| ||
Statement | ||
Chapter 6. Variables, Assignment and Input |
---|
Assignment is fundamental to Python; it is how the objects created by an expression are preserved. We'll look at the basic assignment statement, plus the augmented assignment statement. Later, in Multiple Assignment Statement , we'll look at multiple assignment.
We create and change variables primarily with the assignment statement. This statement provides an expression and a variable name which will be used to label the value of the expression.
variable = expression
Here's a short script that contains some examples of assignment statements.
Example 6.1. example3.py
We have an object, the number 150 , which we assign to the variable shares . We have an expression 3+5.0/8.0 , which creates a floating-point number, which we save in the variable price . We have another expression, shares * price , which creates a floating-point number; we save this in value so that we can print it. This script created three new variables.
Since this file is new, we'll need to do the chmod +x example3.py once, after we create this file. Then, when we run this progam, we see the following.
Any of the usual arithmetic operations can be combined with assignment to create an augmented assignment statement.
For example, look at this augmented assignment statement:
This statement is a shorthand that means the same thing as the following:
Here's a larger example
Example 6.2. portfolio.py
First, we'll do the chmod +x portfolio.py on this file. Then, when we run this progam, we see the following.
The other basic math operations can be used similarly, although the purpose gets obscure for some operations. These include -=, *=, /=, %=, &=, ^=, |=, <<= and >>=.
Here's a lengthy example. This is an extension of Craps Odds in the section called “Numeric Types and Expressions” .
In craps, the first roll of the dice is called the “ come out roll ”. This roll can be won immediately if one rolls 7 or 11. It can be lost immediately if one roll 2, 3 or 12. The remaining numbers establish a point and the game continues.
Example 6.3. craps.py
There's a 22.2% chance of winning, and a 11.1% chance of losing. What's the chance of establishing a point? One way is to figure that it's what's left after winning or loosing. The total of all probabilities always add to 1. Subtract the odds of winning and the odds of losing and what's left is the odds of setting a point.
Here's another way to figure the odds of rolling 4, 5, 6, 8, 9 or 10.
By the way, you can add the statement print win + lose + point to confirm that these odds all add to 1. This means that we have defined all possible outcomes for the come out roll in craps.
We can trace the execution of a program by simply following the changes of value of all the variables in the program. Here's an example for Example 6.3, “craps.py”
As with many things Python, there is some additional subtlety to this, but we'll cover those topics later. For example, multiple-assignment statement is something we'll look into in more deeply in Chapter 13, Tuples .
Chapter 6. Variables, Assignment and Input | Input Functions |
Published under the terms of the Open Publication License |
File handling, python modules, python numpy, python pandas, python matplotlib, python scipy, machine learning, python mysql, python mongodb, python reference, module reference, python how to, python examples, python assignment operators.
Assignment operators are used to assign values to variables:
Operator | Example | Same As | Try it |
---|---|---|---|
= | x = 5 | x = 5 | |
+= | x += 3 | x = x + 3 | |
-= | x -= 3 | x = x - 3 | |
*= | x *= 3 | x = x * 3 | |
/= | x /= 3 | x = x / 3 | |
%= | x %= 3 | x = x % 3 | |
//= | x //= 3 | x = x // 3 | |
**= | x **= 3 | x = x ** 3 | |
&= | x &= 3 | x = x & 3 | |
|= | x |= 3 | x = x | 3 | |
^= | x ^= 3 | x = x ^ 3 | |
>>= | x >>= 3 | x = x >> 3 | |
<<= | x <<= 3 | x = x << 3 |
If you want to use W3Schools services as an educational institution, team or enterprise, send us an e-mail: [email protected]
If you want to report an error, or if you want to make a suggestion, send us an e-mail: [email protected]
Top references, top examples, get certified.
The importance of real code, exceptional cases, scope of the target, relative precedence of :=, change to evaluation order, differences between assignment expressions and assignment statements, specification changes during implementation, _pydecimal.py, datetime.py, sysconfig.py, simplifying list comprehensions, capturing condition values, changing the scope rules for comprehensions, alternative spellings, special-casing conditional statements, special-casing comprehensions, lowering operator precedence, allowing commas to the right, always requiring parentheses, why not just turn existing assignment into an expression, with assignment expressions, why bother with assignment statements, why not use a sublocal scope and prevent namespace pollution, style guide recommendations, acknowledgements, a numeric example, appendix b: rough code translations for comprehensions, appendix c: no changes to scope semantics.
This is a proposal for creating a way to assign to variables within an expression using the notation NAME := expr .
As part of this change, there is also an update to dictionary comprehension evaluation order to ensure key expressions are executed before value expressions (allowing the key to be bound to a name and then re-used as part of calculating the corresponding value).
During discussion of this PEP, the operator became informally known as “the walrus operator”. The construct’s formal name is “Assignment Expressions” (as per the PEP title), but they may also be referred to as “Named Expressions” (e.g. the CPython reference implementation uses that name internally).
Naming the result of an expression is an important part of programming, allowing a descriptive name to be used in place of a longer expression, and permitting reuse. Currently, this feature is available only in statement form, making it unavailable in list comprehensions and other expression contexts.
Additionally, naming sub-parts of a large expression can assist an interactive debugger, providing useful display hooks and partial results. Without a way to capture sub-expressions inline, this would require refactoring of the original code; with assignment expressions, this merely requires the insertion of a few name := markers. Removing the need to refactor reduces the likelihood that the code be inadvertently changed as part of debugging (a common cause of Heisenbugs), and is easier to dictate to another programmer.
During the development of this PEP many people (supporters and critics both) have had a tendency to focus on toy examples on the one hand, and on overly complex examples on the other.
The danger of toy examples is twofold: they are often too abstract to make anyone go “ooh, that’s compelling”, and they are easily refuted with “I would never write it that way anyway”.
The danger of overly complex examples is that they provide a convenient strawman for critics of the proposal to shoot down (“that’s obfuscated”).
Yet there is some use for both extremely simple and extremely complex examples: they are helpful to clarify the intended semantics. Therefore, there will be some of each below.
