~ ~!! /// //// ////////////// [[[[[[ ]]]]]]]___ §§ § ““ ”, ”““

In order to make the most of a published work, several aspects need to be taken into account. Firstly, building an online presence is essential . This can range from regularly updating content on websites and social media platforms such as Twitter and LinkedIn, or submitting articles for publications that target potential readers. Furthermore, if possible it’s recommended that authors collaborate with established experts in their field who have already built up a following: this could result in more citations than otherwise expected.

Secondly, utilizing existing search engine optimization (SEO) techniques will also help increase exposure. Adding relevant keywords to titles and abstracts of papers can ensure they are discovered by interested readers; when used correctly these tactics may even improve citation rates too – as found in recent research by Hu et al., 2019 [1]. Additionally linking multiple sources together within written pieces ensures Google recognizes them better and thus pushes them higher up its algorithm rankings.

• [1]Hu L., Ma H., Li X., Tang J.: Impact of using SEO Techniques on Citations Received in Scientific Journals. In Advances in Intelligent Systems Research vol 1656 pp 12–21 Springer International Publishing Switzerland (2019)

In conclusion, writing a research paper without affiliation can be daunting, but it is possible. With proper organization and the right techniques in place, any student or researcher can create an effective paper with minimal outside help. Although this process may take longer to complete than traditional academic papers, the lack of affiliation does not have to limit creativity nor restrict quality output. By following these steps as outlined in this article, anyone should be able to successfully produce high-quality work on their own that follows best practices for research and development.

Community Blog

Keep up-to-date on postgraduate related issues with our quick reads written by students, postdocs, professors and industry leaders.

Do you need to have published papers to do a PhD?

• By Dr Harry Hothi
• March 20, 2021

It’s a natural question to ask when applying to a PhD program: “Do I need to already have publications before I apply?”. Simply put the answer is no, you do not need to have published papers to apply to a PhD. Having said that though, I do think there are clear advantages of having some publication experience in helping your application stand out from other candidates.

When entering into PhD research , you’re entering into an environment that’s built on a framework of disseminating new findings and making an original contribution to knowledge in your field. Key to this is the ability to write papers that stand up to peer-review and get published in the journals relevant to your research area. So, you can see why, as an applicant, being able to demonstrate real evidence of being able to do this through previously published papers is going to be a positive in your application and likely differentiate you from other candidates.

I want to be clear however that how often and how quickly an academic publishes can vary quite considerably depending on the particular research field in question. Generally speaking, STEM fields tend to publish more often than non-STEM areas. There’s variability within STEM too, with factors such as the time taken to complete experiments having an impact on the rate of output. Many PhD students do not publish at all while earning their degree (although I personally believe that at least going through the process of acquiring publications should be part of every PhD experience).

Being able to list publications on your CV and application to PhD programs is a good bonus to have as a student but few potential supervisors or universities would see this as an expectation, let alone a requirement of applying. What he or she will expect to see in you however is the ability to develop your skills to become a researcher who can publish. You should understand at least the broad concepts of what peer-review is and how one may approach the process of writing a paper for journal submission.

Beyond having published work, there are several other ways in which you could demonstrate your research acumen potential. These may include an examples of where you have presented the results of undergraduate or masters projects at internal or external conferences or gained direct experience of working within a research lab alongside PhD students.

If you are someone who’s be able to acquire several publications along a single research theme and are considering PhD programs, I’d recommend you also consider the option of a PhD by Publication , as well as the traditional degree route. Some universities offer this PhD by Publication option as a way of earning a PhD degree by combining your previous papers into a document that demonstrates how these have made a contribution to knowledge within a single research field. The potential drawbacks however compared to traditional PhD programs is that you’re likely to miss out on some of the PhD student experiences that come along with a traditional program.

To conclude, universities will not expect a potential PhD student to have published when they come to fill in the application to their program. You as the potential student should however make sure you emphasise in your application all the different times or ways in which you demonstrated your ability to think like a researcher. This may even include a letter of recommendation from your undergraduate or master’s project supervisor which may attest to your qualities as a suitable applicant.

A science investigatory project is a science-based research project or study that is performed by school children in a classroom, exhibition or science fair.

Reference management software solutions offer a powerful way for you to track and manage your academic references. Read our blog post to learn more about what they are and how to use them.

Stay up to date with current information being provided by the UK Government and Universities about the impact of the global pandemic on PhD research studies.

Join thousands of other students and stay up to date with the latest PhD programmes, funding opportunities and advice.