However, in order to be compelling , examples should be rooted in real code, i.e. code that was written without any thought of this PEP, as part of a useful application, however large or small. Tim Peters has been extremely helpful by going over his own personal code repository and picking examples of code he had written that (in his view) would have been clearer if rewritten with (sparing) use of assignment expressions. His conclusion: the current proposal would have allowed a modest but clear improvement in quite a few bits of code.
Another use of real code is to observe indirectly how much value programmers place on compactness. Guido van Rossum searched through a Dropbox code base and discovered some evidence that programmers value writing fewer lines over shorter lines.
Case in point: Guido found several examples where a programmer repeated a subexpression, slowing down the program, in order to save one line of code, e.g. instead of writing:
they would write:
Another example illustrates that programmers sometimes do more work to save an extra level of indentation:
This code tries to match pattern2 even if pattern1 has a match (in which case the match on pattern2 is never used). The more efficient rewrite would have been:
In most contexts where arbitrary Python expressions can be used, a named expression can appear. This is of the form NAME := expr where expr is any valid Python expression other than an unparenthesized tuple, and NAME is an identifier.
The value of such a named expression is the same as the incorporated expression, with the additional side-effect that the target is assigned that value:
There are a few places where assignment expressions are not allowed, in order to avoid ambiguities or user confusion:
This rule is included to simplify the choice for the user between an assignment statement and an assignment expression – there is no syntactic position where both are valid.
Again, this rule is included to avoid two visually similar ways of saying the same thing.
This rule is included to disallow excessively confusing code, and because parsing keyword arguments is complex enough already.
This rule is included to discourage side effects in a position whose exact semantics are already confusing to many users (cf. the common style recommendation against mutable default values), and also to echo the similar prohibition in calls (the previous bullet).
The reasoning here is similar to the two previous cases; this ungrouped assortment of symbols and operators composed of : and = is hard to read correctly.
This allows lambda to always bind less tightly than := ; having a name binding at the top level inside a lambda function is unlikely to be of value, as there is no way to make use of it. In cases where the name will be used more than once, the expression is likely to need parenthesizing anyway, so this prohibition will rarely affect code.
This shows that what looks like an assignment operator in an f-string is not always an assignment operator. The f-string parser uses : to indicate formatting options. To preserve backwards compatibility, assignment operator usage inside of f-strings must be parenthesized. As noted above, this usage of the assignment operator is not recommended.
An assignment expression does not introduce a new scope. In most cases the scope in which the target will be bound is self-explanatory: it is the current scope. If this scope contains a nonlocal or global declaration for the target, the assignment expression honors that. A lambda (being an explicit, if anonymous, function definition) counts as a scope for this purpose.
There is one special case: an assignment expression occurring in a list, set or dict comprehension or in a generator expression (below collectively referred to as “comprehensions”) binds the target in the containing scope, honoring a nonlocal or global declaration for the target in that scope, if one exists. For the purpose of this rule the containing scope of a nested comprehension is the scope that contains the outermost comprehension. A lambda counts as a containing scope.
The motivation for this special case is twofold. First, it allows us to conveniently capture a “witness” for an any() expression, or a counterexample for all() , for example:
Second, it allows a compact way of updating mutable state from a comprehension, for example:
However, an assignment expression target name cannot be the same as a for -target name appearing in any comprehension containing the assignment expression. The latter names are local to the comprehension in which they appear, so it would be contradictory for a contained use of the same name to refer to the scope containing the outermost comprehension instead.
For example, [i := i+1 for i in range(5)] is invalid: the for i part establishes that i is local to the comprehension, but the i := part insists that i is not local to the comprehension. The same reason makes these examples invalid too:
While it’s technically possible to assign consistent semantics to these cases, it’s difficult to determine whether those semantics actually make sense in the absence of real use cases. Accordingly, the reference implementation [1] will ensure that such cases raise SyntaxError , rather than executing with implementation defined behaviour.
This restriction applies even if the assignment expression is never executed:
For the comprehension body (the part before the first “for” keyword) and the filter expression (the part after “if” and before any nested “for”), this restriction applies solely to target names that are also used as iteration variables in the comprehension. Lambda expressions appearing in these positions introduce a new explicit function scope, and hence may use assignment expressions with no additional restrictions.
Due to design constraints in the reference implementation (the symbol table analyser cannot easily detect when names are re-used between the leftmost comprehension iterable expression and the rest of the comprehension), named expressions are disallowed entirely as part of comprehension iterable expressions (the part after each “in”, and before any subsequent “if” or “for” keyword):
A further exception applies when an assignment expression occurs in a comprehension whose containing scope is a class scope. If the rules above were to result in the target being assigned in that class’s scope, the assignment expression is expressly invalid. This case also raises SyntaxError :
(The reason for the latter exception is the implicit function scope created for comprehensions – there is currently no runtime mechanism for a function to refer to a variable in the containing class scope, and we do not want to add such a mechanism. If this issue ever gets resolved this special case may be removed from the specification of assignment expressions. Note that the problem already exists for using a variable defined in the class scope from a comprehension.)
See Appendix B for some examples of how the rules for targets in comprehensions translate to equivalent code.
The := operator groups more tightly than a comma in all syntactic positions where it is legal, but less tightly than all other operators, including or , and , not , and conditional expressions ( A if C else B ). As follows from section “Exceptional cases” above, it is never allowed at the same level as = . In case a different grouping is desired, parentheses should be used.
The := operator may be used directly in a positional function call argument; however it is invalid directly in a keyword argument.
Some examples to clarify what’s technically valid or invalid:
Most of the “valid” examples above are not recommended, since human readers of Python source code who are quickly glancing at some code may miss the distinction. But simple cases are not objectionable:
This PEP recommends always putting spaces around := , similar to PEP 8 ’s recommendation for = when used for assignment, whereas the latter disallows spaces around = used for keyword arguments.)
In order to have precisely defined semantics, the proposal requires evaluation order to be well-defined. This is technically not a new requirement, as function calls may already have side effects. Python already has a rule that subexpressions are generally evaluated from left to right. However, assignment expressions make these side effects more visible, and we propose a single change to the current evaluation order:
Most importantly, since := is an expression, it can be used in contexts where statements are illegal, including lambda functions and comprehensions.