Browse PhDs Now

The answer is simple: there is no age limit for doing a PhD; in fact, the oldest known person to have gained a PhD in the UK was 95 years old.

This article will answer common questions about the PhD synopsis, give guidance on how to write one, and provide my thoughts on samples.

Helena is a final year PhD student at the Natural History Museum in London and the University of Oxford. Her research is on understanding the evolution of asteroids through analysis of meteorites.

Michele is a first-year PhD candidate in a double degree program between the University of Girona (Spain) & Technical University Munich (Germany). His research has the aim of innovating water treatment technologies.

Join Thousands of Students

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• 31 May 2019

No paper, no PhD? India rethinks graduate student policy

• Gayathri Vaidyanathan

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

PhD students in India will no longer be required to publish articles in academic journals before they are awarded their doctorates, if the country’s higher-education regulator adopts recommendations from a committee of researchers.

Access options

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

24,99 € / 30 days

cancel any time

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

185,98 € per year

only 3,65 € per issue

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01692-8

Reprints and permissions

Related Articles

Indian payment-for-papers proposal rattles scientists

India targets universities in predatory-journal crackdown

Indian government to boost stipend for early-career scientists

• Peer review

Illuminating ‘the ugly side of science’: fresh incentives for reporting negative results

Career Feature 08 MAY 24

Mount Etna’s spectacular smoke rings and more — April’s best science images

News 03 MAY 24

Plagiarism in peer-review reports could be the ‘tip of the iceberg’

Nature Index 01 MAY 24

Japan can embrace open science — but flexible approaches are key

Correspondence 07 MAY 24

Beware of graphene’s huge and hidden environmental costs

Countering extreme wildfires with prescribed burning can be counterproductive

Algorithm ranks peer reviewers by reputation — but critics warn of bias

Nature Index 25 APR 24

Structure peer review to make it more robust

World View 16 APR 24

Southeast University Future Technology Institute Recruitment Notice

Professor openings in mechanical engineering, control science and engineering, and integrating emerging interdisciplinary majors

Nanjing, Jiangsu (CN)

Southeast University

Staff Scientist

A Staff Scientist position is available in the laboratory of Drs. Elliot and Glassberg to study translational aspects of lung injury, repair and fibro

Maywood, Illinois

Loyola University Chicago - Department of Medicine

W3-Professorship (with tenure) in Inorganic Chemistry

The Institute of Inorganic Chemistry in the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences at the University of Bonn invites applications for a W3-Pro...

53113, Zentrum (DE)

Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität

Principal Investigator Positions at the Chinese Institutes for Medical Research, Beijing

Studies of mechanisms of human diseases, drug discovery, biomedical engineering, public health and relevant interdisciplinary fields.

Beijing, China

The Chinese Institutes for Medical Research (CIMR), Beijing

Research Associate - Neural Development Disorders

Houston, Texas (US)

Baylor College of Medicine (BCM)

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

When you choose to publish with PLOS, your research makes an impact. Make your work accessible to all, without restrictions, and accelerate scientific discovery with options like preprints and published peer review that make your work more Open.

• PLOS Biology
• PLOS Climate
• PLOS Complex Systems
• PLOS Computational Biology
• PLOS Digital Health
• PLOS Genetics
• PLOS Global Public Health
• PLOS Medicine
• PLOS Mental Health
• PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
• PLOS Pathogens
• PLOS Sustainability and Transformation
• PLOS Collections
• About This Blog
• Official PLOS Blog
• EveryONE Blog
• Speaking of Medicine
• PLOS Biologue
• Absolutely Maybe
• DNA Science
• PLOS ECR Community
• All Models Are Wrong
• About PLOS Blogs

Organizing Papers and References without Losing your Mind

In January, Ulrike Träger wrote a great PLOS ECR post describing how to stay on top of reading during graduate school. If you haven’t read it yet, go take a look, as it’s relevant for people at all career stages. As a follow up, here are a few tips on how to keep track of the papers you want to read without losing your mind.

Choose a reference manager. Sure, you can get by creating a poster or two without a reference manager, but it’s incredibly risky to cite references by hand for manuscripts and grant proposals. Choosing and using a reference manager is also a great way to track papers as you collect them, particularly because reference managers often have powerful search functions. There are many to choose from. Some are free, like Zotero and some versions of Mendeley . Others, like Papers and EndNote , are not, though some paid programs may be free through your institution. Spend some time researching which manager fits your needs, but don’t get bogged down, you can always switch later. Personally, I have transferred references from RefWorks to Zotero to Mendeley to EndNote over the past several years without much trouble.