Conversely, assignment expressions don’t support the advanced features found in assignment statements:
The following changes have been made based on implementation experience and additional review after the PEP was first accepted and before Python 3.8 was released:
env_base is only used on these lines, putting its assignment on the if moves it as the “header” of the block.
Avoid nested if and remove one indentation level.
Code looks more regular and avoid multiple nested if. (See Appendix A for the origin of this example.)
tz is only used for s += tz , moving its assignment inside the if helps to show its scope.
Calling fp.readline() in the while condition and calling .match() on the if lines make the code more compact without making it harder to understand.
A list comprehension can map and filter efficiently by capturing the condition:
Similarly, a subexpression can be reused within the main expression, by giving it a name on first use:
Note that in both cases the variable y is bound in the containing scope (i.e. at the same level as results or stuff ).
Assignment expressions can be used to good effect in the header of an if or while statement:
Particularly with the while loop, this can remove the need to have an infinite loop, an assignment, and a condition. It also creates a smooth parallel between a loop which simply uses a function call as its condition, and one which uses that as its condition but also uses the actual value.
An example from the low-level UNIX world:
Proposals broadly similar to this one have come up frequently on python-ideas. Below are a number of alternative syntaxes, some of them specific to comprehensions, which have been rejected in favour of the one given above.
A previous version of this PEP proposed subtle changes to the scope rules for comprehensions, to make them more usable in class scope and to unify the scope of the “outermost iterable” and the rest of the comprehension. However, this part of the proposal would have caused backwards incompatibilities, and has been withdrawn so the PEP can focus on assignment expressions.
Broadly the same semantics as the current proposal, but spelled differently.
Since EXPR as NAME already has meaning in import , except and with statements (with different semantics), this would create unnecessary confusion or require special-casing (e.g. to forbid assignment within the headers of these statements).
(Note that with EXPR as VAR does not simply assign the value of EXPR to VAR – it calls EXPR.__enter__() and assigns the result of that to VAR .)
Additional reasons to prefer := over this spelling include:
To the contrary, the assignment expression does not belong to the if or while that starts the line, and we intentionally allow assignment expressions in other contexts as well.
reinforces the visual recognition of assignment expressions.
This syntax is inspired by languages such as R and Haskell, and some programmable calculators. (Note that a left-facing arrow y <- f(x) is not possible in Python, as it would be interpreted as less-than and unary minus.) This syntax has a slight advantage over ‘as’ in that it does not conflict with with , except and import , but otherwise is equivalent. But it is entirely unrelated to Python’s other use of -> (function return type annotations), and compared to := (which dates back to Algol-58) it has a much weaker tradition.
This has the advantage that leaked usage can be readily detected, removing some forms of syntactic ambiguity. However, this would be the only place in Python where a variable’s scope is encoded into its name, making refactoring harder.
Execution order is inverted (the indented body is performed first, followed by the “header”). This requires a new keyword, unless an existing keyword is repurposed (most likely with: ). See PEP 3150 for prior discussion on this subject (with the proposed keyword being given: ).
This syntax has fewer conflicts than as does (conflicting only with the raise Exc from Exc notation), but is otherwise comparable to it. Instead of paralleling with expr as target: (which can be useful but can also be confusing), this has no parallels, but is evocative.
One of the most popular use-cases is if and while statements. Instead of a more general solution, this proposal enhances the syntax of these two statements to add a means of capturing the compared value:
This works beautifully if and ONLY if the desired condition is based on the truthiness of the captured value. It is thus effective for specific use-cases (regex matches, socket reads that return '' when done), and completely useless in more complicated cases (e.g. where the condition is f(x) < 0 and you want to capture the value of f(x) ). It also has no benefit to list comprehensions.
Advantages: No syntactic ambiguities. Disadvantages: Answers only a fraction of possible use-cases, even in if / while statements.
Another common use-case is comprehensions (list/set/dict, and genexps). As above, proposals have been made for comprehension-specific solutions.
This brings the subexpression to a location in between the ‘for’ loop and the expression. It introduces an additional language keyword, which creates conflicts. Of the three, where reads the most cleanly, but also has the greatest potential for conflict (e.g. SQLAlchemy and numpy have where methods, as does tkinter.dnd.Icon in the standard library).
As above, but reusing the with keyword. Doesn’t read too badly, and needs no additional language keyword. Is restricted to comprehensions, though, and cannot as easily be transformed into “longhand” for-loop syntax. Has the C problem that an equals sign in an expression can now create a name binding, rather than performing a comparison. Would raise the question of why “with NAME = EXPR:” cannot be used as a statement on its own.
As per option 2, but using as rather than an equals sign. Aligns syntactically with other uses of as for name binding, but a simple transformation to for-loop longhand would create drastically different semantics; the meaning of with inside a comprehension would be completely different from the meaning as a stand-alone statement, while retaining identical syntax.
Regardless of the spelling chosen, this introduces a stark difference between comprehensions and the equivalent unrolled long-hand form of the loop. It is no longer possible to unwrap the loop into statement form without reworking any name bindings. The only keyword that can be repurposed to this task is with , thus giving it sneakily different semantics in a comprehension than in a statement; alternatively, a new keyword is needed, with all the costs therein.
There are two logical precedences for the := operator. Either it should bind as loosely as possible, as does statement-assignment; or it should bind more tightly than comparison operators. Placing its precedence between the comparison and arithmetic operators (to be precise: just lower than bitwise OR) allows most uses inside while and if conditions to be spelled without parentheses, as it is most likely that you wish to capture the value of something, then perform a comparison on it:
Once find() returns -1, the loop terminates. If := binds as loosely as = does, this would capture the result of the comparison (generally either True or False ), which is less useful.
While this behaviour would be convenient in many situations, it is also harder to explain than “the := operator behaves just like the assignment statement”, and as such, the precedence for := has been made as close as possible to that of = (with the exception that it binds tighter than comma).
Some critics have claimed that the assignment expressions should allow unparenthesized tuples on the right, so that these two would be equivalent:
(With the current version of the proposal, the latter would be equivalent to ((point := x), y) .)
However, adopting this stance would logically lead to the conclusion that when used in a function call, assignment expressions also bind less tight than comma, so we’d have the following confusing equivalence:
The less confusing option is to make := bind more tightly than comma.