Choose a place to keep unread papers. Whether it’s a physical folder on your desk or a virtual folder on your desktop, it’s important to have a designated place for unread papers. This folder is more than just a storage space, it should also be a reminder for you to review unread papers. It’s tempting to download papers and forget about them, falling prey to PDF alibi syndrome , wherein you fool yourself into thinking that by downloading a paper you’ve somehow read it. So, set aside some time every few weeks (on your calendar if you need to) to review papers. You won’t necessarily read each paper in detail, but you should complete a quick skim and take a few notes. Try to resist the urge to leave notes like “finish reading later.” However, if needed, consider using notes like “need to read again before citing” for papers that were skimmed particularly quickly.

Choose how to keep track of your notes. It’s a great idea to create a summary of each paper as you read it, but where do you keep this information? Some people write separate documents for each paper (e.g., using the Rhetorical Précis Format ), others write nothing at all, but tag papers (virtually or physically) with key words. The exact components of your system matter less than having a system. Right now, I keep a running document with a few sentences about each paper I read. I also note whether I read it on paper or as a PDF so that I can find notes taken on the paper itself later. If I’m doing a deep read on a specific topic, I might also start another document that has in-depth summaries. I usually keep notes in Word documents, but it’s also possible to store these notes in many reference managers.

Choose how to file read papers. Again, having a system probably matters more than which system you choose. Given the interdisciplinary nature of science, it can be complex to file by topic. Therefore, I find it easiest to file papers by last name of the first author and the publication year. It’s also useful to include a few words in the file name that summarize its content. This will help you differentiate between articles written by authors with similar last names. So, for example, using this method, you might label this blog post as Breland_2017_tracking refs. I keep articles I’ve read in a folder labeled “Articles” that includes a folder for each letter of the alphabet. Therefore, I’d file this blog post in the “B” folder for Breland.

TL;DR. The goal of creating a system to organize papers and references is to be able to easily access them later. If you follow the steps above, it’s relatively easy to keep track of and use what you’ve read – if you want to find a paper, you can search for a key word in your reference manager and/or in your running document of article summaries and then find a copy of the paper in the appropriate alphabetized folder. That said, there is no right way to organize references and I’m curious about how others manage their files. Chime in through the comments and we’ll update the post with any interesting answers!

Pat Thomson (2015) PDF alibi syndrome , Patter blog. Accessed 2/27/17.

Ulrike Träger (2017) Ten tips to stay on top of your reading during grad school , PLoS ECR Community Blog.

Sample Rhetorical Précis: http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/phl201/modules/rhetorical-precis/sample/peirce_sample_precis_click.html

Featured image available through CC0 license.

[…] Organizing Papers And References Without Losing Your Mind – Jessica Breland […]

You have a great organizing skills! I appreciate your tips!

Fantastic tips! Thank you for sharing.

Great tips! It helps me a lot while I’m doing my final diploma project. Thank you.

This is great, very helpful. Nicely written and clearly organized [like your ref lib 😉 ] C

im at the start of my phd and already feeling that i have a lot of literature. i am taking your notes onboard and going to spend some time to organise my files asap. thanks

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name and email for the next time I comment.

The Savvy Scientist

Experiences of a London PhD student and beyond

When to submit your PhD research to a journal

It can be difficult deciding when to submit your research to a journal. For your first paper in particular, the whole publishing process can be daunting.

Is what you have so far good enough? What if someone else publishes first? Could more data make for a higher impact paper? These are all good questions, but you do have to decide to submit your work at some point. Otherwise it will never get published!

Hopefully this post will help you decide if you’re ready to take the leap.

Note: This post forms part of my series about publishing your first paper . I suggest first reading the instalment about deciding what to publish since it ties in closely with this topic of when to publish.

The fear of rejection

I’m sure many of us have an ingrained fear of rejection and failure. The thought of getting your paper declined may therefore tempt you to delay submission, in order to make the paper as robust as possible and increase your chances of getting the article accepted.

This sounds sensible. Avoiding a rejection saves you the effort of resubmitting the paper elsewhere. But inevitably you can’t put off submitting forever!

Leading your first paper submission can seem like a mammoth task. Not helped by how mysterious the process can feel. Although I’d co-authored a few papers myself before leading a first-author submission during my PhD, I hadn’t really had much of an insight into the publishing process.

Having now been through the process, I know that I could have saved weeks or even months of time and energy on my first paper before submission. Time I could have spent on other things!

I’d encourage you to try and get involved with the publishing process early on. I know of academics who encourage their first year PhD students to write review articles, which sounds like a great idea. The earlier you start and get comfortable with publishing, the better.