It’s been proposed to just always require parentheses around an assignment expression. This would resolve many ambiguities, and indeed parentheses will frequently be needed to extract the desired subexpression. But in the following cases the extra parentheses feel redundant:
C and its derivatives define the = operator as an expression, rather than a statement as is Python’s way. This allows assignments in more contexts, including contexts where comparisons are more common. The syntactic similarity between if (x == y) and if (x = y) belies their drastically different semantics. Thus this proposal uses := to clarify the distinction.
The two forms have different flexibilities. The := operator can be used inside a larger expression; the = statement can be augmented to += and its friends, can be chained, and can assign to attributes and subscripts.
Previous revisions of this proposal involved sublocal scope (restricted to a single statement), preventing name leakage and namespace pollution. While a definite advantage in a number of situations, this increases complexity in many others, and the costs are not justified by the benefits. In the interests of language simplicity, the name bindings created here are exactly equivalent to any other name bindings, including that usage at class or module scope will create externally-visible names. This is no different from for loops or other constructs, and can be solved the same way: del the name once it is no longer needed, or prefix it with an underscore.
(The author wishes to thank Guido van Rossum and Christoph Groth for their suggestions to move the proposal in this direction. [2] )
As expression assignments can sometimes be used equivalently to statement assignments, the question of which should be preferred will arise. For the benefit of style guides such as PEP 8 , two recommendations are suggested.
The authors wish to thank Alyssa Coghlan and Steven D’Aprano for their considerable contributions to this proposal, and members of the core-mentorship mailing list for assistance with implementation.
Here’s a brief essay Tim Peters wrote on the topic.
I dislike “busy” lines of code, and also dislike putting conceptually unrelated logic on a single line. So, for example, instead of:
instead. So I suspected I’d find few places I’d want to use assignment expressions. I didn’t even consider them for lines already stretching halfway across the screen. In other cases, “unrelated” ruled:
is a vast improvement over the briefer:
The original two statements are doing entirely different conceptual things, and slamming them together is conceptually insane.
In other cases, combining related logic made it harder to understand, such as rewriting:
as the briefer:
The while test there is too subtle, crucially relying on strict left-to-right evaluation in a non-short-circuiting or method-chaining context. My brain isn’t wired that way.
But cases like that were rare. Name binding is very frequent, and “sparse is better than dense” does not mean “almost empty is better than sparse”. For example, I have many functions that return None or 0 to communicate “I have nothing useful to return in this case, but since that’s expected often I’m not going to annoy you with an exception”. This is essentially the same as regular expression search functions returning None when there is no match. So there was lots of code of the form:
I find that clearer, and certainly a bit less typing and pattern-matching reading, as:
It’s also nice to trade away a small amount of horizontal whitespace to get another _line_ of surrounding code on screen. I didn’t give much weight to this at first, but it was so very frequent it added up, and I soon enough became annoyed that I couldn’t actually run the briefer code. That surprised me!
There are other cases where assignment expressions really shine. Rather than pick another from my code, Kirill Balunov gave a lovely example from the standard library’s copy() function in copy.py :
The ever-increasing indentation is semantically misleading: the logic is conceptually flat, “the first test that succeeds wins”:
Using easy assignment expressions allows the visual structure of the code to emphasize the conceptual flatness of the logic; ever-increasing indentation obscured it.
A smaller example from my code delighted me, both allowing to put inherently related logic in a single line, and allowing to remove an annoying “artificial” indentation level:
That if is about as long as I want my lines to get, but remains easy to follow.
So, in all, in most lines binding a name, I wouldn’t use assignment expressions, but because that construct is so very frequent, that leaves many places I would. In most of the latter, I found a small win that adds up due to how often it occurs, and in the rest I found a moderate to major win. I’d certainly use it more often than ternary if , but significantly less often than augmented assignment.
I have another example that quite impressed me at the time.
Where all variables are positive integers, and a is at least as large as the n’th root of x, this algorithm returns the floor of the n’th root of x (and roughly doubling the number of accurate bits per iteration):
It’s not obvious why that works, but is no more obvious in the “loop and a half” form. It’s hard to prove correctness without building on the right insight (the “arithmetic mean - geometric mean inequality”), and knowing some non-trivial things about how nested floor functions behave. That is, the challenges are in the math, not really in the coding.
If you do know all that, then the assignment-expression form is easily read as “while the current guess is too large, get a smaller guess”, where the “too large?” test and the new guess share an expensive sub-expression.
To my eyes, the original form is harder to understand:
This appendix attempts to clarify (though not specify) the rules when a target occurs in a comprehension or in a generator expression. For a number of illustrative examples we show the original code, containing a comprehension, and the translation, where the comprehension has been replaced by an equivalent generator function plus some scaffolding.
Since [x for ...] is equivalent to list(x for ...) these examples all use list comprehensions without loss of generality. And since these examples are meant to clarify edge cases of the rules, they aren’t trying to look like real code.
Note: comprehensions are already implemented via synthesizing nested generator functions like those in this appendix. The new part is adding appropriate declarations to establish the intended scope of assignment expression targets (the same scope they resolve to as if the assignment were performed in the block containing the outermost comprehension). For type inference purposes, these illustrative expansions do not imply that assignment expression targets are always Optional (but they do indicate the target binding scope).
Let’s start with a reminder of what code is generated for a generator expression without assignment expression.
Let’s add a simple assignment expression.
Let’s add a global TARGET declaration in f() .
Or instead let’s add a nonlocal TARGET declaration in f() .
Finally, let’s nest two comprehensions.
Because it has been a point of confusion, note that nothing about Python’s scoping semantics is changed. Function-local scopes continue to be resolved at compile time, and to have indefinite temporal extent at run time (“full closures”). Example:
This document has been placed in the public domain.
Source: https://github.com/python/peps/blob/main/peps/pep-0572.rst
Last modified: 2023-10-11 12:05:51 GMT
In the following examples, input and output are distinguished by the presence or absence of prompts ( >>> and … ): to repeat the example, you must type everything after the prompt, when the prompt appears; lines that do not begin with a prompt are output from the interpreter. Note that a secondary prompt on a line by itself in an example means you must type a blank line; this is used to end a multi-line command.
You can toggle the display of prompts and output by clicking on >>> in the upper-right corner of an example box. If you hide the prompts and output for an example, then you can easily copy and paste the input lines into your interpreter.
Many of the examples in this manual, even those entered at the interactive prompt, include comments. Comments in Python start with the hash character, # , and extend to the end of the physical line. A comment may appear at the start of a line or following whitespace or code, but not within a string literal. A hash character within a string literal is just a hash character. Since comments are to clarify code and are not interpreted by Python, they may be omitted when typing in examples.
Some examples:
Let’s try some simple Python commands. Start the interpreter and wait for the primary prompt, >>> . (It shouldn’t take long.)
The interpreter acts as a simple calculator: you can type an expression at it and it will write the value. Expression syntax is straightforward: the operators + , - , * and / can be used to perform arithmetic; parentheses ( () ) can be used for grouping. For example:
The integer numbers (e.g. 2 , 4 , 20 ) have type int , the ones with a fractional part (e.g. 5.0 , 1.6 ) have type float . We will see more about numeric types later in the tutorial.
Division ( / ) always returns a float. To do floor division and get an integer result you can use the // operator; to calculate the remainder you can use % :
With Python, it is possible to use the ** operator to calculate powers [ 1 ] :
The equal sign ( = ) is used to assign a value to a variable. Afterwards, no result is displayed before the next interactive prompt:
If a variable is not “defined” (assigned a value), trying to use it will give you an error:
There is full support for floating point; operators with mixed type operands convert the integer operand to floating point:
In interactive mode, the last printed expression is assigned to the variable _ . This means that when you are using Python as a desk calculator, it is somewhat easier to continue calculations, for example:
This variable should be treated as read-only by the user. Don’t explicitly assign a value to it — you would create an independent local variable with the same name masking the built-in variable with its magic behavior.
In addition to int and float , Python supports other types of numbers, such as Decimal and Fraction . Python also has built-in support for complex numbers , and uses the j or J suffix to indicate the imaginary part (e.g. 3+5j ).
Python can manipulate text (represented by type str , so-called “strings”) as well as numbers. This includes characters “ ! ”, words “ rabbit ”, names “ Paris ”, sentences “ Got your back. ”, etc. “ Yay! :) ”. They can be enclosed in single quotes ( '...' ) or double quotes ( "..." ) with the same result [ 2 ] .
To quote a quote, we need to “escape” it, by preceding it with \ . Alternatively, we can use the other type of quotation marks:
In the Python shell, the string definition and output string can look different. The print() function produces a more readable output, by omitting the enclosing quotes and by printing escaped and special characters:
If you don’t want characters prefaced by \ to be interpreted as special characters, you can use raw strings by adding an r before the first quote:
There is one subtle aspect to raw strings: a raw string may not end in an odd number of \ characters; see the FAQ entry for more information and workarounds.
String literals can span multiple lines. One way is using triple-quotes: """...""" or '''...''' . End of lines are automatically included in the string, but it’s possible to prevent this by adding a \ at the end of the line. The following example:
produces the following output (note that the initial newline is not included):
Strings can be concatenated (glued together) with the + operator, and repeated with * :
Two or more string literals (i.e. the ones enclosed between quotes) next to each other are automatically concatenated.
This feature is particularly useful when you want to break long strings:
This only works with two literals though, not with variables or expressions:
If you want to concatenate variables or a variable and a literal, use + :
Strings can be indexed (subscripted), with the first character having index 0. There is no separate character type; a character is simply a string of size one:
Indices may also be negative numbers, to start counting from the right:
Note that since -0 is the same as 0, negative indices start from -1.
In addition to indexing, slicing is also supported. While indexing is used to obtain individual characters, slicing allows you to obtain a substring:
Slice indices have useful defaults; an omitted first index defaults to zero, an omitted second index defaults to the size of the string being sliced.
Note how the start is always included, and the end always excluded. This makes sure that s[:i] + s[i:] is always equal to s :
One way to remember how slices work is to think of the indices as pointing between characters, with the left edge of the first character numbered 0. Then the right edge of the last character of a string of n characters has index n , for example:
The first row of numbers gives the position of the indices 0…6 in the string; the second row gives the corresponding negative indices. The slice from i to j consists of all characters between the edges labeled i and j , respectively.
For non-negative indices, the length of a slice is the difference of the indices, if both are within bounds. For example, the length of word[1:3] is 2.
Attempting to use an index that is too large will result in an error:
However, out of range slice indexes are handled gracefully when used for slicing:
Python strings cannot be changed — they are immutable . Therefore, assigning to an indexed position in the string results in an error:
If you need a different string, you should create a new one:
The built-in function len() returns the length of a string:
Strings are examples of sequence types , and support the common operations supported by such types.
Strings support a large number of methods for basic transformations and searching.
String literals that have embedded expressions.
Information about string formatting with str.format() .
The old formatting operations invoked when strings are the left operand of the % operator are described in more detail here.
Python knows a number of compound data types, used to group together other values. The most versatile is the list , which can be written as a list of comma-separated values (items) between square brackets. Lists might contain items of different types, but usually the items all have the same type.
Like strings (and all other built-in sequence types), lists can be indexed and sliced:
Lists also support operations like concatenation:
Unlike strings, which are immutable , lists are a mutable type, i.e. it is possible to change their content:
You can also add new items at the end of the list, by using the list.append() method (we will see more about methods later):
Simple assignment in Python never copies data. When you assign a list to a variable, the variable refers to the existing list . Any changes you make to the list through one variable will be seen through all other variables that refer to it.:
All slice operations return a new list containing the requested elements. This means that the following slice returns a shallow copy of the list:
Assignment to slices is also possible, and this can even change the size of the list or clear it entirely:
The built-in function len() also applies to lists:
It is possible to nest lists (create lists containing other lists), for example:
Of course, we can use Python for more complicated tasks than adding two and two together. For instance, we can write an initial sub-sequence of the Fibonacci series as follows:
This example introduces several new features.
The first line contains a multiple assignment : the variables a and b simultaneously get the new values 0 and 1. On the last line this is used again, demonstrating that the expressions on the right-hand side are all evaluated first before any of the assignments take place. The right-hand side expressions are evaluated from the left to the right.