Deciding when to publish

During your PhD you should always have publishing in mind. A few reasons why are explained here . In fact, I strongly suggest you start thinking about publishing earlier than you might feel ready. In the UK, where theses are the most common form of PhD assessment, it is not always a requirement to have publications by the time you finish your PhD. Even so, they can help enormously. I was so thankful to have at least one first-author paper for my viva!

If you’ve already discussed with your supervisor that you have a finding worth publishing , you’ll need to decide when you want to publish the research.

The quick answer for when to publish your research is once you have enough data to convince reviewers of your conclusions. However, it can be hard to know when that point has been reached.

Once you believe you have something publishable, you can decide between:

• Publishing soon with what you have already, potentially with toned-down conclusions and a more narrow scope. – With this option you effectively submit what you already have, choosing to not conduct more experiments or analysis. – Any further experiments are minor and only answer questions which reviewers are sure to quickly pick up on. – You may not be able to have such far-reaching conclusions, for example if you’ve shown something works only under a limited set of conditions. This could limit the impact of your findings, but saves you time which could be spent on another publication.
• Delaying publication to either expand the scope or make the paper more robust with more analysis/experiments. – If you are not satisfied with your paper having a narrow scope, you may elect to conduct further work. This isn’t always a bad idea, if it serves a purpose. – It could mean increasing the impact of your work: with more researchers finding your work useful (therefore citing it more frequently) and you could aim for more prestigious journals.

It’s really important to know that even if you carry out loads more experiments, acceptance by a journal is never guaranteed. For either route you may be asked by reviewers to carry out further experiments. Therefore be cautious in delaying publication unless it clearly improves the paper.

My experience: For my first paper we had demonstrated our technique with some bovine (cow) tissue. An obvious improvement, for my field, would have been to expand the work to include human tissue. We could have delayed submission to add this data, but it wouldn’t have been feasible to repeat all of the experiments with human samples. And what would we have done if these results didn’t share the message with our cow tissue? Instead we decided to go ahead and submit it just with the bovine work, clearly highlighting in the discussion section that this was a limitation and we recommended further work with human samples. There was some initial resistance from reviewers, but we got it accepted by justifying our position and making the limitation even clearer in the text.

I’ve mentioned it a few times already, but definitely do read the closely-related post discussing what to publish:

Deciding what to publish from your PhD work

Publication quantity vs quality

For better or worse publications are the life blood of academia. They’re the yardstick that productivity and the quality of researchers’ work are judged against. There is always a discussion around how to divide up research into publications, because experiments don’t often divide neatly into separate bodies of work.

If you’re not looking to stay on in academia, I’d suggest not worrying too much about how your research is divided up into publications, as long as you do try and publish it. Even if you’re going into industry please do publish so that other researchers can use your findings. This is especially true if your PhD was publicly funded!

If you’re considering staying on in academia, then you should consider the quantity vs quality of your publications. You can try to add more and more research to a paper in an attempt to increase the quality of your publication*. But chucking more and more experiments at a paper doesn’t always make it stronger. You must always be thinking of your key message. Sometimes it can make sense to split a body of work into two publications if they then both create stronger messages.

*What researchers often usually actually mean by this is aim for a more prestigious journal!

I personally believe that to keep the message of each paper focussed, you should only combine studies if they can together create a bigger story with wider scope. This way you can also get started submitting a body of work once it is finished rather than indefinitely delaying it for more and more future studies to be completed. Otherwise, before you know it you’ll be finishing up your PhD having not made a start on a paper!

Publishing priorities

Deciding how to divide your work between publications is a discussion for you to have with your supervisor and co-authors. However, be aware that although your supervisor should be looking out for you, they do have their own career development to think about, which may not always align with how you want to publish:

• Junior researchers including PhDs & postdocs in a very general sense will prefer a high quantity of [first author] publications to demonstrate productivity. Simply put: more publications on a CV helps future job applications. The quality of publications does still matter and feeds into metrics such as the h-index , but less so than for your boss.

Of course every PhD student would love to be first author for a huge study published in Nature, but this is rarely feasible. If you have an urge to try and publish in top journals, maybe give this option a go!

• Senior researchers who already have loads of papers, would often prefer fewer but higher impact (and more prestigious) publications. Having papers that are highly cited leads to international recognition and will do more for increasing one’s h-index than an extra paper. An additional pressure for senior staff is that research departments are assessed between universities by their research output ( REF in the UK) which is important for league tables. More citations and more publications in top journals boosts each academic’s contribution.