The while loop executes as long as the condition (here: a < 10 ) remains true. In Python, like in C, any non-zero integer value is true; zero is false. The condition may also be a string or list value, in fact any sequence; anything with a non-zero length is true, empty sequences are false. The test used in the example is a simple comparison. The standard comparison operators are written the same as in C: < (less than), > (greater than), == (equal to), <= (less than or equal to), >= (greater than or equal to) and != (not equal to).
The body of the loop is indented : indentation is Python’s way of grouping statements. At the interactive prompt, you have to type a tab or space(s) for each indented line. In practice you will prepare more complicated input for Python with a text editor; all decent text editors have an auto-indent facility. When a compound statement is entered interactively, it must be followed by a blank line to indicate completion (since the parser cannot guess when you have typed the last line). Note that each line within a basic block must be indented by the same amount.
The print() function writes the value of the argument(s) it is given. It differs from just writing the expression you want to write (as we did earlier in the calculator examples) in the way it handles multiple arguments, floating point quantities, and strings. Strings are printed without quotes, and a space is inserted between items, so you can format things nicely, like this:
The keyword argument end can be used to avoid the newline after the output, or end the output with a different string:
2. Using the Python Interpreter
4. More Control Flow Tools
An assignment statement designates a value for a variable. An assignment statement can be used as an expression in Java.
After a variable is declared, you can assign a value to it by using an assignment statement . In Java, the equal sign = is used as the assignment operator . The syntax for assignment statements is as follows:
An expression represents a computation involving values, variables, and operators that, when taking them together, evaluates to a value. For example, consider the following code:
You can use a variable in an expression. A variable can also be used on both sides of the = operator. For example:
In the above assignment statement, the result of x + 1 is assigned to the variable x . Let’s say that x is 1 before the statement is executed, and so becomes 2 after the statement execution.
To assign a value to a variable, you must place the variable name to the left of the assignment operator. Thus the following statement is wrong:
Note that the math equation x = 2 * x + 1 ≠ the Java expression x = 2 * x + 1
Which is equivalent to:
And this statement
is equivalent to:
Note: The data type of a variable on the left must be compatible with the data type of a value on the right. For example, int x = 1.0 would be illegal, because the data type of x is int (integer) and does not accept the double value 1.0 without Type Casting .
◄◄◄BACK | NEXT►►►
Enhance your Brain
Subscribe to Receive Free Bio Hacking, Nootropic, and Health Information
HTML for Simple Website Customization My Personal Web Customization Personal Insights
DISCLAIMER | Sitemap | ◘
HTML for Simple Website Customization My Personal Web Customization Personal Insights SEO Checklist Publishing Checklist My Tools
JavaHyperText and Data Structures |
1. explaining how to execute the assignment statement.
The first question is easy ---you can copy from the first video or its transcript on the pdf file. Questions 2 and 3 ask about the if-statement and if-else statement. These are the same as in just about any programming language, except for the syntax, of course. So use your knowledge of these statements in whatever programming language you know.
1. Write the algorithm for executing the Java assignment statement <variable>= <expression>; 2. Write the algorithm for executing the Java if-statement if (<boolean-expression>) <statement 1> 3. Write the algorithm for executing the Java if-else-statement if (<boolean-expression>) <statement 1> else <statement 2> 4. Tell us in a few words what you thought of the videos on presenting algorithms in English and executing the assignment statement, their message, and the homework.
Python Programming
Updated on: September 1, 2021 | 20 Comments
In this tutorial, you will learn Python statements. Also, you will learn simple statements and compound statements.
Multi-line statements, python compound statements, expression statements, the pass statement.
A statement is an instruction that a Python interpreter can execute . So, in simple words, we can say anything written in Python is a statement.
Python statement ends with the token NEWLINE character. It means each line in a Python script is a statement.
For example, a = 10 is an assignment statement. where a is a variable name and 10 is its value. There are other kinds of statements such as if statement, for statement, while statement, etc., we will learn them in the following lessons.
There are mainly four types of statements in Python, print statements, Assignment statements, Conditional statements , Looping statements .
The print and assignment statements are commonly used. The result of a print statement is a value. Assignment statements don’t produce a result it just assigns a value to the operand on its left side.
A Python script usually contains a sequence of statements. If there is more than one statement, the result appears only one time when all statements execute.
As you can see, we have used three statements in our program. Also, we have added the comments in our code. In Python, we use the hash ( # ) symbol to start writing a comment. In Python, comments describe what code is doing so other people can understand it.
We can add multiple statements on a single line separated by semicolons, as follows:
Python statement ends with the token NEWLINE character. But we can extend the statement over multiple lines using line continuation character ( \ ). This is known as an explicit continuation.
Implicit continuation :
We can use parentheses () to write a multi-line statement. We can add a line continuation statement inside it. Whatever we add inside a parentheses () will treat as a single statement even it is placed on multiple lines.
As you see, we have removed the the line continuation character ( \ ) if we are using the parentheses () .
We can use square brackets [] to create a list . Then, if required, we can place each list item on a single line for better readability.
Same as square brackets, we can use the curly { } to create a dictionary with every key-value pair on a new line for better readability.
Compound statements contain (groups of) other statements; they affect or control the execution of those other statements in some way.
The compound statement includes the conditional and loop statement.
Apart from the declaration and calculation statements, Python has various simple statements for a specific purpose. Let’s see them one by one.
If you are an absolute beginner, you can move to the other beginner tutorials and then come back to this section.
Expression statements are used to compute and write a value. An expression statement evaluates the expression list and calculates the value.
To understand this, you need to understand an expression is in Python.
An expression is a combination of values, variables , and operators . A single value all by itself is considered an expression. Following are all legal expressions (assuming that the variable x has been assigned a value):
If your type the expression in an interactive python shell, you will get the result.
So here x + 20 is the expression statement which computes the final value if we assume variable x has been assigned a value (10). So final value of the expression will become 30.
But in a script, an expression all by itself doesn’t do anything! So we mostly assign an expression to a variable, which becomes a statement for an interpreter to execute.
pass is a null operation. Nothing happens when it executes. It is useful as a placeholder when a statement is required syntactically, but no code needs to be executed.
For example, you created a function for future releases, so you don’t want to write a code now. In such cases, we can use a pass statement.
The Python del statement is used to delete objects/variables.
The target_list contains the variable to delete separated by a comma. Once the variable is deleted, we can’t access it.
We create a function in Python to perform a specific task. The function can return a value that is nothing but an output of function execution.
Using a return statement, we can return a value from a function when called.
The import statement is used to import modules . We can also import individual classes from a module.
Python has a huge list of built-in modules which we can use in our code. For example, we can use the built-in module DateTime to work with date and time.
Example : Import datetime module
We use break, continue statements to alter the loop’s execution in a certain manner.
Read More : Break and Continue in Python
Did you find this page helpful? Let others know about it. Sharing helps me continue to create free Python resources.
I’m Vishal Hule , the Founder of PYnative.com. As a Python developer, I enjoy assisting students, developers, and learners. Follow me on Twitter .
Python exercises and quizzes.
Free coding exercises and quizzes cover Python basics, data structure, data analytics, and more.
Loading comments... Please wait.
PYnative.com is for Python lovers. Here, You can get Tutorials, Exercises, and Quizzes to practice and improve your Python skills .
To get New Python Tutorials, Exercises, and Quizzes
We use cookies to improve your experience. While using PYnative, you agree to have read and accepted our Terms Of Use , Cookie Policy , and Privacy Policy .
Copyright © 2018–2024 pynative.com
Enrollment options.
Java programs store data values in variables. When a programmer creates a variable in a Java application, he declares the type and name of the variable, then assigns a value to it. The value of a variable can be altered at subsequent points in execution using further assignment operations. The assignment statement in Java involves using the assignment operator to set the value of a variable. The exact syntax depends on the type of variable receiving a value.
Advertisement
Video of the Day
In Java, variables are strongly typed. This means that when you declare a variable in a Java program, you must declare its type, followed by its name. The following sample Java code demonstrates declaring two variables, one of primitive-type integer and one of an object type for a class within the application: int num; ApplicationHelper myHelp;
Once a program contains a variable declaration, the kind of value assigned to the variable must be suited to the type declared. These variable declarations could be followed by assignment statements on subsequent lines. However, the assignment operation could also take place on the same line as the declaration.
Assignment in Java is the process of giving a value to a primitive-type variable or giving an object reference to an object-type variable. The equals sign acts as assignment operator in Java, followed by the value to assign. The following sample Java code demonstrates assigning a value to a primitive-type integer variable, which has already been declared: num = 5;
The assignment operation could alternatively appear within the same line of code as the declaration of the variable, as follows: int num = 5;
The value of the variable can be altered again in subsequent processing as in this example: num++;
This code increments the variable value, adding a value of one to it.
When the assignment statement appears with object references, the assignment operation may also involve object instantiation. When Java code creates a new object instance of a Java class in an application, the "new" keyword causes the constructor method of the class to execute, instantiating the object. The following sample code demonstrates instantiating an object variable: myHelp = new ApplicationHelper();
This could also appear within the same line as the variable declaration as follows: ApplicationHelper myHelp = new ApplicationHelper();
When this line of code executes, the class constructor method executes, returning an instance of the class, a reference to which is stored by the variable.
Once a variable has been declared and assigned a value, a Java program can refer to the variable in subsequent processing. For primitive-type variables, the variable name refers to a stored value. For object types, the variable refers to the location of the object instance in memory. This means that two object variables can point to the same instance, as in the following sample code: ApplicationHelper myHelp = new ApplicationHelper(); ApplicationHelper sameHelp = myHelp;
This syntax appears commonly when programs pass object references as parameters to class methods.
Screenshot loading...
Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most.
Q&A for work
Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.
Get early access and see previews of new features.
This is the Verilog code.
I'm getting the following errors. Can you help me understand how to fix them?
There are a few syntax errors with your code.
Do not use the assign keyword to make an assignment to a reg ( F1 ).
Do not place a module instance ( sub ) inside an always block.
Use an instance name for your sub module instance.
Do not create a task with the same name as a module ( sub ). There is no need for the task/endtask in this case.
Here is a version which compiles cleanly for me:
Reminder: Answers generated by artificial intelligence tools are not allowed on Stack Overflow. Learn more
Post as a guest.
Required, but never shown
By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy .
The JavaScript reference serves as a repository of facts about the JavaScript language. The entire language is described here in detail. As you write JavaScript code, you'll refer to these pages often (thus the title "JavaScript reference").
The JavaScript language is intended to be used within some larger environment, be it a browser, server-side scripts, or similar. For the most part, this reference attempts to be environment-agnostic and does not target a web browser environment.
If you are new to JavaScript, start with the guide . Once you have a firm grasp of the fundamentals, you can use the reference to get more details on individual objects and language constructs.
JavaScript standard built-in objects , along with their methods and properties.
Function properties.
Error objects.
Text processing, indexed collections.
Structured data.
JavaScript statements and declarations
Functions and classes.
JavaScript expressions and operators .
Left-hand-side expressions.
Unary operators, arithmetic operators, relational operators.
Bitwise shift operators.
Binary logical operators, conditional (ternary) operator.
Spread syntax, comma operator.
JavaScript functions.
JavaScript classes.
So you married a supreme court justice, sign up for democracy, refreshed, a newsletter series on how to renovate the republic, justice alito is right about today’s politics, trump telegraphs plans to neuter congress, this time by seizing spending, the ‘double haters’ misnomer: biden’s secret weapon, how could a city built on a lake run out of water look at mexico city., going for gold in the trump loyalty olympics, 5 practical ways to cut ultra-processed foods from your diet, how congress could curb the use of lawfare for partisan attacks, no one should be surprised a black politician is the canary in aipac’s coal mine, taylor swift and beyoncé albums ‘dropped’ we’re all insiders now..
Stephen bannon ordered to report to prison, falling apart under pressure, cartoon by clay jones, raising taxes this much in d.c. will backfire, today’s western alliance needs the spirit of the boys of pointe du hoc, an epidemic of scientific fakery threatens to overwhelm publishers, merrick garland: unfounded attacks on the justice department must end, obama tried to pivot to asia in 2011. we must succeed this time., ask eugene robinson about the latest news around the u.s. and world, what’s a dog’s favorite shakespeare play i was taking your jokes., chat with karen tumulty about the campaign trail, chat with david ignatius about the war in ukraine and foreign affairs.