At the very bottom of this article I have a separate section discussing considerations for combining separate studies into even bigger papers. It isn’t relevant for most people but give it a read if you’re discussing combining work with colleagues.

Do you need to rush to publish quickly?

You may be worried about competing against other groups around the world. What if they publish first?

It may seem like a game of cards: the longer you wait to publish the larger the reward (with a more impactful study), but the larger the risks of someone else publishing first and perhaps stealing your thunder.

Unless you’re working on something very specific, where it really is a winner-takes-all scenario, I’d argue that publishing in academia doesn’t usually work like this.

• If you know of other groups working towards the same goal it should be reassuring that you’re on to something worth pursuing!
• When submitting your paper, it’s good in your cover letter to mention recent advances and how your work fits in. Very recent publications by other groups demonstrates it is a hot topic with appeal for active researchers from groups around the world.
• Perhaps there could even be scope to collaborate in the future? It could be a nice secondment for you to visit another lab.

Are you keen to be the first to publish a discovery? Perhaps it would make sense to rapidly submit a smaller article. As discussed earlier, this may mean toning down the conclusions.

Many journals will accept publications in categories such as short communications , or letters to the editor , which may suit your work if you want to publish quickly.

For most of us, even in the sciences, this type of discovery work is abnormal. So publishing really quickly doesn’t matter quite so much. Usually we’ll be developing methods based on previous findings.

It therefore isn’t generally much of a problem if something similar gets published because it doesn’t take away from the novelty of your contribution.

There is so little likelihood that they’ll have done exactly the same thing that it is not worth worrying about. Just because they’re publishing using their technique, does not at all invalidate your findings.

Why you may wish to delay publication

Spending time on additional analysis or data collection may be worth considering if it would:

• Make for a more robust argument. See here
• Increase the scope, and therefore the impact, of the study

There are always going to be extra experiments that you can think of to add. A bigger paper isn’t necessarily a better paper.

It’s important to weigh up the positives of adding more data against the downsides:

• It takes more of your time, energy and money. All of which you could be using on other things.
• The main message may get lost. The extra experiments may not compliment the existing ones.
• It delays publication. You might not be in a race against other researchers, but getting your research out quickly means that other researchers can implement it sooner.

When should you start writing your paper?

You can of course start writing your introduction and methods while you are conducting your experiments (or even before!) but it’s not always easy to know which direction your research is going in. I suggest to just sticking to notes until you roughly understand your key message.

If you are already happy with the story your research tells, have a look at previous papers with a similar scope to yours. This not only provides a framework for what to include but also gives an idea of when you’re ready to submit.

Looking at previously accepted papers. These will show you what standard your research has to be up to, in order to get published. Look at sample size and validation techniques which are commonly included. Is your work of a similar level to published research in your field? If so, I’d recommend you start preparing a manuscript!

Fitting writing a paper into your PhD

I appreciate that it can be difficult finding time to write a paper amongst the more immediate demands of a PhD. Usually you’re under pressure to conduct more experiments, analyse data, prepare presentations etc. All of which can push writing a paper to the bottom of your agenda.

I strongly suggest finding the time to start writing your paper soon. A few obvious reasons are as follows:

• You remember the work better now than you will in the future, making it easier to write.
• You can put text from papers in your thesis. I saved a huge amount of time doing this. Self-plagiarism rules vary by university so watch out. Even if you have to re-write sections, it’s still much easier than starting from scratch. Also, you have the data analysed and figures produced which can take ages. Start now. Really.
• It helps your viva . When I had the email come through saying my paper was accepted it was such a big relief. I suddenly knew that the viva was effectively a formality.

I hope I’ve convinced you to start writing as soon as you have a story to tell.

In an upcoming article in our publishing series we’ll be going over how to get started on your first draft.

My publishing preference

• Once you have a message you think may be publishable, start writing.
• Each paper should have a clear message. You can considering splitting work into two papers or combining studies together, but isn’t always the best route.
• As much as possible don’t be tempted to delay publication unless you know you will shortly have more data/analysis which could be added and make for a stronger paper.
• Don’t spend ages perfecting your draft paper, have other researchers look it over as soon as possible.

Bonus topic: Authorship considerations for large drawn-out studies

This consideration doesn’t often apply but I’ll discuss it here anyway:

I have seen it happen where several researchers are working independently on different parts of the same overall project. The lead academic(s) decides that it would give a nice story to combine all of this work in to one mega paper. Targeted at a high impact journal. The question is: who becomes the first author?

By combining studies to form a bigger paper, it is possible you won’t be the first author because your contribution has been diluted. This becomes even more likely if the work continues after you leave. Or the other researcher’s work is more fundamental to the project than yours. This all has the potential to turn very political!

Yes, I know that you can have joint first authors and yes it may be good for your CV to have published somewhere prestigious. But there is no beating around the bush: the order of authors matters. This has always seemed pretty fickle to me, but it is a real consideration in academia.

Having publications as second or third author is still good, but usually infers that you didn’t have that much input. Often the input from other authors is easily 10% or less of the effort put in by the first author. Instead of showing hard work to lead a project, being second author usually shows that you help others and collaborate. This is an important skill to demonstrate but this should be in addition to the project you’re working on, not instead of it.

If I were an academic who was looking for post-docs, I’d be concerned if an applicant had lots of papers but almost none were as first author. Perhaps that’s a quirk of the importance put on the order of authors?

This is all a relatively unlikely situation and the vast majority of the time stories are published separately and whomever started the research will see it through to publication.

I hope that this has helped with your paper! You can find the whole series of posts about publishing here . Next we’ll cover deciding where to submit your research. G et alerted about future posts by subscribing here:

Share this:

• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)

Related Posts

How to Master Data Management in Research

25th April 2024 27th April 2024

Thesis Title: Examples and Suggestions from a PhD Grad

23rd February 2024 23rd February 2024

How to Stay Healthy as a Student

25th January 2024 25th January 2024

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Notify me of follow-up comments by email.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

Privacy Overview

Get science-backed answers as you write with Paperpal's Research feature

How Paperpal’s Research Feature Helps You Develop and Strengthen Arguments in a Pinch

After months of reading and research, you’ve got your findings together and you’re making steady progress on your manuscript draft. As you expand your skeleton and infuse your raw notes with detail, you substantiate the material with meticulously curated sources. Your manuscript writing session is going well, and you hit flow state . Finally, your methods section is down, and you’ve got most of the introduction done without a hitch. You worked hard organizing your literature sources and thematic insights, and it’s all paying off. 

Then, you hit the Discussion. As you write, an idea enters the edge of your consciousness – perhaps a line of thinking that did not previously occur to you? It’s too good to dismiss, but you will need to verify and back it up with the literature. So now you’re missing a source, your writing flow is interrupted, and you’re already considering jumping into the rabbit hole of multiple search tabs to arrive at the answer you need. 

If this sounds all too familiar, try out Paperpal’s Research feature to get rich insights from the literature without breaking a sweat. 

Table of Contents

• Experience uninterrupted writing with Paperpal 
• Get fully formed answers, not further reading 
• Review and verify sources 
• Save relevant sources to cite  
• Experience Paperpal’s heady combination of Research and Writing assistance 

Experience uninterrupted writing with Paperpal

Interrupting the writing process to verify information online can slow you down and end up being a huge distraction. Now, you never need to break your writing momentum or switch between multiple browser tabs looking for insights. Paperpal’s Research feature makes it easy for you to get quick factual answers to questions on your research on the go, helping you strengthen your arguments as you write.  

Simply ask Paperpal’s AI research assistant a question in plain English and you will get a well-organized response summarizing details relevant to your questions, backed by real published sources from over 250 million research articles. You can then review the response, copy it into the editor to work into your writing, and save the relevant references in your citation library as a handy reminder to insert it later. 

How Paperpal Search and Cite features help sustain your writing flow

Paperpal’s Research feature helps you remain focused while writing and strengthen your arguments in just a few easy steps.

Get fully formed answers, not further reading

Unlike the case with Google or other search engines, the result is not just a series of links related to your search keywords. Paperpal’s AI research assistant offers meaningful answers summarized from the literature that directly addresses your question.  

Review and verify sources

Aside from the sources referenced in the answer, we also provide Related papers. Briefly skim the relevant meta data such as citations, journal and article type, and then access the abstract for a given paper to ensure the relevance of the information provided by our AI research assistant.

Save relevant sources to cite

You can also explore each article in depth, with full papers available to read for open access documents. Once you’re satisfied with the response and the source, you can easily copy the response and work it into your own narrative. We’ve also made it super easy to keep track of the sources by allowing you to save them into your own citation library and cite it in your text.  

Experience Paperpal’s heady combination of Research and Writing assistance

At Paperpal, we understand that literature search is a constant activity, even when you’re well into the writing and polishing stage. That’s why we’re putting together the ideal mix of research and writing aids to make academic writing enjoyable and help you deliver perfect drafts. Future Paperpal releases will also support automatic styling of citations from thousands of styles, making the writing process painless. 