What biden needs to say about the economy if he wants to win, how to help d.c.’s kids learn the math they need to succeed, eighty years after d-day, these lessons matter more than ever.
COMMENTS
The Assignment Statement Syntax. To create a new variable or to update the value of an existing one in Python, you'll use an assignment statement. This statement has the following three components: A left operand, which must be a variable; The assignment operator (=) A right operand, which can be a concrete value, an object, or an expression
Multiple- target assignment: x = y = 75. print(x, y) In this form, Python assigns a reference to the same object (the object which is rightmost) to all the target on the left. OUTPUT. 75 75. 7. Augmented assignment : The augmented assignment is a shorthand assignment that combines an expression and an assignment.
An Assignment statement is a statement that is used to set a value to the variable name in a program.. Assignment statement allows a variable to hold different types of values during its program lifespan. Another way of understanding an assignment statement is, it stores a value in the memory location which is denoted by a variable name.. Syntax
Learn the basics of assignment statements in Python in this tutorial. We'll cover the syntax and usage of the assignment operator, including multiple assignm...
Assignment (computer science) In computer programming, an assignment statement sets and/or re-sets the value stored in the storage location (s) denoted by a variable name; in other words, it copies a value into the variable. In most imperative programming languages, the assignment statement (or expression) is a fundamental construct.
For example, assignment expressions using the := syntax allow variables to be assigned inside of if statements, which can often produce shorter and more compact sections of Python code by eliminating variable assignments in lines preceding or following the if statement. In this tutorial, you will use assignment expressions in several examples ...
The syntax for an expression statement is: ... An assignment statement evaluates the expression list (remember that this can be a single expression or a comma-separated list, the latter yielding a tuple) and assigns the single resulting object to each of the target lists, from left to right. ...
For example, x = x - 1, x -= 1, and x--are all assignment statements which do the same thing — assign the variable x a new value that is one lower than its current value. Examples Basic assignment statement. In this example we use ReadLine to get input from the user and store it in a name variable.
Syntax. Assignment statements consist of a variable, an equal sign, and an expression. Here's an example: Get hands-on with 1200+ tech skills courses.
Assignment Statements. Assignment statements in a program come in two forms - with and without mutations. Assignments without mutation are those that give a value to a variable without using the old value of that variable. ... For example, an increment statement like x = x + 1 MUTATES the value of x by updating its value to be one bigger than ...
The assignment statement. The assignment statement is used to store a value in a variable. As in most programming languages these days, the assignment statement has the form: <variable>= <expression>; For example, once we have an int variable j, we can assign it the value of expression 4 + 6: int j; j= 4+6; As a convention, we always place a ...
This statement provides an expression and a variable name which will be used to label the value of the expression. variable = expression. Here's a short script that contains some examples of assignment statements. Example 6.1. example3.py. #!/usr/bin/env python. # Computer the value of a block of stock. shares= 150. price= 3 + 5.0/8.0.
Python Assignment Operators. Assignment operators are used to assign values to variables: Operator. Example. Same As. Try it. =. x = 5. x = 5.
Unparenthesized assignment expressions are prohibited at the top level of the right hand side of an assignment statement. Example: y0 = y1 := f(x) # INVALID y0 = (y1 := f(x)) # Valid, though discouraged. Again, this rule is included to avoid two visually similar ways of saying the same thing.
This example introduces several new features. The first line contains a multiple assignment: the variables a and b simultaneously get the new values 0 and 1. On the last line this is used again, demonstrating that the expressions on the right-hand side are all evaluated first before any of the assignments take place.
An assignment statement designates a value for a variable. An assignment statement can be used as an expression in Java. After a variable is declared, you can assign a value to it by using an assignment statement. In Java, the equal sign = is used as the assignment operator. The syntax for assignment statements is as follows: variable ...
Questions 2 and 3 ask about the if-statement and if-else statement. These are the same as in just about any programming language, except for the syntax, of course. So use your knowledge of these statements in whatever programming language you know. 1. Write the algorithm for executing the Java assignment statement <variable>= <expression>; 2.
The assignment operator = is used to associate a variable name with a given value. For example, type the command: a=3.45. in the command line window. This command assigns the value 3.45 to the variable named a. Next, type the command: a. in the command window and hit the enter key. You should see the value contained in the variable a echoed to ...
A statement is an instruction that a Python interpreter can execute. So, in simple words, we can say anything written in Python is a statement. Python statement ends with the token NEWLINE character. It means each line in a Python script is a statement. For example, a = 10 is an assignment statement. where a is a variable name and
So far, the example programs have been using the value initially put into a variable. Programs can change the value in a variable. An assignment statement changes the value that is held in a variable. The program uses an assignment statement. The assignment statement puts the value 123 into the variable.
Free Certificate. Explore the basic concepts, nomenclature, and historical perspective of computers and computing, and principles of software development and Object-Oriented Programming. Self enrollment (Student) Guests cannot access this course.
The assignment statement in Java involves using the assignment operator to set the value of a variable. The exact syntax depends on the type of variable receiving a value. Advertisement Variables Video of the Day In Java, variables are strongly typed. This means that when you declare a variable in a Java program, you must declare its type ...
0. You have 2 types of syntax errors. You need to declare new_content as a reg since you make a procedural assignment to it in an always block. You need to place @ to the left of the ( in your always line. This code compiles with no errors for me: module IF_ID(new_content, instruction, newPC, clk, pwrite1); input pwrite1, clk;
0. There are a few syntax errors with your code. Do not use the assign keyword to make an assignment to a reg ( F1 ). Do not place a module instance ( sub) inside an always block. Use an instance name for your sub module instance. Do not create a task with the same name as a module ( sub ). There is no need for the task/endtask in this case.
JavaScript reference. The JavaScript reference serves as a repository of facts about the JavaScript language. The entire language is described here in detail. As you write JavaScript code, you'll refer to these pages often (thus the title "JavaScript reference"). The JavaScript language is intended to be used within some larger environment, be ...
The Washington Post Opinions section features opinion articles, op-eds, editorials by the Editorial Board, global opinions and letters to the editor on the issues of the day. Offerings include ...