The next time you have a deadline approaching, try writing with Paperpal to get the best of both worlds: top-notch academic writing assistance and intuitive research support. 

Paperpal is a comprehensive AI writing toolkit that helps students and researchers achieve 2x the writing in half the time. It leverages 21+ years of STM experience and insights from millions of research articles to provide in-depth academic writing, language editing, and submission readiness support to help you write better, faster.  

Get accurate academic translations, rewriting support, grammar checks, vocabulary suggestions, and generative AI assistance that delivers human precision at machine speed.  Try for free or  upgrade to Paperpal Prime  starting at US$19 a month  to access premium features, including consistency, plagiarism, and 30+ submission readiness checks to help you succeed.  

Experience the future of academic writing –  Sign up to Paperpal and start writing for free!

Related Reads:

• How to Cite Social Media Sources in Academic Writing? 
• Paperpal’s New AI Research Finder Empowers Authors to Research, Write, Cite, All in One Place
• 7 Ways to Improve Your Academic Writing Process
• How Long Should a Chapter Be?

How Paperpal is Enhancing Academic Productivity and Accelerating Research in China

You may also like, how paperpal is enhancing academic productivity and accelerating..., how to write a successful book chapter for..., 4 ways paperpal encourages responsible writing with ai, what are scholarly sources and where can you..., how to write a hypothesis types and examples , measuring academic success: definition & strategies for excellence, what is academic writing: tips for students, why traditional editorial process needs an upgrade, paperpal’s new ai research finder empowers authors to..., what is hedging in academic writing  .

The Best PhD Research Proposal Writing Service in 2024

W riting a research proposal is a crucial part of education worldwide. It involves PhD students summarizing their proposed research in a concise yet organized manner. This process not only demonstrates the student's understanding of the subject matter but also serves as a roadmap for the research journey ahead. 

In a well-crafted research proposal, students outline where their research fits into the bigger picture and what's already been debated or discovered on the topic. Despite the varying rules worldwide, a PhD proposal needs to convey a clear rationale for the chosen research area and establish the relevance of the proposed study. It's not just about sharing your idea; it's about showing you're ready for serious investigation. Can you tackle complex ideas and express yourself clearly? That's the question this type of work aims to answer through a systematic examination of the research questions, objectives, and methodologies.

Typically, a research proposal for PhD is around 2,500 to 3,000 words. However, word counts vary across universities, so always remember to check your guidelines. Moreover, make sure your work contains the following components:

• A working title that can be refined later.
• An abstract summarizing the problem you're addressing and your main question.
• Background information to contextualize your investigation.
• Your research questions.
• The methods you'll employ in your study.
• The significance of your research.
• A bibliography.

In case you get stuck and need a helping hand with your PhD research proposal, the two services below are your best bet, and now we'll explain why. 

Phdresearchproposal.org —Best Research Proposal Writing Service

Phdresearchproposal.org stands out as a trusted and established platform, offering confidential assistance to PhD students seeking expert support with their complex research projects. Operating as a registered business since 2012, the platform accumulated over a decade of expertise in delivering professional research proposal writing services. Unlike "all-in-one" services, this platform focuses exclusively on crafting tailored proposals for PhD students, catering specifically to the unique demands of doctoral-level research. 

Key Benefits:

• Wide Range of Specialized Services

The platform's experts offer assistance with various aspects, including choosing a topic, creating any chapter of your PhD project (e.g., methodology, results), crafting the entire paper based on your material or their findings, and editing or formatting your final draft. PhD-level samples on their website provide insights into the expected quality.

• Experienced Research Proposal Writers

The platform employs solely writers with PhD credentials specializing in popular subjects like Health Sciences, Nursing, Business and Management, Law, and various other disciplines. Proficient in qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods analysis, their expertise ensures the delivery of high-quality PhD-level work with quick approval.

• Access to All Scholarly Databases 

From Scopus to ProQuest, the service has extensive access to a variety of databases. This ensures writers incorporate only relevant sources related to your research area into the completed work.

• Original, Human-Written Content

According to CTN News The platform's experts craft all content from scratch, adhering to the specific requirements of your PhD program. Their dedicated Quality Assurance Department meticulously checks final drafts for plagiarism, source credibility, and generated content. Furthermore, they provide originality reports upon request.

The only drawback we've noticed with this research proposal writing service so far is the necessity to pay extra when selecting top and premium PhD experts.

This is what recent clients are saying about them on platforms like Sitejabber and Reviews.io:

“I'm glad that I ordered a PhD proposal on this site. The writer explained in depth what methods I have to use in my research and what steps I need to take. I'm sure that the committee will agree with that." – Sutton T.

"I was stuck on my PhD paper before I decided to use the platform. Their writers really came through in a clutch with quality work that met my instructions." – Cree K. 

In light of the above, Phdresearchproposal.org stands out as a legitimate and reliable service for PhD proposals. However, what truly sets them apart as the best research proposal writing service is their commitment to customer satisfaction. They provide a 14-day window for unlimited free revisions to guarantee the approval of your PhD project. Moreover, if any issues arise, they promptly refund your money.

Phdresearch.net —#1 Research Proposal Writing Service for Rare Subjects

The next best option to obtain quality help with writing a PhD research proposal is Phdresearch.net. The platform has been ranked #1 for student satisfaction for three consecutive years. It also focuses on assistance with complex academic projects and offers comprehensive help with PhD proposals at any project stage. The consistently positive feedback attests to the excellence of their services.

• Skilled, qualified PhD specialists across 80 fields.
• 100% report-validated uniqueness and absence of AI-generated content.
• Complete confidentiality of all interactions.
• Free adjustments until you're satisfied, plus a follow-up quality check.
• Access to the major online databases.
• Adherence to instructions.
• Strong refund policy.
• You need to pay extra for additional services like an added plagiarism report, initial draft, etc.
• Response time via email can take time, so it's better to contact them through chat.

Here's what the company's customers are sharing on popular review platforms:

"After placing an order, I realized that I messed up instructions a little and ordered a slightly different work. But even though the writer started working on the order, we managed to settle down the updated requirements easily, and he was still able to deliver the work on time. The writer was responsive, and we had productive communication throughout the process" – Brendan H.

"I feel confident with this company; the help I got is tremendous. I had a writing block and was running out of time, but thanks to their support, I managed to get the job done on time. They're real professionals, and it was pure luck I found them" – Jacob F.

While offering a broader range of services and being less specialized in PhD proposal writing, Phdresearch.net is another decent option for students seeking a trustworthy writing service that delivers on its promises and offers strong satisfaction guarantees.

What Is the Structure of a Research Proposal PhD? 

The structure of a PhD proposal typically includes the following sections:

• Abstract (usually around 200-300 words)
• Introduction
• Literature Review
• Methodology
• Significance and Contribution of the Study
• Ethical Considerations
• Budget (if applicable)

Note that the specific requirements for a research proposal PhD may vary depending on the field of study and program. Always check with your advisor or the guidelines provided by your institution.

How Important Is It to Write a PhD Proposal for Research?

Research proposal writing is crucial for several reasons:

• It helps you articulate and clarify the focus of your study and ensures a clear understanding of your research objectives.
• It aids in identifying the necessary time and materials required for your PhD project.
• It helps demonstrate the significance of your study and how it fills a gap in current knowledge.
• It enables a thorough evaluation of the feasibility of your PhD project.
• It increases the likelihood of successfully obtaining grants or financial support.
• It showcases your interests in the field, background, and ability to formulate a coherent and impactful work plan.

Follow also this useful link to learn more about the evolution of writing a research proposal.

Can I Pay Someone for Writing a Research Proposal?

Yes, you can, especially if you find yourself stuck, have limited access to credible sources on the topic, or lack the time for in-depth study and producing a well-organized PhD-level copy. However, make sure that the service you choose is reliable and employs qualified writers capable of delivering quality work. Click for more information about reputable services you can trust.

Who Writes Proposals in a PhD Research Proposal Writing Service?

If speaking about top services like the ones described above, the individuals writing PhD proposals are typically qualified, hand-selected experts with 5-8 years of hands-on expertise in the field and hundreds of positive reviews from satisfied clients. 

Is Every PhD Research Proposal Writing Service Listed Legit?

Yes, the above PhD research proposal writing services are all legit and have over a decade of experience crafting proposals for domestic and international students from different PhD programs.

In Conclusion

Considering the challenges most students encounter in determining suitable methodologies, it becomes quite demanding to allocate sufficient time and energy to craft an impeccable PhD proposal. This is where the support of a specialized PhD research proposal writing service, such as Phdresearchproposal.org, becomes invaluable.

The service's focused approach ensures that its writers comprehend the nuances of the process and the challenges you face, enabling them to efficiently assist you in resolving them. Therefore, if you find yourself overwhelmed with the complexities of PhD proposal writing, consider seeking help from reputable professionals. With proper assistance, you can confidently present a compelling PhD proposal that meets the highest standards and achieves the desired result.